Monday, December 15, 2014

The "genderbread person."

How did the gingerbread man become the genderbread person?  Apparently he was taken hostage by homofascists and forced to push the gay agenda into the minds of 13-year-olds without the consent of their parents. 

This is what I shine the spotlight on.  This is what the glbt community wants.  The destruction of those who disagree with them, and unfettered access to the minds (and sometimes the bodies) of children.  The leadership of the glbt community howls about the perceived violation of their civil rights, when it comes to the redefinition of marriage, and then turns around and violates the parental civil rights of those who disagree with their evil sexual acts.

“… Along with local area groups, some parents are irate that their children’s sex ed class at Acalanes High School in Lafayette is being taught by employees of Planned Parenthood without their prior knowledge. They are also fuming over the methods and materials being used, including a checklist that asks students if they are “ready for sex” and another worksheet that describes how to give and obtain consent, as well as a diagram that uses a "genderbread" person for lessons in gender identity.

… “[Parents] are very concerned,” Brad Dacus, president of the Pacific Justice Institute, a non-profit legal organization that is assisting the concerned parents, told “Planned Parenthood is not exactly the best when it comes to putting young people first.
“They get more grants from the promiscuity of children,” he added. “The material they have provided was material that mirrored their agenda.”

…one instructor threw a model of female reproductive organs at one student and that many felt the sessions were pressuring them to have sex.

…it was divergent from what they were taught at home,” Dacus said.

… the 13 and 14-year-old students are asked questions such as if they have water–based lubricants and condoms and if they could handle a possible infection or pregnancy. Another worksheet reads like a how-to on obtaining consent from a possible sexual partner and offers possible statements like “Do you want to go back to my place?” and “Is it OK if I take my pants off?”

… After completing the course, it was apparent that some of what was ‘taught’ went beyond what was represented on the opt-out form. This is disappointing to us, because we are actually strong supporters of teen sex education in a peer environment to complement our home-based discussions.”
Lyons added that he and his wife were dismayed by how the students were instructed.

…“We have not seen any documentation to indicate that distribution of the surveys complied with either Federal law of the California Education Code as to parental notification,”

… “Notably, the law does not merely require notice; it requires specific parental permission for this type of survey to be administered,” reads the letter.

Full story here.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Debate and discussion are welcome here, but attitude and ad hominem attacks will get you banned.