A good explination of the Kim Davis case for the homofascists mind.

Kim Davis, the Kentucky clerk, could have been smarter. (Updated.)

I've been crunching the data on this case since I first heard of it.  Ms. Davis should have demanded retraining for another job/position if her decision to live by the Word of God prevents her from complying with the POTUS ruling on same-sex marriage.  The legal fight to preserve true marriage was lost.  True Christians must now do things like privatizing divisions of their businesses.  For example; a servant of Jesus Christ who owns a bakery should do wedding cakes by invitation only.
A Christian photographer should do weddings by invitation only or simply go completely silent when asked to do a same-sex "marriage." 

Until human laws evolve to recognize those who wish to live their lives by the inspired Word of God, true Christians must be smarter.  Why don't servants of Jesus Christ simply go silent when asked to participate in the redefinition of marriage?  If one were to just go silent and stare at the member of the glbt community, the glbt person would, eventually, just walk away without being able to truthfully say that they were denied service. 

True Christians must now either get out of the wedding business, or figure out how to obey the Word of God and do business.  We must be wise a serpents and innocent as doves. 

More info here, here and here.

The amazing Katy Faust.

Who is more qualified than this woman to speak about the wrongness of same-sex "parents"?

Same-sex "marriage" is just wrong.  But, since common sense observations about the importance of a mother and a father to a child's life are dismissed as "bigotry" by the glbt community, this video is further proof of a child's need and right to a father and a mother. 

The emotion-driven glbt community has no respect for reality.

SCOTUS has fallen: It's open season on true Christians.

Well, I can't say that I'm surprised. I'm saddened, but not surprised.

The Supreme Court of the United States has been wrong before, especially in 1973 when convenience abortion was legalized.  The Supreme Court of the United States even supported slavery at one time.  Now same-sex "marriage" has been forced on all states by five Godless, unelected people that can't discern the difference between race and sexual behavior.

The word "gay" is a noun and a verb, the word "black" is just a noun.  This subtle difference has flown over the heads of many and allowed the glbt community to falsely portray their redefinition of marriage as a civil rights issue.

How long will it be until business-busting-homofascists start targeting Christian businesses?  Even Chief Justice John Roberts has foreseen the coming wave of anti-Christ homofascism.

Story here.

Michael LaCour perpetrates a fraud about same-sex "marriage."

I first heard about this story about four days ago from Fox news, and I'm in the middle of a rare, low-stress day off, so I finally have time to investigate and address this case that doesn't surprise me one bit. 

Homosexual activists will do anything to normalize homosexuality to those who don't know the Truth and I am so glad that I discovered the Truth when I was 17.  This blog wouldn't exist had not the glbt community attacked me for merely disagreeing with their behavior.

Anyhow, the link to this story on retractionwatch.com is here.  And more info is here, and here.

A heartwrenching amicus brief to SCOTUS.

It's simple.  A child has the right to a father and a mother and same-sex "marriage" does psychological harm to children!  There's no escaping the fact.  Is it not evil to be unconcerned about the safety of a child?  Some gays even admit that they are harming their children and still keep harming their own children!

This video reveals the emotion-based entry into the glbt community.

Great pic.

This picture explains my point of view very well and the point of view of many others who won't support or participate in a same-sex "marriage."  Those who reject the inspired Word of God/The Bible will never know the truth.

A "marriage" between three men.

Couldn’t it be considered bigotry to say that marriage is between two people? What if a woman wants to marry her boyfriend and her horse? Who is to say that she is wrong? What about her constitutional right to pursue happiness? This is why God defined marriage. God knows what He’s doing.

“… “Love occurs unconditionally and is not limited to only two people,” Art wrote on Facebook. “Love brings peace to the world.”

But after this month’s report out of Thailand, some Christians are noting the inevitable slippery slope that they have stated would result if society deviated from God’s creation order.

“The events in Thailand simply confirm what we’ve been saying all this time: If marriage is no longer the union of one man and one woman, then it can be anything: Two men, two women, three men, three women, or an almost infinite number of other possibilities,” Dr. Michael Brown wrote for Charisma News.

…He noted that the situation demonstrates how mankind has made up its own rules along the way in an attempt to legitimize and justify what a particular person wants. Since homosexuals have stated that marriage should be defined as the union of two people who have feelings for each other, regardless of gender, where does the rule about two people come from?

