Posts
In the video below, that contains language that some people might find offensive, anti-Christ bigot Dan Savage calls scriptures that forbid sexual sin in the Bible "bull****." Then Mr Savage goes on to cherry-pick Old Testament verses concerning food-handling that were made obsolete by the words and sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Just as the word "homosexual" didn't exist when God wrote the Bible through men, the word "employee" didn't exist either. In the contemporary American language of this blog, the word "slave" in Romans, in the Bible, would be "employee," since the "slaves" spoken of in the New Testament, were being paid for their work!
Dan Savage is using a very old tactic of twisting scripture to justify his homosexual sin, since the Bible condemns slavery, which was called "manstealing" in it's day, in 1 Timothy 1:8-11! And, to the Glory of God, (who exposes Dan Savage's entire argument in one verse) verse 10 condemns men who have sex with men (whom we now call "homosexuals," and no longer call "sodomites") before slave traders.
Since he had an audience of young Christians who couldn't possibly have the scriptural knowledge of a mature Christian, Mr Savage got away with mischaracterizing the Word of God and deceiving many into thinking that God is now okay with sexual sin. Notice that sexual sin is the first thing mentioned here.
When will Mr. Savage go into a Mosque and call the verses that command the death of homosexuals in the Quran "bull****"?
The original info that inspired my challenge to Dan Savage to debate scripture with me on this blog can be found here.
Monday, April 30, 2012
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Gay Jay spoils day. (updated 28 April 2012)
Note, at 2:04, how the homofascist teacher launches into the classic barrage of rallying words like, "racist," "bigot," and "bully," while clearly exhibiting the behavior of a bigoted bully.
More info here.
Time capsule video on the homosexual lifestyle.
The false comparison of homosexual behavior to morally benign factors like hair color and skin color began farther back than I thought. The Word of God condemns sexual sin, not skin color or hair color.
This video (that I tried to edit in YouTube but was unsuccessful) is great because it could never be created in today’s homofascist political climate, and it covers a few great points...
How a male develops into a homosexual is covered from 9:50 to 10:18, and 13:40 to 16:20.
The distorted desire for male bonding through sexual contact is covered from 11:10 to 11:38.
The ORIGINAL respect for the minds of children on behalf of the glbt community (whatever happened to that!) can be seen from 20:00 to 21:10.
And the promiscuity of the average homosexual is covered from 8:23 to 9:00, and 16:30 to 18:30.
“...In 1967, the veteran CBS journalist Mike Wallace did what today would seem revolutionary: he hosted a 43-minute documentary that exposed the stark truth about homosexuality, speaking openly of well-established facts that have since been consigned to the memory hole of political correctness.
...the self-destructive behavior of sexually-active homosexuals, the underlying psychological causes of their impulses, and their troubling influence on American culture.
...“The average homosexual, if there be such, is promiscuous,” Wallace states matter-of-factly. “He is not interested in nor capable of a lasting relationship like that of a heterosexual marriage. His sex life, his love life, consists of a series of chance encounters at the clubs and bars he inhabits, and even the streets of the city - the quick one night stand. These are characteristic of the homosexual relationship.”
...“I had a very domineering mother, a tyrant. A very sweet tyrant, but a tyrant nonetheless,” he tells Wallace. “It was a love that I had that was kind of killing me.”
...Overweight and taunted by children, he was never allowed to develop independence from his overbearing mother, of whom he was “scared to death.”
...I’m sick in a lot of ways. Immature, childlike. And the sex part of it is a symptom, like a stomach ache is a symptom of who knows what.”
“Homosexuality is, in fact, a mental illness, which has reached epidemiological proportions,” says Socarides during a lecture. When asked by a student if homosexuals can be happy in the gay lifestyle, Socarides is unequivocal: “The fact that somebody is homosexual—a true, obligatory homosexual - automatically rules out the possibility that he will remain happy for long in my opinion.” ...”
Original story here.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Rejecting a message that supports a sinful activity.
Rejecting a message that promotes sexual sin is like racial oppression? Huh? What!?
This is what some commenters on YouTube allege. Some people are still ignorant to the difference between skin-color and sexual behavior due to the phrases "Black people," and "gay people." "Gay" defines a group of people AND a behavior, whereas "Black" only defines a group of people and does not define a behavior. If the situation was reversed, and a homosexual t-shirt shop owner refused to print an anti-gay message for a group of people, would the Government force the gay businessman to print the message that he found offensive?
More details here.
Monday, April 16, 2012
Don't say, "Ex-gay," in London!
<----This harmless ad was ordered removed from British buses in London by its homofascist mayor, Boris Johnson.
Apparently Mayor Johnson has no problems with ads by former heterosexuals, he only has a problem with ads by ex-gays.
