Showing posts with label homoriculum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label homoriculum. Show all posts
Monday, December 22, 2014
Monday, December 15, 2014
The "genderbread person."
How did the gingerbread man become the genderbread person? Apparently he was taken hostage by homofascists and forced to push the gay agenda into the minds of 13-year-olds without the consent of their parents.
This is what I shine the spotlight on. This is what the glbt community wants. The destruction of those who disagree with them, and unfettered access to the minds (and sometimes the bodies) of children. The leadership of the glbt community howls about the perceived violation of their civil rights, when it comes to the redefinition of marriage, and then turns around and violates the parental civil rights of those who disagree with their evil sexual acts.
“… Along with local area groups, some parents are irate that their children’s sex ed class at Acalanes High School in Lafayette is being taught by employees of Planned Parenthood without their prior knowledge. They are also fuming over the methods and materials being used, including a checklist that asks students if they are “ready for sex” and another worksheet that describes how to give and obtain consent, as well as a diagram that uses a "genderbread" person for lessons in gender identity.
… “[Parents] are very concerned,” Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, a non-profit legal organization that is assisting the concerned parents, told FoxNews.com. “Planned Parenthood is not exactly the best when it comes to putting young people first.
“They get more grants from the promiscuity of children,” he added. “The material they have provided was material that mirrored their agenda.”
…one instructor threw a model of female reproductive organs at one student and that many felt the sessions were pressuring them to have sex.
…it was divergent from what they were taught at home,” Dacus said.
… the 13 and 14-year-old students are asked questions such as if they have water–based lubricants and condoms and if they could handle a possible infection or pregnancy. Another worksheet reads like a how-to on obtaining consent from a possible sexual partner and offers possible statements like “Do you want to go back to my place?” and “Is it OK if I take my pants off?”
… After completing the course, it was apparent that some of what was ‘taught’ went beyond what was represented on the opt-out form. This is disappointing to us, because we are actually strong supporters of teen sex education in a peer environment to complement our home-based discussions.”
Lyons added that he and his wife were dismayed by how the students were instructed.
…“We have not seen any documentation to indicate that distribution of the surveys complied with either Federal law of the California Education Code as to parental notification,”
… “Notably, the law does not merely require notice; it requires specific parental permission for this type of survey to be administered,” reads the letter.
Full story here.
Friday, October 3, 2014
Sunday, September 14, 2014
Chickphobia.
What is so threatening to those that support the redefinition of marriage? Are marriage redefiners afraid of a little chicken sandwich? Is this chickphobia?
I now live in a world where believing that a marriage is between one man and one woman is considered "bigotry."
More info here.
Sunday, November 17, 2013
silencingchristians.com
Ironically, I thought I was going to faint like a homosexual when I found this video.
Monday, August 12, 2013
Sexual sanity now outlawed in California's public schools.

And He (Jesus Christ) answered and said, “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning MADE THEM MALE AND FEMALE, Matthew 19:4.
Well... now it's official. Just when I was sitting down and deciding what to blog about, the homofascist government of California hands me a jewel. Now, a student with a penis, can use a girl's bathroom or locker room in California's public schools.
Now, the completely understandable objections of a parent that doesn't want a boy in the school bathroom with their under-aged daughter, will be ignored. Not only that, the upcoming illegalization of home schooling is well under way.
Who will be held responsible when a girl is raped in a girl's restroom by a "transsexual"? Or when a girl's neck gets broken by a boy during tackle football?
More info here.
Friday, March 22, 2013
Hate-filled, homofascist high school play.
Is there a high school principal in the United States that would allow a play that mocked and riduculed the glbt community to take place in his/her school? How about a play that had explicit, heterosexual erotica? How about a play that mocked Islam? Why then, is it okay to attack, defame, insult, and provoke true Christians? "The school is performing the play, ...by Paul Rudnick. It's billed as a "comedy." But it's described by many as "blasphemous and hateful." The play retells stories from the Bible using homosexual characters in a pornographic and mocking fashion.
The play begins with a retelling of Genesis using a homosexual couple, Adam and Steve, instead of Adam and Eve, along with other homosexual characters who are are very sexually explicit in their speech and actions. As one review puts it, this re-telling of Genesis "gets so specific as to be a gay how-to sexbook."
