Monday, December 31, 2012

The shocking truth... simplified.

This illustration made me laugh.  People who defend and promote the redefinition of marriage are woefully decieved and in dire need of the Truth.

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Friday, December 28, 2012

"Black" vs "gay."

Skin color is morally innate; it is neither good nor bad.  Sexual behavior is sometimes a bad thing.  A man having sex outside of marriage, with another man's wife, with an adult family member, with a child, with an animal, or with another man... is a bad, sinful thing.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Happy Holidays from Chick-fil-A.

Despite what Godless people think, you can't fool all of the people all of the time.  People will vote with their wallets, and 01 Aug. 2012, Chick-fil-A day, set homofascism back by twenty years.  People are waking up to the hatred that comes FROM the glbt community.

Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Merry CHRISTmas.

I thought it appropriate to pay my respects to the Lord Jesus Christ on this Christmas day.

Monday, December 24, 2012

The Emperor's new gender.

I really thought that I was going to be able to get through the holidays without doing any heavy-lifting in my personal battle against homofascism, but, yet again, the glbt community has provided a slow-moving target for my heterosaber.  Here it is Christmas Eve, and I would much rather not have to pick up my weapon, but this story is too good to let go.

The man in the photo, a Mr. Riki Wilchins, is mad because he can't get a group of kids to believe that he is a woman.  Wow.  What happened to this man to make him believe that he is a woman when he has a penis?  Is this why there are so many gay characters in sitcoms?  Because the homosexual mind is so funny?

Hilarious story here.

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Homofascist propaganda.

This is what got me started here at  I was slandered as a "homophobe" because of my hate-free rejection of homosexuality. 

I completely support the civil rights of homosexuals, but I also support God's definition of marriage.  I also have the same right to defend myself against defamation that the glbt community has.

Few people who don't know the Word of God are able to understand the wrongness of homosexuality.

Monday, December 17, 2012

Sunday, December 16, 2012

There's no shame in being normal.

Going against the grain is a great way to get attention, but people who are emotionally mature and secure don't need attention.

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Godlessness at Sandy Hook Elementary.

When some people find my blog, they loose interest when they see that I'm a servant of Jesus Christ, but today, I might seem less stupid to those who don't understand what I've learned from the Word of God.

Today, the churches that are near Sandy Hook Elementary School are full of people looking for solace after the murder of 20 children and 6 adults.

This tragedy happened because of multiple layers of human misconduct like the rejection of any mention of the God of the Bible in our nation's schools.  Then add to that the genderphobic/feminist/glbt rejection of God's definition of marriage and family, which created the fatherless home in which Adam Lanza lived in, and you have the cornerstone of yesterday's mass murder. 

Young boys desperately need an appropriate male role model sleeping under the same roof that they do every night.  I learned 85% of the unwritten laws of manhood by merely observing the day-to-day activities of my biological father.  And then I discovered the perfect commandments of my heavenly Father, and I learn from him now.

So go ahead and mock me for my decision to follow the commandments of Jesus Christ.  Look what happens when a person/family/culture/nation is seduced away from the Word of God.  And some people will still fight against God's definition of marriage, even after yesterday's tragedy.  Wow.  Story here.

Friday, December 14, 2012

"Born gay" takes another hit.

The “born gay” hoax is being dragged further into the sunlight and dying fast.

“...Researchers Peter Bearman of Columbia and Hannah Bruckner of Yale furnished proof that, as a matter of fact, gays aren’t “born that way.”

...In one small step for mankind, scientists are starting to bend in the direction of actual data rather than blindly adhering to the kind of political correctness that punished scientists like Galileo who followed the truth rather than prevailing, intimidating and threatening cultural trends.

...Under a Judeo-Christian moral construct, we can freely admit that we do not understand the origin of all of our impulses. But it is not necessary to understand the source of every impulse to know that self-destructive impulses must be resisted at all costs. That’s what the message of the gospel is all about - that there is power in Christ to resist dark impulses, no matter what the source, that will destroy us if indulged. ...”

Full article here.

True marriage: what genderphobes and homofascists hate the most.

Genderphobes and homofascists hate it when the differences between men and women are acknowledged.  Marriage redefiners hate the truth, and all those who know and speak the truth.  The glbt community is fighting against the Word of God, which is eternal, not the perceptions and prejudices of humanity.  The word "black" does not have the dual meaning that the word "gay" does; "black" does not describe an aspect of a person's character. 

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Victory for Julea Ward.

What would a University do if a Muslim counselor refused to support the sexual activities of a homosexual client and referred that client to another counselor?  Wouldn't the University go out of its way to respect Islam?  Why then are true Christians thrown under the bus?

Story here

Monday, December 10, 2012

"Equal protection"?

Marriage redefiners will say anything to distract from the fact that they do, indeed, wish to redefine marriage from something that takes place between one man and one woman, to something that is merely between two people.  Just as a heterosexual couple doesn't have the right to redefine marriage, a same-sex couple doesn't have the right to redefine marriage.

