StopCorruptingChildren.com

Click on this poster to see it better, and look closely at the sentences in the lower-left corner.

In some Canadian grade schools, parents do NOT have the option of excluding their children from anti-hetero classes.

Great info here.

Can't Christians have opinions?

If a homosexual teacher were to express his disgust for true marriage on his own time in his own home on his Facebook page, what school district on the planet would suspend him?

Homofascism backfires on anti-Christ teacher.

What would happen to a teacher if he was a Christian and had suspended a gay student for saying that Christianity was wrong?

“...Fort Worth, TX — Last week, high school freshman Dakota Ary was given in-school suspension for telling another student that he believes homosexuality is wrong because of his Christian faith. Western Hills High School teacher, Kristopher Franks, is responsible for his suspension and has now been placed on administrative leave with pay.

...Franks overheard the comment, wrote Dakota an infraction, and sent him to the principal’s office...

...Franks charged Dakota with “possible bullying” and indicated, “It is wrong to make such a statement in public school.”

Two weeks prior to this event, Franks displayed a picture of two men kissing on a “World Wall” and told his students that homosexuality is becoming more prevalent in the world and that they should just accept it...

...the school district reversed the in-school suspension and placed Franks on administrative leave with pay.

This teacher should not force his views about homosexuality upon students. Teachers cannot use their position to bully students and humiliate them in front of their peers.”...”

Story here.

Will Vanderbuilt University persecute Christians?

The rallying power of the word "discrimination" came into being when African-Americans were being murdered, persecuted, and prosecuted for nothing other than the color of their skin and the difference of their hair. So, that being said, how then does the word discrimination apply to a persons conduct.

Homosexuality is conduct, not race or gender. A person cannot decide to embrace the sexual sins of fornication, adultery, and homosexuality and be a Christian. A person can have the aforementioned desires (that will greatly diminish by the power of the Holy Spirit) and be a Christian. But a person cannot willfully chose to live in sexual sin and have a relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ and be saved/Christian.

How Chastity became Chaz.

Today I found out the root cause of Chastity's desire to become Chaz. Lo and behold, it was lesbian rape that sparked Chastity's loss of sexual sanity.

“...NEW YORK, May 28, 2002 (LSN.ca) - Chastity Bono, the daughter of the famed singer Cher, claims in her newly released memoir that she was sexually seduced by an adult female at age 11. Chastity says she was left in the care of "Joan" a lesbian friend of Cher's and had "sex" with her. Chastity writes that when, years later, she told her mother of the affair, Cher responded, "This will be a good life experience for you."

..."Chastity's experiences completely underline and reinforce our perspective that homosexuality has its roots in child development." Paulk, the author of two books on homosexuality, said "homosexuality is an environmentally based condition, not genetic, but developed through life experiences often rooted in childhood." He explained that Chastity says she was seduced by an older woman while her mother was absent and her abuser "Joan" met her emotional needs. ...”

Story here.

Gay "Christians."

There are some who incorrectly believe that a person can be actively involved in a same-sex, romantic, sexual relationship and also be a Christian. This belief is not true. A person must renounce sexual sin to have a relationship with God through the Lord Jesus Christ.

To say/believe that a person can be Christian and actively involved in a romantic or sexual relationship with another person of the same gender is just like saying a person can be a Jewish Nazi or a Christian pornstar.

“...Five Christian student groups at Vanderbilt University are fighting to stay on campus and retain their religious freedom as administrators try to decide whether they are in violation of the school's nondiscrimination policy.

The groups all have clauses in their constitutions that require leaders to share their religious beliefs...

Vanderbilt administrators began a review of all student organizations earlier this year after Christian fraternity Beta Upsilon Chi asked an openly gay member to resign. He subsequently filed a discrimination complaint.

...asked one of its officers to step down after he announced he was in a homosexual relationship. The school eventually put InterVarsity on probation, dropping plans for a suspension, after leaders convinced administrators they removed the gay officer because he violated the group's pledge of celibacy.

Another Christian group on the University of North Carolina's Chapel Hill campus also is facing an investigation over ousting a gay member. A cappella group Psalm 100 expelled one of its singers after he announced he was gay. As with the InterVarsity case, Psalm 100 says it was not the singer's sexuality that caused the problem. His disagreement with the group's constitution led to his removal, members said. ...”

Story here.

"L" Word lesbian actress expected special treatment?

Once again, a member of the glbt community expects special treatment in public. Apparently, a lesbian actress who plays a lesbian on a pay-tv show, was making out with another woman on an aircraft, and was booted off of the plane due to the complaints of fellow passengers. Kudos to Southwest Airlines for having the guts to stand up to this inappropriate public display of affection.

I also noted that there were two other stories concerning sexual misconduct on the same Fox News homepage where I found this story. The two other stories are here, and here. And the "L" Word story is here.

Marriage Anti-Defamation Alliance.

