Bruce Genner: Glamour magazine's "woman" of the year.

 

My new job has eaten up so much of my time lately that I unconsciously raised the bar about which things in the gender-rejection-community to blog about. But this latest story about Bruce Jenner leapt over that bar like an Olympic athlete.

Apparently, you don’t even have to be in possession of a vagina to be considered a woman by Glamour magazine. Silly me. I thought that you had to be born with a vagina and over the age of eighteen to be considered a woman. What kind of future does Glamour magazine have with this kind of decision making in charge?


“… “Jenner might feel like he is a woman,” she writes, “he might want to be a woman, he might be living as a woman, but thoughts do not generate biology or reality.”

…Australian-born feminist Germaine Greer accused Glamour of “misogyny” in its decision to award Jenner its woman of the year award, noting that transgender women are “not women” and do not “look like, sound like or behave like women.” …”

The article that almost completely mirrors the point of view of a heteroseparatist is here.

Proposition 1 in Houston.

I suppose it's "transphobic" to not want a man in the women's restroom with my wife.