A "marriage" between three men.

Couldn’t it be considered bigotry to say that marriage is between two people? What if a woman wants to marry her boyfriend and her horse? Who is to say that she is wrong? What about her constitutional right to pursue happiness? This is why God defined marriage. God knows what He’s doing.

“… “Love occurs unconditionally and is not limited to only two people,” Art wrote on Facebook. “Love brings peace to the world.”

But after this month’s report out of Thailand, some Christians are noting the inevitable slippery slope that they have stated would result if society deviated from God’s creation order.

“The events in Thailand simply confirm what we’ve been saying all this time: If marriage is no longer the union of one man and one woman, then it can be anything: Two men, two women, three men, three women, or an almost infinite number of other possibilities,” Dr. Michael Brown wrote for Charisma News.

…He noted that the situation demonstrates how mankind has made up its own rules along the way in an attempt to legitimize and justify what a particular person wants. Since homosexuals have stated that marriage should be defined as the union of two people who have feelings for each other, regardless of gender, where does the rule about two people come from?

“If a gay activist says, ‘But marriage is the loving, long-term commitment of two people,’ the answer is simple: ‘Says who? That’s just your new definition. Where did you get the idea it was two people if not from its historic, natural meaning?'” Brown explained. “And so, if I’m ‘bigoted’ because I don’t recognize same-sex ‘marriage,’ then gay activists (and their allies) are just as ‘bigoted’ if they don’t recognize three men (or women) ‘marrying.’

“Those who have taken down the fence of marriage as God intended it have opened up a Pandora’s Box of possibilities,” he said, “none of them good.” …”

Full story here.

SCOTUS stops marriage redefinition in Utah. (At least temporarily.)

Why is the definition of a true marriage always called, "...a same-sex 'marriage' ban..." by the mainstream media?  Why is this manipulative, incendiary, terminology the go-to phrase of so many?  This is the type of mislabeling that inspired me to create the word "heteroseparatist" in the first place.  Because of my childhood, misinformation drives me up the wall.

By the same reasoning that people support the redefinition of marriage, (the concept that a same-sex couple should have the same access to marriage of a heterosexual couple) people support marriage between sterile, adult siblings or polygamists.  If the glbt community is allowed to redefine marriage, then other communities must also be able to redefine marriage.

Story here and here.

Same-sex "marriage" forced upon the people of Hawaii.

The persecution of Christians has begun in Hawaii.

Same-sex "marriage" was forced upon the people of Hawaii despite the outcry of the majority to uphold God's definition of marriage.  This is what the glbt community wants.  The destruction of anyone who doesn't support same-sex "marriage.

There was a great, media-ignored, outcry against the redefinition of marriage in Hawaii.  Story-with-many-videos here.

"...(d)uh anti-gay groups..."

I just saw this arch-homofascist on Fox news and found the video on YouTube.  Some people who want marriage redefined are the most intolerant and hate-filled people on the Earth, and their bigotry is astounding.  Just being labeled as "anti-gay" can cost you your life.  This is what the glbt community has done to American culture; people are being persecuted for merely refusing to accept homosexuality as normal.  People are being sued for refusing to be involved in a same-sex "wedding." 

True Christians are done in Denmark.

"That can never happen here," homofascists will say when people like me defend their right to follow the teachings of Jesus Christ and shun sexual sin.  I'm not buying what the glbt community is selling, and I reject the concept that homosexuality is normal.  Even if every human being on the face of the Earth decides that homosexuality is normal, and every country legalizes same-sex "marriage," it will still be wrong because God says it is.

More info here.

SCOTUS vs. God?

How Godless is the Supreme Court going to prove itself to be when it comes to the definition of marriage?  

Info here.

The shocking truth... simplified.

This illustration made me laugh.  People who defend and promote the redefinition of marriage are woefully decieved and in dire need of the Truth.

So voting on marriage is okay now??

What happened?  I thought that voting on the definition of marriage was unconstitutional?  That's what the homofascists say in California.

So why is it that the gays are celebrating now in other states where voters have redefined marriage?  Are they celebrating the coming legal persecution of Christian business that will be fined or closed for their refusal to comply with sexual perversion? Are they celebrating the intentional deprivation of a mother or a father from a child's life?

Oh I get it!  A vote on the definition of marriage is ONLY valid if the glbt community agrees with that vote!  Wow.  Silly me.  Can a heterosexual federal judge now throw out the votes that support the redefinition of marriage?  How would the gay community react to that?

Info here.

No freedom of speech for true marriage supporters.

Disagreement with marriage redefiners is not allowed, and no group of people is more ready to violate the civil rights of others than full-of-hate marriage redefinition bigots.

Fired for supporting true marriage.

It is wrong to be gay, but people have the right to be wrong. Therefore, no one should lose their job for being straight or gay, or their support for same-sex "marriage," or their support for true marriage. Redefining marriage will begin the religious persecution that the United States of America was founded to escape from.

"...marriage is more than what adults want for themselves."

Those who wish to redefine marriage cry out for compassion for their feelings while simultaneously disregarding the fact that a child deservers a mother and a father.

Then there's the absurd comparison of interrracial marriage to same-sex "marriage" when laws forbidding interracial marriage came from men, and interracial marriage is supported by God.

Marriage redefiners wish to destroy anyone who merely disagrees with them.  How is that not bigotry?

Maine marriage.

Father, mother, child. It can't be beat.

How did it come to this?  Why do some people hate those that stand for God's definition of marriage?  A child needs, wants, and deserves a mother and a father, and anyone who can't accept that fact is someone that I won't associate with.

Marriage redefinition bigotry at Gallaudet University.

The marriage-redefinition-bigots are at it again with their, support- same-sex -“marriage”-or-else mindset. What happened to this world? How did people develop the desire to punish those of us who believe in God’s, one-man-one-woman definition of marriage? Compassion for gays means ignoring what God says? This is why, in my private life, I have no conversation for marriage redefiners.

“..Dr. Angela McCaskill has the distinction of being the first deaf black woman to receive a PhD from Gallaudet University, …teacher, administrator and leader for twenty-three years.

Today she was summarily put on administrative leave while university officials "determine her future" at Gallaudet. Why? Because it was brought to their attention that she signed the petition to allow the people of Maryland to vote on same-sex marriage!

No one is safe when marriage is redefined. The architects of same-sex marriage are bent on silencing and firing those who oppose their agenda. The irony of a university putting its own chief diversity officer on leave—a woman who by all accounts has served the institution with distinction for over two decades—simply because she chose to exercise her rights as a citizen, cannot be ignored. …”

Original info here.