Why some people attack homosexuals.

Normally, I would come to the defense of a gay man that was minding his own business and was being attacked for being gay.  But this man is the type of spotlight homosexual that I would NOT come to his aid if someone decided to do him harm. 

Disgraceful public behavior inspires hatred.

Do I support male-on-male sex? What?!?

 

Why would a company ask its employees if they support the glbt community?   Wouldn't it be to eventually remove all those who don't support male-on-male sexual activity?  What does this mean for those who don't support homosexuality?  Termination?  Harassment?  Denial of promotions?  What happens to those who don't answer the question? 

A clear example of corporate homofascism is here.

The Jason Collins paradox.

I was quite upset when the Jason Collins story broke because I was too busy to cover it immediately, and I like to serve fresh bread.  Then, today's chapter in the saga came to my attention and gave me an opportunity to address this issue.  Like always, I was inspired by yet another lie told by those who propel gay propaganda, which I love to expose.

There are two amazing things about the Jason Collins story:

1.  Apparently, Mr. Collins is among those who still believe that Matthew Shepard was murdered by homophobes when he wasn't.  The primary killer of Matthew Shepard was a man who had had sex with other men.

2.  Mr. Collins has an identical twin brother who is straight and nobody is talking about this glaringly obvious proof that nobody is born gay.  Jason Collins is a homosexual and his identical twin brother is heterosexual and they have the exact same DNA!!  Living proof that homosexual behavior is not genetically based is in the spotlight of the American media, and people are heaping praise upon Jason Collins for announcing to the entire world that he has sex with men!  

THIS is how brainwashed people have become by the constant onslaught of homofascist propaganda.  Jason Collins is praised for being a homosexual when he is living proof that a person cannot be born gay!   OMG!!  Two of the greatest lies that underpin the glbt community are in plain sight for all to see... and nobody will point it out! 

I think I'm going to pass out laughing.


Full story here.

Gender denial runs amok in California.

It

is

ABSURD

to ignore the fact that human beings are either born male or female.  But, because of the Godless mindset of the government in California, the absurd is the law. 

The young man in the picture above has decided that he is a girl, and since no one has the courage to tell him otherwise, he now gets to compete against real females on a high school softball team.

Story here. 

56th Annual Grammy Awards show celebrates same-sex "marriage."

I had every intention of watching the Grammy's last night but I got tired and fell asleep.  I knew that, if Lorde didn't win best song of the year for Royals, then the Grammy Awards were full of crap.

Then, lo and behold, I wake up to find out that the anti-Christ, redefinition of marriage was mixed in with true marriage at the end of the Grammy Awards last night. Even though it was apparently at the end of the show, I'm glad I missed it.

Sad story here and here.

Originator of "gay gene" debacle admitted defeat. (Updated 11 Jan. 2014)

I was seriously considering posting on the Evander Holyfield case when I stumbled upon this jewel.  In my efforts to find the original article in/on the Washington Blade I have only found this found this so far.

"Born gay" takes another hit.

The “born gay” hoax is being dragged further into the sunlight and dying fast.

“...Researchers Peter Bearman of Columbia and Hannah Bruckner of Yale furnished proof that, as a matter of fact, gays aren’t “born that way.”

...In one small step for mankind, scientists are starting to bend in the direction of actual data rather than blindly adhering to the kind of political correctness that punished scientists like Galileo who followed the truth rather than prevailing, intimidating and threatening cultural trends.

...Under a Judeo-Christian moral construct, we can freely admit that we do not understand the origin of all of our impulses. But it is not necessary to understand the source of every impulse to know that self-destructive impulses must be resisted at all costs. That’s what the message of the gospel is all about - that there is power in Christ to resist dark impulses, no matter what the source, that will destroy us if indulged. ...”

Full article here.

Gay bashing... squared.

Once again, the glbt community shows its intolerance and hatred for any disagreement or non-cooperation with their agenda to force people to accept homosexuality as normal.

But this time, they’ve attacked one of their own who refused to tow the party line. Incredible. Fighting homofascism is so easy because homofascists just keep handing me great news stories! As the owner of heteroseparatist.com, I feel like a pet mouse in a cheese factory.

