Homosexual couple seducing underage boys.

Very few homosexuals were NOT seduced into homosexuality by an older homosexual. Gay men are made, and not born with same sex attraction. Same sex attraction comes from an evil, sexual seduction of an underdeveloped heart and mind.

“… Police in South St. Paul, Minnesota, have revealed that a homosexual elementary-school teacher and his “husband” sexually abused eight underage boys since at least 2013, according to a report released Tuesday.

…Aric Babbitt, 40, and Matthew Deyo, 36, came to the attention of local authorities Aug. 14 after a 16-year-old former student of Babbitt’s revealed an “ongoing sexual relationship” with the two men to his parents…

…Babbitt and Deyo died 10 days later in a murder-suicide.

Babbitt, a teacher at Lincoln Center Elementary since 2002, was put on paid leave Aug. 17 after news of the allegations became public. Police collected a large amount of evidence from the pair’s home during an Aug. 16 search, including photos and videos on phones, computers and media devices. Secret video from a camera hidden in a bathroom clock also contained evidence of their crimes as well as clues that led to other victims.

The first accuser said Babbitt, his former elementary-school teacher, served as his volunteer-work supervisor and had become his mentor when he came out to his parents as homosexual. Babbit gave him gifts of underwear and yoga shorts and requested images of the boy before he turned 16. Following his birthday, the pair asked to take him to a jazz concert but instead took him to a Minneapolis hotel where they provided him with alcohol, marijuana and had unprotected sex with the teen. He was told to “keep this our little secret.”

Other boys described being plied with alcohol and marijuana at Babbitt’s and Deyo’s home, Babbitt’s family cabin and Deyo’s parents’ farm before “it got weird.”

Videos show Babbitt filming himself masturbating in a school bathroom and in his empty classroom, near a student’s desk.

Text messages between the two men revealed the planning that went into their abuse of the boys.

Babbitt, referencing a boy staying overnight, texted Deyo: “Make sure the alarm clock [containing the hidden camera] ends up somewhere good. I was going to surprise (victim) with hot tub … in case it improves chances of skinny dip.”

…On Aug. 16, the men drained their bank accounts, purchased $860 in camping gear on a credit card and went on the run.

The couple was found dead on Aug. 25 on a beach on Lopez Island in northwest Washington state, having died the previous day in a shotgun murder-suicide, ruled the local coroner. Deyo killed Babbitt before turning the weapon on himself, according to the report.

…they had decided to “choose our own destinies rather than experience the embarrassment, ridicule, hatred and inevitable loss of freedom that the justice system would give.”

More, well-written info here and here.

A "marriage" between three men.

Couldn’t it be considered bigotry to say that marriage is between two people? What if a woman wants to marry her boyfriend and her horse? Who is to say that she is wrong? What about her constitutional right to pursue happiness? This is why God defined marriage. God knows what He’s doing.

“… “Love occurs unconditionally and is not limited to only two people,” Art wrote on Facebook. “Love brings peace to the world.”

But after this month’s report out of Thailand, some Christians are noting the inevitable slippery slope that they have stated would result if society deviated from God’s creation order.

“The events in Thailand simply confirm what we’ve been saying all this time: If marriage is no longer the union of one man and one woman, then it can be anything: Two men, two women, three men, three women, or an almost infinite number of other possibilities,” Dr. Michael Brown wrote for Charisma News.

…He noted that the situation demonstrates how mankind has made up its own rules along the way in an attempt to legitimize and justify what a particular person wants. Since homosexuals have stated that marriage should be defined as the union of two people who have feelings for each other, regardless of gender, where does the rule about two people come from?

“If a gay activist says, ‘But marriage is the loving, long-term commitment of two people,’ the answer is simple: ‘Says who? That’s just your new definition. Where did you get the idea it was two people if not from its historic, natural meaning?'” Brown explained. “And so, if I’m ‘bigoted’ because I don’t recognize same-sex ‘marriage,’ then gay activists (and their allies) are just as ‘bigoted’ if they don’t recognize three men (or women) ‘marrying.’

“Those who have taken down the fence of marriage as God intended it have opened up a Pandora’s Box of possibilities,” he said, “none of them good.” …”

Full story here.

Elton John admits that he's harming his child.

