Same sex "marriage" vs. religious freedom.

Like my last post, here’s another, good-but-long article that I’ve spent some time trimming down to the bone. It’s too bad that the author doesn’t know the word, “homofascism.” He could have used it in almost every instance where “anti-anti-homosexual” is used.

The red highlighting below is an accurate description of heteroseparatism.

“...But those who advocate homosexual marriage as a way of enlarging the American sphere of liberty are profoundly—and deceptively—misrepresenting their aims. ...”

“...the fundamental aim of those advocating homosexual marriage: it is not at all about giving homosexuals a new freedom to participate in ceremonies that they regard as weddings. It is entirely about denying freedom of public speech to anyone who would criticize such ceremonies or the sexual behaviors such ceremonies legitimize. The muzzle that homosexual activists tried (largely successfully) to put on an outspoken monarch represents only the beginning. Homosexual activists in this country deeply desire to place first thousands, and then millions, of even tighter muzzles on all who disagree with them about the nature of homosexual behavior. They well understand that enactment of laws authorizing homosexual marriage will give them sweeping powers to bind those muzzles very tightly on their fellow citizens. ...”

“...Homosexual activists may plausibly assert that they were advancing the cause of freedom when opposing anti-sodomy laws, even if many Americans view the freedom advanced as morally and even medically problematic. However, when these same activists claim that they are still advancing the cause of freedom in advocating laws that grant same-sex unions the status of marriage, their arguments quickly lose all plausibility. For those trying to enshrine the notion of same-sex “marriage” in law are not primarily trying to enlarge the freedom of homosexuals; they are primarily striving to diminish the freedom of skeptics who would deny that the union of homosexuals is—or can ever be—a legitimate marriage. The aim of those trying to inscribe the novelty of homosexual marriage in law is actually that of making an outlaw out of anyone who would question the moral substance of this new social construct and the sexual behaviors it legitimates. ...”

“...the freedom of individuals in positions of public trust to voice their opposition to homosexual behavior. It is this freedom that homosexual advocates hope to make disappear through enactment of homosexual marriage. Enshrining this radically innovative construct in law will not so much enlarge the sphere of freedom for homosexuals as it will shrink the sphere of freedom—in the workplace, legislative chamber, classroom, mainstream media, civic and student club, and marketplace—for those who in any way find homosexual behavior wanting. ...”

“...The ex-nihilo creation of homosexual marriage as a legal notion serves, above all, to give coercive power to those Justice Antonin Scalia has identified as “homosexual activists . . . [intent on] eliminating the moral opprobrium that has traditionally attached to homosexual conduct.” The success of these activists, as Scalia notes, has helped foster an “anti-anti-homosexual culture.”...”

“...use the notion of homosexual marriage to silence their opponents and to drive them from the public square. ...syndicated columnist John Leo has complained that in recent homosexual activism, “a line is being crossed”: “The traditional civic virtue of tolerance (if gays want to live together, it’s their own business) has been replaced with a new ethic requiring approval and endorsement”..."

“...Americans who resist the normalizing of homosexuality are seeing their freedom shrink. ..."

“...the ingenious camouflaging of power with the rhetoric of freedom.”...”

“...Americans have seen more than a few instances in which anti-anti-homosexual power has flexed its muscles in suppressing the freedom of those who dare resist their agenda for normalizing homosexual behavior. That power was manifest in March 2011 when homosexual activists successfully pressured Apple to withdraw from its iTunes store an app developed by an evangelical Christian group that works with individuals trying to overcome homosexual impulses. That power was manifest again a month later when the prominent law firm King & Spalding announced that, despite its previous commitment to doing so, it would not defend the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act...”

“...In 2008, a biology professor at San Jose City College was dismissed for indicating—in answer to a student’s question about how heredity affects sexual orientation—that environment might be a cause of homosexuality. In 2010, Hasting College of Law denied official recognition and funding to the Christian Legal Society as a student organization (the first time it had ever denied a student organization recognition) because the group required officers (not its members) to affirm Christian sexual ethics, including the scriptural proscription against homosexuality. In 2009, a student was expelled from a counseling program at Eastern Michigan State University for refusing to affirm that homosexual behavior is normal and acceptable. In 2005, a student in a counseling program at Missouri State University found that the university had filed a grievance against her for refusing to fulfill a class assignment requiring her to write a letter to the state legislature advocating the legalization of homosexual adoption. And in 2011, a counseling student who dared to voice her opinion in class that homosexual acts are immoral learned that Augusta State University would not let her continue her academic program unless she successfully completed diversity-sensitivity training. The list goes on, with reports of similar anti-anti-homosexual bullying at Washington State University, Georgia Tech University, and the Ohio State University. ...”

“...the university has become the new surrogate church, laying down the moral imperatives guiding judges, policymakers, executives, and media moguls. The outlaws who oppose homosexuality will find no right of sanctuary in this church. Far otherwise. They will find that that new church regards them not only as outlaws but also as dangerous heretics. ...”

“...Outlaw-heretics have reason to fear inquisitorial persecution from the priests in the surrogate church, ... outlaw-heretics have reason to fear that the new priests—for all their professed

commitment to freedom for all—will actually lock them out of the democratic process. ...”

“...Those Americans can also point to election results on ballot initiatives in thirty-one states across the country defining marriage in ways consonant with religious belief, but not in alignment with the progressive homosexual-affirming agenda. ...”

“...silenced and marginalized church-goers actually constitute a majority only makes the process by which they are denied their full democratic liberties all the more insidious. For those in doubt as to how this process works, California has provided a prime illustration: through a costly and bruising electoral fight, defenders of natural marriage passed a measure (Proposition 8) acknowledging marriage as the union of man and woman—only to have a single unelected federal judge, Vaughan Walker, strike down the voter-approved measure because he, a “now-outed” homosexual, disapproved of the moral and religious impulses of those who championed it! In this fashion, a progressive anti-anti-homosexual elite dramatically diminishes the political liberties of those who wish to affirm an understanding of marriage consistent with reality as affirmed by nature, history, biology, reason, as well as religion. It is this kind of assault on religious liberty...”

“...It is precisely that liberty-denying process that elite activists are trying to advance through the legal notion of same-sex marriage. For outlaws, enforcement of the law can mean only punishment—usually loss of freedom. That contraction of freedom is exactly what those advocating same-sex marriage seek: they want to lock those who oppose homosexuality into as small a box as possible. Just how terribly small that box can be is illustrated by the case of the fertility specialist in California who in 2001 declined to artificially inseminate a lesbian, though he referred that woman to a colleague who would perform that service for her. When the doctor, who happened to also be a devout Christian, later lost a discrimination suit filed by the offended lesbian woman, he found no relief upon appeal to the California Supreme Court, which found—unanimously—that this doctor’s religious convictions did not afford him even the very, very minimal freedom of declining to perform a medical procedure that violated his convictions!...”

“...military chaplains must “embrace the new openly homosexual military, resign from service, or face court-martial for their ‘religious, conscience’ objections.”12 All these assaults on religious liberty have occurred in jurisdictions without the legal innovation of same-sex marriage. ...”

“...Catholic Social Services to suspend its handling of adoptions in the Bay State because of its refusal to violate its religious principles by placing children with homosexual couples. ...”

“...This disturbing pattern of hostility to religious freedom should leave little doubt as to the consequences of broader enactment of homosexual marriage.. ...”

