See YouTube-banned video about Harvey Milk on "Harvey Milk Day."

I know that all homosexuals aren’t child-molesters, and I understand that most gays, would never harm a child. Yet, on the other hand, I also understand that the majority of gay men were seduced into the glbt community while being told that their sexual contact was an act of love.

To gauge their level of respect for the civil rights of others, I sometimes ask gays if encouraging a child INTO the glbt community, without the consent of that child’s parent, is okay. The answer, or lack thereof, tells me whether or not I’m dealing with a homofascist, since a person who doesn’t respect the parental rights of another is a clear danger to children.

“...“Homosexual activists didn’t like the truth that was in the video; they complained to YouTube and YouTube’s committee yanked it,” Thomasson said. “They did the bidding of the homosexual activists and apparently don’t do their research and all of these are true facts.”

“People around the world – they’re getting a one-sided and biased, incorrect picture of Harvey Milk. Harvey Milk is being called a hero and a role model. Actually, he was a sexual predator,” Thomasson said.

“It doesn’t show all of the young boyfriends Harvey Milk had. It made him look like he had only one steady, older boyfriend. It doesn’t talk about all of the boyfriends who went and killed themselves because they got AIDS and so forth,” Thomasson said.

“They don’t want the truth told about the lifestyle, about the unhealthiness of it. They continue to introduce bills that promote the lifestyle, especially Senate Bill 48 that forces schools to promote homosexual and transgendered figures and prohibits anyone talking about them in a way that affects them adversely,” England said.

“So we’re calling on parents to visit SaveCalifornia.com and get informed and keep your child home from the government and get a taste of academic freedom and opt out of all eight of California’s homosexual indoctrination laws.” Thomasson said. ...”

Original, extended info here.

"Gender liberation."

What a way to start 2012!

The glbt community used to scoff at and ridicule people who would say that they were after children. Now, the gay community doesn't even try to hide their efforts to circumvent the parental civil rights of those who don't think that homosexuality is normal.

The highlighting in red below is my doing.

“...“In other words,” Tyler explains of what “gender liberation” means, “male-female distinctions must be eliminated in order to ‘liberate’ children from unnecessary ‘stereotypes.’ This is not a movement seeking ‘equal rights,’ but a movement seeking to obliterate our God-given distinctions between male and female.” ...”

“...SB 543, signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010, “allows school staff to remove children ages 12 and up from government schools and taken off-campus for counseling sessions, without parental permission or involvement. The purpose is to permit pro-homosexuality teachers and administrators to remove sexually confused children in 6th grade and up from campus and take them to pro-homosexuality counselors who will encourage them to embrace the homosexual lifestyle.” ...”

“...Said the email, according to Thomasson, “You were right: Our daughter was told she had to attend a gay straight alliance rally to honor Harvey Milk. … She shared she was a Christian with the teacher and only after she saw Lauren was clearly upset about going to this rally did she issue her a hall pass. She was persecuted by another student but made it out of the class. I picked up her and she was very upset. How many other Christians were forced to go to this rally?” ...”

“... “Parents, realize there was NO advance parental notification of this happening or the opportunity to opt out your children. Even more, realize there was no parent permission sought, no opt-in form to sign. No, Harvey Milk sexual indoctrination, and other sexual indoctrination implemented, because of other perverse laws are being done behind parents’ backs and despite parents’ objections,” Thomasson’s report said. ...”

Complete info here.

Boys going Wilde.

About a year or more ago, a commenter on my blog told me that Oscar Wilde was a homosexual. I filed the information away in my mind and went on about my business.

Then, just two days ago, I found out that Oscar Wilde was also a homophile. I can’t say that I was shocked, but the title of this post popped into my head today, and my heteroseparatist muse will not let me rest until this torpedo is “in the water.”

Now, it is mandatory in California schools that children honor homophiles!!

“...To be clear, I personally believe that the great majority of homosexual men also deplore Sandusky’s alleged acts. At the same time, there is a very large pedophile elephant that is hiding in the gay activist closet...

Let’s start with our children’s schools, where GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight, Education Network, has long advocated for the celebration of homosexual history, using tools like “North American History Game Cards,” where elementary school children learn that famous Americans like Allen Ginsberg and Walt Whitman were gay.

What the children don’t learn is that if Whitman was a homosexual, he was also a pederast, that Ginsberg was a defender of NAMBLA, the notorious North American Man Boy Love Association...

...mention that Oscar Wilde, when they’re teaching his work, would mention that Oscar Wilde was locked in an asylum because he was gay.”

Would they also mention that he was a boy lover and that he wrote about his passionate sexual encounters with young teens no older than some of the boys allegedly molested by Sandusky?

