Showing posts with label anti-Christ "gay activists". Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-Christ "gay activists". Show all posts
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
A religious fanatic murders three homosexual males and is ignored by the media.
If the murderer of three homosexual males in the picture above had had a single Bible in his dwelling, the homofascists that have a great influence over mainstream media, would have had a field day by falsely placing the blame of his actions on Christian doctrine.
But, since this man wasn't claiming to be a Christian, his murder spree that claimed the lives of three gay men has been ignored by the mainstream media.
Full story here.
Monday, August 20, 2012
Homofascist hate-crime against FRC largely ignored.
When the FRC labels another group as a "hate group," it becomes a license for anti-Christ homofascist activists to violate the civil rights of the members of that group. The FRC operates like the KKK used to.
Thursday, August 16, 2012
Anti-hetero "chicken hawk" goes looney tunes over true marriage.
Wow. Now, if you believe that marriage is between one man and one woman, someone might get a gun and try to kill you. And some people think I'm wrong from walking away from the glbt community!?!Look what anti-Christ/anti-hetero/anti-family bigotry and homofascist propaganda has produced! Is this not further evidence that Chick-fil-A day set homofascism back by 20 years? And then the subsequent failure of the homosexual "kiss-in"? The militant gay community has never been this wounded in my lifetime.
Story here.
Friday, August 10, 2012
Monday, August 6, 2012
Dissin' "kiss-in" missin'.

I went to the closest Chick-fil-A friday and didn't see any gay people protesting or same-sex kissing.
Is this the beginning of the end of the reign of homofascism? Has the population of my country become fully aware of what I've been saying for 10 years? What a turn-out of true marriage supporters on wednesday, and what a flop for homofascists on friday!
Story here.
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
freejinger.org

Well, here we go again.
A person that is very most probably an anti-Christ bigot said that one of my videos was banned from YouTube. That struck me as curious, since I’ve never even made a video, much less for YouTube. When I investigated the accusation, I immediately discovered that it was yet another false accusation from someone who very probably thinks that anyone who doesn’t support male-on-male sexual activity is a “bigot.”
Yet the more I clarify heteroseparatism, the more false accusations I get. That’s no surprise to me. That’s why I wrote my manifesto, to cover all of the little lies that are told about those who don’t support the glbt community.
So now I’m laying down a challenge for each person who can only attack me with a like-minded group to support them. I’m challenging anyone from freejinger.org to find a post on this blog where I have condoned proactive violence, hatred, or oppression against the glbt community. Until someone from freejinger.org can face me here, where I guarantee a one-on-one debate, the commenters on the linked-to thread above are nothing but anti-hetero bigots.
Will anyone one of those cyberjackals take me on one-on-one? No they won’t. Jackals cannot fight mono-e-mono.
A person that is very most probably an anti-Christ bigot said that one of my videos was banned from YouTube. That struck me as curious, since I’ve never even made a video, much less for YouTube. When I investigated the accusation, I immediately discovered that it was yet another false accusation from someone who very probably thinks that anyone who doesn’t support male-on-male sexual activity is a “bigot.”
Yet the more I clarify heteroseparatism, the more false accusations I get. That’s no surprise to me. That’s why I wrote my manifesto, to cover all of the little lies that are told about those who don’t support the glbt community.
So now I’m laying down a challenge for each person who can only attack me with a like-minded group to support them. I’m challenging anyone from freejinger.org to find a post on this blog where I have condoned proactive violence, hatred, or oppression against the glbt community. Until someone from freejinger.org can face me here, where I guarantee a one-on-one debate, the commenters on the linked-to thread above are nothing but anti-hetero bigots.
Will anyone one of those cyberjackals take me on one-on-one? No they won’t. Jackals cannot fight mono-e-mono.
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Who's bigoted and ignorant and intolerant?

"...A group calling itself “Angry Queers” has claimed responsibility for throwing baseball-sized rocks through nine church windows in Portland’s Mars Hill Church, including two 100-year-old stained glass panes. ..."
This is what got me started. This is the kind of anti-Christ hatred that pulled me away from my fiction writing projects and into blogging. I would have never thought that I would one day be a blogger but here I am now because I have so much to say about the hatred FROM the glbt community.
The Lord Jesus Christ died to save the homosexual as well as all others who are enslaved by sexual sin, and gays throw rocks at His house? Wow. Talk about ignorance. The majority of the glbt community that accuses others of hatred, fear, and ignorance, will then turn around and commit acts of hatred and ignorance like throwing rocks through the windows of a church. Has the church become their enemy by telling them the truth about homosexuality?
How come fornicators and adulterers don't gather in groups to persecute the Church? Why is it that the glbt community is particularly upset at the Word of God? Is there something particular about the homosexual mindset that drives them crazy when they hear the Truth? Once a person understands who Jesus Christ really is, and gets past all of the false teachings about the Word of God, their mind is opened to a new level of knowledge.
Story here.
Friday, April 13, 2012
David/NOM vs. Starbucks/Goliath.