“...But Americans may increasingly wonder why this spatial and transcendent liberty and autonomy of self do not extend to those Americans who want to distance themselves from homosexual acts, to stand apart, as it were, from those who engage in such acts. ...”

“...homosexual activists do, in fact, know that advancing their agenda means reducing the liberty of Americans. They hide that reality behind rhetoric of freedom, just as they hide their exclusion of religious Americans from the public square behind rhetoric of inclusion, and their extirpation of every deviation from the approved attitude toward homosexuality behind the rhetoric of diversity. ...”

“...Apparently, homosexual activists do not want anyone to notice that all the arguments that their political allies have made against the decidedly illiberal and dehumanizing logic of genetic determinism in other contexts tell against their reliance upon genetic determinism in advocating restrictions on the liberty of those who would criticize homosexual conduct. ...”

“...The second justification for restricting the freedoms of those who oppose homosexuality is that of asserting that this freedom has no content except that of hatred and bigotry, or that this freedom amounts to nothing but the equivalent of racism...as a group, African Americans—who should be the very first to recognize a fundamental kinship between racial bias and resistance to homosexuality—are actually more resistant to homosexuality than are whites...”

“...George Orwell would not normally be classed as an unthinking exponent of bias. Yet he opposed homosexuality, and as a twenty-first-century critic has remarked, “Orwell’s anti-homosexual position (definitely not ‘homophobia,’ which would suggest irrational fear) flowed naturally from beliefs and values about which he was quite forthcoming.”...”

“...Surprisingly, even the homosexual poet W. H. Auden—famous both for his insistent honesty and his astonishing prosodic talents—said some very negative things about homosexuality. “I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s wrong to be queer,” Auden said. “In the first place, all homosexual acts are acts of envy. ...”

“...Of course, millions of Americans who oppose homosexual acts for religious reasons will not want to simply wait while the elite decide what restrictions to impose on their liberties. They will want to vigorously protest every incursion upon those liberties...their witness for truth will be most effective when it is expressed with empathy and compassion, including especially a merciful compassion for those who are suffering from AIDS or other diseases often found among homosexuals. But devout Americans can express genuine love for homosexuals without accepting or endorsing their sexual behavior. An authentic faith indeed requires both firm opposition to homosexual acts and unfailing love for those who commit such acts. ...”

“...perhaps it is time for sympathetic law-makers to start enacting “conscience clause” protections—comparable to those that protect medical professionals from being compelled to perform abortions—for justices of the peace, fertility doctors, wedding caterers and photographers, and others who will find themselves forced to choose between their careers and their convictions. If they cannot prevent the enactment (often by judicial fiat) of same-sex marriage laws, lawmakers should at least be able to give an opt-out to citizens who object to homosexuality for religious reasons. ...”

Very interesting, full article here.

How the same-sex "marriage" proposal is unjust.

I almost couldn't believe the strength of this piece of ammunition I found yesterday. The homofascists are going to hate this post! I spent 40 minutes editing out the core pieces of data that I wanted to display below...

“...The implicit argument is that the state’s granting marriage licenses only to opposite-sex couples is undue discrimination...this charge, I will show, rests on a profound confusion about both marriage and equality. A state’s recognition that marriage is only between a man and a woman is not unjust. ...”

“...But whatever one holds about the morality of homosexual acts, it is clear that the state does have an interest in promoting and regulating marriage as traditionally defined, and that the sexual relationships of same-sex couples are distinct in kind from that. ... And so the two types of relationships or arrangements should not be lumped together. Moreover, falsely to equate the two is to obscure the nature of marriage. ...”

“...First, marriage is a bodily union...which consummates the marital union...to form a single subject of a single biological action...that could procreate, provided conditions outside their conduct are present.

“...marriage is not a mere means in relation to procreation, but a sharing of lives (bodily, emotionally, and spiritually) that is good in itself—and so a man and a woman who have consented to such a multi-leveled union are genuinely married, and have an intrinsically fulfilling marital union, even if it turns out they cannot procreate together.

“...is simply this: marriage, as traditionally defined, is a distinct type of community and not an arbitrary set. Unmarried cohabitators have a different type of relationship. Alliances to raise children also are not necessarily marriages: a group of celibate religious women running an orphanage, for example, are not married. And, plainly, same-sex sexual relationships are a different kind of relationship: they cannot become biologically one, nor is their relationship of the kind that would find its fruition in conceiving, bearing, and raising children together. (True, same-sex partners can form an alliance to raise children—for example, those from a previous marriage or produced by artificial reproduction; but that alliance is not an extension or prolongation of a bodily-emotional-spiritual union already begun, as is the case in marriage.)...”

“...marriage also provides the crucial social function...will provide the safest and healthiest environment for children. ...it is in everyone’s interest for the state to promote a sound understanding of marriage, and certainly to avoid obscuring its nature. ...”

"...Since a same-sex couple is unable to form the kind of union marriage is, not granting same-sex couples marriage licenses is simply a decision by the state not to engage in a confusing and harmful fiction. ... Denying a marriage license—or the privileges, protections, and obligations of marriage—to those who are unable to marry is not unjust discrimination. ..."

"...The state denies marriage licenses to threesomes or foursomes (refraining from declaring polyamorous groups marriages) and denies marriage licenses to twelve-year-olds (requiring valid consent for a marriage). These denials are not unjust because threesomes, foursomes, and twelve-year-olds are unable to form the kind of union that marriage is. But the same is true of same-sex couples. So, just as the distinction between eighteen-year-olds and twelve-year-olds is relevant to the purpose of marriage—because the former but not the latter are actually able to form the union that is marriage—in the same way, the distinction between opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples is relevant to the purpose of the marriage laws, because the former but not the latter can actually form the kind of union that marriage is. ...”

“...benefits such as hospital visitation, inheritance rights, and so on, is really a side issue—such benefits could be secured by other means for individuals who need them (for example, a durable power of attorney for health care, a will, etc.). ... what proponents of same-sex “marriage” principally desire is the social affirmation and endorsement of homosexual relationships as such. Judge Walker indicated this point clearly in his Proposition 8 decision: “Plaintiffs [some same-sex couples] seek to have the state recognize their committed relationships...”

“...So, the proposal is...that marriage...will include same-sex partners. ... But the same-sex “marriage” position cannot provide a coherent account of what that something is. ...”

“...If marriage is not a bodily, emotional, and spiritual union of a man and a woman... then what makes a union marriage and why should the state support it? It is not simply a union that is formed by a wedding ceremony:... Nor is every romantic and sexual relationship a marriage... Suppose John and Mary have a romantic-sexual relationship while college students but plan to go their separate ways after graduation: is that stable enough to be a marriage? If not, why not? ...”

“...suppose Joe, Jim, and Steve have a committed, stable, romantic-sexual relationship among themselves—a polyamorous relationship. On what ground can the state promote the relationship between couples, but not the relationship among Joe, Jim, and Steve?... the point is: There must be some non-arbitrary features shared by relationships that the state promotes...fair for the state not to promote in the same way other relationships lacking those features. ... marriage is a distinct basic human good, that needs social support and that uniquely provides important social functions; ...inherent orientation to procreation distinguish it from other relationships similar in superficial respects to it. ...”