“If a gay activist says, ‘But marriage is the loving, long-term commitment of two people,’ the answer is simple: ‘Says who? That’s just your new definition. Where did you get the idea it was two people if not from its historic, natural meaning?'” Brown explained. “And so, if I’m ‘bigoted’ because I don’t recognize same-sex ‘marriage,’ then gay activists (and their allies) are just as ‘bigoted’ if they don’t recognize three men (or women) ‘marrying.’

“Those who have taken down the fence of marriage as God intended it have opened up a Pandora’s Box of possibilities,” he said, “none of them good.” …”

Full story here.

Homointolerance at Marquette University.

Same-sex "marriage" supported in a Catholic University?!?

Great defense of the true definition of marriage.

Since I've already covered homofascism from so many angles for over five years now, I was lamenting the lack of new material to blog about when this jewel of a video dropped into my hands.  I was encouraged by Ryan Anderson's wise response to the old, worn-out, "discrimination" argument of the homosexual community.

A homosexual has the same right to marry one woman at a time that I do.  Every one has the right to marry.  But no one has the right to redefine marriage, which is what the glbt community is doing. 

This video gets into the meat of the redefinition of marriage at 2:30.  I was thrilled!  I love seeing the clever arguments of the glbt community exposed for what they are.

The end of Ellen and Portia?

 

Personally, I really like Ellen DeGeneres.  I covered her relationship in this excerpt of my manifesto...

The eight divisions of lesbianism are...

The four major categories; the Disappointed lesbian, who’s decided to live her life having romantic, sexual relations with other females due to her disappointment with the sexuality of and/or the weak and passive nature of modern men. The Exotic lesbian who’s turned on by the sheer rebelliousness of the lesbian lifestyle and/or the attention that it brings. The Feminist lesbian who sees sex with a man as an act of submission and oppression and just isn’t going to have sex with a man. Then, there’s the type that I care about the most, the Betrayed lesbian, who was sexually and/or emotionally abused by a person (usually her stepfather, mother’s boyfriend, or father) usually when she was very young and wants no sexual contact with anyone with an actual, live-flesh, penis.

The two minor categories are; the “Butch”/masculine lesbian, who’s decided to live her life as a man due to her appearance, rugged personality, and masculine/protective nature. (Most of these come from fatherless homes.) And the “Femme”/feminine lesbian, who usually doesn’t believe that the human male is capable of the kindness, compassion, or empathy of the human female, and/or wants a penis-free “man.”

The eight types of lesbians are much more emotionally intertwined than the five types of homosexuals because the former four types of lesbians; the disappointed, the exotic, the feminist, and the betrayed, choose one of the latter categories of butch or femme. Every lesbian that I’ve ever spoken to fits into one of the four major categorizes and one of the two sub-categorizes.

The best examples I can give are Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi. A betrayed-butch lesbian with an exotic-femme lesbian. And then there’s Rosie O’Donnell, who is clearly a feminist-butch lesbian.
(end excerpt)

With all of the above-mentioned info however, the Word of God will always be proven true.  No same-sex "marriage" can last because the participants thereof have automatically rejected the commandments of the Lord Jesus Christ and, unfortunately, are doomed to fail. 

Will video tapes of a belligerent Ellen end her relationship AND her television career?

Story here.

The importance of the definition of marriage.

Will marriage be outlawed altogether someday because of the current push to redefine it?  If I fall in love with my sister and get a vasectomy, can we marry?  Why not?  I would want nothing more than what a homosexual couple is asking for, so why not?  Do I not have a Constitutional right to the pursuit of happiness?  Who would we be harming by our marriage?

Baker refuses to participate in false wedding. (Updated 14 June 2014.)

A true Christian would refuse to bake a wedding cake if he knew that the man and woman getting married were sterile siblings or blood relatives or wrongly divorced.  A true Christian would also refuse to bake a cake for a polygamist or a same-sex couple.

This man, Mr. Jack Phillips, is dead on point with what the Lord Jesus Christ would do and want His followers to do; NOT deny service to the glbt community, but refuse to participate in a same-sex "wedding."  The gay community is in an uproar over the truth.  The truth is that it is wrong to have a romantic/sexual relationship with someone of your same sex.  But, if people have the right to be wrong, don't I have the right to walk away from them because of their behavior?  There are those who would force people like me to undergo "sensitivity training" for my heteroseparatist mindset.

Has a homosexual ever been ordered to attend sensitivity training for offending a true Christian?

More info here and here.

Is it illegal to not participate in a same-sex "marriage"?

