Posts
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
As a servant of Jesus Christ, I reject the hatred FOR and FROM, the glbt community. I challenge the glbt community to denounce telling children that homosexuality is normal, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents; the PRIME goal of the glbt community. I speak out against homofascism, transtyranny, genderinsanity, and ANY end-run around parental rights. REDEFINED marriage harms children. Click on the "h" for the full definition of "heteroseparatist."
Standing challenge to Rob Tish, Joe.My.God., and Dan Savage.
Thu.28Jan.2010. How come Rob Tish won't disavow how some in the gay community wish to recruit schoolchildren, in grades K thru 6, INTO the glbt lifestyle WITHOUT the consent of their parents? Especially after my challenge to his video? Will Joe.My.God. ever face my challenge to him? Will Dan Savage ever face my challenge?
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(228)
-
▼
October
(33)
- Regnerus. Part two.
- "...marriage is more than what adults want for the...
- The GLBT's community's desire to violate parental ...
- "I want to be a boy again."
- R-74
- HAMmering homofascism.
- Encore pic.
- Dakota Ary.
- Dr, Edmond Bergler.
- Maine marriage.
- Gay bashing... squared.
- Dawn Stefanowicz, heteroactivist extraordinaire.
- Marriage Equality. (It already exists!!)
- 600,000 signatures to protect marriage in the Unit...
- Dear NOM comments. (update)
- How true.
- In front of children too?!
- Father, mother, child. It can't be beat.
- "...the signature meant that I was anti-gay."
- H.A.M. illustration.
- How civil rights and parental rights are violated ...
- Hatred from marriage redefiners.
- The consequences of redefining marriage.
- It's not bigotry... it's biology.
- Congratulations Felix Baumgartner.
- Marriage redefinition bigotry at Gallaudet Univers...
- The Sandusky touch.
- Homofascists aren't after children?
- Feminist-femme lesbian angry at reality.
- HAM pic.
- How gay "marriage" destroys religious freedom.
- Matt Birk supports true marriage.
- Heterosexual awareness month.
-
▼
October
(33)
One of your consequences is that "since gay marriage was instituted in the Netherlands out-of-wedlock birthrate has increased"
ReplyDeleteFirst of all, that's a "Post hoc ergo propter hoc" if I've ever seen one (logical fallacy).
Second, please explain how gay couples getting married would lead to out-of-wedlock births, since, last time I checked, gay couples can't procreate so there is no relation between the two.
If you worked hard next to a slacker and, at the end of the day, the slacker got the same amount of pay as you did, would you continue to work as hard the next day?
ReplyDeleteLike counterfeit money devalues real money, a marriage certificate looses it's value to conformists when the rules are changed to reward non-conformists with the same prize. A same-sex couple should not have what I have because they have not DONE what I have done.
So what you're saying is because gay couples can get married, straight couples aren't going to work as hard to get married? That is the argument you are going with?
ReplyDeleteNo. People won't value a marriage license as much if it is given out to those who haven't rightly earned it.
DeleteSo people won't value a marriage license as much because gay couples can get married? As such people won't get married but still have kids anyway (i.e. out-of-wedlock births) and THIS is how same-sex marriage causes an increase in out-of-wedlock births? Because that's basically what you are arguing right now, Mantronikk.
DeleteNo need to add to my words. When you decided to embrace homosexuality, you knew that marriage was between one man and one woman.
DeleteNo, there is a need to add to your words because your argument boils down to "because gay people can get married straight people won't want to get married" which is utterly ridiculous and shows how desperate you are to show negative consequences of gay marriage.
ReplyDeleteI am utterly flummoxed that you TRULY believe that straight people won't want to get married because gay people can get married.
Some, not all, won't value a marriage certificate, if marriage is redefined. And you will not add to MY words.
Delete