Monday, August 30, 2010

Glenn Beck on homosexual "marriage."

This guy, Glenn Beck, is someone who I admire. He's made a big splash lately with his rally in D.C. But Mr. Beck couldn't be more wrong in his recent comment about homosexual "marriage" being no danger to America.

It's wrong to end religious freedom in the United States of America, which is exactly what this country was founded for. And legalizing homosexual "marriage" will do just that. Gay "marriage" will also legislate the acceptance of homosexuality in the sex-education classes of schoolchildren which is even more wrong.

"We must choose between the homosexual agenda and religious liberty, because it is impossible to have both." My supporting evidence is here.

Sunday, August 29, 2010

My favorite car.

I wonder if the fighter could hold up, in the same race, with the new Bugatti Veyron Super Sport? It has 200 more horsepower than the car in this race.

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Bigamy vs. "bigotry."

Normally I completely reject the "slippery-slope" argument. But in the case of the definition of marriage, I sincerely believe that changing the definition of marriage will lead to an almost endless series of changes.

A Mormon sect is poised to further redefine marriage if the hetero-haters are successful. Story here.

(Having the name of Jesus Christ in the title of your church doesn't mean that you are actually following the teachings of Christ.)

Viral video report.

Wednesday, August 25, 2010


homoplagiarist: An anti-hetero person or entity who steals or pollutes the message or words of a heteroactivist.

Copyright 2010, Carl Rowan Morris, All Rights Reserved. Wed. 25 Aug. 2010.

(This definition and post to be expanded on at a later date.)


How many women would join the Armed Forces of the United States of America if they knew, beforehand, that they would sometimes be required to be nude in front of, and shower with, men? Would this not dampen a woman's desire to join this type of a military because of its abandonment of common sense and sexual sanity? Would any high-ranking woman in our American military try to force this situation upon lower-ranking women?

Why is it then, that some gays and homoappeasers call it "homophobia" (one of the top five most overused words in our culture!) when a male soldier doesn't want to shower and bunk with a homosexual? It looks to me like the mighty United States Marine Corps has a solution to this homofascist developement. Story here.

Tuesday, August 24, 2010

How homosexual "marriage" affects Christians.

Would there be a public outcry if a counselor refused to see a married man concerning his affair with his mistress? Would there be public outrage if a counselor refused to speak to a man concerning his childproofed, consensual, sexual relationship with his adult sister? If Tiger Woods had come out of the closet as a homosexual, would he have lost any of his endorsements?

Why is it that the glbt community gets an automatic pass when it comes to their sexual misconduct? Story here.

Monday, August 23, 2010

Broken masculinity.

I covered the "effeminate" homosexual in my manifesto; which is a boy who over relates to girls/women and grows into a homosexual due to a violent, passive, or absent father and/or an overbearing mother.

Today I have the brief, well-written story of a man who's feminist mother isolated him from his father, and all things masculine, when he was growing up, and how his desire to bond with men led to his homosexuality. Click here.

Lesbian couple meets sexual sanity.

What did these two lesbians expect? Did they really expect a private, Christian school to ignore the fact that they are lesbians when they showed up together at a parent-teacher meeting? Remember when Courtney Love's daughter was rejected from a private school because of Ms. Love's behavior? Why do most gays expect the rest of humanity to join them in ignoring gender and the laws of God? Not everyone is going to ignore sexual sanity. Story here.

Friday, August 20, 2010

More abandonment of sexual sanity.

Well, we have people that believe that they're "genderless" now. And men wearing bras in public to support women who want to be topless in public because men have the legal option of being topless in public here.

I thought that the glbt lifestyle was bad enough. Now we have the "genderless" crowd. Here's an idea. How about complying with your biological design? I guess that that would be too "old-fashioned" for some people. I think I'll run out and put square wheels on my car since round wheels are so old fashioned.

Thursday, August 19, 2010


This bull must have seen Gladiator when he was a child. Unless innocent children were hurt, this is one of the funniest things that I've seen this year. How did the bull figure out, then pull-off (!), the trajectory of the leap? Incredible. I'll bet that eating a steak from this bull would make a gay guy straight!

Monday, August 16, 2010

Take a walk, Walker.

I've said it once and I'll say it again, a homosexual man has the same right to marry one woman at a time just like I do. We all already have the freedom to marry. Again I'll ask; Why doesn't the glbt community just flat-out say that they want to redefine marriage? How come polygamists aren't trying to ruin those that support true marriage like some/most gays do?