At 2:32, the woman decietfully compares the morally benign conditions of gender and race to sexual orientation.  If a person is sexually attracted to someone of their same gender, their sexual orientation is wrong.  If an adult is sexually attracted to children, their sexual orientation is wrong.  There is a right and wrong to sexual orientation. 

At 5:32, the false comparison to interracial is made since laws forbidding interracial marriage were only made to prevent white women from marrying non-white men.

Saturday, December 1, 2012

Ignore sex in marriage?

Dear marriage redefiners:  Please consider the harm you're doing to children. 

Wednesday, November 28, 2012


The word "homophobia," is on its way out.  People are wising up to its mischaracterization of those who disagree with homosexuality.  Click here.  

Third man accuses Kevin Clash of molestation.

It was the Christmas of 1996 when tickle-me-Elmo was at it’s peak Until I did my homework for this post, I thought that homophile Kevin Clash had thought up tickle-me-Elmo to sexually seduce underage boys. It turns out that he didn’t, but I wouldn’t doubt that he wishes that he had. The homosexuality of Kevin Clash has ruined an icon of childhood, and tickle-me-Elmos, that once sold for $2,500, are now worthless. Maybe Mr. Clash can get a job as a spokesman for NAMBLA. Who else would hire him?

When I ask homofascists to show me the heterosexual equivalent of NAMBLA, none of them can. That says something about the nature of homosexuality.

My supporting info is here, here, and here.

The Witherspoon Institute on true marriage.

Sometimes, I still can’t believe that I live in a world where something as tried and true as the definition of marriage is under attack. How did genderphobia become so popular?

“... Definitions clear away weeds, clarity fosters productive disagreement,...

... The authors explain why debates over gay marriage are only indirectly about homosexuality; the real issue is “not about whom to let marry, but about what marriage is.” Thus the need to address whether the conjugal or revisionist view of marriage is correct. Briefly, the conjugal view holds that marriage, by its nature, can only be the union of man and woman, because marriage is “distinguished by its comprehensiveness,” requiring “a bodily as well as an emotional and spiritual bond.” The revisionist view, on the other hand, treats marriage as a malleable union of any two partners; here marriage is simply “a loving emotional bond, one distinguished by its intensity.”

...The book begins with a pointed challenge to revisionists: What does it mean to say that marriage is an intense emotional bond, and what does such a definition limit? The burden of proof is placed on the revisionists, and they do not fare well.

... If, as revisionists claim, “marriage is distinguished simply by emotional union and the activities that foster it,” what rational basis limits marriage to exclusive monogamy while not including polyamory, close friends, or any sort of arrangement?

... According to the conjugal view, on the other hand, marriage is more than a formless emotional bond; it is a basic human good, a way of being well with an objective and rational basis. Marriage cannot be redefined without deeply misconstruing (and thus missing out on) this good and the flourishing it partially constitutes.

... Marriage, like friendship, also has an objective core that cannot be altered without misunderstanding it. This core distinguishes marriage from other forms of relationship.

... Since “your body is an essential part of you, not a vehicle driven by the ‘real’ you, your mind,” it follows that “any union of two people must include bodily union to be comprehensive.”

... Thus a man and woman of deep intellectual and emotional commitment are not married without bodily union, and neither are Oscar and Alfred, the bachelor brothers. Likewise, same-sex partners or members of a polyamorous community cannot be married, because they cannot establish the bodily union that’s necessary for comprehensive union.

... Marriages are the “main and most effective means” of raising flourishing children, and since the “health and order of society” depend on such children, the law has a compelling reason to support conjugal marriage.

... There is no revulsion or bigotry evident here, but rather compassion for fellow human beings, and while reason reveals that marriage is conjugal and cannot be otherwise, reason—and compassion—demand caring for all, the married or the unmarried. But compassion does not, simply cannot, include redefining marriage, for marriage cannot be redefined. It is what it is. ...”

Full article here.

Friday, November 23, 2012

Guest article from Ronnie Maccallister.

Loyal reader Ronnie Maccallister has blessed with it's second guest article.

This article will seek to explain the enormous power gays exert over the Nation and the World via their control of the Media and Entertainment Industry. It will show how they got into this position of power, and exactly how much power and influence they truly have because of it.

"First let the camel get his nose into the tent, only later his unsightly derriere". "If straights can't shut off the shower, they may eventually get used to being wet." "The objection will be raised, and raised, and raised...that our ads are lies...Yes of course we know it....but it makes no difference that our ads are lies, not to us." "Our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof".

-all passages from "After the Ball", widely accepted as the "gay bible", or "the gay activist's playbook"

The Mainstream Media has a product to sell, and they have the most talented (snake oil) salesmen at their disposal. That product is homosexuality, and the salesmen are deep seeded homosexuals and their sympathizers in the Media and Entertainment Industry. All this has come about by the most sophisticated, well-organized activism and propaganda the world has ever seen. This is the marriage of Corporate America, the Media, Politicians, and the gay activists community.

