"Which parent do I not need, my mom or my dad?"

Since I normally have Mondays off, and I am home from my Heavenly Father's house, it is Friday night for me.  And what do I find at the beginning of my weekend whilst on patrol for the latest ammunition against homofascism?  An eleven-year-old girl who has skewered the entire glbt community with a single question!!  HAHAHAHA!  OMG... homofascism has AIDS!

The consequences of redefining marriage.

Brian Brown vs. Dan Savage.

I haven't had time to watch this yet but I'll post it anyway.

Elton John admits that he's harming his child.

I wanted to post this story about a week and a half ago, but my work schedule and the Chick-fil-A episode have prevented me from doing so.

It is wrong to deprive a child of a parent through one's own sexual actions or "orientation." If you're going to live the single life, or the gay life, or a life that embraces any other sexual sin... leave kids alone!

HRC linked to child rape.

I’m well aware that all homosexuals aren’t a danger to children, but I’m also aware that, when a man breaks from sexual sanity, he becomes a danger to children. A man who is sexually attracted to boys doesn’t see sex with boys as something wrong, he sees the act of sex with a child as an act of “love,” because that’s what he was told when he was seduced, by an older male, into homosexuality himself.

This is one of the reasons the glbt community is so desperate to bypass parental consent to normalize homosexuality to children.

I'm surprised that the San Francisco Chronicle even reported this story. More info here.

The DANGER of redefining marriage.

Last week, I discovered a story concerning a sexual relationship between three men where ALL of the definitions of a true marriage were broken; the one-man-with-one-woman definition, the TWO-become-one definition, and, the definition of adult-with-adult was also brushed against.

The story was too disturbing for me to cover at first. A Facebook friend posted it on her wall, and I discovered it during a standard, morning sweep of the internet. The story gave me the creeps and I was going to leave it alone until I saw the video above. It was this paragraph sent me into a high orbit when I first encountered this story.

"... “My relationship with Mark is lover and husband. And my relationship with Vinny is lover and son—even though there’s a sexual aspect to it,” DiLuzio says. “I think the type of nurturing we both give to Vinny is more of a parental kind of guideline, as well as a boyfriend guideline.” ..."

Lover and SON!?!?! WHAT WAS THAT!! What the f*** did you say?!

Is this not proof, from the words of an active homosexual, of the link between marriage redefiners, homosexuality, child molestation, and polygamy? It's obvious to me that all those who deviate from God's definition of marriage either directly or indirectly support sexual practices that endanger children.

Those who support same-sex "marriage," don't care about depriving a child of an opposite-sex parent. Those who support homosexuality think that it's okay to tell a child that homosexuality is okay without the consent of that child's parents. Those who support sexualizing, or having sex with children, obviously do so without the consent of that child's parents. And those who support polygamy refuse to see that it is mathematically impossible for a man with too many children to spend an appropriate amount of time with each of his children.

Those who cast aside true marriage must cast aside the Truth first.

Dan Savage vs. the Word of God/Challenge for Dan Savage.

In the video below, that contains language that some people might find offensive, anti-Christ bigot Dan Savage calls scriptures that forbid sexual sin in the Bible "bull****." Then Mr Savage goes on to cherry-pick Old Testament verses concerning food-handling that were made obsolete by the words and sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Just as the word "homosexual" didn't exist when God wrote the Bible through men, the word "employee" didn't exist either. In the contemporary American language of this blog, the word "slave" in Romans, in the Bible, would be "employee," since the "slaves" spoken of in the New Testament, were being paid for their work!

Dan Savage is using a very old tactic of twisting scripture to justify his homosexual sin, since the Bible condemns slavery, which was called "manstealing" in it's day, in 1 Timothy 1:8-11! And, to the Glory of God, (who exposes Dan Savage's entire argument in one verse) verse 10 condemns men who have sex with men (whom we now call "homosexuals," and no longer call "sodomites") before slave traders.

Since he had an audience of young Christians who couldn't possibly have the scriptural knowledge of a mature Christian, Mr Savage got away with mischaracterizing the Word of God and deceiving many into thinking that God is now okay with sexual sin. Notice that sexual sin is the first thing mentioned here.

When will Mr. Savage go into a Mosque and call the verses that command the death of homosexuals in the Quran "bull****"?

The original info that inspired my challenge to Dan Savage to debate scripture with me on this blog can be found here.

Marriage redefiner Warren Jeffs sentenced.

This man, who served Satan by redefining marriage while claiming to be a servant of Jesus Christ, won't be eligible for parole until he's 100 years old. This is a good thing.

I would feel no compassion for this bisexual (which makes him a member of the glbt community) child molester if he were to become a "bride" in a reversed-polygamy, prison "marriage," where he was the only "bride" of multiple "husbands."

If all of his victims were young boys, would this be as big of a story?

Marriage redefiner guilty of child rape.

<----This false prophet has been exposed. He used the Lord's name in vain by claimed to be a man of God, then he redefined God's definition of marriage and raped a 12-year-old girl.

The Word of God tells us to look at what a person's life produces verses what that person says. Any person who claims to be a Christian, but regularly and willfully violates the commandments of the Lord is a liar. This man is NOT a Christian.

Story here.

Homosexual "marriage"? How cute!

Look at how sweet and innocent the cover of this vile book is. It's like the marketing design of a box of candy.

Look at the light blue background and the innocent, cute little birds. Look at how the strings that hold up the sign rise up and out of view as if God himself is holding them. Look at the smiling, clean shaven faces of the homosexuals holding hands. Observe the free-floating balloons that defy the laws of physics just to be near the two well-dressed sodomites. See how the little boy is dressed the same way as the men, yet his jacket is a lighter color. Will he be awarded a black jacket when he graduates to anal intercourse like the gay men have? And why is the guy in the glasses looking at the little boy's butt instead of looking at the guy he's "marrying"?

Why is the little boy pointing up like that and smiling even broader than the 44-times-more-likely-to-contract-AIDS men? Is he pointing up as if to say, "Hey there fellow child! I've got something fun to tell you about!"?

My God this is sad.

"Male Intergenerational Intimacy"

Just as "homosexual" was changed to "gay," now, man-on-boy molestation is called, "Male Intergenerational Intimacy." I think I'm going to throw up.

I DON'T think, for one minute, that all homosexuals are child molesters. That's absurd. But I DO think that at least one out of three "gay" men were seduced into the glbt community when they were children. Be advised that there is some profanity in this link.