Yesterday, while I was at work, I was far from home, and I was crazy hungry. Not only that, I wanted a cup of coffee, which is rare for me.
I spotted a Starbucks and remembered their great-tasting coffee and their “turkey bacon” breakfast sandwich that I would buy about once every two weeks. But then I remembered their anti-Christ stand for the redefinition of marriage and I decided not to spend my money there. This was the third time I had refrained from doing business at Starbucks since I found out about their support for the redefinition of marriage.
Then I remembered how a homofascist told me that Starbucks received some sort of thank you from 600,000 people for their support of same-sex “marriage.” I then realized that the boycott of a true servant of Jesus Christ will outweigh the support of at least ten non-believers since the Lord is the eternal Word of God. The boycott of true Christians will outlast the temporary, emotional support of non-believers.
Then today, I read this statement...
“...On January 24th, 2012, Starbucks issued a memorandum declaring that a bill in the state of Washington to legalize so called same-sex marriage is “core to who we are and what we value as a company”. ...”
This statement has sealed my resolve to NOT do business with Starbucks, if I can reasonably avoid doing so. I know that Starbucks will probably be just fine without my money, but I also know that all those who stand for the redefinition of marriage will answer to my Lord.
More info here.
I spotted a Starbucks and remembered their great-tasting coffee and their “turkey bacon” breakfast sandwich that I would buy about once every two weeks. But then I remembered their anti-Christ stand for the redefinition of marriage and I decided not to spend my money there. This was the third time I had refrained from doing business at Starbucks since I found out about their support for the redefinition of marriage.
Then I remembered how a homofascist told me that Starbucks received some sort of thank you from 600,000 people for their support of same-sex “marriage.” I then realized that the boycott of a true servant of Jesus Christ will outweigh the support of at least ten non-believers since the Lord is the eternal Word of God. The boycott of true Christians will outlast the temporary, emotional support of non-believers.
Then today, I read this statement...
“...On January 24th, 2012, Starbucks issued a memorandum declaring that a bill in the state of Washington to legalize so called same-sex marriage is “core to who we are and what we value as a company”. ...”
This statement has sealed my resolve to NOT do business with Starbucks, if I can reasonably avoid doing so. I know that Starbucks will probably be just fine without my money, but I also know that all those who stand for the redefinition of marriage will answer to my Lord.
More info here.
Monday, March 12, 2012
Go ahead. Attack me...

Since I knew that I would come under a fierce attack from some in the glbt community, I designed heteroseparatist.com to strengthen under attack. All a person has to do is read the true definition of heteroseparatist, and my work is done. The more attention that homofascists bring to me, the more damage they do to their selves.
It's what I call "linguistic Aikido." I use the fury and energy of my attacker against them so that the harder they attack me, the more harm they do to their self.
Today, a homofascist calling herself, StarsInHerHair attacked me, and then a wiser homofascist realized the danger of my word/website/concept, and silenced her.
What great joy this web page has brought me!!
It's what I call "linguistic Aikido." I use the fury and energy of my attacker against them so that the harder they attack me, the more harm they do to their self.
Today, a homofascist calling herself, StarsInHerHair attacked me, and then a wiser homofascist realized the danger of my word/website/concept, and silenced her.
What great joy this web page has brought me!!
Friday, March 9, 2012
Homotalitarian GLAAD.
Another, once-noble-but-now-homofascist "gay" organization, is spotlighted today. To no one's surprise, they attacked Kirk Cameron for standing up for God's definition of marriage.“...“Marriage is almost as old as dirt, and it was defined in the garden between Adam and Eve. One man, one woman for life till death do you part. So I would never attempt to try to redefine marriage. And I don’t think anyone else should either,” Cameron said.
The remarks engendered a swift counterattack by the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation...
...but for GLAAD, anyone not of the fervent conviction that homosexuality is as natural as the rain falling is trapped in a medieval mindset and hopelessly out of step with progressive thought.
...do we really believe that any sexual urge may be satiated, that any sexual calling must be applauded, that any sexual – dare we say – perversion is permissible?
The yardstick of political correctness has subtly but undeniably been stretched from tolerance to acceptance to promotion – and now it is insistence, insistence that religious opinion and “people of faith” accept the homosexual lifestyle without question, ...
This insistence is profoundly totalitarian in scope and intent while being completely at odds with basic democratic freedoms...
No one can demand that people think in a certain way or that the only acceptable “people of faith” are the ones who won’t disagree or “condemn” your lifestyle choices. ...
...the spiritual environment described by St. Paul in I Timothy 3:1 when “some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits…”
Complete article here.
Wednesday, March 7, 2012
Kirk Cameron vs. homofascism.
So, let me see if I can get this straight. Kirk Cameron was asked by Piers Morgan his views on homosexuality and now he’s being attacked for not supporting the glbt community. Wow.Homosexuality is a sinful activity not a race of people, so what is the problem? How come fornicators, adulterers, and “polyamorous” people aren’t attacking him also? Why do members of the glbt community have such a big sense of entitlement? So he’s an “...accomplice to murder...” now? Really? It was this exact type of absurd slander that got me involved in the fight against homofascism.
“...and Roseanne Barr, who called Cameron “an accomplice to murder with his hate speech.”
“I should be able to express moral views on social issues,” he said, “especially those that have been the underpinning of Western civilization for 2,000 years — without being slandered, accused of hate speech, and told from those who preach ‘tolerance’ that I need to either bend my beliefs to their moral standards or be silent when I’m in the public square.” ...”
More info here and here.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Todd Carlson: anti-Christ bigot?