It all started with an inspired brainstorm from a couple Harvard- educated geniuses. Enter Kirk and Madsen.
Homosexuals Marshall Kirk, a neuropsychiatry researcher, and Hunter Madsen, a Madison Ave. Marketing virtuoso, put their heads together in the 80's to take on the many failed efforts of the gay lobby and plot a new legacy of success. What followed was the blueprint for what has been called the most sophisticated propaganda in Human history - the writing of "the Overhauling of Straight America" and "After the Ball: How America Will Conquer It's Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90's". Enter the Mainstream Media.

Kirk and Madsen envisioned and plotted aggressive recruitment of the Media to dispense this propaganda. No mere snake oil salesmen sophomores, they envisioned combining Mau Tse Tung's Communist Chinese brainwashing methods with the slickest of Madison Ave. selling techniques, coupled with other forms of advanced psychological persuasion and coercion methods. And some lies.

Kirk and Madsen knew that by corralling, courting, and infiltrating the Media, they would have American Values at their disposal. And dispose of them (their efforts), did.

Americans are addicted to the screen, be it an led or plasma one, or just a plain old tube. We're hooked on shows, movies, video clips and video games. This ubiquitous teat intoxicates us into a daily stupor of complacency, all the while our minds are under siege.

Gay activists have systematically and aggressively infiltrated the ranks of Hollywood and the Mainstream Media, and now command vast power and influence. Roles such as Screenwriters, Production Designers, Set Directors, Casting Directors - anywhere from Actors to Network Executives -drastic overrepresentation in the Entertainment Industry. They've toiled away long and hard to get there, to the point where today, virtually every major tv show has an influential homosexual writer and at least one prominent gay character. Gays, creative and theatrical by nature, are virtuosos in the t.v. and Film Industry -but with an agenda. The predictable, inevitable outcome of this monopolization is the disproportionate abundance of gay sensibilities in our shows, movies and video games - almost always portraying them as the most "with-it", popular, dynamically-cool character. Completely absent from this fictitious slate are any hints of the typical gay lifestyle that is so commonly accompanied by abysmal degeneracy and decadence.

And it's not just dishonest character portrayals. Gay activists' stranglehold on the Media also guarantees that only their biased depiction of homosexuality gets aired, insulating and protecting it from informed, rational debate - it's Achilles Heel. It's like a revolutionist's dream come true -unconditional praise and zero accountability. Gay activists can always count on all their subservient media lackeys to misrepresent, distort, and white wash all the unseemly dimensions of homosexuality from public view, all the while blacklisting, denigrating, ridiculing, and discrediting all those critical of gay activism. They've also mastered the fine art of blacklisting by inundating printed media and websites with the names, addresses and phone numbers of folks who submit official objections to their goals - huge roll-calls of individuals - with the purpose of drawing out as much scrutiny, scorn and vilification from ne'r-do-wells, who then go on to stalk them, slander them, prank-call them, "S.W.A.T" them, harass their business connections and their families. We saw them do a considerable organized hit-job on their opponents in the California Prop-8 case, and also in Maryland, Where the Washington Blade gratuitously published the names of many thousands of individuals who signed a petition gay activists didn't approve of, resulting in the suspension of Dr. Angela McCaskill, a deaf career teacher at Galludet University.

With this overwhelming Media support, homosexuality is thus depicted and enshrined with an inscrutable (faux) righteousness, one seemingly so incontrovertible that fewer and fewer public figures will speak candidly on it for fear of reprisal . Even the once-critical tough guy Bill O'Reilly was cowed into silence on this issue. Gays are literally able dictate the National dialogue on homosexuality, freezing out inconvenient truths from the American consciousness.
From their deep-seeded influence in the Media, gay activists are also able to dictate the trends of popular culture, and by extension, dictate market trends - exerting significant control of Corporate America.
Well-heeled gay activists also specifically seek out, court, and groom Politicians who have a history of being receptive to their radical ideologies, and then bestow upon them the perks of the Media Sponsorship, Advertising, campaign contributions, and appoint and enshrine them as ambassadors of political correctness in their own right. These Politicians' careers thus then become permanently fused with and dependent on the gays' political correctness Media machine. What's more, those linked to the gay agenda are almost always able to vastly outspend their Conservative opponents during campaigning. Once in office, these politicians are bound to and expected to vote affirmatively on every pro-gay bill. With all the powers and influence gay activists command, it would seem might truly does make right. Their version, anyway.

