So voting on marriage is okay now??

What happened?  I thought that voting on the definition of marriage was unconstitutional?  That's what the homofascists say in California.

So why is it that the gays are celebrating now in other states where voters have redefined marriage?  Are they celebrating the coming legal persecution of Christian business that will be fined or closed for their refusal to comply with sexual perversion? Are they celebrating the intentional deprivation of a mother or a father from a child's life?

Oh I get it!  A vote on the definition of marriage is ONLY valid if the glbt community agrees with that vote!  Wow.  Silly me.  Can a heterosexual federal judge now throw out the votes that support the redefinition of marriage?  How would the gay community react to that?

Info here.

Hatred FROM those who cry,"Hater!"

Gay propaganda is loosing traction. People are starting to see through homofascist propaganda. Info here.

Vile homofascists celebrating death of Chick-fil-A spokesman.

If just one person calling themselves a Christian were to celebrate the death of a homosexual or a homofascist, the glbt community would go wild with cries of, "hatred!," "homophobia!," and "intolerance!"

Yet some of those who support the redefinition of marriage are celebrating the sudden death of Don Perry, the chief spokesman of Chick-fil-A.

Now that's hatred.

Story here.

Y.A.H.I. (YAW-he)

<---These people want to redefine marriage, but the glbt community won't support them. Wait...hold on a minute. Waaa? Weren't the polygamists the first social group that wanted to redefine marriage in the United States of America? Is this yet another homofascist inconsistency? A "yahi"?

"...Pro-family activists have long warned that redefining marriage to include two men or two women would inevitably lead to legalized polygamy, with polygamists employing the “equality” and “consensual” rhetoric of the gay rights movement. However, gay rights commentators immediately distanced themselves from the polygamists’ suit, with one prominent commentator calling it “a political gift to anti-gay groups nationwide.”..."

Yahi story here.

Classic homointolerance.

This is a classic example of the, support-homosexuality-or-else mindset of most of the glbt community. If the situation was reversed, and someone attacked an anti-Christ, pro-gay banner, they would be tackled to the ground by police. I'll bet that the homofascist attacker is never prosecuted for his actions either, like an "anti-gay" person would be if the situation was reversed.

If, twenty-five years ago, someone had taken me to into the future and shown me this event, I would've thought, Why is this group stating the obvious about marriage? And, Is this guy (the attacker) some sort of deranged polygamist or something?

More info here.

"Don't say gay" to gradeschoolers.

Whenever I ask someone who belongs to the glbt community to denounce how some in the gay community want to speak to children about entering their lifestyle, without the consent of that child's parents, they almost always go ballistic.

Then they come at me with an avalanche of propaganda designed to distract me from the fact that they won't disavow the glbt violation of the civil rights of some parents. How odd. How strange. It seems that homopocrisy runs very deep. How did I wake up in a country where a person would openly admit their desire to pull children into homosexuality? If a person is born gay, they will still be gay when they are 18, so why do some gays insist on access to children without parental consent?

Well. It looks like Tennessee is waking up to reality and taking a stand against those who would come at children behind the backs of their parents about sexual matters. How could any sane person have a problem with that? Doesn't a person prove that they are a danger to children when they support doing an end-run around the civil rights of that child's parents? WHO CAN DISPUTE THAT?

Story here.

Apple supports formerhomophobia.

"...Clearly, Change.org and groups like it don’t care about that. They simply want to eradicate any speech that critiques their way of life, however gently and respectfully, and they will do or say almost anything to get their way - all in the name of tolerance!..."

More info here.

homopocrisy

homopocrisy:

The state of mind of a homofascist person who will not hesitate to violate the civil rights of a person that they perceive to be "anti-gay," "homophobic," or "intolerant."

Mark Leno's SB 48 vs parental rights.

I've covered this dude before. Looks like he's still trying to do a legal, end-run around parental rights with SB 48.

I've noticed that gay "parents" demand that their parental rights be respected, and would go ballistic if they found out that Christianity was being taught to their children without their consent, and then turn around and support trampling on the rights of Christian or "anti-gay" parents by supporting legislation like SB 48. The homopocrisy of some in the glbt community never ceases to amaze and inspire me.

In the entire history of my website/blog, only one homosexual has accepted my challenge to refrain from speaking to children about homosexuality without the consent of that child's parents, when I can easily refrain from talking to a child about Christianity without parental consent. What does that say about the glbt community?