I'm wondering how long it's going to take for me to get fired for being the World's first heteroseparatist. I already have a plan for such an event. I'm going to find a real killer of a lawyer just before the planned release of the book version of my manifesto and make a deal with him/her so that the minute I get fired from my job, I can begin legal action. Anyhow, this info supports my plan.
1) The article's statement that "And 'false material' lays the burden of proof on the accused," goes against one of the cornerstone beliefs of the American justice system: innocent until proven guilty.
ReplyDelete2) I find quite interesting that you find this bill so appalling when it only seeks to expand protection already afforded to other groups. Notably the bill already contains protection on the basis of religion, another "choice." So basically, you're viewpoint is that your choices should be protected for hate crimes, but other people's shouldn't.
Who said that I found this bill "apalling?" Did I say that? Also, like I've already said to you, homosexuality is not a singular choice, but IS a result of choiceS, like heroin addiction.
ReplyDeleteI want the same protection from persecution, prosecution, and harrassment that gays want. Do you think that I'm wrong for that?
Fair enough, appalling is not your word. But while it’s not specifically used, in my opinion, it’s a fair characterization of the author’s and his interviewee’s opinions in the article that you posted. Nonetheless, my word choice may have mischaracterized.
ReplyDeleteSemantics of singular and plural uses aside (both religion and drug addiction are the result of “choices” just the same), based on rulings from the Supreme Court in the 40’s on “fighting words,” if you think your freedom of speech includes the right to “publish any false material…with intent to maliciously promote hatred,” as the bill aims to address, yes, I think you are wrong, in general. If you think you should be allowed to promote hatred towards homosexuals, but not other racial, religious, ethnic, etc groups, I still think you are wrong.
But I'm exposing the hatred and intolerance OF the glbt community in/on heteroseparatist.com. Don't I have the right to seperate from someone because of their behavior?
ReplyDeleteAlso, what "false material" have you found here?
ReplyDeleteSeparating from someone: yes
ReplyDelete“publish any false material…with intent to maliciously promote hatred”: no
False material where, on your site? Plenty of biased, uninformed, and illogical material, not sure if I'd call it false, especially intentionally false. More importantly, I don't think your site has the intent to maliciously promote hatred. Even if this law passes in your state, I think you and your website are safe.
It's sad how smart you think you are.
ReplyDeleteIt’s sad that your argument has dwindled to name calling.
ReplyDeleteWhat name have I called you? You say "...uninformed, and illogical..." Isn't my response in the same spirit your's?
ReplyDeleteName calling as in an ad hominem argument, choosing to attack me personally by saying that I'm not smart instead of making an argument against the things I've said. What I said referred to the material that you've posted, not you personally; that's the difference.
ReplyDeleteYou misued the words,"name calling" then. 97% of my posts have links to my supporting evidence, so I saw your use of the word "uninformed" as an ad hominem attack on my integrity and responded in the same spirit. Also, I can and have explained my basis for my heteroseparatism and, therefore, find your use of the word "illogical" is itself illogical.
ReplyDeleteBiased? Of course I'm biased. Everyone is "biased." I'm the World's first heteroseparatist and I have to explain what that is to humanity. How can I accomplish this without bias? I can be biased without being wrong in opinion or conduct.