Just about two days ago, I stumbled across this web page and found a fellow heteroactivist under attack. I decided to wade into this fray and test one of my Achilles questions against his most eloquent attacker.
I asked Mr. Scott Rose...
Do you support how some sex education classes for grades K thru 6 welcome schoolchildren INTO the glbt community WITHOUT the consent or knowledge of that child’s parents?
His response was...
"Enlightened human beings of whatever sexual orientation constantly interrelate with one another, as sexual relations are far from being the only thing of importance in life. For example, a heterosexual man with an interest in sailing could very well go out on a lake one day in a sailboat with a lesbian couple and the lesbian couple's children. The way you have phrased your question, Carl Rowan Morris, conspicuously implies that LGBT adults around children in the ages of K through 6th grade would commit child rape on those children. The direct evidence suggests that Catholic priests are far more likely that non-priest LGBT adults to rape children. Anti-gay bigot adults, on the other hand, absolutely should not be permitted to endanger their children's welfare by teaching them irrational anti-gay hate. The children taught that hate by their parents are the ones who become anti-gay bullies in school. That bullying besides damaging the gay victims also hinders the bully from receiving the best possible education. So to answer your question, yes, it is terrible for anti-gay bigot parents to hinder their offsprings' enlightened integration into the contemporary world by teaching them homophobia, the irrational fear of gay human beings, which you have expressed with your stupid question."
Mr Rose's is so fancy and so eloquent as he accuses me of implying child rape, WHILE he admits his support of violating the civil rights of parents that won't support the sexual actions of the glbt community. He calls speaking to a child about ENTERING the gay community, behind the backs of that child's parents, an "enlightened integration into the contemporary world."
Wow. That was some of the smoothest poison I've ever heard.
Isn't Mr. Scott Rose himself guilty of bigotry when he openly advocates the violation of another person's civil rights after he labels that person an "anti-gay bigot"? Isn't it possible to teach kids not to bully each other without glorifying homosexuality? Does Mr. Rose hate those who don't support the concept of a man having sex with another man (anti-gay bigotry according to him) so much that he advocates taking their children away from them? Look at the paragraph marked May 27th at 3:17pm. How will he respond to my question..."How are you better than "anti-gay bigots" when you openly admit your support of violating a parent's right to supervise their child's education?
Again, my evidence is here.
@Stuart (Little)
ReplyDeleteMy Achilles question is designed to expose a person’s level of homofascism. People like Scott Rose (and probably you) falsely think that anyone who doesn’t accept homosexuality as normal is a danger to the glbt community. This is not true. No one is born gay. A person can teach their child that homosexuality is a sin, AND teach them to love the sinner but not the sin as my Lord Jesus Christ has taught me.
To label someone a bigot or a homophobe for their refusal to support the sexual conduct of the glbt community is wrong and sinful. There are many, many people that feel as I do; I don’t accept the concept that a person can be born gay, yet I don’t stand for persecuting someone for being gay. The Lord will judge those who embrace sexual sin. But when it comes to the glbt community attacking me or labeling someone a bigot and trampling their civil rights because of that false label, I will speak out against it while I still can.
Would you tolerate someone teaching your child, WITHOUT your knowledge or consent, that homosexuality was sinful? Yet you speak as if you support teaching children that homosexuality is normal, WITHOUT the consent or knowledge of that child’s parents. Anti-bullying can be taught to children without glorifying (and I’m not referring to the mere mention of gays) the glbt lifestyle, and without trampling upon the civil rights of their parents.
To approach a child about sexual matters without the complete knowledge and consent of that child’s parents, parent, or guardian, is a horrific evil. If you disagree with that, your comments aren’t welcome here.
@Stuart
ReplyDeleteSaw your last post. Why don't you and Scott Rose get together and create a blog and explain to the world why you think the civil rights of Christians and those who don't support the sexual sin of the glbt community should be violated?
I've explained how someone can disagree with homosexuality and still not be a threat to the civil rights of gays but your anti-Christian bigotry just won't let you see the truth. I can disavow those who speak to children about sexual matters without the consent of that child's parents, but you won't. You are a danger to children.
I hope you don't mind me asking, but I've seen you ask this question quite a lot, it seems to be a major issue for you:
ReplyDelete"Do you support how some sex education classes for grades K thru 6 welcome schoolchildren INTO the glbt community WITHOUT the consent or knowledge of that child’s parents?"
What exactly do you mean by that? How *are* schoolchildren being welcomed into the glbt community?
@davidbrider
ReplyDelete“Anti-bullying” classes in grade schools don’t simply tell kids to leave gay kids alone, they are used to tell kids that it is okay to BE gay despite what their parent’s say. This concept is a clear violation of the rights of parents that don’t want their children to be told that becoming a homosexual is okay. Anti-bullying can easily be taught for ALL children without violating the civil rights of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim parents. As people have the right to object to religion being taught to their children, people have the right to object to homosexuality being glorified to their children. And I’m not talking about the mere mention of gay “parents” in classrooms.
I use that question to expose some ugly truths about the majority of the glbt community. I learn a great deal from a person’s answer/reaction to that question. A person who is gay or blindly supports the glbt community who will speak to a child about becoming a member of the glbt community without the knowledge or consent of that child’s parents proves that they are not only a danger to that child, but that they will also not hesitate to violate the civil rights of that child’s parents. Would you want someone talking to your child about sexual matters without your permission? Would you want the administration of your child’s grade school telling your child, in class, that homosexuality was sinful?
@Spencer,
ReplyDeleteSince you support Mr. Lively's, "enlightened intergration (of schoolchildren)into the contemporary world." I believe that you support speaking to children about entering the glbt community WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents, and your comments are no longer welcome here.
----------
ReplyDeleteSince you support Mr. Lively's, "enlightened intergration (of schoolchildren)into the contemporary world." I believe that you support speaking to children about entering the glbt community WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents, and your comments are no longer welcome here.
-----------
My view shouldn't have come as any surprise, but I'm glad I succeeded in getting you to tacitly admit that your "civil rights violation" charge against Ross is utterly unfounded. Good day.
I will NEVER associate with someone who supports speaking to children about sexual matters without the consent or knowledge of that child's parents. Good day to you also.
ReplyDelete--------
DeleteI will NEVER associate with someone who supports speaking to children about sexual matters without the consent or knowledge of that child's parents. Good day to you also.
----------
I wonder: how many people actually support this stance in regards to racist parents? Not many, I'll bet. So I guess that means you'll have to stop associating with virtually all non-racists! Good luck!
It's incredible that you equate sexual behavior with race. They are two vastly different things.
ReplyDeleteIf you run after children behind the backs of their parents to tell them that being a homosexual is okay, you are cut from the same quilt as a man who would sexually seduce a young boy while telling him that you are showing him "love."
And if you ever run after the child of a Christian to tell that child that homosexuality is okay, the Word of God says that you are better off hanging a huge stone around your neck and jumping into the sea.
Matthew 18:6
but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to stumble, it would be better for him to have a heavy millstone hung around his neck, and to be drowned in the depth of the sea.