Marriage redefiners harming children.

<---This guy, Warren Jeffs, believes in a different definition of marriage than the definition of marriage given to humanity by the eternally glorious Jesus Christ.

This man raped a 12-year-old girl, and says he speaks for God? NOT!! This story shows how those who redefine marriage are a danger to children.

Bradlee Dean fighting homofascism.

(Start at 0:01:48 to save time.)
Although I think that Mr. Dean here should upgrade his appearance to be a more effective servant of the eternally glorious Lord Jesus Christ, I fully support his fight against homofascism and the standard, mischaracterize-then-smear tactic of gay "activists."

Words such as, "anti-gay," "homophobe," "bigot," and "intolerant," are the mischaracterizing, rallying words that inspired my creation of the word "heteroseparatist," and my writings pertaining to heteroseparatism.

Pray the gay away.

Does Joy Behar really think that homosexuality and heterosexuality are comparable? Gay people have the same rights that heterosexuals do, but heterosexuals produce human beings and homosexuals do not produce human beings. It is an undeniable fact that every human being walking this Earth was born as a result of biological material that comes from a man and a woman. Am I "homophobic" for acknowledging this fact?

Very few people, if any, can be healed of their same-sex attraction without knowing and following the eternally glorious Lord Jesus Christ.

Ex-gay protection program.

The subject of this story confirms my observations about the origins of homosexuality; the classic story of the emotionally unavailable and distant father and the intrusive, overbearing mother.

"I don't want to be a target for gay activists," he says as we head out into the misty day. "Harassment like that I just don't need."

"It turns out that I didn't have the faintest idea what love was," he says. That's not all he didn't know. He also didn't know that his same-sex attraction, far from being inborn and inescapable, was a thirst for the love that he had not received from his father, a cold and distant man prone to angry outbursts, coupled with a fear of women kindled by his intrusive and overbearing mother, all of which added up to a man who wanted to have sex with other men just so he could get some male attention. He didn't understand any of this, he tells me, until he found a reparative therapist whom he consulted by phone for nearly 10 years, attended weekend workshops, and learned how to "be a man."

"...But Aaron scoffs at these notions, insisting that his wish to go straight had nothing to do with right-wing religion or politics—he's a nonobservant Jew and a lifelong Democrat who volunteered for George McGovern, has a career in public service, and thinks George Bush is a war criminal. It wasn't a matter of ignorance—he has an advanced degree—and it really wasn't a psychopathological thing—he rejects the idea that he's ever suffered from internalized homophobia. He just didn't want to be gay, and, like millions of Americans dissatisfied with their lives, he sought professional help and reinvented himself...."

Story here.

Look at 0:01:27 of this video.

Although same-sex "marriage" won't stop children from being born as one man in this video states, defining marriage as being between one man and one woman doesn't violate the civil rights of anyone. "Marriage equality" already exists due to the fact that everyone has the same right to marry one member of the opposite sex that I do.

Also, look at the homofascist in the red t-shirt snatch away the sign of the true marriage supporter, at 1:27. Is it my imagination, or is it true that homofascists only attack people that look like they can't defend themselves?

New Yorkers powering-up to take back their right to vote.

"Back room tactics were rampant in the passage of this law," Staver wrote in a statement announcing Liberty Counsel's assistance in the filing of the suit. "New York law requires that the government be open and transparent to keep political officials responsible. When government operates in secret and freezes out the very people it is supposed to represent, the entire system fails. … The law should be set aside and the process should begin again to allow the people a voice in the process."

For more info click here.

R.I.P. Amy Winehouse.

I didn't think that her life would unfold in a positive way when she sang about her dedication to drugs in her song "Rehab." What a sad and unnecessary loss.

Move over Vaughn Walker.

<----Lesbian Judge Barbara Lenk is off to a bad start. She wasn't even a State Supreme Court Judge for a week before lending the prestige of her office to anti-hetero activism.

"...Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice Barbara Lenk, widely heralded as the first openly "gay" judge on the state's top court, spoke at a homosexual advocacy group's fundraiser only two days after her confirmation, a move some critics are saying is a clear violation of (see page 8) judicial ethics. ..."

New Yorkers standing up for marriage.

I didn't think that New Yorkers were going to let their right to vote on the definition of marriage be taken away from them. This video shows that there are still people in the Empire State that have sexual sanity.

Savage bullying.

Yet again I offer proof that "tolerance" is a one-way street in the glbt community.