It includes a depiction of Steve having a sexual relationship with an animal during the Noah's Ark scene. After several other hideous defamations of Bible stories, the first act ends with Adam and Steve being two of the wise men at the Nativity. The second scene appears to be a modern-day depiction of the birth of Jesus in a New York apartment with the "wise man" Steve now being HIV-positive and the pregnant Mary being a lesbian who (among other things) exclaims: "I'm not supposed to be pregnant, I'm a bulldyke!" "
Complete info here.
Saturday, June 30, 2012
Anti Christian Liberties Union.

Let me see if I can get this straight; the ACLU is fighting to bypass parental consent?!? Doesn’t the “CL” in ACLU stand for “civil liberties”? Is it not a civil liberty to protect one’s children? Doesn’t the ACLU recognize the concept of parental consent when it comes to a parent’s moral objection to their child being exposed to sexual subject matters? Does ACLU stand for Anti Christian Liberties Union?
“…When a kindergarten boy brought home a children’s book touting the joys of being in a lesbian family, his parents complained to Windridge Elementary School, sparking a petition signed by 25 parents in protest.
The book, “In Our Mother’s House,” is marketed on Amazon as a book for children “ages 6 and up.”
…It touches on the alleged joys of being in a homosexual relationship and what the author believes is society’s condemnation of it.
…Now the American Civil Liberties Union is getting involved – threatening the district for requiring parental consent. (<---say what!!)
…In the book, a resident in a Berkley, Calif., neighborhood is depicted as a constantly scowling woman who wears a pink bow in her hair. She disapproves of the neighboring family’s lesbian relationship and won’t let her children play with them.
She tells the lesbian couple, “I don’t appreciate what you two are!”
The lesbians, Meema and Marmee, comfort their children.
“She’s full of fear, sweetie,” Meema tells them. “She’s afraid of what she can’t understand: She doesn’t understand us.”
…Polacco noted, “What I did take exception to was this mother – who had the right to have this book kept from her child – decided to take it upon herself within that school, and then the entire district, to see that YOUR child couldn’t read the book, either. That’s where I think our First Amendment rights are getting trounced.”
However, as previously noted, the book has not been removed from the school libraries. Children are simply required to obtain parental consent before checking it out.
…“Parents have the ‘fundamental right’ to ‘direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.’ The district is right to leave such decisions to them,”… “Public schools should not surrender to ACLU intimidation when it asks them to expose children to sexual content without parental knowledge. …”
Full story/article here.
“…When a kindergarten boy brought home a children’s book touting the joys of being in a lesbian family, his parents complained to Windridge Elementary School, sparking a petition signed by 25 parents in protest.
The book, “In Our Mother’s House,” is marketed on Amazon as a book for children “ages 6 and up.”
…It touches on the alleged joys of being in a homosexual relationship and what the author believes is society’s condemnation of it.
…Now the American Civil Liberties Union is getting involved – threatening the district for requiring parental consent. (<---say what!!)
…In the book, a resident in a Berkley, Calif., neighborhood is depicted as a constantly scowling woman who wears a pink bow in her hair. She disapproves of the neighboring family’s lesbian relationship and won’t let her children play with them.
She tells the lesbian couple, “I don’t appreciate what you two are!”
The lesbians, Meema and Marmee, comfort their children.
“She’s full of fear, sweetie,” Meema tells them. “She’s afraid of what she can’t understand: She doesn’t understand us.”
…Polacco noted, “What I did take exception to was this mother – who had the right to have this book kept from her child – decided to take it upon herself within that school, and then the entire district, to see that YOUR child couldn’t read the book, either. That’s where I think our First Amendment rights are getting trounced.”
However, as previously noted, the book has not been removed from the school libraries. Children are simply required to obtain parental consent before checking it out.
…“Parents have the ‘fundamental right’ to ‘direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.’ The district is right to leave such decisions to them,”… “Public schools should not surrender to ACLU intimidation when it asks them to expose children to sexual content without parental knowledge. …”
Full story/article here.
Monday, April 30, 2012
Dan Savage vs. the Word of God/Challenge for Dan Savage.