“…“I was getting ready for work and there was a knock at the door,” Wood emailed The Daily Caller late Wednesday. “I opened it, and a guy wrapped a ligature around my neck, slammed my head into the doorway, and smashed my face into a mirror, telling me ‘You should have kept your [f*******] mouth shut.’”

…Wood said his attacker’s reference to a warning likely pointed to graffiti he found painted on his car last week. The vandalism included the phrases “house trained republican faggot,” “traitor,” and “ur like a jew 4 hitler.”

…Those slurs, he explained, were references to him being a gay Republican working to help Lee, a straight GOP candidate, defeat the openly gay Democrat Mark Pocan.

…After he discovered the graffiti, Wood wrote an open letter on Facebook to the unknown vandal. “If you understand either freedom or me at all,” he wrote, “you would that this will only make me work harder. … You can think whatever you like about me, but I will not be bullied into voting for a gay man simply because I am gay.”

Full story here.

In front of children too?!

Father, mother, child. It can't be beat.

How did it come to this?  Why do some people hate those that stand for God's definition of marriage?  A child needs, wants, and deserves a mother and a father, and anyone who can't accept that fact is someone that I won't associate with.

The importance of words. (Updated)

“…Supporters sued after Secretary of State Mark Ritchie changed the title from “Recognition of marriage solely between one man and one woman” to “Limiting the status of marriage to opposite sex couples.” …”

Words. The importance of words.

Words shape thought and evoke emotion. Words can kill and words can heal. Jesus Christ himself is known as the Word of God. That’s very significant.

It was a word-assault that started heteroseparatist.com, and the mere mention of the word “heteroseparatist” is banned on democraticunderground.com. What an honor!

I was even threatened once by a homofascist for creating the word “heteroseparatist.” He said that he was going to, “…stop me personally…” from being a heteroseparatist. Wow. How did he think that he was going to achieve his goal? Do I not have the right to separate from a person because of their behavior? How could he “stop” me without violating my civil rights?

To change the wording of an amendment from that of its authors that defines true marriage is a clear effort to pollute a Godly, simple, genetic, logical, natural, biological, and historical truth.

Story here.

“… Minnesota for Marriage Chairman John Helmberger said Ritchie’s and Swanson’s “meddling with the title of the Marriage Protection Amendment is a perfect example of why we need the marriage amendment.”

“Some politicians are so blinded by ideology and beholden to special interests, like gay marriage activists, that we simply can’t be confident they will follow the law or respect the will of the people,” he said.

“The only way to protect the definition of marriage is to secure it in the constitution where activist judges, ambitious politicians and special interests can’t meddle with it.” …”

Full story here.

What heteroseparatist DON'T do. (updated 28 Aug. 2012)

I wanted to take the time to denounce a vicious, home-invasion attack against a lesbian. This act of violence is not what I stand for at heteroseparatist.com.

"...What she saw instead was her 33-year-old neighbor, she said, naked and bleeding.

"I was in shock," Rappl said. "She was naked, her hands were tied with zip ties. All I could see was a cut across her forehead and blood running down." ..."

Story here.

WHAT!! It was a FAKE hate crime!? Story here.

Gays harrassing Bible reader.

I don't see people who have sex outside of marriage, and people that cheat on their spouses going crazy whenever they see a bible or hear someone reading from it. Why then do homosexuals go so crazy when they see someone reading from the bible? Is there something in the heart of the homosexual that feels particularly threatened by biblical verse?

At 0:16, the Godly man's response to the reporter's question is edited out. At 0:26 the homofascist is clearly provoking the Godly man. And at 1:20, one can brief hear the Godly man say, "...all I'm saying..." His tone of his voice reveals his peaceful mindset, while the behavior of those surrounding and harassing him reveals their intolerance and hatred.

Chick-fil-A bully fired.

How cowardly of this man to attack this innocent young woman who is simply working in a drivethru!! Once again, the hatred of marriage redefiners is clear to all. This coward was fired (an action that I don't support) for his homofascist act.

Spotlight homosexual assualting true marriage supporters.

It is, legally, an assault to "glitter" someone. And this gay man has the exact same right to marry that I do. Anti-Christ gay activists never glitter anyone who looks like they can defend themselves. Notice how the spotlight homosexual backs off from the men that are prepared to stand up to him at :03 and :33.

Cool poster.