Corporate America depends on airtime and advertisements. Dependable advertising depends on quality programs and ratings, which in turn depend on quality screenwriting, production, casting, acting, etc, - all areas of the Entertainment Industry monopolized by gays. Corporate America thus depends on gays. Gays thus command the enormous funding and support of Corporate America (Nike, Target, Starbucks, Disney, etc.). Politicians thus also depend on the gay-controlled Media as a liaison to Corporate America. Gays depend upon high-level Politicians to dispense taxpayer dollars to their causes (Ex. -Obama's effusive funding of GLSEN and "Czar" Kevin Jennings' homosexualizing of schools.) This is why it is extremely difficult to resist gay activism. Because for all intents and purposes, you mess with gays, you mess with Nike. You challenge the gay agenda, you challenge Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and Harry Reid. As this unholy alliance is perpetuated, it's very existence is carefully shielded from view.
This symbiotic relationship is like an eternal wellspring of falsehoods. It is the very source -the headwaters- of the poisoned stream coursing destructively through America's values and sensibilities. It is like a factory. A falsehood factory - one peopled by a loyal army of Marxist gay mercenaries and other hedonistic revolutionaries. And it is this factory that so prolifically churns out it's coveted product: embellished, evocative, glamorous and dynamic portrayals of gays and their ideological cousins, the proudly promiscuous debaucherers.

This falsehood factory, for all its contemporary virtues and influence fortifying it, is as flimsy as a house of cards constructed upon a base of sand, susceptible to aggressive winds of Truth.

The waters of that poisoned stream flow only through meadows and valleys of shadow and darkness, for it quickly evaporates when exposed to cleansing rays of sunlight.

Somewhere in the annals of Cinema sits a foggy-eyed, slurring, drugged and lobotomized actor Ray Liotta, sitting at the dinner table with the top half of his head missing, being spoon fed his own brains ["Hannibal", 2001] The gay-controlled Media has America in a very similar spoon feeding highchair, feeding us things equally outlandish, lulling us into a complacent stupor with propaganda from it's falsehood factory.

Elsewhere in the annals of Cinema, an actor played by Roddy Piper stands at the top of a media skyscraper, having just blown away a space-age satellite transmitter that was the sole transmission source of a planet-wide brainwashing media signal, one that made people blind to the presence and sinister intentions of their alien conquerors living right along side them - that movie's depiction of a reality that eerily parallels the brainwashing of the gay-controlled Media. "They Live" (1988), was the title of that movie, and it ends with a truly hopeful scenario where masses of oppressed, deluded and hapless people finally wake up to the truth for what it really is - the Truth.

Somewhere in America sits everyday Joe, settling in to unwind after a long day of work, school, or parenting with some t.v. viewing to retreat from the stress of his everyday life. What he gets are poisoned fruits of the labor of malicious cultural revolutionaries - peddlers and portrayers of a skewed, poisoned reality, who are at war with the values and freedoms that made his Country special.

This portrayal on this issue has been a dour one, but rays of sunlight have been slowly creeping in. Though public figures are mostly silent on this issue, an army of citizen journalists and bloggers, not so accountable to public scrutiny, have been slowly and steadily educating others and sewing seeds of discord in a populace so previously deluded, bringing about a revolution of critical and rational thought.
George Orwell once wrote, "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act".

It has also been said, "You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can never fool all of the people all of the time."

And I say, "Amen to that".

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Brilliant call to Truth Wins Out.

In this video, revealed to me by loyal reader Ronnie Maccallister, a heteroactivist takes apart homofascist propaganda piece-by-piece. For some reason, whenever I tried to give a thumbs up to a comment, it wouldn't register. Was my thumbs up blocked by the website? I wouldn't be one bit surprised.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

The end of a Clash with sexual insanity.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... I know that not all gay men are child-molesters.  I've never said that, and I don't believe that.  But I also know that many homosexuals were seduced into gaydom when they were under the legal age of consent by a man/male over the legal age of consent. 

Now, a second man has come forward saying that he had sexual contact with Kevin Clash when he was 15.  I'm shocked!!  (Not!!)

"...Then on Tuesday, a lawsuit was filed in federal court in New York charging Clash with sexual abuse of a second youth. The lawsuit alleges that Cecil Singleton, then 15 and now an adult, was persuaded by Clash to meet for sexual encounters. ..."

Links to my supporting info are here and here.

Monday, November 12, 2012

The 'mo inside of Elmo.

Yet again, a member of the glbt community utterly destroys a safe haven for children, and gives the phrase "tickle me Elmo," a whole new and disgusting meaning.  This  homophile, Kevin Clash, has admitted  to sexual contact with a 16-year-old boy when he was 45!! 

I would never associate with a 45-year-old man who was having a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old girl, and that goes triple for a 45-year-old man having a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old boy.  Even if it's legal, it is reprehensible for a 45-year-old to have sexual contact with a 16-year-old.  

Between childrens books, t.v. programs, prime time t.v. shows, animated films for children, Sesame Street, GLSEN, gay-straight-alliances in schools, the Boy Scouts, and NAMBLA, the gay community can't even deny their desire to reach the hearts and minds of children, WITHOUT the parental consent of those children.  Parents in Canada, where same-sex "marriage" is legal, are blocked by law from knowing what is being taught to their children in sex-education classes in grade schools.