This man, Dr. Frank Turek, was fired for supporting God's definition of marriage. Is this is what the glbt community wants? The destruction of everyone who doesn't support the redefinition of marriage? Do the homofascists think that no one is going to fight back? Will there not be a backlash against people being fired for supporting true marriage?

Did gay teacher persecute Christian student?

Apparently, a teacher who teaches German is, ironically, also a homofascist. And this story takes place in Texas!

"...Krause called the incident “mind blowing” and said the teacher had frequently brought homosexuality into ninth grade classroom discussions.

“There has been a history with this teacher in the class regarding homosexual topics,” Krause said. “The teacher had posted a picture of two men kissing on a wall that offended some of the students.”

Krause said the picture was posted on the teacher’s “world wall.”

“He told the students this is happening all over the world and you need to accept the fact that homosexuality is just part of our culture now,” Krause said.

The school district would not comment on why a teacher was discussing homosexuality in a ninth grade German class.

“In German class there should be no talk of being pro-Gay or homosexual topics,”..."

Story with video here.

The end of DADT.

How long will it be before some young military recruit walks into the latrine of his barracks in the middle of the night and sees two men having sex with each other? Or sees some homosexual, much larger than him, staring at his genitalia or his behind as he's taking a shower? Now, with the repeal of DADT, it's open season for homosexual harassment towards heterosexual young men going into the military.

How long will it be before a homosexual is murdered because of his unwanted sexual advances? The, "Don't ask..." part was to protect homosexuals, and the, "...don't tell" part was to protect heterosexuals. Now young men going into the military will have to be on the alert in their own showers. Shouldn't a soldier have some place where he can stand-down and be at rest?

"..."This makes as much sense as permitting men to sleep in women's barracks. Allowing open lusting and sexual activities in showers and barracks will greatly erode trust, troop morale, and military effectiveness. ..."

More info here.

Legal protection for sexual activity???

About a week ago, I found an article that covers almost all of the talking points of my manifesto.

“...This is especially the case with homosexual activists, who ironically seek to hijack the moral capital of the civil rights movement.

Essential to the homosexual agenda is the idea that homosexuals are fighting for basic civil rights denied them by an oppressive society.

Contrary to their claims of "discrimination," there is no effort to deny homosexuals the same rights guaranteed to all Americans. The truth is that homosexuals have the same rights, with the same restrictions, as everyone else.
NOT A TRUE MINORITY

The notion that homosexuals are a true minority group is false. Homosexuals do not meet the three criteria that characterize minority groups that have been accorded special legal protections.

The effort to redefine the family is really an effort to destroy the common definition and has no logical stopping point. If marriage no longer means the union of a man and a woman, then why not "marry" three men, or two men and a woman? Putting homosexual behavior on a par with marriage and family sends the wrong message to a nation already overburdened with family breakdown and its attendant pathologies.

Granting special legal protection to homosexuals would also take away rights from others.
• Parents could lose the right to protect their children from school-endorsed exposure to homosexuality and other various "sexual orientations."
• Good people of conscience are losing the right to disagree. For example, two Madison, Wisconsin women were forced to pay fines, attend a political re-education class, write a letter of apology and informed that they were to be monitored by a public agency for two years because they declined to room with a lesbian.

Opposition to extending special protection to homosexuals is not based on ignorance or bigotry, as homosexuals often claim. It is based on informed judgment about homosexual behavior and the political agenda of homosexual activists. ...”

The powerful article containing these true words is here.

GayPal.

As usual, the persecution of those who don't support homosexuality grows stronger everyday. What an absurdist reality we live in! If the glbt community gets mad at you, look out! Some homosexuals will go so far as to threaten to rape your children if you speak out publicly against their behavior. Wow.

Now, unfortunately, it appears that PayPal is succumbing to homofascism.

“...Severo’s use of PayPal has been targeted in recent weeks by the homosexual group “All Out,” which has created an online petition to urge PayPal to dump Severo and nine other PayPal users as purveyors of “hate” and “extremism.” Severo’s site expresses love of homosexuals and a concern that homosexual behavior is destructive to those who participate in it.

Homosexual militants have sought to silence Severo for years, and the elimination of his PayPal account is the third major success scored in their campaign.

“I am very worried, because PayPal caved in to gay militants and their hate campaign to have me excluded from PayPal,” Severo told LifeSiteNews.

“Julio has a highly effective blog - that’s why he became a target of the Homosexual Lobby. The Left can’t answer his ideas, so they target his funding. By dropping Julio days after the launch of All Out’s “gay” propaganda campaign, PayPal joins the ranks of anti-Christian companies who have taken sides in the Culture War—against committed believers.”...”

Sickening homofascist story here.

Viral video report. Elderly couple with new laptop.

This adorable elderly couple, (I'm in gross violation of manlaw by using the word "adorable," but I'm going to roll with it.) inadvertently display the beauty of God's definition of marriage.

Lesbian rejects "born gay."

