As a servant of Jesus Christ, I reject the hatred FOR and FROM, the glbt community. I challenge the glbt community to denounce telling children that homosexuality is normal, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents; the PRIME goal of the glbt community. I speak out against homofascism, transtyranny, genderinsanity, and ANY end-run around parental rights. REDEFINED marriage harms children. Click on the "h" for the full definition of "heteroseparatist."
Monday, October 15, 2012
It's not bigotry... it's biology.
This is one of my favorite videos ever posted on this blog. This made my day since it's already irking the homofascists. Since denial is the cornerstone of the glbt lifestyle, the truth about the biological differences between men and women drives gays crazy!
When the truth drives you crazy... you are living a lie.
You claim to reject hatred for LGBTQs and yet you promote a video that compares allowing gay marriage to allowing drug use, or allowing zoophilia or pedophilia. Those comparisons sound pretty hateful to me.
ReplyDeleteDon't you promote same-sex "marriage", despite the fact that the redefinition of marriage will bring about the end of my religious freedom and deprive children of a mother or a father? And you imply that I'M hateful? And what "zoophilia" are you talking about? There was nothing about zoophilia in the video.
ReplyDeleteYou incorrectly quote the Lord's, "...do not judge..." statement, which means that I cannot throw stones at another person because of their sins, (And they were ACTUAL stones.) but then you ignore HIS definition of marriage, which is between one man and one woman.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2019:4-6&version=NIV
"WHAT God has joined together, let no man seperate." The word is "what," and not "whom," even in the original language that the New Testament was written in. This means the DEFINITION of marriage was laid down by the Lord and it is not just a commandment against adultry.
In Matthew 19:4-6, the Lord Jesus Christ laid down the only circumstance in which sexual activity is NOT sinful, which is WITHIN a marriage, and marriage is between one man and one woman. In three sentences, Jesus Christ eliminated 95% of sexual sin...that's why he's called the Word of God. Also, God doesn't call fornication, and adultry an abomination, but he does call homosexuality an abomination (a SUPER sin).
When you fight to redefine marriage, and when you have sex with another man, you're going up against Jesus, not human prejudice. You have already lost. My master has already beaten yours.
And pardon me, comparing it to incest. You can quote scripture all you want, but all I have to do is quote you this:
ReplyDelete"As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion"
Treaty of Tripoli, signed into law by President John Adams, ratified unanimously by Congress.
Lastly, God's definition of marriage is hardly one man one woman. As I recall, Abraham had Sarah and a mistress. King David had multiple wives, as did Solomon. God sanctioned polygamy in the bible. And if I am made in God's image, maybe God is a little gay too.
DOMA was signed into law by President Clinton and ratified by congress, so which group of humans do you support? This is why I adhere to the eternal commandments of God.
ReplyDeleteThe Bible NEVER supports polygamy, the Bible simply reported the sinful activities of these three men. Abraham, David, and Soloman all made mistakes by taking multiple wives due to the social pressures of their day. Each of those three men were punished by God for taking multiple wives, and Sept. 11th, 2001 came as a result of the illigitimate son of Abraham from which Islam grew.
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis%2016:1-12&version=NASB
Also, gender was NEVER ignored, even in polygamy, which is outside of God's definition of marriage. If our country can tell the Mormons that they can't have multiple wives, what makes the glbt community so special that they can redefine marriage? You have the exact same marriage option that I do; marriage equality already exists.
You can ask God if he's a "little gay too" when you meet him after you die.
And DOMA has been ruled unconstitutional on MULTIPLE occasions, as recently as this past week.
ReplyDeleteAnd that is not true marriage equality. A gay marriage in Massachusetts is not equal to a straight marriage in Massachusetts (hence why DOMA has been ruled unconstitutional). You can marry a consenting adult for love while I cannot. You would rather have me enter into a sham marriage with no love with a woman I do not love to fit your definition of marriage. I do have to wonder as to whether or not you even believe in equal rights for gay couples, outside of calling it "marriage." Should gay couples have access to medicare, medicaid, and survivor benefits? Hospital visitation rights?
In response to your Islam comment: The Crusades in the early 2nd millenium came forth from the legitimate son of Abraham.
If our country can tell Mormons that their beliefs are unconstitutional and they need to change their beliefs about marriage, why can't our country do the same regarding your Christian belief about marriage? You obviously support one "violation of religious freedom", so why not the other?
Lastly, I won't be asking God that, as I do not believe in an afterlife.
The Supreme Court will decide the fate of DOMA.
DeleteMarriage equality exists because you have all of the same marriage options and restrictions that I do. You claim to love another man because you don’t know the true definition of “love.” God is love. And nothing that comes from God would cause you to “love” someone of your same gender. You are merely imitating the behavior of heterosexual couples.
Gay couples can already have legal hospital visitation rights. The other things that you mentioned are reserved for married couples and marriage is between one man and one woman. So gay couples forfeited those options by their choices to enter a same-sex relationship.
What do the Crusades have to do with the fact that the Bible does NOT condone polygamy? The Crusades were created as a response to the armed invasion of Islam in Europe.
Our country never told the Mormons that their beliefs were unconstitutional. The Mormons did what you did; they could not show where polygamy was condoned by the Bible, so their religious freedom was never violated.
You’re wrong about an afterlife. There is one. You quote Jesus Christ, then you turn around and reject what he says about marriage, heaven, hell, hypocrisy, and your judgment, by Him, after you die. Wow. You have been completely deceived.
Supreme Court will strike down DOMA, it violates states' rights and it violates the 14th Amendment.
ReplyDeleteMormons believe in the Book of Mormon, which is their sacred text. Not all religion relies on the bible. My point is that the government said that their sacred text was unconstitutional.
Gay couples do deserve survivor benefits etc. There is no logical reason why they shouldn't receive survivor benefits and equal access to medicaid (aside from maybe the fact that the government can't afford to pay).
And I quote Jesus Christ, and I live by the second greatest commandment of all.
DOMA does not violate states rights or the 14th amendment.
ReplyDeleteMormons believe in the Bible AND the Book of Mormon.
Gay coupled do not deserve what married couples get because they refuse to do what married people do. Married people have conformed to the laws of God and natural law whereas homosexual couples have rejected both. Consequences arise from breaking Gods laws.
Having sex with other men is not what God meant when He said to love your neighbor as yourself.
It DOES violate states rights via the tenth Amendment. The Tenth Amendment states the Constitution's principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the federal government nor prohibited to the States by the Constitution are reserved to the States or the people
ReplyDeleteIt violates the 14th Amendment (Equal protection) because a man who is married to a man legally is NOT equal to a man married to a woman legally. I can't put it more simply than that.
And at least you can admit you don't want to treat gay couples equally.
And that is not what I meant by love my neighbor as myself; what I meant is that I do unto others as I would have them do unto me. Assuming you follow the same commandment, you'd wish for others to fight to treat you as a second-class citizen because of how you were born?