“...The problem is not solved if one adds to one’s description or definition of marriage, that it must be a permanent commitment...since marriage is a bodily and procreative-type union, and an irreducible basic good, it is non-arbitrarily distinct from other types of relationships. ... (since a strong marriage culture provides a safe haven for children) ...only a relationship between a man and a woman, pledged to be permanent and exclusive. The conjugal conception of marriage is just and coherent; the same-sex marriage proponents’ conception of marriage is unjust and incoherent. ..."

Brilliantly written, complete article, here.

Tolerance FOR Julea Ward.

Looks like the word “tolerance” is beginning to haunt the glbt community. People are starting to see that tolerance is a two-way street, and the gay activists that yell “tolerance!” the loudest, are the most intolerant when it comes to Christians or anyone else who won’t accept homosexuality as normal. Homofascists don’t even want people who disagree with homosexuality to even be allowed to be heard. Free speech that does NOT condone or inspire violence will be labeled “hate speech” by homofascists who hate the truth. Although I have thoroughly denounced hatred for and proactive violence against the glbt community, my blog is attacked at least three times a week!

I've been covering the Julea Ward case since 11 Nov. 2009.

“...The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled Friday in favor of Julea Ward an Eastern Michigan University graduate student represented by Alliance Defense Fund attorneys who was expelled from a counseling program for her beliefs. In a strongly worded opinion, the court reversed a district court decision in favor of the university and sent the case back for trial, saying “a reasonable jury could conclude that Ward’s professors ejected her from the counseling program because of hostility toward her speech and faith….” ...”

“... “Rather than allow Julea to refer a potential client to another qualified counselor--a common, professional practice to best serve clients--EMU attacked and questioned Julea’s religious beliefs and ultimately expelled her from the program because of them.” ...”

“...That her conflict arose from religious convictions is not a good answer; that her conflict arose from religious convictions for which the department at times showed little tolerance is a worse answer.” ...”

“...EMU faculty denigrated Ward’s Christian views...”

“... “That is why she asked to refer gay and lesbian clients (and some heterosexual clients) if the conversation required her to affirm their sexual practices....does not require a Muslim counselor to tell a Jewish client that his religious beliefs are correct if the conversation takes a turn in that direction and (2) does not require an atheist counselor to tell a person of faith that there is a God if the client is wrestling with faith-based issues. Tolerance is a two-way street. Otherwise, the rule mandates orthodoxy, not anti-discrimination.” ...”

Original info here.

Father-hunger and homosexuality.

I don’t buy it when gay men say that there is no link between homosexuality and pedophilia. “Daddy Hunt” is a gay website whose focus is revealed by its title, and father-hunger is a big part of how some boys develop into a homosexuals.

“... I started having sex with grown men when I was 12. Lost count at around 35 and I was 13 at the time. ...”

“... I was way too young to be dealing with sex and understanding the potential consequences of it. ...”

“... I just wanted the attention of men and discovered that if I was sexual with them, I got their attention. It disgusts me now to know that all those men were committing crimes by being with me while I was still a minor. ...”

Original info here.

More trouble for viral YouTube "transsexual."

Remember the viral-video where 22 year old Christopher Lee Polis committed a sex crime by exposing himself in a women's restroom at a McDonald's and got attacked by two Black girls?

Well. The same man is in the news again for an altercation with a police officer. The mainstream media ignored this story, probably so as not to appear "transphobic."

Lesbian Sex in the City.

Well. Well. Well.

We have here what the glbt community hates. A lesbian coming out (no pun intended) and saying that her entry into the glbt community is voluntary. The problem for the gays is that she’s famous and she’s inadvertently blowing the lid off of a major piece of homofascist propaganda. She’s already being persecuted by some in the glbt community.

“... Cynthia Nixon stands by her statement that she is gay by choice, despite the backlash she’s received from members of the gay community. The remark caused a stir in the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. Nixon told last Sunday’s New York Times magazine that she was pressured to change what she said, “because they said it implies that homosexuality can be a choice.

“For me, it is a choice,” Nixon told the Times. “I understand that for many people it’s not, but for me it’s a choice, and you don’t get to define my gayness for me.” ...”

Full story here.

Supreme Court's opinion on marriage.

Bombshell info at 0:01:50.

https://twitter.com/#!/lgbtfacts

Click here.

Todd Carlson: anti-Christ bigot?

A high school student named Brandon Wagner was asked to write an article that opposed the adoption of children by same-sex couples. When he did, he used Biblical verses to point out that the homosexual household was a sinful environment, and therefore unsuitable for children.
Well..... DUH!!!

“...Wegner, a student at Shawano High School, was asked to write an op-ed for the school newspaper about whether gays should be allowed to adopt. Wegner, who is a Christian, wrote in opposition. Another student wrote in favor of allowing gays to adopt. ...”

“...After the op-ed was published, a gay couple whose child attend s the high school, complained. ...”

“...“The superintendent wants everyone to accept homosexuality as normative and homosexual adoption as something that should be standard practices,” Staver said. “In doing so, he’s belittling the views and the biblical views of many people across this country. He is playing a zero-sum game. He’s not interested in dialogue. He wants to cram his view down the throat of everyone else and will not tolerate an opposing viewpoint.”...”

Complete story here.

Denying the reality of gender.

99.999999% of human beings are born either male or female. But there are those who want people to ignore this overwhelming fact. There are those who war against, "gender stereotypes."

I've noticed this predisposition in the glbt community; anyone who points out the differences between male and female will be attacked.

The parents of this boy hid the fact that he was a boy for the first five years of his life. Why? To avoid any "gender stereotypes."

I see a bisexual in the making.

"... Of (this) case, Dr Harold Koplewicz, a U.S. child psychiatrist, said he was ‘disturbed’ that well-meaning parents could be so misguided.

‘When children are born, they’re not a blank slate,’ he said. ‘We do have male brains and female brains. There’s a reason why boys do more rough and tumble play; there’s a reason why girls have better language development skills.’ ..."

Full story here.

Fatherless boy invades Girl Scouts. (updated 20 Jan. 2012)

This young girl is exposing the foolishness of gender denial in the Girl Scouts of America. When did common-sense facts about gender become inactionable and unmentionable? When did merely wanting to be a girl when you were born male become acceptable? This video was "made private" a few days ago.

“...“Right now, GSUSA and councils are focusing on adult agendas that have nothing to do with helping girls,” she continues. “I ask all fellow Girl Scouts who want a true, all-girl experience not to sell any cookies until GSUSA addresses our concerns. I ask all parents of Girl Scouts who want their girls to be in a safe environment to tell their leaders why you will not allow your girls to make any more money for GSUSA.”...”

More details here, and "updated" info here and here.

Even an anti-Christ bigot can understand this article.

“...The present law states: “marriage is a civil contract between a male and a female…” This same law also prohibits marriage to close-blood relations, a clear indication that the definition of marriage is related to bringing children into the world and the continuation of the human race. The legislation to redefine marriage, therefore, is not in the public interest. ...”

“...the state is recognizing the irreplaceable contribution that married couples make to society. Married couples who bring children into the world make particular sacrifices and take on unique risks and obligations for the good of society. For this reason the state has long understood that it has a compelling interest in recognizing and supporting these mothers and fathers through a distinct category of laws. Were the definition of marriage to change, there would be no special laws to support and recognize the irreplaceable contribution that these married couples make to society and to the common good by bringing to life the next generation. ...”

“...present law defining marriage as “a civil contract between a male and a female” is grounded not in faith, but in reason and the experience of society. It recognizes...the unique and irreplaceable potential of a man and woman to conceive and nurture new life...”

