From homosexuality to incest to twincest.

Who will be the first person to call me a "sibphobe" since I won't associate with a person who has sex with their sibling?

When sexual sanity is abandoned, children end up paying the price. And, from what I can tell so far, it looks like incest may be the stage between homosexuality and pedophilia.

“...December 19, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Twenty years ago when advocates of homosexuality were arguing for acceptance of gay sex, their opponents warned that it would lead to pedophilia and incest. Such whistle blowers were labeled as bigots, haters and worse, and laughed into silence.

However, the warnings are coming true. While incest may not yet be legal on the books, there is increasing pressure to legitimize it. The following video, which has gone viral on YouTube, might legitimately be seen a part of the conditioning process leading to such legitimization. It features a high school prank where blindfolded teens are asked to guess who kissed them. Turns out it was their own father or mother. ...”

My inspiration for this post can be found in the comments section of this web page.

The glbt and feminist war on masculinity.

There is a definite link between women who are uncomfortable with strong independent men, and how a boy develops into a homosexual.

When a boy is born to a woman who is full of anger towards men, in many instances, the woman removes the boy's father from his life, and raises the boy in an environment where masculinity is constantly denigrated. This creates an environment from which effeminate homosexuals develop.

Before I was married, if a woman I was dating copped an attitude when I opened a door for her, or if she forbade her son from playing with toy guns, I quietly faded from that woman's life. Having worked with arch-feminists for eight years, I developed effective tactics to deal with feminist contempt.

“...What it says is that my worry that Ms. Lyons might be expressing her own discomfort with masculinity and projecting it onto her son—and mine, and yours—seems to have been justified.

It says that Lyons does seem to have been promulgating her perspectives on gender roles having no value.

It says that she was, indeed, apparently using J. Crew—a brand so many of our kids gravitate toward—as her launching pad for a mini-campaign to change the way our kids think about their bodies and their gender identities.

See, I don’t think it’s so terrible that boys are different than girls. I think it’s just fine, in fact, that a central supporting beam of the architecture of most boys’ senses of self is that they look like boys and act like boys and feel like boys. I don’t think that’s pathological. But I think that Jenna Lyons—and maybe J. Crew—would disagree with me. ...”

Complete article here.

Lesbians dress boy as a girl for facebook pic.

And just how is a boy supposed to learn how to become a man with two lesbians as "parents"? Isn't it common sense to see the link between gay "parents" and sexually confused children? Will I be condemned as a "heterosexist" for stating to obvious? Will I be called a sexist for stating that there are differences between men and women? Who was afraid to say that it was wrong to place children in this immoral, lesbian household?

"...A SIX-year-old boy placed in the care of a lesbian foster couple was dressed in girl's clothes and the humiliating pictures were posted on the couple's Facebook page.

One of the women was preparing for a sex change to become a man at the time, while her girlfriend was undergoing fertility treatment...."

Story here.

Y.A.H.I. (YAW-he)

<---These people want to redefine marriage, but the glbt community won't support them. Wait...hold on a minute. Waaa? Weren't the polygamists the first social group that wanted to redefine marriage in the United States of America? Is this yet another homofascist inconsistency? A "yahi"?

"...Pro-family activists have long warned that redefining marriage to include two men or two women would inevitably lead to legalized polygamy, with polygamists employing the “equality” and “consensual” rhetoric of the gay rights movement. However, gay rights commentators immediately distanced themselves from the polygamists’ suit, with one prominent commentator calling it “a political gift to anti-gay groups nationwide.”..."

Yahi story here.

MSM and SSM bring GSA? OMG! WT...

Well here it is. The new way to say "incest" is now "GSA." Genetic Sexual Attraction. Ironically, GSA also stands for Gay Straight Alliance! (If I weren't so jaded, I would throw up!) The term reminds me of how some homophiles will call their sexual relations with little boys, "male intergenerational intimacy." HomoOrwellianism at its finest!

Now, the loss of sexual sanity that was spearheaded by the glbt community has begun to devolve into its next incarnation; sexual relationships between blood relatives. I suppose I should prepare myself to be slandered by the word "siblingphobe" in the (near?) future for my refusal to support marriage between blood relatives. After all, I covered how sterile siblings could use the exact same arguments of the glbt community in my manifesto.

"...Furthermore, stigmatizing GSA is only going to cause incest advocates to adopt it as a pet cause, like the individual behind the website Full Marriage Equality, which both supports gay marriage AND incest – a conflation any gay marriage advocate would be smacking themselves in the head over. A blog post on the Full Marriage Equality site goes so far as to congratulate Lawrence and her father on their happy relationship, saying, “They are consenting adults who should be allowed to marry…. We wish them the best as a consanguinarmorous couple and family.”..."

"Consanguinarmorous" (I think that the first "r" doesn't belong) story here and here.

Loss of sexual sanity in Canada.

In Canada where homosexual "marriage" is legal and accepted, the next rung in sexual deviance is being discussed. Now, according to an "expert," a man who desires sex with children is equal to a man who desires sex with a grown, consenting woman. The desire to have sex with a child is simply an "orientation."

"...However, MP Marc Lemay of the Bloc Quebecois challenged Van Gijseghem’s definition. “I have to admit that I was not expecting, on this Valentine’s Day, to be talking about this inappropriate type of love. It is not really love. It has more to do with violence and control. I am concerned, Professor Van Gijseghem … because you say, if I am not mistaken, that pedophilia is a sexual orientation.”

“That is what I said,” continued Van Gijseghem.

Lemay pursued the point, asking if it therefore should “be compared to homosexuality.”..."

Perverted, wicked story here.