In any conflict between two entities, the wrongdoer wants to silence his opponent, but the person who is right wants his opponent to speak, so that all may see where his opponent is wrong. For example...

"...Just this past May, Savage demanded that a Canadian politician “Suck my d***, John.” That politician’s crime? He held an opposing position on the gay agenda. Five months earlier, in a single Newsweek article, Savage said “F**K John McCain,” and called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia a “c**ksucker.”

And the anti-bullying activist has no qualms about trying to bully media outlets into removing conservative voices from the air. In 2010, he told CNN’s Kyra Phillips:..."

My supporting info is here.

Ex-gay Steven Bennett speaks to Joy Behar.

You can tell that this guy used to be a spotlight homosexual by how he walks over his wife's conversation as she is talking, and he makes the classic mistake of referring to homosexuality as a singular choice instead of the result of a string of choices. Also, look at how uncomfortable Ms. Behar is at the mere mention of "ex-gay."

Y.A.H.I. (YAW-he)

<---These people want to redefine marriage, but the glbt community won't support them. Wait...hold on a minute. Waaa? Weren't the polygamists the first social group that wanted to redefine marriage in the United States of America? Is this yet another homofascist inconsistency? A "yahi"?

"...Pro-family activists have long warned that redefining marriage to include two men or two women would inevitably lead to legalized polygamy, with polygamists employing the “equality” and “consensual” rhetoric of the gay rights movement. However, gay rights commentators immediately distanced themselves from the polygamists’ suit, with one prominent commentator calling it “a political gift to anti-gay groups nationwide.”..."

Yahi story here.

Give gays puzzles!

“The design of the human body is screaming to us, that its two halves, the male and the female, were made to be combined together in pairs, not simply on the sexual level but on all levels, and when I say this, I am not expressing a mere sentiment, but stating a fact –just as a person is stating a fact when they say that a lock and its key are one mechanism, or that a violin and a bow are one musical instrument; the male and female are designed to come together, and function as a single organism." - C.S. Lewis

Where anti-hetero SB 48 went wrong.

Some few days ago, while I was in comment-combat, a man (who was probably a homofascist judging by the gist of his comments) challenged those who don't support the glbt community to read the actual language of SB 48, which I, of course, did, and found the following paragraph...

"...Native Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans,
Pacific Islanders, European Americans, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender Americans, and members of other ethnic and cultural
groups, to the economic, political, and social development of
California and the United States of America, with particular emphasis
on portraying the role of these groups in contemporary society. ..."

Once again, the advantages of being a forensic heteroseparatist have paid off. The paragraph above shows how sexuality and sexual behavior are deceptively elevated to, and categorized with, the innate aspect of a person's skin color. It's the same old story once again. The sad, absurd comparison of race to sexual behavior. This mischaracterization has led to the legal trampling of the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual misconduct of the glbt community.

Christian parents' rights outlawed in California's public schools.

As of today, with Governor Jerry Brown's signing of SB 48 into law, a parent who has a child in the public school system in California, can NOT exclude their child from a class in which homosexuality is portrayed as a normal sexual activity.

The violation of the parental rights of those who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community is now legal in California's public schools.

Also, it is now illegal to say anything "negative" about homosexuality in California's public school system. This very blog is now illegal in California's public schools. A Bible is now illegal in CA's schools. Quoting scripture from the Bible that tells the truth about homosexual sin is now illegal in Homofornia's public schools. Is the word,"heteroseparatist," now illegal in the Golden State's public schools too?

Who can deny that SB 48 violates the parental rights of those who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community? Is there anyone out there who is so crazy that they think that this legal trampling of the civil rights of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim parents is a good thing?

Today, 14 July 2011, homofascism has been embraced by California's government. My supporting info is here. <---The 6000+ comments on this story that were 96% pro-hetero were removed by the San Francisco-based (go figure!) software company DISQUS.

(Info on home-schooling is here.)

Savaging marriage.

The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive

Marriage was founded by God himself in the Garden of Eden. It is to be between one man and one woman, and the married couple are not to have sexual relations with anyone except each other. Sex outside of marriage will lead to great emotional pain at the very least.

This is heart-wrenching to me. Dan Savage is laughing his way into the wrath of God. Mr. Savage won't be laughing when he's standing before Jesus Christ. This is a prime example of how the acceptance of same-sex "marriage" will adveresely affect true marriage; those who accept same-sex "marriage," will accept adultry. And it is still adultry if your spouse consents to you having sex with another person.