This well-written article is brief, to the point, and doesn’t contain any scriptures to frighten any anti-Christ bigots. But it does get across the point that redefining marriage is wrong. Just right for my blog.

Also, even if a man and woman who cannot have children marry, their marriage sets forth an example that is witnessed by children and, therefore, serves towards the good of humanity.

SPLC labeled a hate group. (updated 18 Jan.)

“...LaBarbera said the SPLC is engaged in a thinly-veiled, one-sided campaign to demonize adherents of traditional Judeo-Christian morality. He noted that despite the considerable hatred and anti-Christian bigotry emanating from homosexual activists (e.g., Dan Savage’s vile hate-site, Santorum[dot]com), the SPLC has never labeled a “gay” organization or website as “hateful.”...”

Complete info here and here.

A libertarian view on same-sex "marriage."

“...In an interview with Reason TV, author and libertarian icon George Gilder explains why he opposes gay marriage: "The family is critical to raising civilized, creative, responsible people who can exploit and enjoy freedom." When asked how he is defining the family in this sense, Gilder responds: "Nuclear family, a man and woman and children."

When asked how he feels about New York legalizing gay marriage, he says: "I think it's a bad thing ... this whole idea that homosexuality resembled race in any respect is nonsense. The whole idea that male homosexuality resembles lesbianism in any respect is nonsense. And so this whole idea of gay marriage is just a parody. It's an absurd concept." He goes on to say later in the interview that "laws about marriage" make sense to him, even as a libertarian. ...”

More info here.

The difference between "Black" and "gay."

When I say “Black people,” or “gay people,” I am talking about two social groups. But when I say “Black person,” or “gay person” the words “Black” and “gay” take on an entire different meaning. When it comes to an individual, the word “gay” describes that person's behavior, and therefore cannot be accurately swapped out with the word “Black.”

The glbt community has effectively stolen the nobility of the African-American civil-rights movement by manipulating those who cannot or will not discern the difference between race and sexual behavior. A homosexual has the exact same right to marry one woman at a time that I do.

"...One constituent likened denial of marriage rights to gays and lesbians to racial apartheid in South Africa. “I saw apartheid, I was in South Africa and I can tell you this is different,” Haugen shot back. She recalled the “necklacing” practice in which victims were stuffed in a tire which was then set afire. ..."

Example here.

Anti-Christ bigotry spotlighted.

"... "Should the Catholic Church find itself discriminated against by the Obama administration in key delivery of services because of the bias and bigotry of the administration?” he asked, referencing the Obama administration’s unprecedented denial of a health care grant to the U.S. Bishops over their pro-life stance.

“The bigotry question goes both ways and there’s a lot more anti-Christian bigotry today than there is concerning the other side, and none of it gets covered by the media,” he concluded to applause. ..."

More info here.

Another glbt end-run around parental rights.

Under the guise of "anti-bullying" no less. How about anti-bullying for parental rights?

Santorum stumps young homofascists.

At 0:07:40, Rick Santorum gets to the meat of why marriage should not be redefined; redefining marriage will harm children by depriving them of their birthright to a married mother and father. Does the glbt community even care about harming children?

Funny "transphobic" commercial.

There are a lot of "thumbs down" votes on YouTube for this funny commercial from the homofascist community. LOL!! The glbt community hates the truth about the fact that we are all born either male or female.

"Gender liberation."

What a way to start 2012!

The glbt community used to scoff at and ridicule people who would say that they were after children. Now, the gay community doesn't even try to hide their efforts to circumvent the parental civil rights of those who don't think that homosexuality is normal.

The highlighting in red below is my doing.

“...“In other words,” Tyler explains of what “gender liberation” means, “male-female distinctions must be eliminated in order to ‘liberate’ children from unnecessary ‘stereotypes.’ This is not a movement seeking ‘equal rights,’ but a movement seeking to obliterate our God-given distinctions between male and female.” ...”

“...SB 543, signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010, “allows school staff to remove children ages 12 and up from government schools and taken off-campus for counseling sessions, without parental permission or involvement. The purpose is to permit pro-homosexuality teachers and administrators to remove sexually confused children in 6th grade and up from campus and take them to pro-homosexuality counselors who will encourage them to embrace the homosexual lifestyle.” ...”

“...Said the email, according to Thomasson, “You were right: Our daughter was told she had to attend a gay straight alliance rally to honor Harvey Milk. … She shared she was a Christian with the teacher and only after she saw Lauren was clearly upset about going to this rally did she issue her a hall pass. She was persecuted by another student but made it out of the class. I picked up her and she was very upset. How many other Christians were forced to go to this rally?” ...”

“... “Parents, realize there was NO advance parental notification of this happening or the opportunity to opt out your children. Even more, realize there was no parent permission sought, no opt-in form to sign. No, Harvey Milk sexual indoctrination, and other sexual indoctrination implemented, because of other perverse laws are being done behind parents’ backs and despite parents’ objections,” Thomasson’s report said. ...”

Complete info here.

A profund truth in the Manhattan Declaration.

Today I was honored, in a way, by the Manhattan Declaration website. I've decided to reciprocate. The body of text below can be found in its complete form here. The red highlighting below is my doing.

This is a profound mystery—but I am talking about Christ and the church. However, each one of you also must love his wife as he loves himself, and the wife must respect her husband. Ephesians 5:32-33

“...In Scripture, the creation of man and woman, and their one-flesh union as husband and wife, is the crowning achievement of God's creation. In the transmission of life and the nurturing of children, men and women joined as spouses are given the great honor of being partners with God Himself. Marriage then, is the first institution of human society—indeed it is the institution on which all other human institutions have their foundation. In the Christian tradition we refer to marriage as "holy matrimony" to signal the fact that it is an institution ordained by God, and blessed by Christ in his participation at a wedding in Cana of Galilee. In the Bible, God Himself blesses and holds marriage in the highest esteem. ...”

“...Vast human experience confirms that marriage is the original and most important institution for sustaining the health, education, and welfare of all persons in a society. Where marriage is honored, and where there is a flourishing marriage culture, everyone benefits—the spouses themselves, their children, the communities and societies in which they live. Where the marriage culture begins to erode, social pathologies of every sort quickly manifest themselves. ...”

“...The impulse to redefine marriage in order to recognize same-sex and multiple partner relationships is a symptom, rather than the cause, of the erosion of the marriage culture. It reflects a loss of understanding of the meaning of marriage as embodied in our civil and religious law and in the philosophical tradition that contributed to shaping the law. Yet it is critical that the impulse be resisted, for yielding to it would mean abandoning the possibility of restoring a sound understanding of marriage and, with it, the hope of rebuilding a healthy marriage culture. It would lock into place the false and destructive belief that marriage is all about romance and other adult satisfactions, ...”

“...Some who enter into same-sex and polyamorous relationships no doubt regard their unions as truly marital. They fail to understand, however, that marriage is made possible by the sexual complementarity of man and woman, and that the comprehensive, multi-level sharing of life that marriage is includes bodily unity of the sort that unites husband and wife biologically as a reproductive unit. ...”

“...No one has a civil right to have a non-marital relationship treated as a marriage. ...”

“...genuine social harms follow. First, the religious liberty of those for whom this is a matter of conscience is jeopardized. Second, the rights of parents are abused as family life and sex education programs in schools are used to teach children that an enlightened understanding recognizes as "marriages" sexual partnerships that many parents believe are intrinsically non-marital and immoral. ...”