I wanted to post this story about a week and a half ago, but my work schedule and the Chick-fil-A episode have prevented me from doing so.

It is wrong to deprive a child of a parent through one's own sexual actions or "orientation." If you're going to live the single life, or the gay life, or a life that embraces any other sexual sin... leave kids alone!

Vile homofascists celebrating death of Chick-fil-A spokesman.

If just one person calling themselves a Christian were to celebrate the death of a homosexual or a homofascist, the glbt community would go wild with cries of, "hatred!," "homophobia!," and "intolerance!"

Yet some of those who support the redefinition of marriage are celebrating the sudden death of Don Perry, the chief spokesman of Chick-fil-A.

Now that's hatred.

Story here.

The risks of having lesbian "mothers."

Supporting info here.

Dumping Starbucks.

When I first heard about the dump Starbucks campaign I thought, Yeah right. As powerful as Starbucks is!

Now it looks like, not only is the "dump Starbucks" movement gaining traction, its gaining international traction.

I think that people are waking up to homofascism and fighting back. Are people getting tired of the glbt community's propaganda? Are people seeing through the misleading phrase "marriage equality," when the phrase should more accurately be "marriage redefining"?

More info here and here.

How same-sex "marriage" affects those that stand for true marriage.

On YouTube, there are people that support the firing of this man. These same people would be up in arms if a man were fired for being gay, or if a man was fired for tweeting his support for the redefinition of marriage.

Do gays hate hate-free free speech?

Anything that the glbt community and their worshippers don't want to hear, no matter how non-violent it is, is labeled "hate." Any speech that gays hate is labeled "hate-speech." How ironic. Story here.

Look at 0:01:27 of this video.

Although same-sex "marriage" won't stop children from being born as one man in this video states, defining marriage as being between one man and one woman doesn't violate the civil rights of anyone. "Marriage equality" already exists due to the fact that everyone has the same right to marry one member of the opposite sex that I do.

Also, look at the homofascist in the red t-shirt snatch away the sign of the true marriage supporter, at 1:27. Is it my imagination, or is it true that homofascists only attack people that look like they can't defend themselves?

Y.A.H.I. (YAW-he)

<---These people want to redefine marriage, but the glbt community won't support them. Wait...hold on a minute. Waaa? Weren't the polygamists the first social group that wanted to redefine marriage in the United States of America? Is this yet another homofascist inconsistency? A "yahi"?

"...Pro-family activists have long warned that redefining marriage to include two men or two women would inevitably lead to legalized polygamy, with polygamists employing the “equality” and “consensual” rhetoric of the gay rights movement. However, gay rights commentators immediately distanced themselves from the polygamists’ suit, with one prominent commentator calling it “a political gift to anti-gay groups nationwide.”..."

Yahi story here.

A robbery in New York.

So what's new about a robbery in New York you say? The sheer scale of this robbery.

Every registered voter in the state of New York was robbed of their right to vote on the definition of marriage in their state. Not only that, the robbers were so smooth that there are some that approve of this attack on democracy.

"... "The people of New York were robbed of the right to vote directly on this issue, and the legislature forced this on the state," he tells OneNewsNow. "And really, the blame lies with the Republican Party -- for those four Republicans deciding to abandon the principles of the Republican Party and betray their voters. That's what happened, and they're going to be held accountable."

"The poll shows that 57 percent of New York voters believe marriage should be defined only as one man and one woman," says Gallagher, "and that in addition, the vast majority -- I think it was close to 60 percent -- said that they think the people of New York should have the right to decide this issue, not the legislature." ..."

Story here.

The difference between race and homosexuality.

A person's sexuality can change; there are ex-gays in this world. Gender and skin color are innate, but, in the wrong circumstances, a person's sexuality can change from it's normal state.

Homofascists are now intentionally trampling the civil rights of parents by telling children in public schools that homosexuality is innate, WITHOUT parental consent. The African-American civil-rights movement didn't go after people's children behind the backs of their parents.

The gay Empire Strikes Back.

<---HomoSith Judges Vaughn Walker (seated) and James Ware.

The first sentence that came to my mind when Judge James Ware upheld Judge Vaughn Walker's self-serving prop 8 ruling was...

