Wednesday, November 28, 2012


The word "homophobia," is on its way out.  People are wising up to its mischaracterization of those who disagree with homosexuality.  Click here.  

Third man accuses Kevin Clash of molestation.

It was the Christmas of 1996 when tickle-me-Elmo was at it’s peak Until I did my homework for this post, I thought that homophile Kevin Clash had thought up tickle-me-Elmo to sexually seduce underage boys. It turns out that he didn’t, but I wouldn’t doubt that he wishes that he had. The homosexuality of Kevin Clash has ruined an icon of childhood, and tickle-me-Elmos, that once sold for $2,500, are now worthless. Maybe Mr. Clash can get a job as a spokesman for NAMBLA. Who else would hire him?

When I ask homofascists to show me the heterosexual equivalent of NAMBLA, none of them can. That says something about the nature of homosexuality.

My supporting info is here, here, and here.

The Witherspoon Institute on true marriage.

Sometimes, I still can’t believe that I live in a world where something as tried and true as the definition of marriage is under attack. How did genderphobia become so popular?

“... Definitions clear away weeds, clarity fosters productive disagreement,...

... The authors explain why debates over gay marriage are only indirectly about homosexuality; the real issue is “not about whom to let marry, but about what marriage is.” Thus the need to address whether the conjugal or revisionist view of marriage is correct. Briefly, the conjugal view holds that marriage, by its nature, can only be the union of man and woman, because marriage is “distinguished by its comprehensiveness,” requiring “a bodily as well as an emotional and spiritual bond.” The revisionist view, on the other hand, treats marriage as a malleable union of any two partners; here marriage is simply “a loving emotional bond, one distinguished by its intensity.”

...The book begins with a pointed challenge to revisionists: What does it mean to say that marriage is an intense emotional bond, and what does such a definition limit? The burden of proof is placed on the revisionists, and they do not fare well.

... If, as revisionists claim, “marriage is distinguished simply by emotional union and the activities that foster it,” what rational basis limits marriage to exclusive monogamy while not including polyamory, close friends, or any sort of arrangement?

... According to the conjugal view, on the other hand, marriage is more than a formless emotional bond; it is a basic human good, a way of being well with an objective and rational basis. Marriage cannot be redefined without deeply misconstruing (and thus missing out on) this good and the flourishing it partially constitutes.

... Marriage, like friendship, also has an objective core that cannot be altered without misunderstanding it. This core distinguishes marriage from other forms of relationship.

... Since “your body is an essential part of you, not a vehicle driven by the ‘real’ you, your mind,” it follows that “any union of two people must include bodily union to be comprehensive.”

... Thus a man and woman of deep intellectual and emotional commitment are not married without bodily union, and neither are Oscar and Alfred, the bachelor brothers. Likewise, same-sex partners or members of a polyamorous community cannot be married, because they cannot establish the bodily union that’s necessary for comprehensive union.

... Marriages are the “main and most effective means” of raising flourishing children, and since the “health and order of society” depend on such children, the law has a compelling reason to support conjugal marriage.

... There is no revulsion or bigotry evident here, but rather compassion for fellow human beings, and while reason reveals that marriage is conjugal and cannot be otherwise, reason—and compassion—demand caring for all, the married or the unmarried. But compassion does not, simply cannot, include redefining marriage, for marriage cannot be redefined. It is what it is. ...”

Full article here.

Friday, November 23, 2012

Guest article from Ronnie Maccallister.

Loyal reader Ronnie Maccallister has blessed with it's second guest article.

This article will seek to explain the enormous power gays exert over the Nation and the World via their control of the Media and Entertainment Industry. It will show how they got into this position of power, and exactly how much power and influence they truly have because of it.

"First let the camel get his nose into the tent, only later his unsightly derriere". "If straights can't shut off the shower, they may eventually get used to being wet." "The objection will be raised, and raised, and raised...that our ads are lies...Yes of course we know it....but it makes no difference that our ads are lies, not to us." "Our effect is achieved without reference to facts, logic, or proof".

