Homofascism in the Armed Forces of the United States of America.

Don't Ask Don't Tell protected both the homosexual and the servants of the Lord.  Now that DADT is gone, true Christians are being illegally persecuted.  The link at libertyinstitute.org is here.

The end of DADT.

How long will it be before some young military recruit walks into the latrine of his barracks in the middle of the night and sees two men having sex with each other? Or sees some homosexual, much larger than him, staring at his genitalia or his behind as he's taking a shower? Now, with the repeal of DADT, it's open season for homosexual harassment towards heterosexual young men going into the military.

How long will it be before a homosexual is murdered because of his unwanted sexual advances? The, "Don't ask..." part was to protect homosexuals, and the, "...don't tell" part was to protect heterosexuals. Now young men going into the military will have to be on the alert in their own showers. Shouldn't a soldier have some place where he can stand-down and be at rest?

"..."This makes as much sense as permitting men to sleep in women's barracks. Allowing open lusting and sexual activities in showers and barracks will greatly erode trust, troop morale, and military effectiveness. ..."

More info here.

Resisting homoindoctrination in the United States military.

An Army lieutenant colonel is refusing to sign an order to send his men to, "...mandatory training sessions intended to change their attitudes toward homosexuality."

Now, just yesterday, I heard African American/Black people compared to homosexuals. And I know that most people who lack the ability to discern the difference between race and sexual misconduct will see the repeal of DADT as the same as the racial desegregation of the military. This is wrong. Homosexuality is a behavior, not a race. So it is wrong to equate the two.

Story here.

DADT cartoon.

DADT repealed.

Well, it's not like gays weren't already there. I'm kind of glad I can stop blogging about DADT since all talk about DADT was irrelevant until today's vote.

I'm still concerned about the homosexual harassment that some soldiers and sailors may not have protection from; harassment from some in the glbt community is what got me started on my website and this blog. I bet the Navy recruiter's job just got real easy! Article here.

The homofascist behind WikiLeaks.

This is the gay man who leaked much of the classified information to WikiLeaks. His motivation was his rebellion against DADT. This fact is ignored by the mainstream media although his treasonous actions were a direct result of his homosexuality.

Private Bradley Manning apparently cares more about pushing homosexuality into the United States Military than the lives that will be lost due to his betrayal of classified documents. Story here.

Will boy-toy Choi get to deploy?

Looks like DADT is going to die with, reportedly, 70% of American service members being okay with homosexuality.

Also, yet again, the differences between race, gender, and sexual conduct have been wrongly fused together in the minds of the undiscerning and the hearts of the brainwashed. Once again, perverted, sinful behavior has been equated to the morally-benign color of a person's skin. Once again, a man who doesn't want to be homosexually harassed in his military bunk or shower will be dismissed as "homophobic."

Will military personnel in "open" marriages be able to sleep around now? How can adultery remain forbidden in the UCMJ if open homosexuality is allowed, since some people are okay with open marriages?

Article here.

Boy-toy Choi can't redeploy.

I'm still surprised when sexual sanity prevails. And I'm just about done talking about DADT.

It seems to me that gays love rule-breaking. Every gay person in the military swore to abide by the UCMJ, but some, like Lt. Choy, feel that they are above all laws, even the laws of God.

In my experience as a heteroseparatist, I've figured out how to expose just how for most gays will go when I ask a gay person if they would encourage a child to embrace the glbt lifestyle, WITHOUT the consent or knowledge of that child's parents. I can completely renounce teaching heterosexuality to a child without the consent of that child's parents, but I have yet to hear a homosexual do the same thing that I can. Anyhow, I digress. Click here.

USMC vs. homofascism.

As much heterosexual love that I have for President Obama, I don't think that he's looking at the repeal of DADT from the correct prospective. The prospective of those whose daily lives are most affected.

NOTHING unnecessary should be forced upon a man who risks his life on the battlefield for his country. And all reasonable requests from that man should be met without question or hesitation. ALL reasonable requests.

It is a reasonable request for a infantryman to not want to bunk or shower with a homosexual, just as it is reasonable for a woman in the military to not want to shower and bunk with a man. This truth is something that cannot be denied by a reasonable, clear-thinking person. Why then, is the repeal of DADT even being considered when homosexuality is (yes I'm going to say it yet again) behavior, not race.

Story here.

DADT video.

