From homosexuality to incest to twincest.

Who will be the first person to call me a "sibphobe" since I won't associate with a person who has sex with their sibling?

When sexual sanity is abandoned, children end up paying the price. And, from what I can tell so far, it looks like incest may be the stage between homosexuality and pedophilia.

“...December 19, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Twenty years ago when advocates of homosexuality were arguing for acceptance of gay sex, their opponents warned that it would lead to pedophilia and incest. Such whistle blowers were labeled as bigots, haters and worse, and laughed into silence.

However, the warnings are coming true. While incest may not yet be legal on the books, there is increasing pressure to legitimize it. The following video, which has gone viral on YouTube, might legitimately be seen a part of the conditioning process leading to such legitimization. It features a high school prank where blindfolded teens are asked to guess who kissed them. Turns out it was their own father or mother. ...”

My inspiration for this post can be found in the comments section of this web page.

Patrisexualphobia.

When a society abandons sexual sanity, i.e. the definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman, a multitude of "diverse" definitions of sexual normalcy will follow. I call it l.o.s.s.

A Mr. David Epstein of Colombia University is in some legal hot water for having a consensual, sexual relationship with his 24-year-old daughter. His legal argument is that they are both consenting adults and that the government has no right to prosecute them for their private, sexual conduct. Does this argument sound familiar? It does to me.

What is the legal basis for forbidding their sexual union since abortion is legal? I mean, the legal basis that outlaws incest would, logically, be the birth defects that are probable in the offspring of such a sexual union. So, if birth defects can be eliminated either by sterilization, abortion or by in-utero genetic resequencing, what is the legal problem with the sexual relationship that Professor Epstein is having with his adult daughter? Is not Professor Epstein's argument valid when Biblical, "old-fashioned" values are set aside? Does he not have the legal right to pursue happiness by having a consensual, sexual relationship with his 24-year-old daughter? Isn't anyone who is disgusted by such a relationship a patrisexualphobe?

Story here.