In the video below, that contains language that some people might find offensive, anti-Christ bigot Dan Savage calls scriptures that forbid sexual sin in the Bible "bull****." Then Mr Savage goes on to cherry-pick Old Testament verses concerning food-handling that were made obsolete by the words and sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Just as the word "homosexual" didn't exist when God wrote the Bible through men, the word "employee" didn't exist either. In the contemporary American language of this blog, the word "slave" in Romans, in the Bible, would be "employee," since the "slaves" spoken of in the New Testament, were being paid for their work!
Dan Savage is using a very old tactic of twisting scripture to justify his homosexual sin, since the Bible condemns slavery, which was called "manstealing" in it's day, in 1 Timothy 1:8-11! And, to the Glory of God, (who exposes Dan Savage's entire argument in one verse) verse 10 condemns men who have sex with men (whom we now call "homosexuals," and no longer call "sodomites") before slave traders.
Since he had an audience of young Christians who couldn't possibly have the scriptural knowledge of a mature Christian, Mr Savage got away with mischaracterizing the Word of God and deceiving many into thinking that God is now okay with sexual sin. Notice that sexual sin is the first thing mentioned here.
When will Mr. Savage go into a Mosque and call the verses that command the death of homosexuals in the Quran "bull****"?
The original info that inspired my challenge to Dan Savage to debate scripture with me on this blog can be found here.
Just as the word "homosexual" didn't exist when God wrote the Bible through men, the word "employee" didn't exist either. In the contemporary American language of this blog, the word "slave" in Romans, in the Bible, would be "employee," since the "slaves" spoken of in the New Testament, were being paid for their work!
Dan Savage is using a very old tactic of twisting scripture to justify his homosexual sin, since the Bible condemns slavery, which was called "manstealing" in it's day, in 1 Timothy 1:8-11! And, to the Glory of God, (who exposes Dan Savage's entire argument in one verse) verse 10 condemns men who have sex with men (whom we now call "homosexuals," and no longer call "sodomites") before slave traders.
Since he had an audience of young Christians who couldn't possibly have the scriptural knowledge of a mature Christian, Mr Savage got away with mischaracterizing the Word of God and deceiving many into thinking that God is now okay with sexual sin. Notice that sexual sin is the first thing mentioned here.
When will Mr. Savage go into a Mosque and call the verses that command the death of homosexuals in the Quran "bull****"?
The original info that inspired my challenge to Dan Savage to debate scripture with me on this blog can be found here.
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Gay Jay spoils day. (updated 28 April 2012)
Note, at 2:04, how the homofascist teacher launches into the classic barrage of rallying words like, "racist," "bigot," and "bully," while clearly exhibiting the behavior of a bigoted bully.
More info here.
Monday, January 30, 2012
Tolerance FOR Julea Ward.

Looks like the word “tolerance” is beginning to haunt the glbt community. People are starting to see that tolerance is a two-way street, and the gay activists that yell “tolerance!” the loudest, are the most intolerant when it comes to Christians or anyone else who won’t accept homosexuality as normal. Homofascists don’t even want people who disagree with homosexuality to even be allowed to be heard. Free speech that does NOT condone or inspire violence will be labeled “hate speech” by homofascists who hate the truth. Although I have thoroughly denounced hatred for and proactive violence against the glbt community, my blog is attacked at least three times a week!
I've been covering the Julea Ward case since 11 Nov. 2009.
“...The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled Friday in favor of Julea Ward an Eastern Michigan University graduate student represented by Alliance Defense Fund attorneys who was expelled from a counseling program for her beliefs. In a strongly worded opinion, the court reversed a district court decision in favor of the university and sent the case back for trial, saying “a reasonable jury could conclude that Ward’s professors ejected her from the counseling program because of hostility toward her speech and faith….” ...”
I've been covering the Julea Ward case since 11 Nov. 2009.
“...The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit ruled Friday in favor of Julea Ward an Eastern Michigan University graduate student represented by Alliance Defense Fund attorneys who was expelled from a counseling program for her beliefs. In a strongly worded opinion, the court reversed a district court decision in favor of the university and sent the case back for trial, saying “a reasonable jury could conclude that Ward’s professors ejected her from the counseling program because of hostility toward her speech and faith….” ...”
“... “Rather than allow Julea to refer a potential client to another qualified counselor--a common, professional practice to best serve clients--EMU attacked and questioned Julea’s religious beliefs and ultimately expelled her from the program because of them.” ...”
“...That her conflict arose from religious convictions is not a good answer; that her conflict arose from religious convictions for which the department at times showed little tolerance is a worse answer.” ...”