...that SB 48, mandating the celebration of LGBT history in all California schools for all children in all grades, is now law.

There is already a Harvey Milk Day in California...

...but there’s more to the Harvey Milk story.

...at age eleven, Milk began attending performances of the New York Metropolitan Opera where he met with “wandering hands,” and soon was engaged in “brief trysts [with grown men] after the performances.” While still in junior high, he “dove headfirst into the newly discovered subculture,” and by the age of fourteen, Milk was “leading an active homosexual life.” As he grew older, the pattern reversed itself to the point that, at age thirty-three, Milk hooked up with a sixteen-year-old named Jack McKinley, one of a number of younger men with whom he was intimate.

...Kramer too was a NAMBLA supporter, and in a 2004 speech in New York City, he spoke of a “sweet young boy who didn’t know anything and was in awe of me. I was the first man who [had sex with] him. I think I murdered him” (meaning, by infecting him with AIDS). Where is the gay outcry over this?

...but the inescapable truth is clear: The gay activist closet has been opened, and the pedophile elephant is there. ...”

Incredibly hard-hitting full story here.

What the glbt community doesn't want you to know about SB48.

Where anti-hetero SB 48 went wrong.

Some few days ago, while I was in comment-combat, a man (who was probably a homofascist judging by the gist of his comments) challenged those who don't support the glbt community to read the actual language of SB 48, which I, of course, did, and found the following paragraph...

"...Native Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans,
Pacific Islanders, European Americans, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender Americans, and members of other ethnic and cultural
groups, to the economic, political, and social development of
California and the United States of America, with particular emphasis
on portraying the role of these groups in contemporary society. ..."

Once again, the advantages of being a forensic heteroseparatist have paid off. The paragraph above shows how sexuality and sexual behavior are deceptively elevated to, and categorized with, the innate aspect of a person's skin color. It's the same old story once again. The sad, absurd comparison of race to sexual behavior. This mischaracterization has led to the legal trampling of the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual misconduct of the glbt community.

Christian parents' rights outlawed in California's public schools.

As of today, with Governor Jerry Brown's signing of SB 48 into law, a parent who has a child in the public school system in California, can NOT exclude their child from a class in which homosexuality is portrayed as a normal sexual activity.

The violation of the parental rights of those who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community is now legal in California's public schools.

Also, it is now illegal to say anything "negative" about homosexuality in California's public school system. This very blog is now illegal in California's public schools. A Bible is now illegal in CA's schools. Quoting scripture from the Bible that tells the truth about homosexual sin is now illegal in Homofornia's public schools. Is the word,"heteroseparatist," now illegal in the Golden State's public schools too?

Who can deny that SB 48 violates the parental rights of those who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community? Is there anyone out there who is so crazy that they think that this legal trampling of the civil rights of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim parents is a good thing?

Today, 14 July 2011, homofascism has been embraced by California's government. My supporting info is here. <---The 6000+ comments on this story that were 96% pro-hetero were removed by the San Francisco-based (go figure!) software company DISQUS.

(Info on home-schooling is here.)

Will parental rights be outlawed by gays in California's Government?

Since when did a person's sexual activities become a part of teachable history? Is it important for California's schoolchildren to know what historical figures did in bed? Why do some people want children to be taught about the sexual activities of adults, outside of the normal process of where babies come from?

How is it wrong for parents to want to opt their children out of classes that teach non-reproductive sexual acts to their children? Who in their right mind would want to outlaw parental rights? Can't anti-bullying classes be taught to children without glorifying homosexuality? Are the glbt community and their worshippers so far gone that they support the trampling of the parental rights of Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others that won't support the sexual activities of the gay community?

Will I ever stop asking questions and post a link to my supporting info?

How SB 48 tramples parental rights.

SB 48 is a Trojan horse that will violate the civil rights of parents who don't support the sexual activities of glbt community. How can this be? What would the gay community do if a Christian Senator in California tried to legislate lessons concerning Christian principles to the children of gay "parents" that trampled their right to parental notification/consent? My supporting evidence is here.

Gender Permanence.

Great facts are given in this video. The fact that SB 48 has, "...seriously flawed thinking." How only 8 out of 100,000 people reject their own genitals. And the term,"gender permanence." I love it!

The hidden danger of SB 48.

As usual... race, gender, and sexual conduct are put in the same category by a homosexual. How more people don't see through this homoganda amazes me sometimes. Then, Senator Mark Leno says that glbt people are excluded from history books. Really? How does he know that? Why does he want a persons sexual behavior to be spotlighted? Shouldn't a person keep their sexual activities private?