“...Boris Johnson, the Conservative Party mayor of London, is being sued by a Christian organization whose bus advertisements for overcoming same-sex attraction he ordered pulled.
...Saying, “Not gay, ex-gay, post-gay, and proud! Get over it,” the nixed slogans were the work of the Core Issues Trust, a Christian organization that helps churches minister to those who want to overcome their temptations to homosexual behavior.
...The campaign was cleared by industry regulator the Advertising Standards Authority. It was intended to be an answer to a similar pro-homosexual ad campaign...
...Core Issues co-director Mike Davidson responded to Johnson’s action, saying, “I didn’t realise censorship was in place.”
...They okayed it and now it has been pulled.
...“It is of deep concern that there can only be one point of view and that is the point of view of individuals who are determined to push through gay marriage and apparently believe that homosexuality cannot be altered in any possible way. That is not a universally held view.”
...Johnson reacted after a chorus of rage from homosexualist campaigners, who argue that homosexuality can only ever be a natural life-long variant of human sexuality, the cornerstone of the homosexualist political schema.
...who is facing an election next month...
...The incident illustrates the growing reality that even to assert that there are some people afflicted with unwanted same-sex attraction who do not want to live the homosexual lifestyle, is now regarded as “anti-gay.”
...“On the one hand, it’s shocking, such a lack of freedom of speech, but on the other, I’m not too surprised,”...
...The climate right now, she said, is immensely hostile to anyone who opposes the homosexualist political agenda. She recounted the story of a Christian Conservative Party MP, David Burrowes, who received death threats after he signed a petition to retain the current legal definition of marriage.
...and there is growing tolerance for overtly anti-Christian rhetoric.
...“at the end of the day what it’s about is intimidation and bullying and fear” by homosexuals to silence opposition.
More/complete info here and here.
Apparently Mayor Johnson has no problems with ads by former heterosexuals, he only has a problem with ads by ex-gays.
“...Boris Johnson, the Conservative Party mayor of London, is being sued by a Christian organization whose bus advertisements for overcoming same-sex attraction he ordered pulled.
...Saying, “Not gay, ex-gay, post-gay, and proud! Get over it,” the nixed slogans were the work of the Core Issues Trust, a Christian organization that helps churches minister to those who want to overcome their temptations to homosexual behavior.
...The campaign was cleared by industry regulator the Advertising Standards Authority. It was intended to be an answer to a similar pro-homosexual ad campaign...
...Core Issues co-director Mike Davidson responded to Johnson’s action, saying, “I didn’t realise censorship was in place.”
...They okayed it and now it has been pulled.
...“It is of deep concern that there can only be one point of view and that is the point of view of individuals who are determined to push through gay marriage and apparently believe that homosexuality cannot be altered in any possible way. That is not a universally held view.”
...Johnson reacted after a chorus of rage from homosexualist campaigners, who argue that homosexuality can only ever be a natural life-long variant of human sexuality, the cornerstone of the homosexualist political schema.
...who is facing an election next month...
...The incident illustrates the growing reality that even to assert that there are some people afflicted with unwanted same-sex attraction who do not want to live the homosexual lifestyle, is now regarded as “anti-gay.”
...“On the one hand, it’s shocking, such a lack of freedom of speech, but on the other, I’m not too surprised,”...
...The climate right now, she said, is immensely hostile to anyone who opposes the homosexualist political agenda. She recounted the story of a Christian Conservative Party MP, David Burrowes, who received death threats after he signed a petition to retain the current legal definition of marriage.
...and there is growing tolerance for overtly anti-Christian rhetoric.
...“at the end of the day what it’s about is intimidation and bullying and fear” by homosexuals to silence opposition.
More/complete info here and here.
Friday, April 13, 2012
David/NOM vs. Starbucks/Goliath.
Yesterday, while I was at work, I was far from home, and I was crazy hungry. Not only that, I wanted a cup of coffee, which is rare for me.
I spotted a Starbucks and remembered their great-tasting coffee and their “turkey bacon” breakfast sandwich that I would buy about once every two weeks. But then I remembered their anti-Christ stand for the redefinition of marriage and I decided not to spend my money there. This was the third time I had refrained from doing business at Starbucks since I found out about their support for the redefinition of marriage.
Then I remembered how a homofascist told me that Starbucks received some sort of thank you from 600,000 people for their support of same-sex “marriage.” I then realized that the boycott of a true servant of Jesus Christ will outweigh the support of at least ten non-believers since the Lord is the eternal Word of God. The boycott of true Christians will outlast the temporary, emotional support of non-believers.
Then today, I read this statement...
“...On January 24th, 2012, Starbucks issued a memorandum declaring that a bill in the state of Washington to legalize so called same-sex marriage is “core to who we are and what we value as a company”. ...”