 

First they came for the Christian bakers, then they came for the Christian florists, then they came for the Christian photographers...  Yet some still ask, "How does gay "marriage" affect yours?"

World Vision recovers!

First of all, a person cannot be in a same-sex "marriage" and be a Christian.  A person can have same-sex-attraction and be a Christian, but cannot willfully act on that attraction and remain one of God's adopted children.  And, over time, the Holy Spirit will correct that person's same-sex attraction.  But a person in a same-sex "marriage" has willfully rejected Jesus Christ's definition of marriage, and is not a Christian despite what they say or think.  

 

 

 

 

When this story first broke, I chalked it up to yet another Christian organization falling under the spell of homofascism.  But when World Vision came to their senses... I was overjoyed.

Story here.

What the redefinition of marriage has done to Massachusetts!!

I was stunned by the information revealed in this video. Despite the less-than-captivating speaking style of Brian Cameker, the info in this video is well worth bearing through till the end.

Sued for refusing wedding cake?

Gay and opposed to redefining marriage.

“… It’s also possible to oppose same-sex marriage based on reason and experience.

… but I am opposed to same-sex marriage. Because activists have made marriage, rather than civil unions, their goal, I am viewed by many as a self-loathing, traitorous gay. So be it. I prefer to think of myself as a reasoning, intellectually honest human being.

The notion of same-sex marriage is implausible, yet political correctness has made stating the obvious a risky business. Genderless marriage is not marriage at all. It is something else entirely.

Opposition to same-sex marriage is characterized in the media, at best, as clinging to “old-fashioned” religious beliefs and traditions, and at worst, as homophobia and hatred.

… Neither religion nor tradition has played a significant role in forming my stance. But reason and experience certainly have.

… But society now promotes the lowest form of love between men while sabotaging the higher forms. Gay culture continues to promote the sexualization of all…

… Neither religion nor tradition turned me into a dedicated father.

… Over several years, intellectual honesty led me to some unexpected conclusions: (1) Creating a family with another man is not completely equal to creating a family with a woman, and (2) denying children parents of both genders at home is an objective evil. Kids need and yearn for both.

… One day as I turned to climb the stairs I saw my sixteen-year-old son walk past his mom as she sat reading in the living room. As he did, he paused and stooped down to kiss her and give her a hug, and then continued on. With two dads in the house, this little moment of warmth and tenderness would never have occurred.

… Moms and dads interact differently with their children. To give kids two moms or two dads is to withhold from them someone whom they desperately need and deserve in order to be whole and happy. It is to permanently etch “deprivation” on their hearts.

… Gay and lesbian activists, and more importantly, the progressives urging them on, seek to redefine marriage in order to achieve an ideological agenda that ultimately seeks to undefine families as nothing more than one of an array of equally desirable “social units,” and thus open the door to the increase of government’s role in our lives.

… judges may have to decide how to split children into three, four, or five equal pieces. In Florida, a judge recently ordered that the birth certificate of a child must show a total of three parents—a lesbian couple and a gay man (the sperm-providing hairdresser of one of the lesbian moms). Expect much more of this to come.

… Marriage is not an elastic term. It is immutable. It offers the very best for children and society. We should not adulterate nor mutilate its definition, thereby denying its riches to current and future generations."

Full article here.

56th Annual Grammy Awards show celebrates same-sex "marriage."

I had every intention of watching the Grammy's last night but I got tired and fell asleep.  I knew that, if Lorde didn't win best song of the year for Royals, then the Grammy Awards were full of crap.

Then, lo and behold, I wake up to find out that the anti-Christ, redefinition of marriage was mixed in with true marriage at the end of the Grammy Awards last night. Even though it was apparently at the end of the show, I'm glad I missed it.

Sad story here and here.

SCOTUS stops marriage redefinition in Utah. (At least temporarily.)

Why is the definition of a true marriage always called, "...a same-sex 'marriage' ban..." by the mainstream media?  Why is this manipulative, incendiary, terminology the go-to phrase of so many?  This is the type of mislabeling that inspired me to create the word "heteroseparatist" in the first place.  Because of my childhood, misinformation drives me up the wall.

By the same reasoning that people support the redefinition of marriage, (the concept that a same-sex couple should have the same access to marriage of a heterosexual couple) people support marriage between sterile, adult siblings or polygamists.  If the glbt community is allowed to redefine marriage, then other communities must also be able to redefine marriage.

Story here and here.