Monday, October 1, 2012
Matt Birk supports true marriage.
One of the consequences of having a same-sex romance is that you cannot marry each other since a marriage is between one man and one woman. Many in the glbt community want to rebel against the heteronormative design of their own bodies and change the definition of marriage to normalize the perversion of their choices. Some gays want to rebel against what a heterosexual couple does, (which is recognize and conform to the design of their genitalia,) and then demand what heterosexual couples have; the legal option of marriage. This doesn't make sense. If you want what heterosexuals have, you have to do what heterosexuals do.
"...The union of a man and a woman is privileged and recognized by society as "marriage" for a reason,
...government recognizes marriages and gives them certain legal benefits so they can provide a stable, nurturing environment for the next generation of citizens: our kids.
...Children have a right to a mom and a dad, and I realize that this doesn't always happen.
... Same-sex unions may not affect my marriage specifically, but it will affect my children -- the next generation.
...Marriage redefinition will affect the broader well-being of children and the welfare of society. As a Christian and a citizen, I am compelled to care about both. ..."
Original info here.