“...EMU faculty denigrated Ward’s Christian views...”
“... “That is why she asked to refer gay and lesbian clients (and some heterosexual clients) if the conversation required her to affirm their sexual practices....does not require a Muslim counselor to tell a Jewish client that his religious beliefs are correct if the conversation takes a turn in that direction and (2) does not require an atheist counselor to tell a person of faith that there is a God if the client is wrestling with faith-based issues. Tolerance is a two-way street. Otherwise, the rule mandates orthodoxy, not anti-discrimination.” ...”
Original info here.
Original info here.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Todd Carlson: anti-Christ bigot?

A high school student named Brandon Wagner was asked to write an article that opposed the adoption of children by same-sex couples. When he did, he used Biblical verses to point out that the homosexual household was a sinful environment, and therefore unsuitable for children.
Well..... DUH!!!
“...Wegner, a student at Shawano High School, was asked to write an op-ed for the school newspaper about whether gays should be allowed to adopt. Wegner, who is a Christian, wrote in opposition. Another student wrote in favor of allowing gays to adopt. ...”
“...After the op-ed was published, a gay couple whose child attend s the high school, complained. ...”
“...“The superintendent wants everyone to accept homosexuality as normative and homosexual adoption as something that should be standard practices,” Staver said. “In doing so, he’s belittling the views and the biblical views of many people across this country. He is playing a zero-sum game. He’s not interested in dialogue. He wants to cram his view down the throat of everyone else and will not tolerate an opposing viewpoint.”...”
Complete story here.
Well..... DUH!!!
“...Wegner, a student at Shawano High School, was asked to write an op-ed for the school newspaper about whether gays should be allowed to adopt. Wegner, who is a Christian, wrote in opposition. Another student wrote in favor of allowing gays to adopt. ...”
“...After the op-ed was published, a gay couple whose child attend s the high school, complained. ...”
“...“The superintendent wants everyone to accept homosexuality as normative and homosexual adoption as something that should be standard practices,” Staver said. “In doing so, he’s belittling the views and the biblical views of many people across this country. He is playing a zero-sum game. He’s not interested in dialogue. He wants to cram his view down the throat of everyone else and will not tolerate an opposing viewpoint.”...”
Complete story here.
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Another glbt end-run around parental rights.
Under the guise of "anti-bullying" no less. How about anti-bullying for parental rights?
Monday, January 2, 2012
"Gender liberation."

What a way to start 2012!
The glbt community used to scoff at and ridicule people who would say that they were after children. Now, the gay community doesn't even try to hide their efforts to circumvent the parental civil rights of those who don't think that homosexuality is normal.
The highlighting in red below is my doing.
“...“In other words,” Tyler explains of what “gender liberation” means, “male-female distinctions must be eliminated in order to ‘liberate’ children from unnecessary ‘stereotypes.’ This is not a movement seeking ‘equal rights,’ but a movement seeking to obliterate our God-given distinctions between male and female.” ...”
“...SB 543, signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010, “allows school staff to remove children ages 12 and up from government schools and taken off-campus for counseling sessions, without parental permission or involvement. The purpose is to permit pro-homosexuality teachers and administrators to remove sexually confused children in 6th grade and up from campus and take them to pro-homosexuality counselors who will encourage them to embrace the homosexual lifestyle.” ...”
“...Said the email, according to Thomasson, “You were right: Our daughter was told she had to attend a gay straight alliance rally to honor Harvey Milk. … She shared she was a Christian with the teacher and only after she saw Lauren was clearly upset about going to this rally did she issue her a hall pass. She was persecuted by another student but made it out of the class. I picked up her and she was very upset. How many other Christians were forced to go to this rally?” ...”
“... “Parents, realize there was NO advance parental notification of this happening or the opportunity to opt out your children. Even more, realize there was no parent permission sought, no opt-in form to sign. No, Harvey Milk sexual indoctrination, and other sexual indoctrination implemented, because of other perverse laws are being done behind parents’ backs and despite parents’ objections,” Thomasson’s report said. ...”
Complete info here.
“...SB 543, signed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2010, “allows school staff to remove children ages 12 and up from government schools and taken off-campus for counseling sessions, without parental permission or involvement. The purpose is to permit pro-homosexuality teachers and administrators to remove sexually confused children in 6th grade and up from campus and take them to pro-homosexuality counselors who will encourage them to embrace the homosexual lifestyle.” ...”
