Encore video for true marriage.

This video is very well done.

French homosexual against same-sex "marriage."

The President of France is powering-up to force same-sex "marriage" upon his countrymen, and the most telling display of his absurd efforts is the fact that some homosexuals in his own country think that he's wrong.  More info here. 

"Equal protection"?

Marriage redefiners will say anything to distract from the fact that they do, indeed, wish to redefine marriage from something that takes place between one man and one woman, to something that is merely between two people.  Just as a heterosexual couple doesn't have the right to redefine marriage, a same-sex couple doesn't have the right to redefine marriage.

At 2:32, the woman decietfully compares the morally benign conditions of gender and race to sexual orientation.  If a person is sexually attracted to someone of their same gender, their sexual orientation is wrong.  If an adult is sexually attracted to children, their sexual orientation is wrong.  There is a right and wrong to sexual orientation. 

At 5:32, the false comparison to interracial is made since laws forbidding interracial marriage were only made to prevent white women from marrying non-white men.

Gay & Lesbian Anger Against Disagreement.

The phrase “rhetorical tactic” captured my attention in the article from which the quotes mentioned below come from. This is what motivated me to become the founder of heteroseparatism. I was smeared and mischaracterized as a “homophobe” and I wasn’t going to let a particular homofascist bully get away with it.

It appears that a woman named Jennifer Roback Morse has had a recent experience with homofascism also.

“...GLAAD’s systematic policy of slapping negative labels on their opponents without actually engaging them in debate reduces the quality of discourse in the public square.

...Out of the hundreds of thousands of words I have spoken or written, GLAAD found a grand total of four quotes as evidence of my supposed “extreme animus towards the entire LGBT community.” One of these is that I say redefining marriage will marginalize fathers from the family, because fathers will be considered inessential. GLAAD acts as if this were self-evident evidence of anti-gay bias.

...Evidently GLAAD believes that raising legitimate questions about the group’s preferred policies automatically makes a person “anti-gay.”

...Redefining marriage raises questions that deserve to be fully aired. Trying to discredit skeptics changes the subject.

...These rhetorical tactics do not do the gay lobby any credit. In fact, responsible people of all parties should shun these strategies and make room for honest debate on this momentous question of changing the fundamental structure of our most important social institution. ..."

Full, well-written, article here.

NOM denounces "hate."

In this video, at 0:01:00, Ms. Gallagher denounces hate. But the anti-Christ division of the glbt community will still, absurdly, accuse her of "hatred" as long as she stands for God's definition of marriage.

Does the glbt community hate NOM's free speech?

It would be different if NOM was preaching violence against the gay community, but they're not. NOM is simply standing up for the Godly, (I Cor. 7:2) common-sense, one-man-one-woman definition of marriage. How does this "deny gays their human rights?"