A woman named Lindsay Miller is very probably angering some (if not most of) the glbt community with her recent article on how her lesbian life is, indeed, her choice.

Although I was turned off by her use of two of the most overused and misused words in this day and age; "discrimination," and "homophobia," her article contained valuable insight into the mind of a bisexual woman who is choosing to have a romantic, sexual relationship with another woman. Her social stock/popularity must be plummeting in the gay community!

“...In direct opposition to both the mainstream gay movement and Lady Gaga, I would like to state for the record that I was not born this way. I have dated both men and women in the past, and when I've been with men, I never had to lie back and think of Megan Fox. I still notice attractive men on the street and on television. If I were terrified of the stigma associated with homosexuality, it would have been easy enough to date men exclusively and stay in the closet my whole life...”

“...The "born this way" argument is frequently used in defense of gay rights, but whether or not I deserve the same rights as straight people has nothing to do with whether I chose to be the way I am...”

“...Make no mistake -- it's a life I chose. ..”

Complete article here.

Lesbians dress boy as a girl for facebook pic.

And just how is a boy supposed to learn how to become a man with two lesbians as "parents"? Isn't it common sense to see the link between gay "parents" and sexually confused children? Will I be condemned as a "heterosexist" for stating to obvious? Will I be called a sexist for stating that there are differences between men and women? Who was afraid to say that it was wrong to place children in this immoral, lesbian household?

"...A SIX-year-old boy placed in the care of a lesbian foster couple was dressed in girl's clothes and the humiliating pictures were posted on the couple's Facebook page.

One of the women was preparing for a sex change to become a man at the time, while her girlfriend was undergoing fertility treatment...."

Story here.

What the glbt community doesn't want you to know about SB48.

In Memory of...

Challenge for "Randomguy"

Dear "Randomguy,"

Do you have the guts to talk to me one-on-one? We can talk here, just you and I. I guarantee a one-on-one meeting. Are you game? Are you man enough? Do you have what it takes to meet me here?

UPDATE:
As of 2327hrs on Tue. 06 Sept. 2011, I promise before my Lord Jesus Christ, that I will post all of my opponent's comments, on this string, until 0001hrs on Tue. 13 Sept. 2011, that do not contain profanity. I make this promise to prove that he cannot fight me fairly.

UPDATE: At 0153hrs (Wed.), Randomguy declines my challenge, despite my promise before the eternally glorious Jesus Christ. :)

Why was this commercial banned?

Transphobia?

Dr. Keith Ablow, a psychiatrist, apparently has a deep understanding of gender identity disorder. Concerning Chaz Bono's obvious case he writes...


“...It would be wrong to think that gender dysphoria cannot be kindled by celebrating those who have undergone sexual reassignment surgery. Human beings do model one another—in terms of emotion, thought and behavior. By broadcasting, applauding and mainstreaming the journey of a very disordered person who endured, and likely will continue to endure, real suffering based on extraordinarily deep psychological problems, we suggest that that journey is a smart—even heroic—one to take.

But Chaz Bono should not be applauded for asserting she is a man (and goes about trying to look like one) any more than a woman who believes she will be happier without arms, has them removed and then continues to assert that she was right all along—her self-concept was that of a double amputee. Now, all is well.

I’m going to take heat for saying all this, by the way. I already have for making similar statements in the past. So be it. I would rather be the one shouting “The Emperor has no clothes!” than one of the happy-go-lucky villagers applauding the tragic parade....”

More info here.

All that Chaz!!

The producers of DWTS (Dancing with the Stars) have every right to cast whomever they wish, and people have every right to vote with their remote and not watch the show.

Just about a month ago, I recently voted with my remote when one of my (then) favorite shows, Warehouse 13, introduced a homosexual character into the storyline. I really liked the show up until the point where the new character revealed that he had sex with men. I stopped the show, deleted it from my hard drive, and reset my dvr to discontinue recording the show. No big deal. These things happen.

I didn't call up the network and tell anyone why I wasn't going to watch the show anymore, I simply chalked up the unacceptable storyline to the loss of sexual sanity that is sweeping my nation and the World. The producer of the show has every right to embrace homosexuality as normal, just as I have every right to watch or do something else. No problem. Some people don't know that "gay" isn't an ethnic group and some people do.

It looks like DWTS is going to lose some viewers due to their decision to consider Chaz Bono a man, and pair her with another woman on the show. The producers are getting comments like...

“HUGE HUGE fan of this show since season two and eagerly await each season to get my dancing/entertainment ‘fix’!! But when I heard that Chaz Bono was going to be on, I was sick. Not that I have anything personally again her/him, I just don’t want that lifestyle choice continually flaunted in the media esp ABC.”

More and more people are starting to feel like me when it comes to homosexuality. People are getting tired of the glbt lifestyle being pushed into their lives. I believe that there is a backlash building up against homofascism.

The story on the bearded woman is here.