“...Said the email, according to Thomasson, “You were right: Our daughter was told she had to attend a gay straight alliance rally to honor Harvey Milk. … She shared she was a Christian with the teacher and only after she saw Lauren was clearly upset about going to this rally did she issue her a hall pass. She was persecuted by another student but made it out of the class. I picked up her and she was very upset. How many other Christians were forced to go to this rally?” ...”
“... “Parents, realize there was NO advance parental notification of this happening or the opportunity to opt out your children. Even more, realize there was no parent permission sought, no opt-in form to sign. No, Harvey Milk sexual indoctrination, and other sexual indoctrination implemented, because of other perverse laws are being done behind parents’ backs and despite parents’ objections,” Thomasson’s report said. ...”
Complete info here.
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
Boys going Wilde.

About a year or more ago, a commenter on my blog told me that Oscar Wilde was a homosexual. I filed the information away in my mind and went on about my business.
Then, just two days ago, I found out that Oscar Wilde was also a homophile. I can’t say that I was shocked, but the title of this post popped into my head today, and my heteroseparatist muse will not let me rest until this torpedo is “in the water.”
Now, it is mandatory in California schools that children honor homophiles!!
“...To be clear, I personally believe that the great majority of homosexual men also deplore Sandusky’s alleged acts. At the same time, there is a very large pedophile elephant that is hiding in the gay activist closet...
Let’s start with our children’s schools, where GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight, Education Network, has long advocated for the celebration of homosexual history, using tools like “North American History Game Cards,” where elementary school children learn that famous Americans like Allen Ginsberg and Walt Whitman were gay.
What the children don’t learn is that if Whitman was a homosexual, he was also a pederast, that Ginsberg was a defender of NAMBLA, the notorious North American Man Boy Love Association...
...mention that Oscar Wilde, when they’re teaching his work, would mention that Oscar Wilde was locked in an asylum because he was gay.”
Would they also mention that he was a boy lover and that he wrote about his passionate sexual encounters with young teens no older than some of the boys allegedly molested by Sandusky?
...that SB 48, mandating the celebration of LGBT history in all California schools for all children in all grades, is now law.
There is already a Harvey Milk Day in California...
...but there’s more to the Harvey Milk story.
...at age eleven, Milk began attending performances of the New York Metropolitan Opera where he met with “wandering hands,” and soon was engaged in “brief trysts [with grown men] after the performances.” While still in junior high, he “dove headfirst into the newly discovered subculture,” and by the age of fourteen, Milk was “leading an active homosexual life.” As he grew older, the pattern reversed itself to the point that, at age thirty-three, Milk hooked up with a sixteen-year-old named Jack McKinley, one of a number of younger men with whom he was intimate.
...Kramer too was a NAMBLA supporter, and in a 2004 speech in New York City, he spoke of a “sweet young boy who didn’t know anything and was in awe of me. I was the first man who [had sex with] him. I think I murdered him” (meaning, by infecting him with AIDS). Where is the gay outcry over this?
...but the inescapable truth is clear: The gay activist closet has been opened, and the pedophile elephant is there. ...”
Incredibly hard-hitting full story here.
Then, just two days ago, I found out that Oscar Wilde was also a homophile. I can’t say that I was shocked, but the title of this post popped into my head today, and my heteroseparatist muse will not let me rest until this torpedo is “in the water.”
Now, it is mandatory in California schools that children honor homophiles!!
“...To be clear, I personally believe that the great majority of homosexual men also deplore Sandusky’s alleged acts. At the same time, there is a very large pedophile elephant that is hiding in the gay activist closet...
Let’s start with our children’s schools, where GLSEN, the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight, Education Network, has long advocated for the celebration of homosexual history, using tools like “North American History Game Cards,” where elementary school children learn that famous Americans like Allen Ginsberg and Walt Whitman were gay.
What the children don’t learn is that if Whitman was a homosexual, he was also a pederast, that Ginsberg was a defender of NAMBLA, the notorious North American Man Boy Love Association...
...mention that Oscar Wilde, when they’re teaching his work, would mention that Oscar Wilde was locked in an asylum because he was gay.”