A high school student named Brandon Wagner was asked to write an article that opposed the adoption of children by same-sex couples. When he did, he used Biblical verses to point out that the homosexual household was a sinful environment, and therefore unsuitable for children.
Well..... DUH!!!
“...Wegner, a student at Shawano High School, was asked to write an op-ed for the school newspaper about whether gays should be allowed to adopt. Wegner, who is a Christian, wrote in opposition. Another student wrote in favor of allowing gays to adopt. ...”
“...After the op-ed was published, a gay couple whose child attend s the high school, complained. ...”
“...“The superintendent wants everyone to accept homosexuality as normative and homosexual adoption as something that should be standard practices,” Staver said. “In doing so, he’s belittling the views and the biblical views of many people across this country. He is playing a zero-sum game. He’s not interested in dialogue. He wants to cram his view down the throat of everyone else and will not tolerate an opposing viewpoint.”...”
Complete story here.
Well..... DUH!!!
“...Wegner, a student at Shawano High School, was asked to write an op-ed for the school newspaper about whether gays should be allowed to adopt. Wegner, who is a Christian, wrote in opposition. Another student wrote in favor of allowing gays to adopt. ...”
“...After the op-ed was published, a gay couple whose child attend s the high school, complained. ...”
“...“The superintendent wants everyone to accept homosexuality as normative and homosexual adoption as something that should be standard practices,” Staver said. “In doing so, he’s belittling the views and the biblical views of many people across this country. He is playing a zero-sum game. He’s not interested in dialogue. He wants to cram his view down the throat of everyone else and will not tolerate an opposing viewpoint.”...”
Complete story here.
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Even an anti-Christ bigot can understand this article.

“...The present law states: “marriage is a civil contract between a male and a female…” This same law also prohibits marriage to close-blood relations, a clear indication that the definition of marriage is related to bringing children into the world and the continuation of the human race. The legislation to redefine marriage, therefore, is not in the public interest. ...”
“...the state is recognizing the irreplaceable contribution that married couples make to society. Married couples who bring children into the world make particular sacrifices and take on unique risks and obligations for the good of society. For this reason the state has long understood that it has a compelling interest in recognizing and supporting these mothers and fathers through a distinct category of laws. Were the definition of marriage to change, there would be no special laws to support and recognize the irreplaceable contribution that these married couples make to society and to the common good by bringing to life the next generation. ...”
“...present law defining marriage as “a civil contract between a male and a female” is grounded not in faith, but in reason and the experience of society. It recognizes...the unique and irreplaceable potential of a man and woman to conceive and nurture new life...”
This well-written article is brief, to the point, and doesn’t contain any scriptures to frighten any anti-Christ bigots. But it does get across the point that redefining marriage is wrong. Just right for my blog.
Also, even if a man and woman who cannot have children marry, their marriage sets forth an example that is witnessed by children and, therefore, serves towards the good of humanity.
“...the state is recognizing the irreplaceable contribution that married couples make to society. Married couples who bring children into the world make particular sacrifices and take on unique risks and obligations for the good of society. For this reason the state has long understood that it has a compelling interest in recognizing and supporting these mothers and fathers through a distinct category of laws. Were the definition of marriage to change, there would be no special laws to support and recognize the irreplaceable contribution that these married couples make to society and to the common good by bringing to life the next generation. ...”
“...present law defining marriage as “a civil contract between a male and a female” is grounded not in faith, but in reason and the experience of society. It recognizes...the unique and irreplaceable potential of a man and woman to conceive and nurture new life...”
This well-written article is brief, to the point, and doesn’t contain any scriptures to frighten any anti-Christ bigots. But it does get across the point that redefining marriage is wrong. Just right for my blog.
Also, even if a man and woman who cannot have children marry, their marriage sets forth an example that is witnessed by children and, therefore, serves towards the good of humanity.
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Did gay teacher persecute Christian student?

