Dumping Starbucks.

When I first heard about the dump Starbucks campaign I thought, Yeah right. As powerful as Starbucks is!

Now it looks like, not only is the "dump Starbucks" movement gaining traction, its gaining international traction.

I think that people are waking up to homofascism and fighting back. Are people getting tired of the glbt community's propaganda? Are people seeing through the misleading phrase "marriage equality," when the phrase should more accurately be "marriage redefining"?

More info here and here.

Supreme Court's opinion on marriage.

Bombshell info at 0:01:50.

Denying the reality of gender.

99.999999% of human beings are born either male or female. But there are those who want people to ignore this overwhelming fact. There are those who war against, "gender stereotypes."

I've noticed this predisposition in the glbt community; anyone who points out the differences between male and female will be attacked.

The parents of this boy hid the fact that he was a boy for the first five years of his life. Why? To avoid any "gender stereotypes."

I see a bisexual in the making.

"... Of (this) case, Dr Harold Koplewicz, a U.S. child psychiatrist, said he was ‘disturbed’ that well-meaning parents could be so misguided.

‘When children are born, they’re not a blank slate,’ he said. ‘We do have male brains and female brains. There’s a reason why boys do more rough and tumble play; there’s a reason why girls have better language development skills.’ ..."

Full story here.

A libertarian view on same-sex "marriage."

“...In an interview with Reason TV, author and libertarian icon George Gilder explains why he opposes gay marriage: "The family is critical to raising civilized, creative, responsible people who can exploit and enjoy freedom." When asked how he is defining the family in this sense, Gilder responds: "Nuclear family, a man and woman and children."

When asked how he feels about New York legalizing gay marriage, he says: "I think it's a bad thing ... this whole idea that homosexuality resembled race in any respect is nonsense. The whole idea that male homosexuality resembles lesbianism in any respect is nonsense. And so this whole idea of gay marriage is just a parody. It's an absurd concept." He goes on to say later in the interview that "laws about marriage" make sense to him, even as a libertarian. ...”

More info here.

From homosexuality to incest to twincest.

Who will be the first person to call me a "sibphobe" since I won't associate with a person who has sex with their sibling?

When sexual sanity is abandoned, children end up paying the price. And, from what I can tell so far, it looks like incest may be the stage between homosexuality and pedophilia.

“...December 19, 2011 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Twenty years ago when advocates of homosexuality were arguing for acceptance of gay sex, their opponents warned that it would lead to pedophilia and incest. Such whistle blowers were labeled as bigots, haters and worse, and laughed into silence.

However, the warnings are coming true. While incest may not yet be legal on the books, there is increasing pressure to legitimize it. The following video, which has gone viral on YouTube, might legitimately be seen a part of the conditioning process leading to such legitimization. It features a high school prank where blindfolded teens are asked to guess who kissed them. Turns out it was their own father or mother. ...”

My inspiration for this post can be found in the comments section of this web page.

The reality of gender.

I remember the first time I was called a sexist” in college. I was taken aback at first but then I recovered quickly. There is a difference between men and women and those that want to ignore that fact are people that I don’t bother talking to anyway. Today I stumbled across an article that was written by a young woman in college who is being told that gender is nothing but an “oppressive” social construct.

It seems to me that the glbt community and the feminists hate the truth about gender differences.

“...The latest, and arguably most outrageous, plot by the Left is to eliminate people's need to identify themselves as either male or female. ...

...Faculty and students are forced to tolerate and accept lifestyles that they object to...

...Many campuses around the country are going back to single-sex dorms because co-ed dorms lead to more sexual promiscuity and binge drinking.

This issue of gender confusion is not unique to my campus. My friend Ashley attends a private Christian university in California, and she recalls the leader of her dormitory hall speaking about how separate male and female restrooms on campus make people uncomfortable. The dorm leader's argument—as is the argument of many liberals—was that male and female bathrooms force us to recognize our differences, thus creating a culture of inequality.

These ridiculous policies are being discussed and implemented in public schools all over the country. A high school in Michigan eliminated homecoming “kings” and “queens,” for fear of offending a transgendered student. At George Mason University, a man dressed in drag as a woman was elected homecoming queen. The school later eliminated the titles of “king” and “queen” and now uses the title “homecoming royalty” to avoid offending anyone who doesn’t identify as a male or female

...Men and women are different, but that does not make one better than the other. In fact, I believe our differences should be celebrated, not condemned.

In reality, people who are confused about their gender or sexual orientation are not victims of inequality. They are products of a sexually saturated society. ...”

Full article here.

The glbt and feminist war on masculinity.

There is a definite link between women who are uncomfortable with strong independent men, and how a boy develops into a homosexual.