Would they also mention that he was a boy lover and that he wrote about his passionate sexual encounters with young teens no older than some of the boys allegedly molested by Sandusky?
...that SB 48, mandating the celebration of LGBT history in all California schools for all children in all grades, is now law.
There is already a Harvey Milk Day in California...
...but there’s more to the Harvey Milk story.
...at age eleven, Milk began attending performances of the New York Metropolitan Opera where he met with “wandering hands,” and soon was engaged in “brief trysts [with grown men] after the performances.” While still in junior high, he “dove headfirst into the newly discovered subculture,” and by the age of fourteen, Milk was “leading an active homosexual life.” As he grew older, the pattern reversed itself to the point that, at age thirty-three, Milk hooked up with a sixteen-year-old named Jack McKinley, one of a number of younger men with whom he was intimate.
...Kramer too was a NAMBLA supporter, and in a 2004 speech in New York City, he spoke of a “sweet young boy who didn’t know anything and was in awe of me. I was the first man who [had sex with] him. I think I murdered him” (meaning, by infecting him with AIDS). Where is the gay outcry over this?
...but the inescapable truth is clear: The gay activist closet has been opened, and the pedophile elephant is there. ...”
Incredibly hard-hitting full story here.
Wednesday, October 26, 2011
Hey kid...you WILL accept homosexuality!!!

“...It was another “anti-bullying” program that presumes that anyone who doesn’t believe homosexuality is morally neutral must be a bully.
One of the school’s principals, David Chambers, told the newspaper that many students had heard there might be same-sex affection portrayed in the play. Some reportedly asked to be excused, but their requests were denied. Chambers also says he considered sending a letter to parents giving them a chance to “opt out,” but decided against it. ..."
Complete story here.
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
Homonauseated highschoolers leave gay play.

(updated 21 Oct. 2011)
Once again, a prime example of homofascism hits my radar. Yet another example of the, you-WILL-accept-homosexuality-as-normal, mindset of those in charge of public schools. The violation of the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community is becoming commonplace and even celebrated by school officials!
This story takes place in Connecticut where the State's Supreme Court imposed same-sex "marriage" on its people. This is how gay "marriage" affects others.
“...two male members of a city-funded school play shared a passionate kiss onstage on Friday. School officials said they opted against informing parents about the event ahead of time, saying that the students needed exposure to homosexuality...”
“...The Hartford Courant reported that “screams and loud voices” and sounds of disgust came from the audience during the display of affection, while “dozens” of mostly male students left the auditorium. While some trickled back in, officials had to prevent many from leaving the school building...”
“...The Family Institute of Connecticut (FIC) condemned the scandal, and called for a protest of the school’s decision, calling it “an outrageous attack on parental rights.”...”
More details here and here.
Wednesday, October 12, 2011
First Jerry Buell, now Dakota Ary.

The high school student that was suspended by his homofascist teacher for merely saying that he thought homosexuality was wrong, has been completely cleared by his school district. Once again I raise the scenario of what would happen to a Christian teacher who suspended a homosexual student that had said Christianity was wrong. Would the mainstream media ignore the vindication of an anti-Christ gay student like they're ignoring the vindication of this Christian student?
People are really starting to wake-up to the bullying perpetrated by the glbt community. Story here.
Monday, October 3, 2011
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Homofascism backfires on anti-Christ teacher.

What would happen to a teacher if he was a Christian and had suspended a gay student for saying that Christianity was wrong?
“...Fort Worth, TX — Last week, high school freshman Dakota Ary was given in-school suspension for telling another student that he believes homosexuality is wrong because of his Christian faith. Western Hills High School teacher, Kristopher Franks, is responsible for his suspension and has now been placed on administrative leave with pay.
...Franks overheard the comment, wrote Dakota an infraction, and sent him to the principal’s office...
...Franks charged Dakota with “possible bullying” and indicated, “It is wrong to make such a statement in public school.”
Two weeks prior to this event, Franks displayed a picture of two men kissing on a “World Wall” and told his students that homosexuality is becoming more prevalent in the world and that they should just accept it...
...the school district reversed the in-school suspension and placed Franks on administrative leave with pay.
This teacher should not force his views about homosexuality upon students. Teachers cannot use their position to bully students and humiliate them in front of their peers.”...”
Story here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