The glbt community deceives or attacks with words like, "bigotry," "homophobe," or "intolerant," to distract from their prime goal of normalizing homosexuality to other peoples children behind the backs of their parents.  Since  homosexuality stems from emotion, it is critical for some gays to recruit children.  Homosexuality is very most often the result of a older homosexual seducing a young boy into the glbt community as he was when he was a young boy.

This disgusting story completely supports the abovementioned points.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

So voting on marriage is okay now??

What happened?  I thought that voting on the definition of marriage was unconstitutional?  That's what the homofascists say in California.

So why is it that the gays are celebrating now in other states where voters have redefined marriage?  Are they celebrating the coming legal persecution of Christian business that will be fined or closed for their refusal to comply with sexual perversion? Are they celebrating the intentional deprivation of a mother or a father from a child's life?

Oh I get it!  A vote on the definition of marriage is ONLY valid if the glbt community agrees with that vote!  Wow.  Silly me.  Can a heterosexual federal judge now throw out the votes that support the redefinition of marriage?  How would the gay community react to that?

Info here.

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

No freedom of speech for true marriage supporters.

Disagreement with marriage redefiners is not allowed, and no group of people is more ready to violate the civil rights of others than full-of-hate marriage redefinition bigots.

Monday, November 5, 2012

Fired for supporting true marriage.

It is wrong to be gay, but people have the right to be wrong. Therefore, no one should lose their job for being straight or gay, or their support for same-sex "marriage," or their support for true marriage. Redefining marriage will begin the religious persecution that the United States of America was founded to escape from.



a:  The hatred, fear, or denial of the biological fact that human beings are either born male or born female.

b: The denial of the obvious physical, emotional, and cognitive differences between men and women.

c:  The rejection of the differences between the mature masculine mind and the mature feminine mind.

d:  A fear of the opposite sex or gender.

Genderphobia at Evergreen State College.

If you were born with a penis, you are male.  If you were born with a vagina, you are female.  If you are a genderphobe, you will not accept that fact, and you hate the biological reality of gender.

Surgery can change your appearance, but not the biological reality of gender.  Gender is not a social construct, "transgender" is a social construct.  Every human being that I've ever met was born either male or female.

This story was so absurd, that it took me four days to absorb it; my mind just wouldn't accept it.  I just couldn't believe that educated people would allow a naked 45-year-old man into a women's locker room.  How could anyone be so out-of-touch with the reality that human beings are either male or female?

Apparently, the administration of Evergreen State College doesn't have the common-sense to stop a 45-year-old man from exposing his genitalia to six-year-old girls, in a women's locker room!!

Mind-bending story herehere, and here.

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Regnerus. Part two.

Out of 15,000 “young adults” surveyed from gay households, only two grew in homes where the lesbian couple stayed together from their birth until their eighteenth birthday. And none of the 15,000 young adults surveyed had homosexual “fathers” that stayed together from their birth until their eighteenth birthday.

"...How many children were raised by two women staying together from the child’s first birthday to his or her eighteenth? Just two. And how many such cases were there in the FGR category—of children raised by two men together for their whole childhood? Zero. This, out of an initial population of 15,000.

…family instability is the characteristic experience of those whose parents have same-sex relationships.

…conspicuously missing from the lives of children whose parents have same-sex relationships.

…plenty of failed heterosexual unions in the data,”…

…Regnerus’s findings do not obscure the realities of family and sexuality in our society; they illuminate them.

…two ‘gold standards’ of family stability and context for children’s flourishing—a heterosexual stably-coupled household and the same among gay/lesbian households—but no population-based sample analysis is yet able to consistently confirm wide evidence of the latter.”

…the biologically-intact two-parent household remains an optimal setting for the long-term flourishing of children.” There is no other type of household of which that can be confidently said.

…long-term stable lesbian and gay couples raising children are extremely rare, or at least that finding them is so difficult that statistical analyses are problematic.

…“lesbian parents . . . have substantially higher rates of relationship instability than do heterosexual parents,” and that “given the apparent fluidity of sexual orientation in general, but especially for women, it may even be rare for parents to maintain a same-sex orientation for 18 years, much less remaining with the same partner for that time.”

…stressful for children and increase the risk of poor child outcomes.” Is it any wonder, then, that the New Family Structures Study yielded the results it did?

…eminently defensible scientific research, making decisions about research design and analysis “within the ball park of what other credible and distinguished researchers have been doing within the past decade.”

…With the latest issue of Social Science Research, Regnerus can consider himself fully vindicated as a scholar.

…Regnerus’s contribution has complicated a set of breezy assumptions too widely held: that children raised in these new family structures suffer no disadvantages whatsoever, and that stable, long-term same-sex-parent families can even be found in significant numbers. ..."

Full article here.

"...marriage is more than what adults want for themselves."

Those who wish to redefine marriage cry out for compassion for their feelings while simultaneously disregarding the fact that a child deservers a mother and a father.

Then there's the absurd comparison of interrracial marriage to same-sex "marriage" when laws forbidding interracial marriage came from men, and interracial marriage is supported by God.