When a boy is born to a woman who is full of anger towards men, in many instances, the woman removes the boy's father from his life, and raises the boy in an environment where masculinity is constantly denigrated. This creates an environment from which effeminate homosexuals develop.

Before I was married, if a woman I was dating copped an attitude when I opened a door for her, or if she forbade her son from playing with toy guns, I quietly faded from that woman's life. Having worked with arch-feminists for eight years, I developed effective tactics to deal with feminist contempt.

“...What it says is that my worry that Ms. Lyons might be expressing her own discomfort with masculinity and projecting it onto her son—and mine, and yours—seems to have been justified.

It says that Lyons does seem to have been promulgating her perspectives on gender roles having no value.

It says that she was, indeed, apparently using J. Crew—a brand so many of our kids gravitate toward—as her launching pad for a mini-campaign to change the way our kids think about their bodies and their gender identities.

See, I don’t think it’s so terrible that boys are different than girls. I think it’s just fine, in fact, that a central supporting beam of the architecture of most boys’ senses of self is that they look like boys and act like boys and feel like boys. I don’t think that’s pathological. But I think that Jenna Lyons—and maybe J. Crew—would disagree with me. ...”

Complete article here.

Hetero pride in Brazil.

Apparently, some gay groups are upset at a "heterosexual day" in Brazil. If a heterosexual were to be upset at a "gay" event, he would be called, "homophobic." So what do you call gays that are upset by a heterosexual event?

"...Unlike the March for Jesus, usually held three days before the annual homosexual march, the Gay Parade is frequently marred by violence between participants, according to Brazilian homosexual news outlets.

Homosexual marchers at the event routinely report numerous robberies and thefts, mostly of cameras, cell phones, and wallets. Drug abuse is “explicit” according to the newspaper Folha de Sao Paulo, particularly the use of the aphrodisiac drug “ecstasy”...."

Info here.

Y.A.H.I. (YAW-he)

<---These people want to redefine marriage, but the glbt community won't support them. Wait...hold on a minute. Waaa? Weren't the polygamists the first social group that wanted to redefine marriage in the United States of America? Is this yet another homofascist inconsistency? A "yahi"?

"...Pro-family activists have long warned that redefining marriage to include two men or two women would inevitably lead to legalized polygamy, with polygamists employing the “equality” and “consensual” rhetoric of the gay rights movement. However, gay rights commentators immediately distanced themselves from the polygamists’ suit, with one prominent commentator calling it “a political gift to anti-gay groups nationwide.”..."

Yahi story here.

More gender denial.

Well. Here it is again. People denying the obvious differences between the human male and the human female. American culture is taking yet another step away from sexual sanity and teaching children that they are the gender that they think they are, regardless of what's between their legs.

Where do I buy stock in a company that provides materials and curriculum for homeschooling because, when more people find out about what's being taught to their kids, homeschooling is going to explode.

"Genderealist"

Just like I constructed the word "heteroseparatist" to free those who embrace sexual normalcy from being marginalized, I created the word "genderealist" to counteract the derisive term "heterosexist." (How crazy are human beings going to become in my lifetime?!)

A couple in Canada are refusing to tell anyone the gender of their child. Wow. Okay.

Now, these people have every right to withhold this information from people, and I'm not disputing their parental rights to do so, but why would they do this? Is this the kind of World that gays, feminists, and liberals want? Is ignoring gender the tie that binds the gays and the feminists? What's next? Will I be thrown in jail for saying "Miss" or "Sir" in the future? Am I going to live the life of Harrison Bergeron?

Story here and here.

MSM and SSM bring GSA? OMG! WT...

Well here it is. The new way to say "incest" is now "GSA." Genetic Sexual Attraction. Ironically, GSA also stands for Gay Straight Alliance! (If I weren't so jaded, I would throw up!) The term reminds me of how some homophiles will call their sexual relations with little boys, "male intergenerational intimacy." HomoOrwellianism at its finest!

Now, the loss of sexual sanity that was spearheaded by the glbt community has begun to devolve into its next incarnation; sexual relationships between blood relatives. I suppose I should prepare myself to be slandered by the word "siblingphobe" in the (near?) future for my refusal to support marriage between blood relatives. After all, I covered how sterile siblings could use the exact same arguments of the glbt community in my manifesto.

"...Furthermore, stigmatizing GSA is only going to cause incest advocates to adopt it as a pet cause, like the individual behind the website Full Marriage Equality, which both supports gay marriage AND incest – a conflation any gay marriage advocate would be smacking themselves in the head over. A blog post on the Full Marriage Equality site goes so far as to congratulate Lawrence and her father on their happy relationship, saying, “They are consenting adults who should be allowed to marry…. We wish them the best as a consanguinarmorous couple and family.”..."