“...And so it is out of love (not "animus") and prudent concern for the common good (not "prejudice"), that we pledge to labor ceaselessly to preserve the legal definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman and to rebuild the marriage culture. How could we, as Christians, do otherwise? ...”

From homosexuality to incest to twincest.

Who will be the first person to call me a "sibphobe" since I won't associate with a person who has sex with their sibling?

When sexual sanity is abandoned, children end up paying the price. And, from what I can tell so far, it looks like incest may be the stage between homosexuality and pedophilia.

“...December 19, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Twenty years ago when advocates of homosexuality were arguing for acceptance of gay sex, their opponents warned that it would lead to pedophilia and incest. Such whistle blowers were labeled as bigots, haters and worse, and laughed into silence.

However, the warnings are coming true. While incest may not yet be legal on the books, there is increasing pressure to legitimize it. The following video, which has gone viral on YouTube, might legitimately be seen a part of the conditioning process leading to such legitimization. It features a high school prank where blindfolded teens are asked to guess who kissed them. Turns out it was their own father or mother. ...”

My inspiration for this post can be found in the comments section of this web page.

A VERY deceived homosexual.

Unless the homosexual in this video undeceives himself, I know what God the Son is going to say to him...


21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven. 22 Many will say to Me in that day, ‘Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!’

The doom of those who embrace sexual sin is here.

CHRISTmas.

And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night. An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news that will cause great joy for all the people. Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is the Messiah, the Lord. This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.” Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest heaven, and on earth peace to those on whom his favor rests.”

Click on the ad.

...repeated, unwanted, (homo)sexual advances...

Although I do NOT support Brandon McInerney's killing of Larry King, I do understand his anger at homosexual harassment.

While homosexual schoolchildren are protected by school officials who are desperate to prove that they aren't "homophobic," a heterosexual child has NO protection from homofascism or homosexual harassment. Just today, not an hour ago, I dealt with homosexual harassment...at my age!

Also, I'm shocked that the news story included the information that Larry King was homosexually harassing Brandon McInerney. It would be a completely different story if the 15-year-old homosexual, Larry King was minding his own business, but he wasn't. Larry King kept coming at Brandon McInerney with homosexual advances.

"...McInerney, then 14, had reached an emotional breaking point after King made repeated, unwanted sexual advances toward him and other boys, defense lawyers said. In the weeks leading up to the shooting, school administrators allowed King to wear heels and makeup because federal law provides the right of students to express their sexual orientation. ..."

"...King's father also blamed the school district for not doing more to address the brewing feud between the two teens and their son's flamboyant behavior. "Instead of protecting him from himself and his poor impulse control, they enabled and encouraged him to become more and more provocative," Greg King said. ..."

Complete story here.

Savage homofascism.

I intentionally designed heteroseparatism to strengthen under attack; If Dan Savage or someone like him attacks me through the media, they will do more harm to homofascism than to me! But, because he is gay, Dan Savage can talk about raping and murdering the people he hates...to public applause!

Father-hunger homosexuality.

I've been away from home and I'm glad to be back at my post on the wall of sexual sanity.

Anyhow, I've found this jewel of a video during a surveillance flyover of a homofascist website and just had to post it. This video shows how father-hunger can and does lead to homosexuality and, most importantly, how God can heal the emotion that causes same-sex attraction.

Heteroactive.

“An unmistakable manifestation of the attack on the family unit is the homosexual community’s efforts to target children both for their own sexual pleasure and to enlarge the homosexual movement. The homosexual community and its allies in the media scoff at this argument. They insist it is merely a tactic to demonize the homosexual...”

“...Using twisted logic, pro-gay academics argue in various social science journals that the molestation of boys is not a gay lifestyle issue and that such men are not really homosexuals. It is simply amazing that gay propagandists and sexology "experts" are successfully bamboozling the public and the media into believing that a man’s exclusive focus on young males should not be defined as homosexuality! But if an exclusive attraction of a male to other males of any age is not homosexuality, what is? On one hand, homosexuals publicly claim that the molestation of boys is not part of the homosexual lifestyle. On the other, they are quietly establishing the legal parameters exempting the molestation of boys from prosecution on anti-discrimination grounds. For example, in Nevada a forty-two year-old man was arrested for molesting a sixteen year-old boy but was not charged by the district attorney. The reason given was that to do so would "discriminate against a class of people." The deputy district attorney added that to charge the man "would be singling out homosexuals."...”

“...Research on the homosexual lifestyle confirms it is almost exclusively a youth oriented culture. Very few gays exhibit a preference for older men. Some admit to a focus on teenage boys, some on prepubescent boys, and many cross over between categories. All are subsets of the homosexual deviancy. Moreover, most pedophiles consider themselves to be gay. In a 1988 study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior, 86% of pedophiles described themselves as homosexual or bisexual. ...”

“... Spartacus Gay Guides, is replete with information about where to find boys for sex and, as a friendly warning, lists penalties in various countries for sodomy with boys if caught. The government of Sri Lanka announced that more than 10,000 boy prostitutes work its beaches as a result of the high demand created by affluent Western homosexuals. ...”

Complete (and kinda long) PDF file here.

Michael Erickson.

Ex-gays...1900 years ago.

How common is man-on-boy "love"? (updated 12-5-'11)

There are three recent stories about men raping boys. Just how common is this?

“...The male victim, now aged 18, told police Weiss told him "what they were doing was common practice in the entertainment industry," according to an affidavit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court. ...”

“..."I never told anybody what he did to me over 100 times at all kinds of places until the newspapers reported that he had abused other kids and the people at Penn State and Second Mile didn’t do the things they should have to protect me and the other kids," the statement read. "I am hurting and have been for a long time because of what happened, but feel now even more tormented that I have learned of so many other kids. Now that I have told and done something about it, I am feeling better and going to get help and work with the police. I want other people who have been hurt to know they can come forward and get help and help protect others in the future. ...”

“...Zach Tomaselli of Lewiston faces charges himself of abusing a boy under 14. He told The Associated Press that his past abuse made it difficult for him to set proper boundaries and to understand a proper relationship between a man and a boy. But he denies the charges. ...”

How can anyone not see that this is how some young boys develop into homosexual men?

All Out homofascism.

<----This man, Mr. Julio Servio, fights homofascism just like I do...with a blog. And, although he denounces hatred and has never condoned violence against the glbt community, the glbt community in his country wants to destroy him. Now where have I heard that story before?

“...Pay Pal corporation has returned funds it froze mid-September in pro-life and pro-family activist Julio Severo’s account following a campaign by militant homosexuals to cut Severo off from the company’s service.

...a petition drive that gathered more than 10,000 electronic signatures and offers of legal help from multiple groups defending the rights of Christians, PayPal informed Severo that it would make an “exception” and release the funds.

PayPal shut down Severo’s account and froze his funds after the organization was petitioned by the homosexualist organization All Out to eliminate ten organizations or individuals from its service, for opposing the homosexual political agenda.

Julio Severo and others were accused of peddling “hate,” although Severo makes it clear that he has no animosity towards homosexuals and wants them to be rescued from the self-destructive homosexual lifestyle.

Also targeted by the campaign have been such groups as Tradition, Family, and Property (TFP), a Catholic group that defends the rights and dignity of Christians and opposes sodomy, and Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, which seeks to inform the public about the facts about the “gay” lifestyle. ...”

