Genderless Scouts of America.

In another amazing blow to common sense, the Boy Scouts have abandoned reality. 

By their dedication to the denial of gender differences, the glbt community and the feminazis have finally destroyed a once noble organization. 

I plan on reinvigorating this blog this year, and even starting my advertising campaign.

Letting children "choose" their gender, WITHOUT parental consent.

We all know the silly, nutty thoughts and beliefs that we had as children. And the Word of God speaks towards this fact;

Proverbs 22:15  Foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child; The rod of correction will drive it far from him.

And, like they always do, the glbt community wants to circumvent parental rights and teach children that they can choose their gender. 

It is evil to teach children what their parents have a moral objection to.  It is wrong to deny that there are only two genders.  It is absurd to ignore the scientific, biological fact that 99.93% of human beings are born either totally male or totally female.  Don't those who reject the Word of God embrace science?  So why does the glbt community reject biological, scientific reality?!?

What more evidence can there be that the glbt community wants to trample the civil rights of those who disagree with them?  What would happen to a teacher who was caught teaching children Biblical lessons without parental consent?

The full info on this perverted story is here.

The "b" in glb.

Great point!  The "b" stands for bisexual, so the gay community admits that there are only two sexes!!  HA!!

Biology is fixed, and psychology is fluid.  The glb community has it exactly backwards!

Punished for thinking the truth.

How can someone be smart enough to get into Harvard, yet not smart enough to know that there are only two genders? 

Yet again, the non-hetero community amazes me.  And, now that I think of it, why don't non-hetero people call their community the "NHC"?  I mean, when I was pulled into this culture war, my attackers called themselves, "glbt."  Now, it's "lgbt."  But in the linked article below it's "BGLTQ+."  What?!  How am I supposed to keep up with the ever-changing, alphabet-soup-mix of the glbt community?

Is anybody else suddenly hungry for a sandwich?  I now want a bacon, guacamole, lettuce, and tomato sandwich from Quiznos!   

"Students said that such a setup was insufficient because it implied that the “gender binary” was “normal.” “Calling gender non-conformity or any gender non-binary identity ‘extra’ is sort of tactless nomenclature,” one student told the Harvard Crimson."

"The task may be difficult. As Kuang points out, in order to create matches, the program has to separate users into specific categories and then compare the data they input into the system. Without some categories, the program simply won’t work —but it’s also impossible to make enough categories to encompass everyone of every gender, particularly those whose gender is highly individualized."

Full info here.

Bruce Genner: Glamour magazine's "woman" of the year.

 

My new job has eaten up so much of my time lately that I unconsciously raised the bar about which things in the gender-rejection-community to blog about. But this latest story about Bruce Jenner leapt over that bar like an Olympic athlete.

Apparently, you don’t even have to be in possession of a vagina to be considered a woman by Glamour magazine. Silly me. I thought that you had to be born with a vagina and over the age of eighteen to be considered a woman. What kind of future does Glamour magazine have with this kind of decision making in charge?


“… “Jenner might feel like he is a woman,” she writes, “he might want to be a woman, he might be living as a woman, but thoughts do not generate biology or reality.”

…Australian-born feminist Germaine Greer accused Glamour of “misogyny” in its decision to award Jenner its woman of the year award, noting that transgender women are “not women” and do not “look like, sound like or behave like women.” …”

The article that almost completely mirrors the point of view of a heteroseparatist is here.