After just ending a three hour ordeal of restoring my beloved computer from some kind of "upgrade" that caused ALL of my icons to disappear, I ran into this video that explains exactly what I was about to post concerning the latest news on DADT.

UCMJ irrelevant if "gay."

Do hetero men that were court-martialed for adultery get their jobs back too? The Universal Code of Military Justice forbids homosexual acts and adultery. (Articles 125 & 134)

I was actually on Major Witt's side when I heard that she didn't tell the military she was gay, but someone else told the military she was gay. After all, it's called don't-ask-don't-tell and she didn't tell, someone else did.

Then I found out that Ms. Witt was dating a married woman! And STILL seeing her! Now all bets are off since she is now in violation of a second, serious article of the UCMJ for which heterosexuals ARE prosecuted! Don't gays want "equality"? She took this same oath that heterosexual servicepeople took. But wait! She's gay. Okay then. Let's all go home now. She's gay and, therefore, cannot be touched by the laws that bind us mere mortals.

Story here, here, and here.

DADT stands.

I desperately wanted to post this story yesterday but had to get up at 0330hrs today.

Anyway, it looks like DADT will stand for now, which is a good thing. Men in the battlefield have enough to worry about without having to be forced to bunk and shower with homosexuals. The United States should make life as comfortable as possible for those brave men and women who protect our precious freedoms, and it is ridiculous to subject our American warriors to even the possibility of homosexual harassment in their living quarters.

Story here.

Lady Gaga vs. The United States Military.

My money is on the military. Even if DADT is repealed, it won't be because of Lady Gaga.

Would Lady Gaga tolerate showering nude with someone that she didn't want to shower nude with? This is what she expects men in the military to do. Women in the military aren't expected to tolerate sexual harassment from men in the military, but the repeal of DADT will allow homosexuals to harass straight men since ANY complaints from a straight serviceman will be dismissed as "homophobia." Story here.

DADT video.

DADT still in effect.

Lifting DADT wouldn't be like the racial desegregation of the military because homosexuality is behavior, not race. Those who fight for the repeal of DADT are wrong in their belief that people are born gay, and people that think that homosexuality is a conscious, overnight choice are also wrong.

The glbt lifestyle can be accurately compared to a person becoming a heroin addict; the addiction is not a single choice, but the result of choices and time. Is it okay for a heroin addict to serve in the military?

My supporting link.

Homophobia?!

How many women would join the Armed Forces of the United States of America if they knew, beforehand, that they would sometimes be required to be nude in front of, and shower with, men? Would this not dampen a woman's desire to join this type of a military because of its abandonment of common sense and sexual sanity? Would any high-ranking woman in our American military try to force this situation upon lower-ranking women?

Why is it then, that some gays and homoappeasers call it "homophobia" (one of the top five most overused words in our culture!) when a male soldier doesn't want to shower and bunk with a homosexual? It looks to me like the mighty United States Marine Corps has a solution to this homofascist developement. Story here.

Wikileaks source a rebellious homosexual.

This dude decided to betray his country because of his rebellion against God and DADT. He has endangered the lives of confidential informants, if he hasn't already caused some deaths, just because he wants to have sex with men. He knew, before he went into the American military, that he was supposed to keep what he does under the covers undercover, but he decided to rebel. Even at the expense of other people's lives. Why don't they just call the website "WickedLeaks'? Info here, here, and here.

Lt. Dan Choi.

Why did this guy join the Armed Forces of The United States of America when he knew that openly gay service members weren't welcome? It had to be for the attention he would get by rebelling against sexual sanity. A classic "spotlight" homosexual that I described in my manifesto. Did Mr. Choi ever stop to think about how he my be embarrassing his parents and his siblings? There must be someone with sexual sanity in his family. Sad story here.

Dont drop the soap!

The prime, common-sense concern of straight men in the military concerning homosexual men will be the close living conditions that are often unavoidable in the military. (Homofascists will of course label these concerns of straight men as "homophobia.") But I would imagine that heterosexual men in the Armed Forces would want to be treated with the same respect that women in the military receive, like not being forced to shower with men, and not having to put up with unwanted sexual attention from men. Haven't I been saying this all along? Then today I find this.

DADT survey going to troops.

Is a woman in the military a prude for not wanting to shower in front of men? Neither is a man "homophobic" for not wanting to shower with a homosexual.