-all passages from "After the Ball", widely accepted as the "gay bible", or "the gay activist's playbook"

The Mainstream Media has a product to sell, and they have the most talented (snake oil) salesmen at their disposal. That product is homosexuality, and the salesmen are deep seeded homosexuals and their sympathizers in the Media and Entertainment Industry. All this has come about by the most sophisticated, well-organized activism and propaganda the world has ever seen. This is the marriage of Corporate America, the Media, Politicians, and the gay activists community.

It all started with an inspired brainstorm from a couple Harvard- educated geniuses. Enter Kirk and Madsen.
Homosexuals Marshall Kirk, a neuropsychiatry researcher, and Hunter Madsen, a Madison Ave. Marketing virtuoso, put their heads together in the 80's to take on the many failed efforts of the gay lobby and plot a new legacy of success. What followed was the blueprint for what has been called the most sophisticated propaganda in Human history - the writing of "the Overhauling of Straight America" and "After the Ball: How America Will Conquer It's Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90's". Enter the Mainstream Media.

Kirk and Madsen envisioned and plotted aggressive recruitment of the Media to dispense this propaganda. No mere snake oil salesmen sophomores, they envisioned combining Mau Tse Tung's Communist Chinese brainwashing methods with the slickest of Madison Ave. selling techniques, coupled with other forms of advanced psychological persuasion and coercion methods. And some lies.

Kirk and Madsen knew that by corralling, courting, and infiltrating the Media, they would have American Values at their disposal. And dispose of them (their efforts), did.

Americans are addicted to the screen, be it an led or plasma one, or just a plain old tube. We're hooked on shows, movies, video clips and video games. This ubiquitous teat intoxicates us into a daily stupor of complacency, all the while our minds are under siege.

Gay activists have systematically and aggressively infiltrated the ranks of Hollywood and the Mainstream Media, and now command vast power and influence. Roles such as Screenwriters, Production Designers, Set Directors, Casting Directors - anywhere from Actors to Network Executives -drastic overrepresentation in the Entertainment Industry. They've toiled away long and hard to get there, to the point where today, virtually every major tv show has an influential homosexual writer and at least one prominent gay character. Gays, creative and theatrical by nature, are virtuosos in the t.v. and Film Industry -but with an agenda. The predictable, inevitable outcome of this monopolization is the disproportionate abundance of gay sensibilities in our shows, movies and video games - almost always portraying them as the most "with-it", popular, dynamically-cool character. Completely absent from this fictitious slate are any hints of the typical gay lifestyle that is so commonly accompanied by abysmal degeneracy and decadence.

And it's not just dishonest character portrayals. Gay activists' stranglehold on the Media also guarantees that only their biased depiction of homosexuality gets aired, insulating and protecting it from informed, rational debate - it's Achilles Heel. It's like a revolutionist's dream come true -unconditional praise and zero accountability. Gay activists can always count on all their subservient media lackeys to misrepresent, distort, and white wash all the unseemly dimensions of homosexuality from public view, all the while blacklisting, denigrating, ridiculing, and discrediting all those critical of gay activism. They've also mastered the fine art of blacklisting by inundating printed media and websites with the names, addresses and phone numbers of folks who submit official objections to their goals - huge roll-calls of individuals - with the purpose of drawing out as much scrutiny, scorn and vilification from ne'r-do-wells, who then go on to stalk them, slander them, prank-call them, "S.W.A.T" them, harass their business connections and their families. We saw them do a considerable organized hit-job on their opponents in the California Prop-8 case, and also in Maryland, Where the Washington Blade gratuitously published the names of many thousands of individuals who signed a petition gay activists didn't approve of, resulting in the suspension of Dr. Angela McCaskill, a deaf career teacher at Galludet University.

With this overwhelming Media support, homosexuality is thus depicted and enshrined with an inscrutable (faux) righteousness, one seemingly so incontrovertible that fewer and fewer public figures will speak candidly on it for fear of reprisal . Even the once-critical tough guy Bill O'Reilly was cowed into silence on this issue. Gays are literally able dictate the National dialogue on homosexuality, freezing out inconvenient truths from the American consciousness.
From their deep-seeded influence in the Media, gay activists are also able to dictate the trends of popular culture, and by extension, dictate market trends - exerting significant control of Corporate America.
Well-heeled gay activists also specifically seek out, court, and groom Politicians who have a history of being receptive to their radical ideologies, and then bestow upon them the perks of the Media Sponsorship, Advertising, campaign contributions, and appoint and enshrine them as ambassadors of political correctness in their own right. These Politicians' careers thus then become permanently fused with and dependent on the gays' political correctness Media machine. What's more, those linked to the gay agenda are almost always able to vastly outspend their Conservative opponents during campaigning. Once in office, these politicians are bound to and expected to vote affirmatively on every pro-gay bill. With all the powers and influence gay activists command, it would seem might truly does make right. Their version, anyway.