Points 11 and 14 caught my attention.

The risks of having lesbian "mothers."

Supporting info here.

Sexual behavior vs. religious freedom.

I wonder, could a Christian photographer be sued for refusing to take pictures of sex toys, or heterosexuals dressed up in S &M gear? Or children in sexually suggestive poses?

Same-sex marriage was not even legal in the state of New Mexico, but Elane Photography, a Christian company, was still fined for refusing to photograph a ceremony of sexual sin. Apparently, a person’s sexual activities makes them a member of a legally protected class. Is this why some people become gay? To belong to a protected group? This is why I fight homofascism and marriage redefiners. I’m fighting to protect my freedom to walk away from the glbt community. Homosexuality is not innate like gender or skin color; people can leave the glbt community anytime they want to.

“... “Should the government force a videographer who is an animal rights activist to create a video promoting hunting and taxidermy? Of course not, and neither should the government force this photographer to promote a message that violates her conscience. Because the Constitution prohibits the state from forcing unwilling artists to promote a message they disagree with, we will certainly appeal this decision to the New Mexico Supreme Court.”

...Benjamin Bull, chief counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, noted at that time, “Homosexuals got exactly what they wanted. In the marketplace of ideas, one side has now been censored. This [situation] is exactly what homosexual activists have in mind.”

...Interestingly, a subsequent poll revealed that almost half of Americans believe that Christians in the United States are being persecuted by homosexual “marriage” advocates who take legal action against them over their religious beliefs, and almost one in three Democrats believes such persecution is “necessary,” according to the alarming results of a new poll

...But 31 percent of Democrats, as well as 12 percent of Republicans and 24 percent of independents, said, “Such tactics are necessary.” ...”

Full story here.

Pacquiao vs. homofascism.

If...twenty years ago, someone told me that a world-famous boxer would be banned from a shopping mall for stating that he supports God’s definition of marriage—something that is between one man and one woman—I would’ve thought that that person was crazy. I would’ve thought of a polite way the extricate myself from any further conversation with that person, and quietly moved away from them. And that person would never hear from me again. But now, in the absurd, homoOrwellian world that I live in, this insanity has actually come to pass.

“...During a May 12 interview with the National Conservative Examiner Pacquiao said the Bible is clear on homosexual activity and that with regard to marriage we must follow “God’s words first ... obey God’s law first before considering the laws of man.”

While Pacquiao is standing by his statements to the Examiner, he has objected that his remarks were taken out of context and that he never cited Leviticus or stated that anyone in the homosexual community deserved death.

“I didn’t say that, that’s a lie… I didn’t know that quote from Leviticus because I haven’t read the Book of Leviticus yet,” he said. ...”

Full article here, and more info here.

The DANGER of redefining marriage.

Last week, I discovered a story concerning a sexual relationship between three men where ALL of the definitions of a true marriage were broken; the one-man-with-one-woman definition, the TWO-become-one definition, and, the definition of adult-with-adult was also brushed against.

The story was too disturbing for me to cover at first. A Facebook friend posted it on her wall, and I discovered it during a standard, morning sweep of the internet. The story gave me the creeps and I was going to leave it alone until I saw the video above. It was this paragraph sent me into a high orbit when I first encountered this story.

"... “My relationship with Mark is lover and husband. And my relationship with Vinny is lover and son—even though there’s a sexual aspect to it,” DiLuzio says. “I think the type of nurturing we both give to Vinny is more of a parental kind of guideline, as well as a boyfriend guideline.” ..."

Lover and SON!?!?! WHAT WAS THAT!! What the f*** did you say?!

Is this not proof, from the words of an active homosexual, of the link between marriage redefiners, homosexuality, child molestation, and polygamy? It's obvious to me that all those who deviate from God's definition of marriage either directly or indirectly support sexual practices that endanger children.

Those who support same-sex "marriage," don't care about depriving a child of an opposite-sex parent. Those who support homosexuality think that it's okay to tell a child that homosexuality is okay without the consent of that child's parents. Those who support sexualizing, or having sex with children, obviously do so without the consent of that child's parents. And those who support polygamy refuse to see that it is mathematically impossible for a man with too many children to spend an appropriate amount of time with each of his children.

Those who cast aside true marriage must cast aside the Truth first.