A "marriage" between three men.

Couldn’t it be considered bigotry to say that marriage is between two people? What if a woman wants to marry her boyfriend and her horse? Who is to say that she is wrong? What about her constitutional right to pursue happiness? This is why God defined marriage. God knows what He’s doing.

“… “Love occurs unconditionally and is not limited to only two people,” Art wrote on Facebook. “Love brings peace to the world.”

But after this month’s report out of Thailand, some Christians are noting the inevitable slippery slope that they have stated would result if society deviated from God’s creation order.

“The events in Thailand simply confirm what we’ve been saying all this time: If marriage is no longer the union of one man and one woman, then it can be anything: Two men, two women, three men, three women, or an almost infinite number of other possibilities,” Dr. Michael Brown wrote for Charisma News.

…He noted that the situation demonstrates how mankind has made up its own rules along the way in an attempt to legitimize and justify what a particular person wants. Since homosexuals have stated that marriage should be defined as the union of two people who have feelings for each other, regardless of gender, where does the rule about two people come from?

“If a gay activist says, ‘But marriage is the loving, long-term commitment of two people,’ the answer is simple: ‘Says who? That’s just your new definition. Where did you get the idea it was two people if not from its historic, natural meaning?'” Brown explained. “And so, if I’m ‘bigoted’ because I don’t recognize same-sex ‘marriage,’ then gay activists (and their allies) are just as ‘bigoted’ if they don’t recognize three men (or women) ‘marrying.’

“Those who have taken down the fence of marriage as God intended it have opened up a Pandora’s Box of possibilities,” he said, “none of them good.” …”

Full story here.

Redefining words.

The Corkins Award. (for homofascist-of-the-year)

On 01 August 2012, Chick-fil-A dealt such a devastating blow to homofascists and marriage redefiners that on 15 Aug. 2012, a Mr. Floyd Corkins took a 9mm Sig Sauer pistol, 45 rounds of ammunition, and 15 Chick-fil-A sandwiches (to place beside each person he killed) into the FRC in Washington D.C. Mr. Corkins was stopped by an unarmed security gaurd after he shot the security guard in the arm.

This is what the "hate" label-placed on anyone who disagrees with the redefinition of marriage-does. How ironic that the "hate" label itself inspires hate. Now the homoOrwellian circle is complete and homofascists are now worse than their phantom "oppressors."

If a member of the Westboro Baptist Church committed an identical act of violence against the headquarters of the HRC with 15 empty Starbucks cups to place beside each fatality, wouldn't the mainstream media hold ALL Christians responsible for the actions of the shooter? Wouldn't there be a thunderous outcry against Christian doctrine for motivating the shooter even though the teachings of Jesus Christ decry proactive violence? Hasn't Floyd Corkins added to the embarrassment of homofascists and marriage redefiners? Did homofascist Corkins put a cork in homofascism?

What a great month for heteroseparatism!!