Corporate America depends on airtime and advertisements. Dependable advertising depends on quality programs and ratings, which in turn depend on quality screenwriting, production, casting, acting, etc, - all areas of the Entertainment Industry monopolized by gays. Corporate America thus depends on gays. Gays thus command the enormous funding and support of Corporate America (Nike, Target, Starbucks, Disney, etc.). Politicians thus also depend on the gay-controlled Media as a liaison to Corporate America. Gays depend upon high-level Politicians to dispense taxpayer dollars to their causes (Ex. -Obama's effusive funding of GLSEN and "Czar" Kevin Jennings' homosexualizing of schools.) This is why it is extremely difficult to resist gay activism. Because for all intents and purposes, you mess with gays, you mess with Nike. You challenge the gay agenda, you challenge Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, and Harry Reid. As this unholy alliance is perpetuated, it's very existence is carefully shielded from view.
This symbiotic relationship is like an eternal wellspring of falsehoods. It is the very source -the headwaters- of the poisoned stream coursing destructively through America's values and sensibilities. It is like a factory. A falsehood factory - one peopled by a loyal army of Marxist gay mercenaries and other hedonistic revolutionaries. And it is this factory that so prolifically churns out it's coveted product: embellished, evocative, glamorous and dynamic portrayals of gays and their ideological cousins, the proudly promiscuous debaucherers.

This falsehood factory, for all its contemporary virtues and influence fortifying it, is as flimsy as a house of cards constructed upon a base of sand, susceptible to aggressive winds of Truth.

The waters of that poisoned stream flow only through meadows and valleys of shadow and darkness, for it quickly evaporates when exposed to cleansing rays of sunlight.

Somewhere in the annals of Cinema sits a foggy-eyed, slurring, drugged and lobotomized actor Ray Liotta, sitting at the dinner table with the top half of his head missing, being spoon fed his own brains ["Hannibal", 2001] The gay-controlled Media has America in a very similar spoon feeding highchair, feeding us things equally outlandish, lulling us into a complacent stupor with propaganda from it's falsehood factory.

Elsewhere in the annals of Cinema, an actor played by Roddy Piper stands at the top of a media skyscraper, having just blown away a space-age satellite transmitter that was the sole transmission source of a planet-wide brainwashing media signal, one that made people blind to the presence and sinister intentions of their alien conquerors living right along side them - that movie's depiction of a reality that eerily parallels the brainwashing of the gay-controlled Media. "They Live" (1988), was the title of that movie, and it ends with a truly hopeful scenario where masses of oppressed, deluded and hapless people finally wake up to the truth for what it really is - the Truth.

Somewhere in America sits everyday Joe, settling in to unwind after a long day of work, school, or parenting with some t.v. viewing to retreat from the stress of his everyday life. What he gets are poisoned fruits of the labor of malicious cultural revolutionaries - peddlers and portrayers of a skewed, poisoned reality, who are at war with the values and freedoms that made his Country special.

This portrayal on this issue has been a dour one, but rays of sunlight have been slowly creeping in. Though public figures are mostly silent on this issue, an army of citizen journalists and bloggers, not so accountable to public scrutiny, have been slowly and steadily educating others and sewing seeds of discord in a populace so previously deluded, bringing about a revolution of critical and rational thought.
George Orwell once wrote, "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act".

It has also been said, "You can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can never fool all of the people all of the time."

And I say, "Amen to that".

Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Brilliant call to Truth Wins Out.

In this video, revealed to me by loyal reader Ronnie Maccallister, a heteroactivist takes apart homofascist propaganda piece-by-piece. For some reason, whenever I tried to give a thumbs up to a comment, it wouldn't register. Was my thumbs up blocked by the website? I wouldn't be one bit surprised.