The legitimate vote of the people of California has been temporarily upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and marriage will remain what it should be for at least a little while longer.

I'll bet that Judge Vaughn Walker is having some Johnnie Walker right about now. Story here.

Sunday, August 15, 2010

7,001,084 votes thrown out by homosexual judge.

I've heard of this case being referred to as "judicial jujitsu," and I laughed, inwardly, at the phrase. Then I got a little miffed at myself for not thinking of that phrase first.

This prop 8 case is so absurd and fast-moving, that my best bulls**t-decryption-processors are red hot and signing off in order to cool down and reboot. BUT, I'm going to rally one last post on Prop 8 until a ruling from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals comes down(which will be tomorrow with my luck).

"What we have today is judicial tyranny..." Story here.

Friday, August 13, 2010

Ninth Circuit Court moving quickly on prop 8.

I can't do a proper post right now since I've been getting my a** kicked at work, but I want to post this.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

A child has no right to a father?

Oh my God. This is all of the evidence I need to figure out that this "judge" is a nutcase. A person has to completely abandon moral common-sense to say/believe/write that a child doesn't need a father.
What happened to this man? I'd bet that his probable lack of a father was one of the factors that led to his homosexuality. And, on top of that, this guy is a Judge! With authority over peoples lives!
Children need and want a mother and a father, and those that deny that fact are just plain crazy and, moreover, bound to raise children even crazier than they are.

Monday, August 9, 2010

Wikileaks source a rebellious homosexual.

This dude decided to betray his country because of his rebellion against God and DADT. He has endangered the lives of confidential informants, if he hasn't already caused some deaths, just because he wants to have sex with men. He knew, before he went into the American military, that he was supposed to keep what he does under the covers undercover, but he decided to rebel. Even at the expense of other people's lives. Why don't they just call the website "WickedLeaks'? Info here, here, and here.

Gay flight attendant twists-off.

This homosexual went out in a flame...ahh..excuse me...a blaze of glory. He got in a shouting match with a rebellious passenger, then got on the planes intercom and cussed out the passengers on the plane, grabbed beer from a serving cart, pulled the rip-cord on the plane's blow-up slide and slid off of the plane. Wow. Story here.

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Invasion of the Booty Snatchers.

What happened to my country? What the hell is going on here?

The people of California have voted twice to define marriage as being between one man and one woman, with propositions 22 and 8, and this change California's constitution was upheld by the state's Supreme Court.

Now, a homosexual Federal judge and the "Governator" want to overthrow this Godly definition of marriage. I sometimes feel like I'm in a horror movie. Story here.

Wednesday, August 4, 2010

31 year old woman posing as a teenage boy... have sexual contact with high-school girls.


Today, I have created a new word in honor of Mr. Enzo Cerusico. That word is...

homovocateur : A person or entity who attacks, smears, or defames a heterosexual out of their hatred, fear, or ignorance of the teachings of Jesus Christ.

Prop 8 overturned by homosexual Judge.

Well, I can't say that I'm surprised. I'm a little saddened, but not surprised.
I covered the beginning of this absurd situation here, stating a common-sense observation of how unseemly it was for a Federal judge in San Francisco who was also openly homosexual (one of the three openly gay Federal judges in the country!) to preside over this case.
And today the expected has happened. The votes of millions of Californians, 52% of those that voted on prop 8, have been thrown out. Now this case will go on to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which is the most overturned Court of Appeals in the United States. I'll be surprised if this doesn't go to SCOTUS. Story here. More info here and here.

Catholic professor reinstated.

I'm a little surprised that this guy got his job back, but I'm glad that he did. He's a professor of Catholicism, for God's sake. What do you expect his outlook on homosexual "marriage" would be? God says that a marriage should be between one man and one woman in Matthew 19:4-6.

Sunday, August 1, 2010

Closed to Christians./What Jesus said about homosexual "marriage."

It seems that the profession of counseling is now closed to Christians due to the glbt community's redefinition of marriage. Is this enough evidence to those who wrongly believe that homosexual "marriage" and religious freedom can coexist in America? They cannot. And since the United States of America was originally founded by those who wanted to worship God freely, the definition of marriage should NOT be changed since it would destroy that freedom.

The one-man-one-woman definition of marriage is from God, and is quoted by Jesus himself in the book of Matthew 19:4-6. (And interracial marriage is supported by the bible in Numbers 12:1-8) Doesn't America call itself, "One nation under God..."?