Whatever happened to sexual common-sense?

How did this happen? How were so many people decieved into believing that there are no differences between men and women? We think differently, we have a different set of emotions, we have a different set of priorities, we have different genitals. Yet, some people actually think that a same-sex couple isn't a disadvantage to the psychological developement of a child.

So a child doesn't need a mother and a father?!?

Isn’t it obvious that a child needs a mother and a father? I quietly separate myself from people that think otherwise.

"…that led the American Psychological Association (in 2005) to assert that the children of gay and lesbian parents are in no way disadvantaged, compared to the children of heterosexual parents, has concluded those studies were inadequate. According to Dr. Loren Marks, Associate Professor at Louisiana State University, who authored the analysis: “The available data, which are drawn from small convenience samples, are insufficient to support a strong generalizable claim...

…Those who knew that their mothers had had a lesbian relationship fared significantly worse on measures of educational attainment and household income, reported more depression, used marijuana more, more often reported forced sexual encounters…

…Those who knew their fathers had had a gay relationship were more likely to have been arrested, to have thought recently about suicide, to feel depressed, to report sexually transmitted diseases and to have experienced forced sex. …

…Twenty-three percent of young adults who knew their mother to have had a gay relationship reported being forced to have sexual contact with a parent or adult caregiver, while only 2 percent of intact families with a mother and father reported such contact. For female young adults, that figure leapt to 31 percent (while only 3 percent of young women from intact heterosexual families reported this). …

…What we should avoid at all costs is silencing such research and such discussion because it is seen by some as politically incorrect. Where optimizing the well-being of children is involved, no stone should be left unturned. …”

Story here and here.

The risks of having lesbian "mothers."

Supporting info here.

Gays can't stifle the Eiffel.

France!? "Gay" Paree?? Taking a stand against homofascism? What the hell is going on here? Who would've thought that a stand for sexual sanity would come out of France?

A lesbian woman tried to adopt the daughter of her lesbian partner and was blocked by a very powerful court in the EU.

This is an incredible development for the liberal judges in the United States that worship all things European. I'm still reeling from this story.

Gay "love" not enough for kids.

Once, in an online discussion, in an effort to pull him back into the realm of sexual sanity, I asked a homosexual what he would do if he found out that his male friend was having sex with a seven year old girl. To my horror, the homosexual responded that he would, “talk” to his friend to, “see what his reasoning was.”

I know what I would do if my best friend told me that he was having sex with a seven year old girl. I would tackle him and hold onto him until the local police took him into custody.

It really boggles my mind when I stop to think that there are people that actually believe that a same-sex household does NOT harm a child, or that the redefinition of marriage won’t harm children. What kind of a depraved mind can’t understand the concept of just how important a safe environment for children is?

Today I found a great article concerning sexual sanity and the safety of children...

“...Men and women bring diversity to parenting...Mothers and fathers simply are not interchangeable. Two women can both be good mothers, but neither can be a good father. ...”

“...children progress through predictable and necessary developmental stages. Some stages require more from a mother, while others require more from a father.”

“...if a young boy is to become a competent man, he must detach from his mother and instead identify with his father. A fatherless boy doesn’t have a man with whom to identify and is more likely to have trouble forming a healthy masculine identity.”

“...Overall, fathers play a restraining role in the lives of their children. They restrain sons from acting out antisocially, and daughters from acting out sexually. When there’s no father to perform this function, dire consequences often result both for the fatherless children and for the society in which these children act out their losses.”

“...Certainly homosexual couples can be just as loving as heterosexual couples, but children require more than love. They need the distinctive qualities and the complementary natures of a male and female parent. The accumulated wisdom of over 5,000 years has concluded that the ideal marital and parental configuration is composed of one man and one woman. Arrogantly disregarding such time-tested wisdom, and using children as guinea pigs in a radical experiment, is risky at best, and cataclysmic at worst.”

Complete, homofascist-crushing-article here.

The glbt and feminist war on masculinity.

There is a definite link between women who are uncomfortable with strong independent men, and how a boy develops into a homosexual.

When a boy is born to a woman who is full of anger towards men, in many instances, the woman removes the boy's father from his life, and raises the boy in an environment where masculinity is constantly denigrated. This creates an environment from which effeminate homosexuals develop.

Before I was married, if a woman I was dating copped an attitude when I opened a door for her, or if she forbade her son from playing with toy guns, I quietly faded from that woman's life. Having worked with arch-feminists for eight years, I developed effective tactics to deal with feminist contempt.

“...What it says is that my worry that Ms. Lyons might be expressing her own discomfort with masculinity and projecting it onto her son—and mine, and yours—seems to have been justified.

It says that Lyons does seem to have been promulgating her perspectives on gender roles having no value.

It says that she was, indeed, apparently using J. Crew—a brand so many of our kids gravitate toward—as her launching pad for a mini-campaign to change the way our kids think about their bodies and their gender identities.

See, I don’t think it’s so terrible that boys are different than girls. I think it’s just fine, in fact, that a central supporting beam of the architecture of most boys’ senses of self is that they look like boys and act like boys and feel like boys. I don’t think that’s pathological. But I think that Jenna Lyons—and maybe J. Crew—would disagree with me. ...”

Complete article here.

Lesbians dress boy as a girl for facebook pic.

And just how is a boy supposed to learn how to become a man with two lesbians as "parents"? Isn't it common sense to see the link between gay "parents" and sexually confused children? Will I be condemned as a "heterosexist" for stating to obvious? Will I be called a sexist for stating that there are differences between men and women? Who was afraid to say that it was wrong to place children in this immoral, lesbian household?

"...A SIX-year-old boy placed in the care of a lesbian foster couple was dressed in girl's clothes and the humiliating pictures were posted on the couple's Facebook page.

One of the women was preparing for a sex change to become a man at the time, while her girlfriend was undergoing fertility treatment...."

Story here.