Full article here.

We ARE preaching love.

When a servant of Jesus Christ shares the Word of God to a member of the glbt community in an appropriate manner, it IS an act of love. God is love; and his Son Jesus is the way the truth and the life. And The Holy Spirit of Jesus Christ can heal a person of the emotions that cause same-sex attraction and all other sexual sin. Jesus Christ also defines marriage as being between one man and one woman.

But, yet again, if you tell a member of the glbt community the truth-in a loving way-about sexual sin, you will be mischaracterized as a "hater," and smeared with lies.

“...Christian believers and activists with signs and American (and Israeli) flags didn’t give an inch outside of the Holy Grounds Coffee House in Springfield, Mass., as a loud, well-organized “Occupy Springfield” protest converged to harass and intimidate them, targeting Pastor Scott Lively and his inner-city Christian mission. Christian activists also counter-picketed the nearby storefront of the “Occupy” organization with the message that they weren’t backing down.

It’s believed to be the first time in the U.S. that any Occupy harassment action has been met with resistance by those they were targeting.

In the Sunday Nov. 13 edition of the area’s local newspaper The Springfield Republican, a shocking display ad appeared attacking Scott Lively and falsely charging him with a list of various “hate” crimes. It also included the names of over 250 people as signatories. A few of the names are recognizable as local residents or statewide homosexual activists, but most of them are untraceable and appear to be made up. ...”

More info concerning this post here.

Boys going Wilde.

About a year or more ago, a commenter on my blog told me that Oscar Wilde was a homosexual. I filed the information away in my mind and went on about my business.

Then, just two days ago, I found out that Oscar Wilde was also a homophile. I can’t say that I was shocked, but the title of this post popped into my head today, and my heteroseparatist muse will not let me rest until this torpedo is “in the water.”

Now, it is mandatory in California schools that children honor homophiles!!

“...To be clear, I personally believe that the great majority of homosexual men also deplore Sandusky’s alleged acts. At the same time, there is a very large pedophile elephant that is hiding in the gay activist closet...

Let’s start with our children’s schools, where GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight, Education Network, has long advocated for the celebration of homosexual history, using tools like “North American History Game Cards,” where elementary school children learn that famous Americans like Allen Ginsberg and Walt Whitman were gay.

What the children don’t learn is that if Whitman was a homosexual, he was also a pederast, that Ginsberg was a defender of NAMBLA, the notorious North American Man Boy Love Association...

...mention that Oscar Wilde, when they’re teaching his work, would mention that Oscar Wilde was locked in an asylum because he was gay.”

Would they also mention that he was a boy lover and that he wrote about his passionate sexual encounters with young teens no older than some of the boys allegedly molested by Sandusky?

...that SB 48, mandating the celebration of LGBT history in all California schools for all children in all grades, is now law.

There is already a Harvey Milk Day in California...

...but there’s more to the Harvey Milk story.

...at age eleven, Milk began attending performances of the New York Metropolitan Opera where he met with “wandering hands,” and soon was engaged in “brief trysts [with grown men] after the performances.” While still in junior high, he “dove headfirst into the newly discovered subculture,” and by the age of fourteen, Milk was “leading an active homosexual life.” As he grew older, the pattern reversed itself to the point that, at age thirty-three, Milk hooked up with a sixteen-year-old named Jack McKinley, one of a number of younger men with whom he was intimate.

...Kramer too was a NAMBLA supporter, and in a 2004 speech in New York City, he spoke of a “sweet young boy who didn’t know anything and was in awe of me. I was the first man who [had sex with] him. I think I murdered him” (meaning, by infecting him with AIDS). Where is the gay outcry over this?

...but the inescapable truth is clear: The gay activist closet has been opened, and the pedophile elephant is there. ...”

Incredibly hard-hitting full story here.

Damian Goddard back to work.

I’ve wondered how my life will change if a public figure ever uses the word "heteroactivist," or “heteroseparatist” to describe their feelings toward the glbt community. Most gays and all homofascists are very angry at me for creating these hate-free words that denounce homosexuality AND hatred at the same time. I even have a few cyberstalkers that have been banned from my blog that don’t know that I can block their comments without reading them!

I feel so sorry for those that support the redefinition of marriage because they are fighting against the will of God and, therefore, doomed to failure.
Anyhow, the hand of God is behind Mr. Goddard’s becoming a spokesman for the Marriage Anti-Defamation Alliance.

“...Last week, Goddard became the spokesman for the U.S.-based Marriage Anti-Defamation Alliance, a project by the National Organization for Marriage dedicated to supporting pro-family citizens who face threats for expressing their views.

... Goddard says he was given a “ringing endorsement” only a week before his dismissal.

“I have to believe this is the work of the Holy Spirit,” he said. “I’ve not solicited my story to anyone. People just seem to be kind of coming to me, and I have to believe this is to bring glory to Him in some sense.”

“When people are afraid to speak up for losing their job, then obviously we’re not two steps away from people being afraid to speak up because they’ll lose their freedom and they’ll be hauled off to jail,” ...”

Full story here and here.

How same-sex "marriage" affects those that stand for true marriage.

On YouTube, there are people that support the firing of this man. These same people would be up in arms if a man were fired for being gay, or if a man was fired for tweeting his support for the redefinition of marriage.

Ex-gay testimony.

Yet more proof that many of those in the glbt community were survivors of childhood sexual abuse.

...for good men to do nothing. (updated 17 Nov.)

I know what I’d do if I saw a man raping a child. The rape would come to a sudden stop, since the rapist wouldn’t be able to move at all once I got close enough to him. Then I would lead the police to the child. Then, if I saw the rapist walking around town going about his life as if nothing ever happened, I would contact the District Attorney and ask why a child rapist was walking the streets.

Yet in the Penn State child rape case, it looks as if someone was afraid of being “homophobic,” so, in this world of bltg propaganda, a man can be SEEN RAPING A BOY, and be protected from arrest/justice. And some gays want ME to be silent? I don’t think so.

“...Paterno was later fired by the university board of trustees for not doing more to report allegations of child sex abuse by his former defensive coordinator Jerry Sandusky, who retired in 1999.

And now a glorious era is finished, demolished beyond redemption. The scandalous end of Paterno’s career has wiped out the university’s sterling reputation and shattered the trust of an entire sport. Riots by crackpot students and death threats punctuate the madness.

It could be a long time before we know the full extent of the pedophilia horror allegedly perpetrated by a former coach and the outrageous silence of many, perhaps dozens, of people. But already the most important lesson is clear. Civilizations, from single universities to national cultures, must be defended with relentless vigilance and courage, or they will not survive. Only the details of their demise will differ.

A sage, perhaps Edmund Burke, once said, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”

And so the whole enterprise lies in shambles, everyone associated with it tarnished and generations of adherents suffering an angry loss of faith.

Yet the rot was quietly hollowing out the foundation. The first report that respected coach Jerry Sandusky was a pedophile was quietly investigated, and dropped without explanation in 1998.

Other reports followed, with the most important one coming in 2002, when a young assistant said he spotted Sandusky, then retired, raping a child in a locker-room shower. The assistant told Paterno, who told his supervisors -- but nobody told the police. So Sandusky, according to the shocking indictment against him, was allowed to continue his predations for nine more years.

The price for that shameful silence must be measured in tens of millions of dollars, reputations lost and lives ruined. ...”

Complete story here.

The reality of gender.

