The glbt community vs. REALITY.

To deny that you are human, male, or female, is supported nowadays by people coming out of college.  To deny your skin color, your age, or your height, or that your body is designed for heterosexual sex, is the kind of denial fuels the glbt community. 

Isn't it obvious that denial and emotional trauma are the two main pillars of the gay community?

Father, mother, child. It can't be beat.

How did it come to this?  Why do some people hate those that stand for God's definition of marriage?  A child needs, wants, and deserves a mother and a father, and anyone who can't accept that fact is someone that I won't associate with.

Hawaii does a five-O on marriage.

Mabye their distance from liberal California has enabled the government of Hawaii to hold on to sexual sanity.

"...Same Sex Marriage (SSM) was originally supported by feminist organizations such as NOW as a way to empower women to be more independent of men (achieving women's equality is important but there are always healthy and unhealthy ways to reach a goal).

The support rose as radical subgroups of feminists grew which advocated that women should in a sense form their own separate tribe, living apart from men and even creating a future society where men could be cut off and eventually disappear because they were redundant and unnecessary as well as dangerous and violent.

The support became so intense it led to irrational positions, leading some to equate grouping people by race with groupings by gender or even by sexual behaviors, ignoring that these groupings are fundamentally different in various ways (gender differences are from evolving together, and the sexual behaviors evolved with them, while racial differences are from evolving separately). Also ignored is that SSM reduces diversity in a family group, a type of diversity that has been fundamental in human evolution and survival. It is argued that it increases the diversity of family groups, but the KKK could argue similarly that it provides a greater diversity of groups by creating a group without diversity.

The SSM movement has been able to grow so vigorously because economic/financial elites have supported it. Militant feminism merged with the left and came to dominate it, promoting lesbianism to the point that males feel uncomfortable and unwelcome in the left, making it small and weak and incapable of any strong resistance. The economic/financial elites recognized this and so have heaped support on the SSM movement. ..."

"...Hawaii is one of thirty-nine states that, by provisions in their state constitutions or in state laws, restrict marriage to one man and one woman. ..."

Story here, here, and here.

So a child doesn't need a mother and a father?!?

Isn’t it obvious that a child needs a mother and a father? I quietly separate myself from people that think otherwise.

"…that led the American Psychological Association (in 2005) to assert that the children of gay and lesbian parents are in no way disadvantaged, compared to the children of heterosexual parents, has concluded those studies were inadequate. According to Dr. Loren Marks, Associate Professor at Louisiana State University, who authored the analysis: “The available data, which are drawn from small convenience samples, are insufficient to support a strong generalizable claim...

…Those who knew that their mothers had had a lesbian relationship fared significantly worse on measures of educational attainment and household income, reported more depression, used marijuana more, more often reported forced sexual encounters…

…Those who knew their fathers had had a gay relationship were more likely to have been arrested, to have thought recently about suicide, to feel depressed, to report sexually transmitted diseases and to have experienced forced sex. …

…Twenty-three percent of young adults who knew their mother to have had a gay relationship reported being forced to have sexual contact with a parent or adult caregiver, while only 2 percent of intact families with a mother and father reported such contact. For female young adults, that figure leapt to 31 percent (while only 3 percent of young women from intact heterosexual families reported this). …

…What we should avoid at all costs is silencing such research and such discussion because it is seen by some as politically incorrect. Where optimizing the well-being of children is involved, no stone should be left unturned. …”

Story here and here.

APA influenced by MSM.

More info here.

Don't use the word "Dad" ?!?!?

Talk about bigotry and intolerance! A gay couple objects to the word "dad" in a guide for raising children, and ALL references to fathers and fatherhood are removed from that guide!?!

WOW!!! This is yet another example of the denial that is the cornerstone of the gay community. To deny that it takes a male and a female to create a child is insane. Yet this type of behavior is supported by those who fear being labeled "homophobic."

Is this not insanity? How is this NOT crazy? After God created Adam and Eve, it takes a male and a female to create a human life on this planet, yet some in the glbt community want this fact silenced. And I'm called a "bigot" for walking away from this? I'm "intolerant," or "homophobic," for my heteroseparatism?

I don't associate with people who deny the truth about gender differences.

Story here.

Worth a thousand words...

True marriage preserved in North Carolina.

There's sadness in gayville today. The voice of sexual sanity has been heard in North Carolina despite the classic overuse of the misnomer, "ban on gay marriage." A much more correct term would be,"State definition of marriage."

This makes me question the validity of the polls that show an ever-increasing support for the redefinition of marriage in the United States.

Wonderful story here.

Sexual sanity in Anchorage, Alaska.

This commercial is so quick, concise, and to-the-point that the homofascists already hate it. LOL!

Gays can't stifle the Eiffel.

France!? "Gay" Paree?? Taking a stand against homofascism? What the hell is going on here? Who would've thought that a stand for sexual sanity would come out of France?

A lesbian woman tried to adopt the daughter of her lesbian partner and was blocked by a very powerful court in the EU.

This is an incredible development for the liberal judges in the United States that worship all things European. I'm still reeling from this story.

Plain talk about true marriage.

The narcissism in the glbt community.

This video, by Dr. Sam Vaknin, hit my radar today, and I was stunned at some of the points he made that reveal the inner workings of the glbt mind. At 0:01:00, 0:03:02, and especially 0:05:30, Dr Vaknin reveals key points about what motivates the homosexual and “transsexual” mindset. Oh my God this guy has given my some powerful ammo in my fight against homofascism.

Gay "love" not enough for kids.

Once, in an online discussion, in an effort to pull him back into the realm of sexual sanity, I asked a homosexual what he would do if he found out that his male friend was having sex with a seven year old girl. To my horror, the homosexual responded that he would, “talk” to his friend to, “see what his reasoning was.”