"So this is how liberty dies. With thunderous applause." -Padme Amidala/Episode III

Once again, the false comparison between race, gender, and sexual sin has eclipsed the fact that Judge Walker stood to gain personally from his decision to throw out the legal votes of over seven million Californians.

"...In his 19-page decision — a response to the first attempt in the nation to disqualify a judge based on sexual orientation — Ware had a bigger message. Gay judges, he said, are just like minority and female jurists: They can be impartial, too, even in cases that might affect them. .."

Homosexuality is a state of mind/emotion, and membership in the glbt community is voluntary, it is not innate like the gender and skin color that comes with birth. Although homosexuality is not an overnight choice, being "gay" is a matter of choice; the end result of a series of choices, like heroin addiction. Although I recognize that a heroin addict has all of the same civil rights that I do, I will not support the lifestyle of a heroin addict as I do not support the glbt community. Nor do I hate the heroin addict since I know how they became an addict.

Seeing homosexuality as innate is where Judge Ware(-is-his-common-sense!) got it wrong. Info here.

Polygamous Federal Judge redefines marriage.

If you replace the word "gay" with "polygamous," how wrong it would be if a Federal judge that was in a sexual, romantic relationship with multiple women, threw out a majority vote that defined marriage as being between one man and one woman, right before his retirement?

How long would his decision stand since he clearly benefits from his own judicial decision? Would I be called "polyphobic" for speaking out against his obvious misconduct? Weren't the Mormons stopped from practicing polygamy by the American law the defines marriage as being between one man and one woman? Do the members of the glbt community consider themselves above the law?

Story here and here.

Homofascists attack N.Y. State Senator Ruben Diaz.

Homosexual activists want to kill him and "sexually assault" his daughter because New York State Senator Ruben Diaz stands for Jesus Christ's definition of marriage; which is between one man and one woman.

How is this not homofascism? How is this not homointolerance? What kind of a society do I live in where a man's life and daughter are threatened because of his stand for sexual sanity? What percentage of the glbt community supports the murder of Senator Diaz and the sexual assault of his daughter?

“...The entire campaign to enact same-sex marriage is conducted under a banner of acceptance, and equality and respect for others,” Barnes continued. “Yet behind that banner of tolerance is another campaign – of intimidation, threats and ugliness. What at first appears to be simple juvenile behavior by a few is becoming a culture and climate of abusiveness toward those who disagree. ..”

Story here.

You like true marriage? Your fired!

I haven't heard of anyone being fired for supporting the redefinition of marriage, yet I do hear of people being fired and harassed for supporting God's definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman.

Oh but wait! It's Canada where homofascism was legitimized by legalizing same-sex "marriage." The members of the glbt community want me to believe that legalizing homosexual "marriage" in my country won't affect my marriage, and then I read this. If I'm fired for standing for true marriage, won't that adversely effect mine?

The Peter Vidmar case.

How does gay "marriage" affect mine? I could get fired for supporting true marriage. Story here and (as of 17 May 2011) here.

What if he was a polygamous judge?

Do I have the same right that "gay activists" do when it comes to word-replacement-arguments?

What if Judge Walker believed in polygamy, was in a long term sexual relationship with multiple women, was about to retire, and worked in Salt Lake City, Utah?

If, under the above mentioned conditions, he then threw out a Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as being between one man and one woman... how would his actions be seen? Wouldn't the personal gain of his decision be an obvious disqualifier?

“It is important to emphasize at the outset that we are not suggesting that a gay or lesbian judge could not sit on this case,” the group’s attorneys said in their motion, which was submitted to the district court. “Rather, our submission is grounded in the fundamental principle, reiterated in the governing statute, that no judge ‘is permitted to try cases where he has an interest in the outcome.’ ”

My supporting evidence is here.

Liberals and same-sex "marriage."

The man's argument could be better, but he still makes some valid points about the redefinition of marriage. Especially about how interracial marriage always existed, and homosexual "marriage" never has.

Judge Vaughn Walker is going down on...

...the issue of the personal gain of his own court ruling.

Lets go over the common-sense viewpoint again; A homosexual judge in a 10-year, sexual relationship with another man, and is about to retire from the bench, throws out the legal, 52% of the vote that defines marriage as being between one man and one woman. In the city of San Francisco. Okay. Wow. The prosecution rests.

Exhibit A is here. Exhibit B is here.