I remember the first time I was called a sexist” in college. I was taken aback at first but then I recovered quickly. There is a difference between men and women and those that want to ignore that fact are people that I don’t bother talking to anyway. Today I stumbled across an article that was written by a young woman in college who is being told that gender is nothing but an “oppressive” social construct.

It seems to me that the glbt community and the feminists hate the truth about gender differences.

“...The latest, and arguably most outrageous, plot by the Left is to eliminate people's need to identify themselves as either male or female. ...

...Faculty and students are forced to tolerate and accept lifestyles that they object to...

...Many campuses around the country are going back to single-sex dorms because co-ed dorms lead to more sexual promiscuity and binge drinking.

This issue of gender confusion is not unique to my campus. My friend Ashley attends a private Christian university in California, and she recalls the leader of her dormitory hall speaking about how separate male and female restrooms on campus make people uncomfortable. The dorm leader's argument—as is the argument of many liberals—was that male and female bathrooms force us to recognize our differences, thus creating a culture of inequality.

These ridiculous policies are being discussed and implemented in public schools all over the country. A high school in Michigan eliminated homecoming “kings” and “queens,” for fear of offending a transgendered student. At George Mason University, a man dressed in drag as a woman was elected homecoming queen. The school later eliminated the titles of “king” and “queen” and now uses the title “homecoming royalty” to avoid offending anyone who doesn’t identify as a male or female

...Men and women are different, but that does not make one better than the other. In fact, I believe our differences should be celebrated, not condemned.

In reality, people who are confused about their gender or sexual orientation are not victims of inequality. They are products of a sexually saturated society. ...”

Full article here.

Challenge for Mark Monford of the San Francisco Chronicle.

Dear Mr. Monford,

I hereby challenge you to a debate on this blog where I will match my heteroseparatism against your homofascism. And I hereby promise to post all of your replies that do not contain profanity.

Do you have what it takes to face me or are you all print? Can you defend your homofascist rant against me? Can you face me one-on-one? Can you support your homofascism in a debate with a live person?

I saw your slanderous, hetero-bashing article today...

“...Woe to you, oh modern card-carrying homophobe. For it can't be easy to be you right now, what with all the terrifying changes taking place, all the dramatic sexual upheavals and flagrant displays of "unnatural" love being hurled like exotic sushi in your plain hamburger face these days. Oh, you poor dear. ...”

Full homofascist article here.

"Neuralgay": The neural connections of homosexuality.

Well, here it is. Yet more evidence to support my observations that homosexuality is all in the mind.

<----This 26 year old rugby player, (you can’t get more masculine that that!) attempted a flip, landed wrong, broke his neck, and had a stroke. When he woke up in the hospital, he “felt different,” and, when he recovered, he became a member of the glbt community. To sum it up...he was fully straight, then he suffered severe brain damage, and now he’s a homosexual.

This is what I’ve been saying all along; there is something wrong with a man who is not sexually attracted to women.

I saw this on a skit on In Living Color (theme song by Heavy D, may he rest in peace) where one of a pair of homosexuals was hit on the head and turned straight and his boyfriend was eventually able to hit him in the jaw and turn him gay again. Now life imitates art/comedy, and I have to update my manifesto.


“...Mr. Birch’s astonishing change saw him break up with his fiancée, ditch his job in a bank to retrain as a hairdresser and lose eight stone in weight.

Mr. Birch recalled: ‘I was gay when I woke up and I still am. It sounds strange but when I came round I immediately felt different.

‘I wasn’t interested in women any more. I was definitely gay. I had never been attracted to a man before – I’d never even had any gay friends.

But he said: ‘Suddenly, I hated everything about my old life. I didn’t get on with my friends, I hated sport and found my job boring. ...”

Original, tragic/comedic story here.

Gender denial...again.

<---This boy wants to be a girl, and there are no adults in his life with the guts to truthfully tell this boy that he cannot be a girl. What is wrong with the parents of this boy?


“...I say “used to be taken for granted” with a heavy heart, because our morally confused culture is rapidly losing the ability to tell the difference between the sexes. And we all know who the losers will be.

The latest example of this confusion comes in the person of Bobby Montoya, a seven-year-old pint-sized Colorado boy who wears dresses and is, as advocates of so-called “gender non-conformity” say, “living as a girl.”

Here we see truth that can help us confront our society’s moral confusion: Human beings are created; we are created in God’s image; and we are created male and female. ...”

Story here.

True marriage supporters in Minnesota.

Boy rape at Penn State. (updated 11-9-'11)

I know that some men molest young girls, but men who sexually assault young girls don’t get the same level of protection that homophiles do. Once again, the fear of being labeled a “homophobe,” has led to the sexual abuse of young boys.

“...The first case to come to light was a boy who met Sandusky when he was 11 or 12, and physical contact began during his overnight stays at Sandusky's house, the grand jury said. Eventually, the boy's mother reported the sexual assault allegations to his high school, and Sandusky was banned from the child's school district in Clinton County. That triggered the state investigation that culminated in charges Saturday.

Another child, known only as a boy about 11 to 13, was seen by a janitor pinned against a wall while Sandusky performed oral sex on him in fall 2000, the grand jury said.

And in 2002, Kelly said, a graduate assistant saw Sandusky sexually assault a naked boy, estimated to be about 10 years old, in a team locker room shower. The grad student and his father reported what he saw to Paterno, who immediately told Curley, prosecutors said.

"Despite a powerful eyewitness statement about the sexual assault of a child, this incident was not reported to any law enforcement or child protective agency, as required by Pennsylvania law," Kelly said. ...”

Original story here, updated story here.

Gay couples vs. love.

Through biblical scripture, I can prove that gay couples do not love each other.

We have to start with the true definition of love that comes from the eternally glorious Word of God. Verse 5 points out that,"love does not seek it's own." This means that sacrifice is a part of love.

I learned from my parents that sacrifice is a part of love. When I was a child, I saw my parents put themselves between me and possible danger.

One time, when a man had given me candy, in front of my parents, my dad had some of it first and waited to see if it would have any ill effect on him before he allowed me to eat any of it. And there were other similar, protective actions on his part throughout my childhood. I learned some things about love by observing his actions, especially when I knew that he didn't know that I was watching him. It's no surprise to me that very few gay men have their fathers in their life since I learned 85% of manlaw by simply observing the day-to-day behavior of my father.

There are times, like this morning and almost every morning, when I wake up before my wife and turn on her coffee machine and warm up our home so that she doesn't have to get out of a warm bed into a cold environment. I go first into a cold, hostile environment and change it to a more comfortable one, putting her comfort before my own, because her comfort is more important to me than my own.

That being said, I can prove, through Biblical scripture and secular example that gay couples are not functioning under God's definition of love.

Since same-sex "marriage" will restrict or eliminate religious freedom wherever it is wrongfully legalized, those who support SSM do not act out of love because love does not harm a neighbor.

When a gay couple puts their pursuit of happiness before the welfare of children in their home, they are not acting out of love because they're depriving their child of a much-needed, opposite sex parent.

I found two stories of today that show the difference between those that function out of love, and those that don't. Story A is about a man and a woman that found out that they were brother and sister after they conceived a child and, despite their feelings for each other, ended their romantic, sexual relationship. They didn't insist that society accept their sexual relationship when they found out that they were siblings.

Story B is about a lesbian couple that is trying to normalize their sexual relationship at the expense of the children in their home.

Which couple is acting out of love?