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

The end of a Clash with sexual insanity.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... I know that not all gay men are child-molesters.  I've never said that, and I don't believe that.  But I also know that many homosexuals were seduced into gaydom when they were under the legal age of consent by a man/male over the legal age of consent. 

Now, a second man has come forward saying that he had sexual contact with Kevin Clash when he was 15.  I'm shocked!!  (Not!!)

"...Then on Tuesday, a lawsuit was filed in federal court in New York charging Clash with sexual abuse of a second youth. The lawsuit alleges that Cecil Singleton, then 15 and now an adult, was persuaded by Clash to meet for sexual encounters. ..."

Links to my supporting info are here and here.

Monday, November 12, 2012

The 'mo inside of Elmo.

Yet again, a member of the glbt community utterly destroys a safe haven for children, and gives the phrase "tickle me Elmo," a whole new and disgusting meaning.  This  homophile, Kevin Clash, has admitted  to sexual contact with a 16-year-old boy when he was 45!! 

I would never associate with a 45-year-old man who was having a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old girl, and that goes triple for a 45-year-old man having a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old boy.  Even if it's legal, it is reprehensible for a 45-year-old to have sexual contact with a 16-year-old.  

Between childrens books, t.v. programs, prime time t.v. shows, animated films for children, Sesame Street, GLSEN, gay-straight-alliances in schools, the Boy Scouts, and NAMBLA, the gay community can't even deny their desire to reach the hearts and minds of children, WITHOUT the parental consent of those children.  Parents in Canada, where same-sex "marriage" is legal, are blocked by law from knowing what is being taught to their children in sex-education classes in grade schools.

The glbt community deceives or attacks with words like, "bigotry," "homophobe," or "intolerant," to distract from their prime goal of normalizing homosexuality to other peoples children behind the backs of their parents.  Since  homosexuality stems from emotion, it is critical for some gays to recruit children.  Homosexuality is very most often the result of a older homosexual seducing a young boy into the glbt community as he was when he was a young boy.

This disgusting story completely supports the abovementioned points.

Thursday, November 8, 2012

So voting on marriage is okay now??

What happened?  I thought that voting on the definition of marriage was unconstitutional?  That's what the homofascists say in California.

So why is it that the gays are celebrating now in other states where voters have redefined marriage?  Are they celebrating the coming legal persecution of Christian business that will be fined or closed for their refusal to comply with sexual perversion? Are they celebrating the intentional deprivation of a mother or a father from a child's life?

Oh I get it!  A vote on the definition of marriage is ONLY valid if the glbt community agrees with that vote!  Wow.  Silly me.  Can a heterosexual federal judge now throw out the votes that support the redefinition of marriage?  How would the gay community react to that?

Info here.

Tuesday, November 6, 2012

No freedom of speech for true marriage supporters.

Disagreement with marriage redefiners is not allowed, and no group of people is more ready to violate the civil rights of others than full-of-hate marriage redefinition bigots.

Monday, November 5, 2012

Fired for supporting true marriage.

It is wrong to be gay, but people have the right to be wrong. Therefore, no one should lose their job for being straight or gay, or their support for same-sex "marriage," or their support for true marriage. Redefining marriage will begin the religious persecution that the United States of America was founded to escape from.



a:  The hatred, fear, or denial of the biological fact that human beings are either born male or born female.

b: The denial of the obvious physical, emotional, and cognitive differences between men and women.

c:  The rejection of the differences between the mature masculine mind and the mature feminine mind.

d:  A fear of the opposite sex or gender.

Genderphobia at Evergreen State College.

If you were born with a penis, you are male.  If you were born with a vagina, you are female.  If you are a genderphobe, you will not accept that fact, and you hate the biological reality of gender.

Surgery can change your appearance, but not the biological reality of gender.  Gender is not a social construct, "transgender" is a social construct.  Every human being that I've ever met was born either male or female.

This story was so absurd, that it took me four days to absorb it; my mind just wouldn't accept it.  I just couldn't believe that educated people would allow a naked 45-year-old man into a women's locker room.  How could anyone be so out-of-touch with the reality that human beings are either male or female?

Apparently, the administration of Evergreen State College doesn't have the common-sense to stop a 45-year-old man from exposing his genitalia to six-year-old girls, in a women's locker room!!

Mind-bending story herehere, and here.