"Consanguinarmorous" (I think that the first "r" doesn't belong) story here and here.

Loss of sexual sanity in the United Kingdom.

When any nation or people abandons the laws of sexual conduct handed down to humanity by the Word of God, children are, eventually, sexually abused.

"...called “Too Much, Too Young,” unmasks the extremely explicit nature of sex education material that public groups are pushing on school children as young as five-year-olds. Among other things, the controversial resources teach youngsters about oral and anal sex, as well as prostitution, masturbation, and “straight and gay,” and include explicit depictions and descriptions of sexual intercourse, as well as real footage of full-frontal adult nudity."

Story here.

Princess... boy?

I'm quite upset that I didn't get to this story in a timely manner; it's the same old story of getting overwhelmed by work. Anyhow, here is, yet again, a boy who may develop into a homosexual because his Godless parents don't have the moral common sense to tell him that it is wrong for a boy to dress like a girl, or that he cannot ever be a girl. This is how effeminate homosexuals start off; by overrelating to girls and then wanting to be girls.

What happened to sexual sanity on planet Earth? I see and hear about mothers in my country telling their daughters to be, "strong and independent," yet this mother is allowing her son to be a "princess." Not only that, the glbt community is celebrating this woman's "tolerance." I never thought that I would live in a society where masculinity was practically forbidden. Story here.

Urine on "diversity" at Harvard University.

I don't support whoever vandalized the books on glbt issues at Harvard University. Everyone has the right to free speech in my country, including those who serve the Lord Jesus Christ.

I do however understand this backlash against perceived homofascism. This is a case of someone with understandable angst, but inappropriate behavior. (Like the entire glbt community.) What gets me is; how can someone be smart enough to be attending Harvard, yet dumb enough to (probably) use and leave their own DNA to commit a hate crime like this? Story here.

Will boy-toy Choi get to deploy?

Looks like DADT is going to die with, reportedly, 70% of American service members being okay with homosexuality.

Also, yet again, the differences between race, gender, and sexual conduct have been wrongly fused together in the minds of the undiscerning and the hearts of the brainwashed. Once again, perverted, sinful behavior has been equated to the morally-benign color of a person's skin. Once again, a man who doesn't want to be homosexually harassed in his military bunk or shower will be dismissed as "homophobic."

Will military personnel in "open" marriages be able to sleep around now? How can adultery remain forbidden in the UCMJ if open homosexuality is allowed, since some people are okay with open marriages?

Article here.

What gays want to teach children.

The glbt community is constantly crying out about just wanting to be treated with dignity and respect, and then turn around and force a classroom of kindergartners to view a film glorifying homosexuality without the consent or knowledge of their parents. This is the dark side of homofascism that I specialize in exposing.

"...children as young as kindergarten were being subjected to pro-LGBT films and instruction, with no notice or opportunity to opt out."

"...the film "Straightlaced," which extols homosexuality and transsexuality while attacking gender norms, was shown to Vallejo high school students this past Friday with no advance notice to parents."

Is this what the glbt community wants? Unfettered access to other people's children? Would gay "parents" tolerate people approaching their children without their consent? What would happen if a pro-Christianity film were shown to the children of gay "parents," in grade school, without any parental consent? How would the gay community react to that? Would the glbt parents be called, "Anti-Christ," for objecting to a Christian end-run around their parental rights? How come gays can do anything they want to children and still be protected?

My evidence is here.

Straight pride.

Why is it that offending gays is the only concern of some school administrations? "Gay Pride" activities and advertisements offend many people, yet any complaints about homosexual propaganda are just dismissed as "homophobia."

A group of kids decided to wear "Straight Pride" t-shirts at their school and met with resistance from their school. Why is it okay for a student to be proud to be gay, but not okay for a student to be proud to be straight? Info here.

Goodbye Amazon.com!!

You can bet that the CEO of Border's Books is doing some kind of happy dance right now due to all of the increased business that they're going to receive.

Just as Amazon.com has the right to offer a book that is a how-to guide for adult-on-child sexual contact, people have the right to never do business with Amazon.com ever again. I can't imagine ever doing business with them again. This is the kind of thing that happens when people don't want to be "judgemental," and turn their back on Biblical sexual boundaries.

An evil, wicked man named Phillip Greaves has written this book. Story here.

Michigan assistant attorney general fired.

To speak out against homofascism is one thing, but to harass someone for being gay is wrong. Going to a person's house at 1:30am to harass them for being gay is, very probably, what got this guy fired. Story here.