I remember posting about this dude. What if this guy wants to redefine marriage in order to marry his fembot? Will he call people who disagree with him "robophobic"? Wouldn't he argue that his love for his fembot was real and, therefore, they should be allowed to marry? Is LGBTQR next? Am I robointolerant for objecting to his probable, future request to his government to marry his fembot? Story here.
A robot is not a human being. Your analogy only holds if you think members of the LBGTQ community are not human beings.
ReplyDeleteMy analogy stands because his LOVE is real. You robophobe you.
ReplyDeleteIt's a shame you don't understand the difference between humans and non-humans, and why only one group is allowed the right to enter into contracts.
ReplyDeleteI know the difference between humans and non-humans. I also know the difference between right and wrong. This man's erotic love for his fembot is as ligitimate as your erotic love for another man.
ReplyDeleteI know you think you've stumbled on to some really cool argument here, but you just embarrass yourself when you come up with an analogy that equates human beings with robots. Seriously.
ReplyDeleteBut...but...doesen't the GLBT community equate sexual behavior with race?
ReplyDeleteAre you implying that this man's love ISN'T ligitimate from his point of view? Haven't you seen "Bicentennial Man" where (Robin Williams) started out as a robot and was eventually, legally declared human? Who are you to deny this man his obvious dream that his fembot and he will live happily ever after in marital and sexual bliss? Isn't it the desire to "marry the one you love" the cornerstone of the GLBT community's effort to change the definition of marriage? Would you deny this tax paying man his pursuit of happiness? Thanks to your intolerance, I'm sobbing uncontrollably here.