I DO support anti-bullying for all children, but there has to be a better way than making the glorification of sexual sin mandatory learning in the classrooms of schoolchildren. Few people know that a discrimination-against-"gender-identity" clause/provision is in SB 48, which means that a boy who wants to be considered a girl cannot be prevented from using the girl's bathroom, in a California grade school, if SB 48 is made into a law. That's crazy.

SB 48.

Even while they cry..."Gay rights! Gay rights! Gay civil rights!" ...the glbt community doesn't even deny their desire to trample the rights of parents who won't support their sexual conduct. Thanks to this type of behavior, more and more people are starting to see through homosexual propaganda.

The talking heads of the "gay rights" movement will preach that gay people just want to be treated with respect, which is a very reasonable point-of-view, but then turn around and support laws that trample the rights of parents to protect their children.

"...The homosexual movement sees SB48 not only as a model for legislation across the country, but as a way to force homosexuality and transgenderism past parents into the minds of children. .."

My facts are here.

Gay curriculum ignores parental consent.

Sometimes, when I'm in a debate with a homofascist, I'll ask the question,"Would you tolerate someone teaching Christianity to your child without your consent?" I never get the obvious answer to that simple question because it will immediately collapse the argument for teaching children that homosexuality is okay without the consent of that child's parents; one of the prime goals of the majority of the glbt community. Note the excerpts below...

"...their rights were being violated because they had no control over whether their children received such lessons.
“No one should take my right to tell me what can be shown to my child,” Cookie Gordon, a mother of two, told the board."

"...“These controversial issues don’t belong in the classroom, no matter how many times people vote on marriage,” said Karen England, a member of the State Central Committee of the California Republican Party. “The homosexual activists have repeatedly been pushing for more and more in sexual curriculum when our kids can’t read or write.”..."

"State law does not allow parents to remove their children from particular lessons that are part of a set curriculum."

"...a mother angrily waved a crossword puzzle assigned her 9-year old daughter that included the word “lesbian.” (The clue: “Two women who love each other in a romantic way.”)..."

"...Vallejo’s Christians felt that their voice was being suppressed.
“When you call us haters, or bigoted, or unintelligent because we believe in God’s word,” Mr. Jefferson said, “that’s hate, that’s bigotry.”..."

Story here.

Homosexual "marriage"? How cute!

Look at how sweet and innocent the cover of this vile book is. It's like the marketing design of a box of candy.

Look at the light blue background and the innocent, cute little birds. Look at how the strings that hold up the sign rise up and out of view as if God himself is holding them. Look at the smiling, clean shaven faces of the homosexuals holding hands. Observe the free-floating balloons that defy the laws of physics just to be near the two well-dressed sodomites. See how the little boy is dressed the same way as the men, yet his jacket is a lighter color. Will he be awarded a black jacket when he graduates to anal intercourse like the gay men have? And why is the guy in the glasses looking at the little boy's butt instead of looking at the guy he's "marrying"?

Why is the little boy pointing up like that and smiling even broader than the 44-times-more-likely-to-contract-AIDS men? Is he pointing up as if to say, "Hey there fellow child! I've got something fun to tell you about!"?

My God this is sad.

Mark Leno's SB 48 vs parental rights.

I've covered this dude before. Looks like he's still trying to do a legal, end-run around parental rights with SB 48.

I've noticed that gay "parents" demand that their parental rights be respected, and would go ballistic if they found out that Christianity was being taught to their children without their consent, and then turn around and support trampling on the rights of Christian or "anti-gay" parents by supporting legislation like SB 48. The homopocrisy of some in the glbt community never ceases to amaze and inspire me.

In the entire history of my website/blog, only one homosexual has accepted my challenge to refrain from speaking to children about homosexuality without the consent of that child's parents, when I can easily refrain from talking to a child about Christianity without parental consent. What does that say about the glbt community?

SB 543: The LEGAL, glbt pursuit of children.

I'm stunned by this story.

Democratic Senator Mark Leno from San Francisco (where else), wants to make a law that prevents a parent from knowing if their, 12-year-old child is being "counseled" by their school about their desire to enter the glbt community.

"Current parental consent requirements for mental health services create a barrier to treatment that is especially harmful to LGBT youth who may be put at risk of emotional or physical abuse by coming out to their parents prematurely or without support."

From what I've heard, a child can call the police or child-protective-services on their own parents in the case of emotional or physical abuse. Also, if people are truly "born gay," as many homofascists and homoappeasers would have people believe, then why are some anti-hetero types so desperate to approach children without the knowledge or consent of that child's parents? I mean, if they are "born gay," won't the "gay" still be there when they're 18?

What would happen if Christians wanted to approach the 12-year-old children of gays without the knowledge or consent of their parents? How would the glbt community react to that?

Get a container to vomit in before clicking here and here.