Saturday, June 30, 2012

Anti Christian Liberties Union.

Let me see if I can get this straight; the ACLU is fighting to bypass parental consent?!? Doesn’t the “CL” in ACLU stand for “civil liberties”? Is it not a civil liberty to protect one’s children? Doesn’t the ACLU recognize the concept of parental consent when it comes to a parent’s moral objection to their child being exposed to sexual subject matters? Does ACLU stand for Anti Christian Liberties Union?

“…When a kindergarten boy brought home a children’s book touting the joys of being in a lesbian family, his parents complained to Windridge Elementary School, sparking a petition signed by 25 parents in protest.
The book, “In Our Mother’s House,” is marketed on Amazon as a book for children “ages 6 and up.”

…It touches on the alleged joys of being in a homosexual relationship and what the author believes is society’s condemnation of it.

…Now the American Civil Liberties Union is getting involved – threatening the district for requiring parental consent. (<---say what!!)

…In the book, a resident in a Berkley, Calif., neighborhood is depicted as a constantly scowling woman who wears a pink bow in her hair. She disapproves of the neighboring family’s lesbian relationship and won’t let her children play with them.
She tells the lesbian couple, “I don’t appreciate what you two are!”
The lesbians, Meema and Marmee, comfort their children.
“She’s full of fear, sweetie,” Meema tells them. “She’s afraid of what she can’t understand: She doesn’t understand us.”

…Polacco noted, “What I did take exception to was this mother – who had the right to have this book kept from her child – decided to take it upon herself within that school, and then the entire district, to see that YOUR child couldn’t read the book, either. That’s where I think our First Amendment rights are getting trounced.”
However, as previously noted, the book has not been removed from the school libraries. Children are simply required to obtain parental consent before checking it out.

…“Parents have the ‘fundamental right’ to ‘direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.’ The district is right to leave such decisions to them,”… “Public schools should not surrender to ACLU intimidation when it asks them to expose children to sexual content without parental knowledge. …”

Full story/article here.

Cool poster.

Points 11 and 14 caught my attention.

Thursday, June 28, 2012

So a child doesn't need a mother and a father?!?

Isn’t it obvious that a child needs a mother and a father? I quietly separate myself from people that think otherwise.

"…that led the American Psychological Association (in 2005) to assert that the children of gay and lesbian parents are in no way disadvantaged, compared to the children of heterosexual parents, has concluded those studies were inadequate. According to Dr. Loren Marks, Associate Professor at Louisiana State University, who authored the analysis: “The available data, which are drawn from small convenience samples, are insufficient to support a strong generalizable claim...

…Those who knew that their mothers had had a lesbian relationship fared significantly worse on measures of educational attainment and household income, reported more depression, used marijuana more, more often reported forced sexual encounters…

…Those who knew their fathers had had a gay relationship were more likely to have been arrested, to have thought recently about suicide, to feel depressed, to report sexually transmitted diseases and to have experienced forced sex. …

…Twenty-three percent of young adults who knew their mother to have had a gay relationship reported being forced to have sexual contact with a parent or adult caregiver, while only 2 percent of intact families with a mother and father reported such contact. For female young adults, that figure leapt to 31 percent (while only 3 percent of young women from intact heterosexual families reported this). …

…What we should avoid at all costs is silencing such research and such discussion because it is seen by some as politically incorrect. Where optimizing the well-being of children is involved, no stone should be left unturned. …”

Story here and here.

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

HRC linked to child rape.

I’m well aware that all homosexuals aren’t a danger to children, but I’m also aware that, when a man breaks from sexual sanity, he becomes a danger to children. A man who is sexually attracted to boys doesn’t see sex with boys as something wrong, he sees the act of sex with a child as an act of “love,” because that’s what he was told when he was seduced, by an older male, into homosexuality himself.

This is one of the reasons the glbt community is so desperate to bypass parental consent to normalize homosexuality to children.

I'm surprised that the San Francisco Chronicle even reported this story. More info here.

Monday, June 25, 2012

Aservant's article. Part 2 of 5.

This story spans over 15 years and has many, many details, some of which may seem irrelevant to the issue in question. That being said, I would like to encourage the reader to read on, to eventually be able to understand the need to include so much detail in this story.

I arrived into young adulthood as a default liberal. What I mean by that is that I was never indoctrinated directly during my upbringing to embrace liberal viewpoints, I simply absorbed them by default through the culture at large. I have come to believe that unless one is raised as overtly conservative and often Christian as well, one will ultimately take on the progressive/liberal world view. This was me to a fault.