Marriage redefiners wish to destroy anyone who merely disagrees with them.  How is that not bigotry?

Tuesday, October 30, 2012

The GLBT's community's desire to violate parental civil rights.

I can fully understand and support a gay child's desire to live a harassment free life. But what I can not understand is the glbt community's desire to normalize homosexuality to children in grade school, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parent or parent's.  Some people think that homosexuality is wrong and their parental civil rights should be respected. 

Anti-bullying classes can be taught to children without glorifying sexually deviant actions. And NOTHING concerning sexual activities should be taught to children without the full knowledge and consent of that child's parents. Without a doubt, the glbt community wants to bypass parental consent to teach children that homosexuality is a normal thing. This is wrong. Sexual behavior is not morally benign like skin color. Sex education should be renamed "reproductive" education, in order to prevent the parental-civil-rights-violating recruitment efforts of the glbt community. 

Anyone who wishes to bypass parental consent when it comes to teaching children about sexual matters is cut from the same cloth as a child-molester.

"I want to be a boy again."

Godless parents, fatherless homes, and gay propaganda have created this tragic story of a boy who was allowed to have a sex change operation at 17.  Talk about a parental fail!! 

Where was his father when he decided that he was a girl?  Why did his mother allow him to develop into such an extreme state of gender-denial?  Why did the psychological and medical professionals involved simply tell this boy that he could never be female?  What is going on here?  Is this not madness?!

If you're born with a penis, you are male.  If you're born with a vagina, you are female.  That reality cannot be changed.  Your gender is not your choice.  How is it that there are people that won't accept this horrifically obvious truth?

Denial is the cornerstone of the glbt lifestyle.

Story here.

Monday, October 29, 2012


Wherever marriage is redefined, religious freedom ends.

HAMmering homofascism.

It is really good to see others taking up the fight against homofascism.  Between the NOM blog, Chick-fil-A day, and now HAM, I'm no longer alone in the fight to prevent the religious-freedom-stealing redefinition of marriage.

Despite my compassion for those who suffer from same-sex attraction, the redefinition of marriage will harm innocent, helpless children, and take away the religious freedoms and livelihoods of some adults.

Friday, October 26, 2012

Dr, Edmond Bergler.

Maine marriage.

Gay bashing... squared.

Once again, the glbt community shows its intolerance and hatred for any disagreement or non-cooperation with their agenda to force people to accept homosexuality as normal.

But this time, they’ve attacked one of their own who refused to tow the party line. Incredible. Fighting homofascism is so easy because homofascists just keep handing me great news stories! As the owner of, I feel like a pet mouse in a cheese factory.

“…“I was getting ready for work and there was a knock at the door,” Wood emailed The Daily Caller late Wednesday. “I opened it, and a guy wrapped a ligature around my neck, slammed my head into the doorway, and smashed my face into a mirror, telling me ‘You should have kept your [f*******] mouth shut.’”

…Wood said his attacker’s reference to a warning likely pointed to graffiti he found painted on his car last week. The vandalism included the phrases “house trained republican faggot,” “traitor,” and “ur like a jew 4 hitler.”

…Those slurs, he explained, were references to him being a gay Republican working to help Lee, a straight GOP candidate, defeat the openly gay Democrat Mark Pocan.

…After he discovered the graffiti, Wood wrote an open letter on Facebook to the unknown vandal. “If you understand either freedom or me at all,” he wrote, “you would that this will only make me work harder. … You can think whatever you like about me, but I will not be bullied into voting for a gay man simply because I am gay.”

Full story here.

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Dawn Stefanowicz, heteroactivist extraordinaire.

Valued reader Ronnie Maccallister (thanks Ronnie!) gave me the link to a powerful story written by a woman who was raised in a homosexual household.

Dawn Stefanowicz's story illustrates how the glbt lifestyle is more harmful to children than heterosexuality.

“…Dawn brings a rare voice to the public discussion; her father was actively involved in the gay lifestyle, and she describes herself as “raised under the GLBT [gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender] umbrella.”

…their father ended sexual relations with his wife, and pursued homosexual relationships at well-known gay meeting places in Canada and the United States. Dawn was often brought along to many of these locations, even as a child. Her father had numerous gay lovers, and brought them into the home. At age 51, in 1991, he died of AIDS.

…Almost immediately, gay activists who had been bussed in—and I should say I dislike using the term “gay,” but it’s commonly used today, so I will—began shouting at me as I testified so that you couldn’t even hear what I was saying. A half dozen times I was interrupted. I was concerned for my safety, so I asked a security guard for an escort to my car. I went home and began writing my book.

…Monogamy in the gay community means “serial monogamy,” you have a single partner for several months and then move on, or you’re in a relationship but have multiple partners on the side.

…they would often take me along to meeting places in the GLBT community. I was just a child, but I was exposed to overt sexual activity. When I was about nine, for example, my father took me to a downtown sex shop. He said he wanted to expose me to sexuality … that was part of the gay culture.

