Wednesday, October 31, 2012
"...How many children were raised by two women staying together from the child’s first birthday to his or her eighteenth? Just two. And how many such cases were there in the FGR category—of children raised by two men together for their whole childhood? Zero. This, out of an initial population of 15,000.
…family instability is the characteristic experience of those whose parents have same-sex relationships.
…conspicuously missing from the lives of children whose parents have same-sex relationships.
…plenty of failed heterosexual unions in the data,”…
…Regnerus’s findings do not obscure the realities of family and sexuality in our society; they illuminate them.
…two ‘gold standards’ of family stability and context for children’s flourishing—a heterosexual stably-coupled household and the same among gay/lesbian households—but no population-based sample analysis is yet able to consistently confirm wide evidence of the latter.”
…the biologically-intact two-parent household remains an optimal setting for the long-term flourishing of children.” There is no other type of household of which that can be confidently said.
…long-term stable lesbian and gay couples raising children are extremely rare, or at least that finding them is so difficult that statistical analyses are problematic.
…“lesbian parents . . . have substantially higher rates of relationship instability than do heterosexual parents,” and that “given the apparent fluidity of sexual orientation in general, but especially for women, it may even be rare for parents to maintain a same-sex orientation for 18 years, much less remaining with the same partner for that time.”
…stressful for children and increase the risk of poor child outcomes.” Is it any wonder, then, that the New Family Structures Study yielded the results it did?
…eminently defensible scientific research, making decisions about research design and analysis “within the ball park of what other credible and distinguished researchers have been doing within the past decade.”
…With the latest issue of Social Science Research, Regnerus can consider himself fully vindicated as a scholar.
…Regnerus’s contribution has complicated a set of breezy assumptions too widely held: that children raised in these new family structures suffer no disadvantages whatsoever, and that stable, long-term same-sex-parent families can even be found in significant numbers. ..."
Full article here.
Then there's the absurd comparison of interrracial marriage to same-sex "marriage" when laws forbidding interracial marriage came from men, and interracial marriage is supported by God.
Marriage redefiners wish to destroy anyone who merely disagrees with them. How is that not bigotry?
Tuesday, October 30, 2012
I can fully understand and support a gay child's desire to live a harassment free life. But what I can not understand is the glbt community's desire to normalize homosexuality to children in grade school, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parent or parent's. Some people think that homosexuality is wrong and their parental civil rights should be respected.
Anti-bullying classes can be taught to children without glorifying sexually deviant actions. And NOTHING concerning sexual activities should be taught to children without the full knowledge and consent of that child's parents. Without a doubt, the glbt community wants to bypass parental consent to teach children that homosexuality is a normal thing. This is wrong. Sexual behavior is not morally benign like skin color. Sex education should be renamed "reproductive" education, in order to prevent the parental-civil-rights-violating recruitment efforts of the glbt community.
Anyone who wishes to bypass parental consent when it comes to teaching children about sexual matters is cut from the same cloth as a child-molester.
Where was his father when he decided that he was a girl? Why did his mother allow him to develop into such an extreme state of gender-denial? Why did the psychological and medical professionals involved simply tell this boy that he could never be female? What is going on here? Is this not madness?!
If you're born with a penis, you are male. If you're born with a vagina, you are female. That reality cannot be changed. Your gender is not your choice. How is it that there are people that won't accept this horrifically obvious truth?
Denial is the cornerstone of the glbt lifestyle.
Monday, October 29, 2012
It is really good to see others taking up the fight against homofascism. Between the NOM blog, Chick-fil-A day, and now HAM, I'm no longer alone in the fight to prevent the religious-freedom-stealing redefinition of marriage.
Despite my compassion for those who suffer from same-sex attraction, the redefinition of marriage will harm innocent, helpless children, and take away the religious freedoms and livelihoods of some adults.
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Friday, October 26, 2012
Thursday, October 25, 2012
Dawn Stefanowicz's story illustrates how the glbt lifestyle is more harmful to children than heterosexuality.
“…Dawn brings a rare voice to the public discussion; her father was actively involved in the gay lifestyle, and she describes herself as “raised under the GLBT [gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender] umbrella.”
…their father ended sexual relations with his wife, and pursued homosexual relationships at well-known gay meeting places in Canada and the United States. Dawn was often brought along to many of these locations, even as a child. Her father had numerous gay lovers, and brought them into the home. At age 51, in 1991, he died of AIDS.
…Almost immediately, gay activists who had been bussed in—and I should say I dislike using the term “gay,” but it’s commonly used today, so I will—began shouting at me as I testified so that you couldn’t even hear what I was saying. A half dozen times I was interrupted. I was concerned for my safety, so I asked a security guard for an escort to my car. I went home and began writing my book.
…Monogamy in the gay community means “serial monogamy,” you have a single partner for several months and then move on, or you’re in a relationship but have multiple partners on the side.
…they would often take me along to meeting places in the GLBT community. I was just a child, but I was exposed to overt sexual activity. When I was about nine, for example, my father took me to a downtown sex shop. He said he wanted to expose me to sexuality … that was part of the gay culture.
…my father came to school to watch me perform in the band. …I saw his eyes bug out when he saw all the teenage boys performing on the stage with me. Then I realized that he was not there for me, but to pick up young men.
…I knew many gay men who had a preference for adolescent males who had just hit puberty. They would look for boys with absent fathers who were vulnerable.