The Chillicothe case.

Concerning this story, a reader named Ronnie MacCallister writes...

"...Out of chillicothe ohio, gay activists have a juicy, grand opportunity to cherrypick details of a news story where a gay kid got himself in hot water by surruptitiously photographing other students, got found out, and one of them beat him up over it.
He was posting their photos on his facebook, adding sexual comments about the boys, and one of those boys retaliated from his damaged reputation and humiliation.

THe local stories are painting the beaten gay student as a hapless, oppressed, innocent victim. That gay students assailant did indeed post a nasty comment himself "..faggot" and that facebook post is the only thing the news stories will acknowledge.
The news stories are trying to say that the assailant acted on homophobia alone, and that this was simply a hate crime.

Google chillicothe gazette. ..."

Homoinvitrofertilization.

An eleven year old girl is sitting at an empty dinner table with two men and two women. Her name is Emma, and she is sobbing uncontrollably.

“I JUST WANT A FAMILY!!” she screams, and continues to cry.

“We are your family Emma,” says Anna. Then Anna’s lesbian partner Betty chimes in and says...

“Anna and I are your family Emma.”

Emma sobs louder, and lowers her head into her arms on the table at which they are sitting. Emma knows what a real family is but she is powerless against the adults at the table, and she hates the control they have over her life.

“Hold on there Betty,” says Charles. “David and I are Emma’s family.”

“Yes we are,” David chimes in.

David and Charles are in a sexual relationship with each other. But Charles and Anna are the biological parents, through invitro fertilization, of Emma and her younger sister Francis.

Betty, who is six feet tall and 280lbs, stands up out of her chair and, with an angry expression on her face and her fists on her hips, bellows at both Charles and David saying, “You SHUT YOUR MOUTHS!!!”

Charles and David fall silent with astonishment and fright on both of their faces as Emma continues crying.

“Emma,” Betty says, in a much calmer and softer voice. “Anna and I are your true family. Men are not necessary for a family. We don’t need them to be happy.”

Emma then looks up at Betty and says, “But my friend Gina has a mom and a dad. And they love her. And she’s so happy. And lots of my friends have a mom and a dad. Why can’t I have a mom and a dad? Am I being punished? Did I do something wrong? Is God mad at me?

“Those people are just intolerant Emma,” says Anna.

“And there is no God,” says Betty, who is still standing.

Emma lowers her head into her arms and begins to sob again. Seeing this, Charles gathers up his courage, rises to his feet, and yells at Betty.

“You are NOT taking my daughter away from me!!”

Betty draws back and punches Charles in his jaw. He flies backward and falls on the floor where he lies motionless. Anna screams as David sits paralyzed with fear.

Emma runs crying to the bedroom she shares with her sister, closes the door behind her, and leaps onto their bed. Her little sister Francis, who is only seven years old, comes to comfort her on the bed.

“It’s okay Emma,” Francis says. “When we grow up we’ll have husbands so our babies can have a mom and a dad.”

Emma and Francis cry softly in their bedroom as the muffled sounds of arguing adults leak through the bedroom door.

Do you think that this story is implausible? Click here.

The glbt and feminist war on masculinity.

There is a definite link between women who are uncomfortable with strong independent men, and how a boy develops into a homosexual.

When a boy is born to a woman who is full of anger towards men, in many instances, the woman removes the boy's father from his life, and raises the boy in an environment where masculinity is constantly denigrated. This creates an environment from which effeminate homosexuals develop.

Before I was married, if a woman I was dating copped an attitude when I opened a door for her, or if she forbade her son from playing with toy guns, I quietly faded from that woman's life. Having worked with arch-feminists for eight years, I developed effective tactics to deal with feminist contempt.

“...What it says is that my worry that Ms. Lyons might be expressing her own discomfort with masculinity and projecting it onto her son—and mine, and yours—seems to have been justified.

It says that Lyons does seem to have been promulgating her perspectives on gender roles having no value.

It says that she was, indeed, apparently using J. Crew—a brand so many of our kids gravitate toward—as her launching pad for a mini-campaign to change the way our kids think about their bodies and their gender identities.

See, I don’t think it’s so terrible that boys are different than girls. I think it’s just fine, in fact, that a central supporting beam of the architecture of most boys’ senses of self is that they look like boys and act like boys and feel like boys. I don’t think that’s pathological. But I think that Jenna Lyons—and maybe J. Crew—would disagree with me. ...”

Complete article here.

Hey kid...you WILL accept homosexuality!!!

“...It was another “anti-bullying” program that presumes that anyone who doesn’t believe homosexuality is morally neutral must be a bully.

One of the school’s principals, David Chambers, told the newspaper that many students had heard there might be same-sex affection portrayed in the play. Some reportedly asked to be excused, but their requests were denied. Chambers also says he considered sending a letter to parents giving them a chance to “opt out,” but decided against it. ..."

Complete story here.

46% of gay men Stockholm homosexuals?

When I was writing my Heteroseparatist's Manifesto and I was categorizing the types of gay men, I was very sure that the Stockholm homosexual was going to be listed/named first. When I was young, the first two gay men I knew well, told me how they became gay. Their seduction into the glbt community by an older homosexual was the common thread in each case. My later investigations to write a strong and relevant manifesto only supported this finding.

"...The Archives of Sexual Behavior: “One of the most salient findings was that 46% of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. 22% of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation." (Marie, E. Tomeo “Comparative Data of Childhood and Adolescent Molestation in Heterosexual and Homosexual Persons.” Archives of Sexual Behavior 30 (2001): 539)..."

The saddest thing about the gay life is that the young victim of same-sex, sexual molestation has been deceived into believing that they were receiving love when they were, in fact, being used for sex. From what I've observed, people that continue on in the glbt lifestyle after hearing the Truth, simply don't want to face the fact that what was done to them was NOT an act of love, but was a evil, perverted, sexual seduction.

This is why I don't hate gay men, but go out of my way to shine the light of truth on those who approach children concerning sexual matters without parental consent. If gays were born and not made, some in the glbt community wouldn't be so desperate to bypass parental consent in "anti-bullying" classes that encourage children into the glbt community.

My supporting info is here.

Ex-gay.....for 26 years.

homoeuphemism

homoeuphemism:
A word or phrase used by the glbt community or a homofascist to distract attention away from the truth.

The phrase, "marriage equality" is a homoeuphemism to draw attention away from the correct phrase of, "marriage redefinition."

Homonauseated highschoolers leave gay play.

(updated 21 Oct. 2011)
Once again, a prime example of homofascism hits my radar. Yet another example of the, you-WILL-accept-homosexuality-as-normal, mindset of those in charge of public schools. The violation of the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community is becoming commonplace and even celebrated by school officials!

This story takes place in Connecticut where the State's Supreme Court imposed same-sex "marriage" on its people. This is how gay "marriage" affects others.

“...two male members of a city-funded school play shared a passionate kiss onstage on Friday. School officials said they opted against informing parents about the event ahead of time, saying that the students needed exposure to homosexuality...”

“...The Hartford Courant reported that “screams and loud voices” and sounds of disgust came from the audience during the display of affection, while “dozens” of mostly male students left the auditorium. While some trickled back in, officials had to prevent many from leaving the school building...”

“...The Family Institute of Connecticut (FIC) condemned the scandal, and called for a protest of the school’s decision, calling it “an outrageous attack on parental rights.”...”

More details here and here.