…my father came to school to watch me perform in the band. …I saw his eyes bug out when he saw all the teenage boys performing on the stage with me. Then I realized that he was not there for me, but to pick up young men.

…I knew many gay men who had a preference for adolescent males who had just hit puberty. They would look for boys with absent fathers who were vulnerable.

…my childhood in a homosexual environment. It was not a safe … I don’t know how else to put this: gay sex is messy. I would see dirty bed sheets, covered with sperm, fecal matter, and lubricant gel.

…My twin brother witnessed the group sex once. He couldn’t understand why dad could kiss other men, but couldn’t show affection to him.

…He was sexually abused as a child; his father was a violent alcoholic.

…Many have been deluded by the cultural acceptance of homosexuality. They haven’t thought about its long-term impact on children.

…Every kid wants to be raised by biological parents who are faithful to one another.

Original info here.

Marriage Equality. (It already exists!!)

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

600,000 signatures to protect marriage in the United Kingdom.

More info here.

Dear NOM comments. (update)

Okay "NOM comments," here's what's going to happen.

You and I are going to talk here and only here on THIS post until I say otherwise.  I've noticed that you drop a subject and attack from another post whenever I corner you on a point-of-logic, so I'm containing you here.

I will guarantee you that I will post all of your comments, that do not contain profanity, and that only you and I will talk here.  But, if you sidestep or ignore my questions, you're not going to be posting here anymore.

Since I have been responding to your questions and accusations, without ignoring or sidestepping ANYTHING that you've come at me with... I'm going to go first this time.  (Strap in.  It's going to be a bumpy ride.)

My first question is:  Do you think that Christian parents should have the right to exclude their children from classes where homosexual acts are discussed?  (And I'm not talking about the mere mention of homosexuals in "anti-bullying" classes.) 

Monday, October 22, 2012

Friday, October 19, 2012

"...the signature meant that I was anti-gay."

So, signing a petition to put the definition of marriage on the ballot makes you "anti-gay," and could cost you your job.  Wow.  Has anyone ever been fired for supporting the redefinition of marriage?  What would happen to a business, or a University that fired a marriage redefiner?

Since it clearly illuminates their gross homofascism, and willingness to violate a person's civil right to vote, Gallaudet University is apparently very unhappy about this video.

Thursday, October 18, 2012

H.A.M. illustration.

How civil rights and parental rights are violated by same-sex "marriage."

Sexual behavior cannot honestly be compared to race, a persons skin color is morally benign; it is neither good nor bad.  The word "gay" describes a social group and a behavior.  "Gay people"= social group.  "Gay person"= someone that engages in a perverted, sinful life.

Wherever same-sex "marriage" is legalized, those who refuse to participate, are punished and persecuted.  Redefining marriage ends religious freedom, and I have the right to defend my freedom to serve the Lord Jesus Christ.

Hatred from marriage redefiners.

Monday, October 15, 2012

It's not bigotry... it's biology.

This is one of my favorite videos ever posted on this blog. This made my day since it's already irking the homofascists. Since denial is the cornerstone of the glbt lifestyle, the truth about the biological differences between men and women drives gays crazy!

When the truth drives you crazy... you are living a lie.

Congratulations Felix Baumgartner.

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Marriage redefinition bigotry at Gallaudet University.

The marriage-redefinition-bigots are at it again with their, support- same-sex -“marriage”-or-else mindset. What happened to this world? How did people develop the desire to punish those of us who believe in God’s, one-man-one-woman definition of marriage? Compassion for gays means ignoring what God says? This is why, in my private life, I have no conversation for marriage redefiners.

“..Dr. Angela McCaskill has the distinction of being the first deaf black woman to receive a PhD from Gallaudet University, …teacher, administrator and leader for twenty-three years.

Today she was summarily put on administrative leave while university officials "determine her future" at Gallaudet. Why? Because it was brought to their attention that she signed the petition to allow the people of Maryland to vote on same-sex marriage!

No one is safe when marriage is redefined. The architects of same-sex marriage are bent on silencing and firing those who oppose their agenda. The irony of a university putting its own chief diversity officer on leave—a woman who by all accounts has served the institution with distinction for over two decades—simply because she chose to exercise her rights as a citizen, cannot be ignored. …”

Original info here.

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

The Sandusky touch.

The Sandusky case shows how some people allow their fear of being called a homophobe to enable men to rape young boys.  Jerry Sandusky was seen raping a young boy and was still allowed to continue with his homosexual molestations.  Not only that, Mr. Sandusky still doesn't think that he did anything wrong.  The classic, state-of-constant-denial in the gay mind. 

I am well aware that all homosexuals aren't a danger to children, but I am also aware of how very young boys are seduced into the glbt community by older homosexuals.  Same-sex attraction is emotion-based.  People are not born gay.

Story here.

Homofascists aren't after children?

This is what is in the mind of some, if not most gays.  THEY, not you, will tell your children how to feel about homosexuality.  Homofascists won't hesitate to violate the parental rights of a heterosexual. 

