As much heterosexual love that I have for President Obama, I don't think that he's looking at the repeal of DADT from the correct prospective. The prospective of those whose daily lives are most affected.
NOTHING unnecessary should be forced upon a man who risks his life on the battlefield for his country. And all reasonable requests from that man should be met without question or hesitation. ALL reasonable requests.
It is a reasonable request for a infantryman to not want to bunk or shower with a homosexual, just as it is reasonable for a woman in the military to not want to shower and bunk with a man. This truth is something that cannot be denied by a reasonable, clear-thinking person. Why then, is the repeal of DADT even being considered when homosexuality is (yes I'm going to say it yet again) behavior, not race.
Story here.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Debate and discussion are welcome here, but attitude and ad hominem attacks will get you banned.