This statement has sealed my resolve to NOT do business with Starbucks, if I can reasonably avoid doing so. I know that Starbucks will probably be just fine without my money, but I also know that all those who stand for the redefinition of marriage will answer to my Lord.
More info here.
I spotted a Starbucks and remembered their great-tasting coffee and their “turkey bacon” breakfast sandwich that I would buy about once every two weeks. But then I remembered their anti-Christ stand for the redefinition of marriage and I decided not to spend my money there. This was the third time I had refrained from doing business at Starbucks since I found out about their support for the redefinition of marriage.
Then I remembered how a homofascist told me that Starbucks received some sort of thank you from 600,000 people for their support of same-sex “marriage.” I then realized that the boycott of a true servant of Jesus Christ will outweigh the support of at least ten non-believers since the Lord is the eternal Word of God. The boycott of true Christians will outlast the temporary, emotional support of non-believers.
Then today, I read this statement...
“...On January 24th, 2012, Starbucks issued a memorandum declaring that a bill in the state of Washington to legalize so called same-sex marriage is “core to who we are and what we value as a company”. ...”
This statement has sealed my resolve to NOT do business with Starbucks, if I can reasonably avoid doing so. I know that Starbucks will probably be just fine without my money, but I also know that all those who stand for the redefinition of marriage will answer to my Lord.
More info here.
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
Monday, April 9, 2012
"Offended" by the natural/true family!?!?
This story illuminates perfectly the influence of glbt organizations in our middle schools and high schools. A mural depicting a married man and woman with their child was deemed "possibly offensive to some" by high school officials, and the natural/true family was actually painted over!
Was the mural too "heteronormative"? Was it too "heterosexist"? What straight person would be offended by this mural? Doesn't this absurd action/point-of-view illustrate the glbt community's perverse mindset? I couldn't believe the homofascist bent/flavor of this story at first, but then my disbelief turned to joy because, once again, the adverse influence of the homosexual lifestyle in our nation's schools can be clearly and easily shown. Anyone offended by a mural depicting a man graduating from college, getting married, and then having a son, is clearly a twisted individual.
This is why I no longer associate with marriage/family redefiners. A person has to be crazy to be offended by true marriage and the normalcy of this mural.
Friday, April 6, 2012
heteroadvocate
heteroadvocate:
A person, entity, or organization that speaks or writes in support or defence of heterosexuality, true marriage, heteroactivism, or heteroseparatism.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
T-shirt homofascists.
Should a t-shirt company owned by a homosexual be forced to print a t-shirt that said,"God hates fags"? Should a Jewish-owned t-shirt company be forced to print t-shirts for a neo-Nazi gathering? Should any company be forced to print a message that they had a problem with?
If a man can be prevented from merely passing out Bibles at a "gay pride" event, can't a Christian decline from supporting an anti-Christ message?
“...GLSO wanted “Hands On Original” to print shirts for the city’s fifth annual Lexington Pride Festival. The store offered to find another company that would honor its price – but that wasn’t good enough for the GLSO.
...“Over the past 20 years, we have declined to produce several other products with different messages than the one at issue here because we disapproved of whatever message it was, and it never had anything to do with discrimination,” he wrote. “People reading this may disagree with my view on the current issue, but I hope they will join us in supporting our right to decline an order that promotes a view so contrary to our personal beliefs.”
...Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, condemned the attacks on the t-shirt company and said Adamson has as much freedom to reject homosexuality as his customers do to endorse it.
“The Left still insists that personal morality take a backseat to its radical agenda,” Perkins said. “Whether it’s a t-shirt company, wedding photographer, or the church, homosexuals will not be satisfied until they compel us to either spread their perversion or promote it.”...”
Full article here.
If a man can be prevented from merely passing out Bibles at a "gay pride" event, can't a Christian decline from supporting an anti-Christ message?
“...GLSO wanted “Hands On Original” to print shirts for the city’s fifth annual Lexington Pride Festival. The store offered to find another company that would honor its price – but that wasn’t good enough for the GLSO.
...“Over the past 20 years, we have declined to produce several other products with different messages than the one at issue here because we disapproved of whatever message it was, and it never had anything to do with discrimination,” he wrote. “People reading this may disagree with my view on the current issue, but I hope they will join us in supporting our right to decline an order that promotes a view so contrary to our personal beliefs.”
...Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, condemned the attacks on the t-shirt company and said Adamson has as much freedom to reject homosexuality as his customers do to endorse it.
“The Left still insists that personal morality take a backseat to its radical agenda,” Perkins said. “Whether it’s a t-shirt company, wedding photographer, or the church, homosexuals will not be satisfied until they compel us to either spread their perversion or promote it.”...”
Full article here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)