Monday, October 8, 2012

Feminist-femme lesbian angry at reality.

After three ultra-intense days at work and configuring my new smart phone, I can finally tend to my beloved blog.

And there it was waiting for me.  The story of a lesbian angry at the fact that her female lover couldn't impregnate her.  She considers it a, "biological injustice" that she can't procreate with her female partner.

"...What I mean is that I want the ease, the convenience, the — dare I say it — naturalness that straight people have when starting a family.

...The attitude I have always taken to having a baby with another woman has been this: "It's not fair! It's so hard! Why me?"

...I am a total brat about what I consider a biological injustice. . . 

...Why can't my girlfriend and I have a baby that shares our DNA? Why can't an egg from each of us be scrambled up and sprinkled with sperm? It seems so easy! Try harder scientists! Make this a priority. ..."


The obvious, blatant, insanity of most of the glbt community is what powers this blog.  Can anyone defend this twisted woman?  What happened to this woman?  Who is she mad at?  Whose fault is it that she can't procreate with her lesbian lover? 

Denial is the cornerstone/foundation of the glbt lifestyle.

The data supporting this post is here and here.

Monday, October 1, 2012

Matt Birk supports true marriage.

One of the consequences of having a same-sex romance is that you cannot marry each other since a marriage is between one man and one woman.  Many in the glbt community want to rebel against the heteronormative design of their own bodies and change the definition of marriage to normalize the perversion of their choices.  Some gays want to rebel against what a heterosexual couple does, (which is recognize and conform to the design of their genitalia,) and then demand what heterosexual couples have; the legal option of marriage.  This doesn't make sense.  If you want what heterosexuals have, you have to do what heterosexuals do.

"...The union of a man and a woman is privileged and recognized by society as "marriage" for a reason,

...government recognizes marriages and gives them certain legal benefits so they can provide a stable, nurturing environment for the next generation of citizens: our kids.

...Children have a right to a mom and a dad, and I realize that this doesn't always happen.

... Same-sex unions may not affect my marriage specifically, but it will affect my children -- the next generation.

...Marriage redefinition will affect the broader well-being of children and the welfare of society. As a Christian and a citizen, I am compelled to care about both. ..."

Original info here.

Heterosexual awareness month.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Another Susan Boyle moment.

I am ashamed. My self-control-reactor jumped to 94% to keep me from crying over this video.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

"...and design their own tradition."

I had to create the words "heteroseparatist," "heteroactivist," and "heteroadvocate," to describe a rational, hate-free rejection of the glbt lifestyle. How come the gay community can't create a word to describe a union between two people of the same sex instead of trying to hijack the word "marriage"?

A loyal reader who also happens to be a powerful heteroactivist, brought to my attention an article written by a homosexual who opposes the redefinition of the word “marriage.” This is a rare thing, but there are some gays who can punch through homofascist propaganda and see that a true marriage is all about the acknowledgement of gender and not the ignoring thereof. Words are very important, and the word “marriage,” belongs to heterosexuals.

“…Many attribute homophobic motives to the signers. In some cases, that may be true. I am certain that the vast majority are others who, like me, simply view “marriage” as an immutable term that can only apply to heterosexuals. It’s undeniable that, from age to age, marriage has been humanity’s greatest success and source of prosperity, crossing all cultures and religions. We shouldn’t mess with it.

…Full disclosure: I am gay. A few years ago, I was on the other side of the fence on this topic. But the more I read, thought, investigated and attempted to defend my position, the more I realized that I couldn’t. I feel very strongly that gay relationships should be supported by society. I have grown convinced, however, that the term “marriage” should not be altered or adjusted in any way.

…Let’s face it: We should not attempt to force into an old construct something that was never meant for same-sex partnerships. We should welcome the opportunity to christen a new tradition, beginning a new chapter in the history of gays and lesbians within American society. Same-sex relationships are different from heterosexual relationships, and gay men and lesbians need to accept that and design their own tradition. …”

Original info here.


Tuesday, September 25, 2012

French kissing sexual insanity.

Despite my compassion for those who have endured the trauma that causes same-sex attraction, my decision to disassociate with marriage redefiners is strengthened by what’s happening in France right now. Soon, a heterosexual couple marrying in France may not be able to legally call each other “husband” and “wife,” so as not to offend the glbt community. This is yet another answer for the, how-does-gay-“marriage”-effect-yours crowd. This is what marriage redefinition brings. It brings the absurd into reality. To ignore gender in a social institution that is based on the differences in men and women is an absurd, insane thing to do. Gay couples reject the reality of gender differences and therefore have no justification in demanding the redefinition of marriage.

“Under the proposed law, only the word "parents" would be used in marriage ceremonies for all heterosexual and same-sex couples, a move that has sparked widespread outrage, The Telegraph reports.”

“French Catholics also have published a 'Prayer for France,' which says, "Children should not be subjected to adults' desires and conflicts, so they can fully benefit from the love of their mother and father," according to the report.”

Sad story here.