As a servant of Jesus Christ, I reject the hatred FOR and FROM, the glbt community. I challenge the glbt community to denounce telling children that homosexuality is normal, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents; the PRIME goal of the glbt community. I speak out against homofascism, transtyranny, genderinsanity, and ANY end-run around parental rights. REDEFINED marriage harms children. Click on the "h" for the full definition of "heteroseparatist."
Tuesday, August 7, 2012
Disagreement equals 'hate"?!?
Everything I know about the glbt community points to the conclusion that most gays hate anyone who dares to disagree with their behavior.
No doubt a great many gays, tormented by their feelings of alienation and abnormality, sincerely hate anyone who dares question whatever "gay right" happens to be fashionable at the moment, but, _pace_ Heteroseparatist, I think most of the vitriol spewed at moral traditionalists is tactical in nature, straight out of Alinsky's _Rules for Radicals_, e.g., his Rule 12: "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)" What's more, I don't believe that the political energy of the homosexualist movement comes so much from homosexuals themselves--though they doubtlessly supply many of the zealots at the spearhead of the movement, e.g., Dan Savage--but from cultural Marxists who simply seek raw totalitarian political power. Homosexuals, in my opinion, have been co-opted as allies of convenience by the forces of cultural Marxism.
We moral traditionalists would do well to remember that homosexuals are actually a very small demographic, and that most gay rights agitation is just one more front of the Gramnscian long march through the core institutions of Western Civilization. Homosexuals came along at just the right time, the late 1960s, to be used as another "discriminated" against victim group, in the mold of the earlier racial Civil Rights Movement that had gotten so much traction in the collective American conscience. The fact that homosexuals were already disproportionately to be found in the opinion-molding centers of American culture, Hollywood, the music industry, academia, and the literary pursuits, was a big plus, from the Gramscian perspective.
Not that this provides consolation for those of us fighting them in the trenches of the culture wars, but, for all we know, once the cultural Marxists achieve final victory, they may well turn on their erstwhile homosexual allies and persecute them with greater zeal than a Salafist Moslem imam: Remember that the Bolsheviks initially repealed Tsarist Russia's (weakly enforced) anti-sodomy laws upon attaining power, only to have Stalin pass even more stringent (and more stringently enforced) ones in 1934, as part of his "socialist morality" campaign.
I KNEW that I would be fircely attacked, so I designed heteroseparatism to use the energy of its attackers to advertise itself. If a homofascist uses the word "heteroseparatist" in the public square or the mainstream media in an effort to smear me, my work is done.
When a curious person Googles “heteroseparatist” and reads just part “A” of the definition; A person who wishes to separate their self from homosexual acts, and stand apart from those who engage in such acts…my work is done.
There is a websites that won't even allow heteroseparatism to be discussed!!
No doubt a great many gays, tormented by their feelings of alienation and abnormality, sincerely hate anyone who dares question whatever "gay right" happens to be fashionable at the moment, but, _pace_ Heteroseparatist, I think most of the vitriol spewed at moral traditionalists is tactical in nature, straight out of Alinsky's _Rules for Radicals_, e.g., his Rule 12: "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)" What's more, I don't believe that the political energy of the homosexualist movement comes so much from homosexuals themselves--though they doubtlessly supply many of the zealots at the spearhead of the movement, e.g., Dan Savage--but from cultural Marxists who simply seek raw totalitarian political power. Homosexuals, in my opinion, have been co-opted as allies of convenience by the forces of cultural Marxism.
ReplyDeleteWe moral traditionalists would do well to remember that homosexuals are actually a very small demographic, and that most gay rights agitation is just one more front of the Gramnscian long march through the core institutions of Western Civilization. Homosexuals came along at just the right time, the late 1960s, to be used as another "discriminated" against victim group, in the mold of the earlier racial Civil Rights Movement that had gotten so much traction in the collective American conscience. The fact that homosexuals were already disproportionately to be found in the opinion-molding centers of American culture, Hollywood, the music industry, academia, and the literary pursuits, was a big plus, from the Gramscian perspective.
Not that this provides consolation for those of us fighting them in the trenches of the culture wars, but, for all we know, once the cultural Marxists achieve final victory, they may well turn on their erstwhile homosexual allies and persecute them with greater zeal than a Salafist Moslem imam: Remember that the Bolsheviks initially repealed Tsarist Russia's (weakly enforced) anti-sodomy laws upon attaining power, only to have Stalin pass even more stringent (and more stringently enforced) ones in 1934, as part of his "socialist morality" campaign.
But Mr. Perera,
ReplyDeleteI KNEW that I would be fircely attacked, so I designed heteroseparatism to use the energy of its attackers to advertise itself. If a homofascist uses the word "heteroseparatist" in the public square or the mainstream media in an effort to smear me, my work is done.
When a curious person Googles “heteroseparatist” and reads just part “A” of the definition; A person who wishes to separate their self from homosexual acts, and stand apart from those who engage in such acts…my work is done.
There is a websites that won't even allow heteroseparatism to be discussed!!
http://heteroseparatist.blogspot.com/2012/03/what-is-democratic-underground-dot-com.html