God clearly tells us to honor marriage.

homoetiology

homoetiology: The unique experiences of a person that causes them to embrace homosexuality.

Today I stumbled across a well-written post by a man calling himself "rjligier," here, and I was inspired to create "homoetiology."

(The links in the quote below are my doing.)

"...It quite obvious to anyone who understands the difference between race and neuroses. Race is an immutable characteristic whereas sexual behavior is a manifestation of the etiology of abuse specific to one's psychopathology. The liberal bodies of the APAs and the ABA have been systematically trying to normalize neurotic behavior and its associated paraphilias to children and the uneducated masses since the revision of the ALIMPC in 1955. Only recently has the electorate been paying attention to what can only be described as collusive litigation by the aforementioned parties when they have been unable to convince or control the state legislatures. ..."

Will parental rights be outlawed by gays in California's Government?

Since when did a person's sexual activities become a part of teachable history? Is it important for California's schoolchildren to know what historical figures did in bed? Why do some people want children to be taught about the sexual activities of adults, outside of the normal process of where babies come from?

How is it wrong for parents to want to opt their children out of classes that teach non-reproductive sexual acts to their children? Who in their right mind would want to outlaw parental rights? Can't anti-bullying classes be taught to children without glorifying homosexuality? Are the glbt community and their worshippers so far gone that they support the trampling of the parental rights of Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others that won't support the sexual activities of the gay community?

Will I ever stop asking questions and post a link to my supporting info?

Revisited video.

I think that I have posted this video before, but I don't feel like doing the research and this video has resurfaced. My motivation for creating the word "heteroseparatist," can be seen at 3:58 in this video.

I also want to note that, according to the Word of God, heterosexuals who embrace sexual sin are two groups to be excluded from God's eternal Kingdom, before homosexuals. My info is here. This is why I worship and serve the eternally glorious Lord Jesus Christ, His written word obliterates the arguments of the evil one and his followers.

Misconduct in New York Senate creates gay "marriage."

Politicians are so homophobic (afraid of the gay community) now, that they will break the law to show how gay-friendly they are. This is how same-sex "marriage" became legal in the empire state.

“...King explained that turmoil on the Senate floor erupted after senators discovered that they were barred from explaining their votes. Same-sex “marriage” proponent and Democrat Senator Kevin Parker, who disclosed what happened at the Senate to the Gazette, was one of them.

“I go to the door, and I tried to leave, and they had us locked in. I tried to leave, and they had us locked on to the floor,” Parker told the Gazette. After he made it out of the chamber, he continued, “One sergeant of arms physically grabbed me....”

Story here.

Supporters of true marriage threatened.

So merely supporting God's definition of marriage makes some in the glbt community want to kill and rape?

Among the documented threats:
• "I will kill you and your family."
• "Oh my God, This woman is so f---ing stupid. Someone please shoot her in the head, again and again. And again."
• "I'm going to kill the pastor."
• "If I had a gun I would have gunned you down along with each and every other supporter…"
• "We're going to kill you."
• "You're dead. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon … you're dead."
• "I'm a gay guy who owns guns, and he's my next target."
• "I warn you, I know how to kill, I'm an ex-special forces person."
• "Get ready for retribution all you bigots."
• Burn their f---ing churches to the ground, and then tax the charred timbers."
The evidence included churches marred by graffiti, swastikas on lawns and walls, bricks thrown through windows and doors, adhesive poured into locks, suspicious packages of white powder sent in the mail – "all for nothing more than supporting traditional marriage."

Story here.

Is SSM in New York legal?

I've never seen a Governor sign a new law into existence so fast. It appears that the legislature of New York illegally cut a few corners to redefine marriage and bypass the vote of the people.

I think that people are starting to see the difference between race and sexual behavior when the glbt community compares the definition of true marriage to the historic oppressions suffered by African-American people in the United States.

“...At the very least, the procedure for passage of same-sex marriage in the New York Senate contravenes the principles underlying the constitutional provisions noted above. Those provisions attempt to secure an open, transparent and deliberative process. By contrast, the procedure followed to get the same-sex marriage bill through as quickly as possible was characterized by secrecy, curtailed discussion and top-down control. The important changes to the bill's religious exemption were not only not explored at any length, but the attempt of Senator Ruben Diaz to ask questions about these provisions (which had only become public a few hours before) was completely foreclosed. ...”

The facts that show how the legislators of New York broke some little-known laws to redefine marriage are here.