Christian parents' rights outlawed in California's public schools.

As of today, with Governor Jerry Brown's signing of SB 48 into law, a parent who has a child in the public school system in California, can NOT exclude their child from a class in which homosexuality is portrayed as a normal sexual activity.

The violation of the parental rights of those who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community is now legal in California's public schools.

Also, it is now illegal to say anything "negative" about homosexuality in California's public school system. This very blog is now illegal in California's public schools. A Bible is now illegal in CA's schools. Quoting scripture from the Bible that tells the truth about homosexual sin is now illegal in Homofornia's public schools. Is the word,"heteroseparatist," now illegal in the Golden State's public schools too?

Who can deny that SB 48 violates the parental rights of those who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community? Is there anyone out there who is so crazy that they think that this legal trampling of the civil rights of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim parents is a good thing?

Today, 14 July 2011, homofascism has been embraced by California's government. My supporting info is here. <---The 6000+ comments on this story that were 96% pro-hetero were removed by the San Francisco-based (go figure!) software company DISQUS.

(Info on home-schooling is here.)

Will parental rights be outlawed by gays in California's Government?

Since when did a person's sexual activities become a part of teachable history? Is it important for California's schoolchildren to know what historical figures did in bed? Why do some people want children to be taught about the sexual activities of adults, outside of the normal process of where babies come from?

How is it wrong for parents to want to opt their children out of classes that teach non-reproductive sexual acts to their children? Who in their right mind would want to outlaw parental rights? Can't anti-bullying classes be taught to children without glorifying homosexuality? Are the glbt community and their worshippers so far gone that they support the trampling of the parental rights of Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others that won't support the sexual activities of the gay community?

Will I ever stop asking questions and post a link to my supporting info?

How SB 48 tramples parental rights.

SB 48 is a Trojan horse that will violate the civil rights of parents who don't support the sexual activities of glbt community. How can this be? What would the gay community do if a Christian Senator in California tried to legislate lessons concerning Christian principles to the children of gay "parents" that trampled their right to parental notification/consent? My supporting evidence is here.

Gender Permanence.

Great facts are given in this video. The fact that SB 48 has, "...seriously flawed thinking." How only 8 out of 100,000 people reject their own genitals. And the term,"gender permanence." I love it!

The hidden danger of SB 48.

As usual... race, gender, and sexual conduct are put in the same category by a homosexual. How more people don't see through this homoganda amazes me sometimes. Then, Senator Mark Leno says that glbt people are excluded from history books. Really? How does he know that? Why does he want a persons sexual behavior to be spotlighted? Shouldn't a person keep their sexual activities private?

I DO support anti-bullying for all children, but there has to be a better way than making the glorification of sexual sin mandatory learning in the classrooms of schoolchildren. Few people know that a discrimination-against-"gender-identity" clause/provision is in SB 48, which means that a boy who wants to be considered a girl cannot be prevented from using the girl's bathroom, in a California grade school, if SB 48 is made into a law. That's crazy.

SB 48.

Even while they cry..."Gay rights! Gay rights! Gay civil rights!" ...the glbt community doesn't even deny their desire to trample the rights of parents who won't support their sexual conduct. Thanks to this type of behavior, more and more people are starting to see through homosexual propaganda.

The talking heads of the "gay rights" movement will preach that gay people just want to be treated with respect, which is a very reasonable point-of-view, but then turn around and support laws that trample the rights of parents to protect their children.

"...The homosexual movement sees SB48 not only as a model for legislation across the country, but as a way to force homosexuality and transgenderism past parents into the minds of children. .."

My facts are here.

Homosexual "marriage"? How cute!

Look at how sweet and innocent the cover of this vile book is. It's like the marketing design of a box of candy.

Look at the light blue background and the innocent, cute little birds. Look at how the strings that hold up the sign rise up and out of view as if God himself is holding them. Look at the smiling, clean shaven faces of the homosexuals holding hands. Observe the free-floating balloons that defy the laws of physics just to be near the two well-dressed sodomites. See how the little boy is dressed the same way as the men, yet his jacket is a lighter color. Will he be awarded a black jacket when he graduates to anal intercourse like the gay men have? And why is the guy in the glasses looking at the little boy's butt instead of looking at the guy he's "marrying"?

Why is the little boy pointing up like that and smiling even broader than the 44-times-more-likely-to-contract-AIDS men? Is he pointing up as if to say, "Hey there fellow child! I've got something fun to tell you about!"?

My God this is sad.

Mark Leno's SB 48 vs parental rights.

I've covered this dude before. Looks like he's still trying to do a legal, end-run around parental rights with SB 48.

I've noticed that gay "parents" demand that their parental rights be respected, and would go ballistic if they found out that Christianity was being taught to their children without their consent, and then turn around and support trampling on the rights of Christian or "anti-gay" parents by supporting legislation like SB 48. The homopocrisy of some in the glbt community never ceases to amaze and inspire me.

In the entire history of my website/blog, only one homosexual has accepted my challenge to refrain from speaking to children about homosexuality without the consent of that child's parents, when I can easily refrain from talking to a child about Christianity without parental consent. What does that say about the glbt community?

SB 543: The LEGAL, glbt pursuit of children.

I'm stunned by this story.

Democratic Senator Mark Leno from San Francisco (where else), wants to make a law that prevents a parent from knowing if their, 12-year-old child is being "counseled" by their school about their desire to enter the glbt community.

"Current parental consent requirements for mental health services create a barrier to treatment that is especially harmful to LGBT youth who may be put at risk of emotional or physical abuse by coming out to their parents prematurely or without support."

From what I've heard, a child can call the police or child-protective-services on their own parents in the case of emotional or physical abuse. Also, if people are truly "born gay," as many homofascists and homoappeasers would have people believe, then why are some anti-hetero types so desperate to approach children without the knowledge or consent of that child's parents? I mean, if they are "born gay," won't the "gay" still be there when they're 18?

What would happen if Christians wanted to approach the 12-year-old children of gays without the knowledge or consent of their parents? How would the glbt community react to that?

Get a container to vomit in before clicking here and here.