…my childhood in a homosexual environment. It was not a safe … I don’t know how else to put this: gay sex is messy. I would see dirty bed sheets, covered with sperm, fecal matter, and lubricant gel.
…My twin brother witnessed the group sex once. He couldn’t understand why dad could kiss other men, but couldn’t show affection to him.
…He was sexually abused as a child; his father was a violent alcoholic.
…Many have been deluded by the cultural acceptance of homosexuality. They haven’t thought about its long-term impact on children.
…Every kid wants to be raised by biological parents who are faithful to one another.
Original info here.
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
You and I are going to talk here and only here on THIS post until I say otherwise. I've noticed that you drop a subject and attack from another post whenever I corner you on a point-of-logic, so I'm containing you here.
I will guarantee you that I will post all of your comments, that do not contain profanity, and that only you and I will talk here. But, if you sidestep or ignore my questions, you're not going to be posting here anymore.
Since I have been responding to your questions and accusations, without ignoring or sidestepping ANYTHING that you've come at me with... I'm going to go first this time. (Strap in. It's going to be a bumpy ride.)
My first question is: Do you think that Christian parents should have the right to exclude their children from classes where homosexual acts are discussed? (And I'm not talking about the mere mention of homosexuals in "anti-bullying" classes.)
Monday, October 22, 2012
How did it come to this? Why do some people hate those that stand for God's definition of marriage? A child needs, wants, and deserves a mother and a father, and anyone who can't accept that fact is someone that I won't associate with.
Friday, October 19, 2012
So, signing a petition to put the definition of marriage on the ballot makes you "anti-gay," and could cost you your job. Wow. Has anyone ever been fired for supporting the redefinition of marriage? What would happen to a business, or a University that fired a marriage redefiner?
Since it clearly illuminates their gross homofascism, and willingness to violate a person's civil right to vote, Gallaudet University is apparently very unhappy about this video.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Sexual behavior cannot honestly be compared to race, a persons skin color is morally benign; it is neither good nor bad. The word "gay" describes a social group and a behavior. "Gay people"= social group. "Gay person"= someone that engages in a perverted, sinful life.
Wherever same-sex "marriage" is legalized, those who refuse to participate, are punished and persecuted. Redefining marriage ends religious freedom, and I have the right to defend my freedom to serve the Lord Jesus Christ.
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Monday, October 15, 2012
This is one of my favorite videos ever posted on this blog. This made my day since it's already irking the homofascists. Since denial is the cornerstone of the glbt lifestyle, the truth about the biological differences between men and women drives gays crazy!
When the truth drives you crazy... you are living a lie.
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Tuesday, October 9, 2012
The Sandusky case shows how some people allow their fear of being called a homophobe to enable men to rape young boys. Jerry Sandusky was seen raping a young boy and was still allowed to continue with his homosexual molestations. Not only that, Mr. Sandusky still doesn't think that he did anything wrong. The classic, state-of-constant-denial in the gay mind.
I am well aware that all homosexuals aren't a danger to children, but I am also aware of how very young boys are seduced into the glbt community by older homosexuals. Same-sex attraction is emotion-based. People are not born gay.
This is what is in the mind of some, if not most gays. THEY, not you, will tell your children how to feel about homosexuality. Homofascists won't hesitate to violate the parental rights of a heterosexual.
Monday, October 8, 2012
After three ultra-intense days at work and configuring my new smart phone, I can finally tend to my beloved blog.
And there it was waiting for me. The story of a lesbian angry at the fact that her female lover couldn't impregnate her. She considers it a, "biological injustice" that she can't procreate with her female partner.
"...What I mean is that I want the ease, the convenience, the — dare I say it — naturalness that straight people have when starting a family.
...The attitude I have always taken to having a baby with another woman has been this: "It's not fair! It's so hard! Why me?"
...I am a total brat about what I consider a biological injustice. . .
...Why can't my girlfriend and I have a baby that shares our DNA? Why can't an egg from each of us be scrambled up and sprinkled with sperm? It seems so easy! Try harder scientists! Make this a priority. ..."
The obvious, blatant, insanity of most of the glbt community is what powers this blog. Can anyone defend this twisted woman? What happened to this woman? Who is she mad at? Whose fault is it that she can't procreate with her lesbian lover?
Denial is the cornerstone/foundation of the glbt lifestyle.
The data supporting this post is here and here.
Saturday, October 6, 2012
Thursday, October 4, 2012
Monday, October 1, 2012
One of the consequences of having a same-sex romance is that you cannot marry each other since a marriage is between one man and one woman. Many in the glbt community want to rebel against the heteronormative design of their own bodies and change the definition of marriage to normalize the perversion of their choices. Some gays want to rebel against what a heterosexual couple does, (which is recognize and conform to the design of their genitalia,) and then demand what heterosexual couples have; the legal option of marriage. This doesn't make sense. If you want what heterosexuals have, you have to do what heterosexuals do.
"...The union of a man and a woman is privileged and recognized by society as "marriage" for a reason,
...government recognizes marriages and gives them certain legal benefits so they can provide a stable, nurturing environment for the next generation of citizens: our kids.
...Children have a right to a mom and a dad, and I realize that this doesn't always happen.
... Same-sex unions may not affect my marriage specifically, but it will affect my children -- the next generation.
...Marriage redefinition will affect the broader well-being of children and the welfare of society. As a Christian and a citizen, I am compelled to care about both. ..."
Original info here.