I know what I would do if my best friend told me that he was having sex with a seven year old girl. I would tackle him and hold onto him until the local police took him into custody.

It really boggles my mind when I stop to think that there are people that actually believe that a same-sex household does NOT harm a child, or that the redefinition of marriage won’t harm children. What kind of a depraved mind can’t understand the concept of just how important a safe environment for children is?

Today I found a great article concerning sexual sanity and the safety of children...

“...Men and women bring diversity to parenting...Mothers and fathers simply are not interchangeable. Two women can both be good mothers, but neither can be a good father. ...”

“...children progress through predictable and necessary developmental stages. Some stages require more from a mother, while others require more from a father.”

“...if a young boy is to become a competent man, he must detach from his mother and instead identify with his father. A fatherless boy doesn’t have a man with whom to identify and is more likely to have trouble forming a healthy masculine identity.”

“...Overall, fathers play a restraining role in the lives of their children. They restrain sons from acting out antisocially, and daughters from acting out sexually. When there’s no father to perform this function, dire consequences often result both for the fatherless children and for the society in which these children act out their losses.”

“...Certainly homosexual couples can be just as loving as heterosexual couples, but children require more than love. They need the distinctive qualities and the complementary natures of a male and female parent. The accumulated wisdom of over 5,000 years has concluded that the ideal marital and parental configuration is composed of one man and one woman. Arrogantly disregarding such time-tested wisdom, and using children as guinea pigs in a radical experiment, is risky at best, and cataclysmic at worst.”

Complete, homofascist-crushing-article here.

Supreme Court's opinion on marriage.

Bombshell info at 0:01:50.

https://twitter.com/#!/lgbtfacts

Click here.

Even an anti-Christ bigot can understand this article.

“...The present law states: “marriage is a civil contract between a male and a female…” This same law also prohibits marriage to close-blood relations, a clear indication that the definition of marriage is related to bringing children into the world and the continuation of the human race. The legislation to redefine marriage, therefore, is not in the public interest. ...”

“...the state is recognizing the irreplaceable contribution that married couples make to society. Married couples who bring children into the world make particular sacrifices and take on unique risks and obligations for the good of society. For this reason the state has long understood that it has a compelling interest in recognizing and supporting these mothers and fathers through a distinct category of laws. Were the definition of marriage to change, there would be no special laws to support and recognize the irreplaceable contribution that these married couples make to society and to the common good by bringing to life the next generation. ...”

“...present law defining marriage as “a civil contract between a male and a female” is grounded not in faith, but in reason and the experience of society. It recognizes...the unique and irreplaceable potential of a man and woman to conceive and nurture new life...”

This well-written article is brief, to the point, and doesn’t contain any scriptures to frighten any anti-Christ bigots. But it does get across the point that redefining marriage is wrong. Just right for my blog.

Also, even if a man and woman who cannot have children marry, their marriage sets forth an example that is witnessed by children and, therefore, serves towards the good of humanity.

A libertarian view on same-sex "marriage."

“...In an interview with Reason TV, author and libertarian icon George Gilder explains why he opposes gay marriage: "The family is critical to raising civilized, creative, responsible people who can exploit and enjoy freedom." When asked how he is defining the family in this sense, Gilder responds: "Nuclear family, a man and woman and children."

When asked how he feels about New York legalizing gay marriage, he says: "I think it's a bad thing ... this whole idea that homosexuality resembled race in any respect is nonsense. The whole idea that male homosexuality resembles lesbianism in any respect is nonsense. And so this whole idea of gay marriage is just a parody. It's an absurd concept." He goes on to say later in the interview that "laws about marriage" make sense to him, even as a libertarian. ...”

More info here.

Santorum stumps young homofascists.

At 0:07:40, Rick Santorum gets to the meat of why marriage should not be redefined; redefining marriage will harm children by depriving them of their birthright to a married mother and father. Does the glbt community even care about harming children?

The reality of gender.

I remember the first time I was called a sexist” in college. I was taken aback at first but then I recovered quickly. There is a difference between men and women and those that want to ignore that fact are people that I don’t bother talking to anyway. Today I stumbled across an article that was written by a young woman in college who is being told that gender is nothing but an “oppressive” social construct.

It seems to me that the glbt community and the feminists hate the truth about gender differences.

“...The latest, and arguably most outrageous, plot by the Left is to eliminate people's need to identify themselves as either male or female. ...

...Faculty and students are forced to tolerate and accept lifestyles that they object to...

...Many campuses around the country are going back to single-sex dorms because co-ed dorms lead to more sexual promiscuity and binge drinking.

This issue of gender confusion is not unique to my campus. My friend Ashley attends a private Christian university in California, and she recalls the leader of her dormitory hall speaking about how separate male and female restrooms on campus make people uncomfortable. The dorm leader's argument—as is the argument of many liberals—was that male and female bathrooms force us to recognize our differences, thus creating a culture of inequality.

These ridiculous policies are being discussed and implemented in public schools all over the country. A high school in Michigan eliminated homecoming “kings” and “queens,” for fear of offending a transgendered student. At George Mason University, a man dressed in drag as a woman was elected homecoming queen. The school later eliminated the titles of “king” and “queen” and now uses the title “homecoming royalty” to avoid offending anyone who doesn’t identify as a male or female

...Men and women are different, but that does not make one better than the other. In fact, I believe our differences should be celebrated, not condemned.

In reality, people who are confused about their gender or sexual orientation are not victims of inequality. They are products of a sexually saturated society. ...”

Full article here.

StopCorruptingChildren.com

Click on this poster to see it better, and look closely at the sentences in the lower-left corner.

In some Canadian grade schools, parents do NOT have the option of excluding their children from anti-hetero classes.

Great info here.