Apparently, a teacher who teaches German is, ironically, also a homofascist. And this story takes place in Texas!
"...Krause called the incident “mind blowing” and said the teacher had frequently brought homosexuality into ninth grade classroom discussions.
“There has been a history with this teacher in the class regarding homosexual topics,” Krause said. “The teacher had posted a picture of two men kissing on a wall that offended some of the students.”
Krause said the picture was posted on the teacher’s “world wall.”
“He told the students this is happening all over the world and you need to accept the fact that homosexuality is just part of our culture now,” Krause said.
The school district would not comment on why a teacher was discussing homosexuality in a ninth grade German class.
“In German class there should be no talk of being pro-Gay or homosexual topics,”..."
Story with video here.
“There has been a history with this teacher in the class regarding homosexual topics,” Krause said. “The teacher had posted a picture of two men kissing on a wall that offended some of the students.”
Krause said the picture was posted on the teacher’s “world wall.”
“He told the students this is happening all over the world and you need to accept the fact that homosexuality is just part of our culture now,” Krause said.
The school district would not comment on why a teacher was discussing homosexuality in a ninth grade German class.
“In German class there should be no talk of being pro-Gay or homosexual topics,”..."
Story with video here.
Friday, August 19, 2011
History teacher making history?
What would happen to a history teacher, who was also a homosexual, if he supported the redefinition of marriage on his Facebook page in his own home on his own time? What would a school district do if a student filed a complaint on that same history teacher saying that they would be uncomfortable in his classroom because he was gay and supported same-sex "marriage"? What would happen to a Christian student that voiced their discomfort at being taught by a history teacher that was a homosexual?
"...Buell told Fox News Radio that he was stunned by the accusations. “It was my own personal comment on my own personal time on my own personal computer in my own personal house, exercising what I believed as a social studies teacher to be my First Amendment rights,” he said.
“And now they showed two guys kissing after their announcement. If they want to call it a union, go ahead. But don’t insult a man and woman’s marriage by throwing it in the same cesspool of whatever. God will not be mocked. When did this sin become acceptable?”
Three minutes later, Buell posted another comment: “By the way, if one doesn’t like the most recently posted opinion based on biblical principles and God’s laws, then go ahead and unfriend me. I’ll miss you like I miss my kidney stone from 1994. And I will never accept it because God will never accept it. Romans chapter one.”
“The school district is being anti-straight, anti-First Amendment and anti-personal liberty,” said Horatio Mihet, an attorney with the Liberty Counsel. “The idea that public servants have to whole-heartedly endorse homosexual marriage is repugnant to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,”..."
“And now they showed two guys kissing after their announcement. If they want to call it a union, go ahead. But don’t insult a man and woman’s marriage by throwing it in the same cesspool of whatever. God will not be mocked. When did this sin become acceptable?”
Three minutes later, Buell posted another comment: “By the way, if one doesn’t like the most recently posted opinion based on biblical principles and God’s laws, then go ahead and unfriend me. I’ll miss you like I miss my kidney stone from 1994. And I will never accept it because God will never accept it. Romans chapter one.”
“The school district is being anti-straight, anti-First Amendment and anti-personal liberty,” said Horatio Mihet, an attorney with the Liberty Counsel. “The idea that public servants have to whole-heartedly endorse homosexual marriage is repugnant to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,”..."
Story here.
Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Savage bullying.

Yet again I offer proof that "tolerance" is a one-way street in the glbt community.
In any conflict between two entities, the wrongdoer wants to silence his opponent, but the person who is right wants his opponent to speak, so that all may see where his opponent is wrong. For example...
"...Just this past May, Savage demanded that a Canadian politician “Suck my d***, John.” That politician’s crime? He held an opposing position on the gay agenda. Five months earlier, in a single Newsweek article, Savage said “F**K John McCain,” and called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia a “c**ksucker.”
And the anti-bullying activist has no qualms about trying to bully media outlets into removing conservative voices from the air. In 2010, he told CNN’s Kyra Phillips:..."
My supporting info is here.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Homofascists are bullying the Boy Scouts.

Gay is behavior, not race. To swap out the word,"Black" for "gay" is wrong because the color of a person's skin is morally benign and a person's sexual conduct is never morally benign.
The Boy Scouts acknowledge God and his laws. Boy Scouts are; trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent. I memorized these twelve words, in this sequence, over 38 years ago.
A person cannot embrace sexual sin and be reverent. Therefore, all those who wish to embrace sexual sin cannot be a part of the BSA. Leave it to anti-Christ, "gay activists," to want to destroy the Boy Scouts of America for their reverence for God's laws.
Story here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


