Okay "NOM comments," here's what's going to happen.
You and I are going to talk here and only here on THIS post until I say otherwise. I've noticed that you drop a subject and attack from another post whenever I corner you on a point-of-logic, so I'm containing you here.
I will guarantee you that I will post all of your comments, that do not contain profanity, and that only you and I will talk here. But, if you sidestep or ignore my questions, you're not going to be posting here anymore.
Since I have been responding to your questions and accusations, without ignoring or sidestepping ANYTHING that you've come at me with... I'm going to go first this time. (Strap in. It's going to be a bumpy ride.)
My first question is: Do you think that Christian parents should have the right to exclude their children from classes where homosexual acts are discussed? (And I'm not talking about the mere mention of homosexuals in "anti-bullying" classes.)
Showing posts with label one-on-one debate. Show all posts
Showing posts with label one-on-one debate. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
Monday, September 10, 2012
Challenge for Jason Friedman.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Challenge for Mark Monford of the San Francisco Chronicle.

Dear Mr. Monford,
I hereby challenge you to a debate on this blog where I will match my heteroseparatism against your homofascism. And I hereby promise to post all of your replies that do not contain profanity.
Do you have what it takes to face me or are you all print? Can you defend your homofascist rant against me? Can you face me one-on-one? Can you support your homofascism in a debate with a live person?
I hereby challenge you to a debate on this blog where I will match my heteroseparatism against your homofascism. And I hereby promise to post all of your replies that do not contain profanity.
Do you have what it takes to face me or are you all print? Can you defend your homofascist rant against me? Can you face me one-on-one? Can you support your homofascism in a debate with a live person?
I saw your slanderous, hetero-bashing article today...
“...Woe to you, oh modern card-carrying homophobe. For it can't be easy to be you right now, what with all the terrifying changes taking place, all the dramatic sexual upheavals and flagrant displays of "unnatural" love being hurled like exotic sushi in your plain hamburger face these days. Oh, you poor dear. ...”
Full homofascist article here.
“...Woe to you, oh modern card-carrying homophobe. For it can't be easy to be you right now, what with all the terrifying changes taking place, all the dramatic sexual upheavals and flagrant displays of "unnatural" love being hurled like exotic sushi in your plain hamburger face these days. Oh, you poor dear. ...”
Full homofascist article here.
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Challenge for Mischa Bilinski.

So you want to call me a bigot? Can you explain your accusation here, where we can talk one-on-one?
Just so you'll have no excuse for not showing up, I'll promise to post all of your comments, that do not contain profanity. I'll bet that you can't fight one-on-one. Can you prove me wrong? I ignored your first insult where you compared Christianity to the Westboro Baptist Church, which is like saying all gays support NAMBLA.
Can you do it Mischa? Can you back up your wild accusations? What will people think if you don't answer my challenge?
Monday, August 22, 2011
Challenge for Bart de Graaf.
Mr. de Graaf. Can you debate one-on-one? I challenge you to meet me here where we can speak concerning Mr. Jerry Buell's suspension for speaking disrespectfully about same-sex "marriage."
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Monday, May 16, 2011
Dear "Voice of Reason."

Dear Voice of Reason, (VoR for short) I've seen your last two comments and I've decided to clear up a matter before I accept any more of your posts. I think that I've figured out something about you.
Because of my experiences with comments about my posts, I've developed a process of figuring out key pieces of information by formulating a key question.
I must preface my question to you with the following statement; I hereby denounce speaking to any child about the Lord Jesus Christ and I denounce recruiting children into the heterosexual lifestyle, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents.
Now. That being said. VoR, can you match me by stating that you won't support gays that wish to tell children that joining the glbt community is okay, WITHOUT the knowledge or consent of that child's parents? Because if you can't, that will tell me how far your support for the glbt community goes.
I know how some people like to throw up a smoke screen when they're dodging a simple question so I'll make it clear that I'm not talking about the mere mention of the existence of homosexuals in the anti-bullying classes taught to schoolkids. I'm specifically talking about those in the gay community that wouldn't hesitate to tell a child that entering the glbt community is okay, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents.
So, Voice of Reason, this is the question I'm presenting to you. Will you denounce how some adults in the glbt community will tell a child/person under the age of 16, that it okay for them to BE gay, WITHOUT the consent of their parents?
Monday, April 11, 2011
Discussion with Mr. Rusty Blustering.
Dear Rusty:
I choose not to speak to someone via two different means. I am a monotasker 89% of the time and I'm having a hard time keeping track of our private emails and your comments on my blog posts.
I'm going to ask you to list your problems/questions concerning my heteroseparatist lifestyle in the comment section of this blog post so that I can understand you better. Only you and I are going to talk here. I will be deleting any future private emails or comments to other posts from you until I'm satisfied with your answers to my questions here.
And, to be fair, I won't send you any more emails until you are satisfied with my answers to your questions. I believe that I can help you come to a more Biblical understanding of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