I have worked in the culinary industry my whole career which has always had its fair share of gays, especially as service staff. Being that I was a young liberal, this was a non- issue. Also, keep in mind that when I started my career just over 25 years ago, the world was a different place. Sure, the gay revolution was well under way, but it wasn't on steroids as it is today. There was no “Queer Eye for The Straight Guy” or “Will and Grace” or aggressive pro-gay campaigns in the name of “tolerance” in public education. As such, although I knew and worked with many openly homosexual men, their attitude towards me, and their attitude in general was very different than what I observe today. They knew I was straight, I knew they were gay, and boundaries were respected. Sometimes there was a bit of good natured teasing that went both ways, but I never personally witnessed any discrimination or bigotry towards the many homosexuals I knew. That isn't to say that homosexuals haven't suffered discrimination or been affected by bigotry, but it wasn't my experience. Everyone got along fine and for all intents and purposes, although I was never close to being anything like a gay activist, in my personal views I was pro-gay. I would define this by saying that I didn't see any homosexuals that I knew as being really any different than myself, with the only exception being their sexual orientation. If anyone expressed a contrary viewpoint, I didn't “fight for gay rights”, but I did get in a few discussions defending what I thought was my “enlightened” point of view, and at the very least, I was uncomfortable hearing viewpoints that portrayed homosexuals as anything “deviant”. But I will say that the thought of actual homosexual acts between men has always been repugnant to me no matter what the social/political viewpoint I expressed at whatever time. This has been so ever since I was old enough to understand the concept of homosexuality. I now strongly believe that my repugnance came and comes from a much deeper truth than the one I became to believe in as a young adult liberal, but I denied it. I learned to deny it by being exposed to relentless propaganda that made me feel that there was something repugnant about my repugnance.......

I did not understand at the time which I described in the above paragraph that my pro-gay beliefs were due to being heavily propagandized by the media to see gays as oppressed victims. This of course would explain the “why” as to my being “pro-gay” in my social/political viewpoint, but at the same time still unable to accept the actual thought of gay sex itself. It is only been within approximately the last 5 years that I have been able to finally put those pieces together with hindsight. As I said before, the world was different 25 years ago, and although the political gay movement wasn't nearly as advanced as it is today, it was well underway. The time I am speaking of was the late 80s and early 90s. This was the time of the AIDS epidemic and the Oscar award-winning movie “Philadelphia”, a brilliant propaganda piece that succeeded in harnessing a massive amount of goodwill towards the gay community from the public at large. I obviously didn't realize it at the time, but due to works like “Philadelphia” and many others to come, done in such a masterful, almost subliminal manner to invoke empathy for homosexuals, I and large segments of mainstream society had or were becoming “pro-gay”. Unaware that we were being indoctrinated into this viewpoint, it seemed as though this was just another “social enlightenment”, such as equal recognition of women under the law or guaranteed civil rights for non-white minorities. I think that I felt, along with many others, that we were just naturally “evolving” into a morally superior people by accepting this benevolent, “diverse” way of life. This was progression, pure and simple.......

But being that I now write this essay for “”, it goes without saying that I now know this was and continues to be a complete farce. I will tell you about here in detail how this fraud was revealed to me through subsequent years of direct exposure to the gay lifestyle, a lifestyle that 25 years ago I thought I knew......but it has now become obvious that my superficial dealings with homosexuals at that time did not educate me in the least about the hard facts of this proclivity. Although the gays I knew at that time were living as open homosexuals, it is once again now blatantly obvious to me that they were very guarded still amongst non-gays about revealing the totality of what “gay culture” was and is. I was very naïve as well, too quick to believe in the general good intentions of human beings. In the years since, my same exposure to this culture has seen homosexuals become very emboldened and confident in the political and social gains that their movement has achieved. This has resulted in many gays abandoning their guarded behavior when around non-gays and allowing us to really see the gay lifestyle as it truly is. What I have seen, and what I will tell you about here, is gay culture in reality without the media filter, .... and it isn't pretty. Looking back on a few occasions, I saw signs of this with the homosexuals that I knew, but I ignored and even buried some of the uncomfortable feelings I had from time to time as I believed the problem was with me....I was “intolerant.”

So on the gay question, all was fine more or less for me as a young adult. To sum it up, I was never a radical gay rights activist or anything as such, but I did believe the propaganda that there was really no difference between gay and straight, it was just a matter of preference, and I felt I had the direct experience with many gay friends to back this opinion with truth.

Things began to change for me in the late nineties because of a close friendship I developed with a homosexual. Now, at the time, I wasn't the man that writes this today in many significant ways, most importantly, I was not a Christian, and I would even go as far as saying that I was somewhat anti-Christian, although I did not call myself that. I saw Christian doctrine through the lens of the typical, modern progressive liberal, although I had never read the Bible. Of course this made me extremely ignorant about my own supposed convictions, but you wouldn't convince me of that at the time. I was quite indoctrinated, and like almost all progressives of our age, my opinion was that Christianity had some good ideas, yes, but the majority of the philosophy was basically a manipulation to keep humans in line through oppression. So at the time in my life where my story begins, I want the reader to know that I wasn't and never had been a criminal or a delinquent, but from where I stand now looking back, I was in some very deep spiritual trouble at the time, although completely oblivious to that fact. But
for most judging me by appearance, I was a pretty capable, hardworking, intelligent young man with a lot going for him.

Let me give you an even better idea of the person that I was at this time. I think this is important because I now know as well that broken people will believe in broken ideologies. It is now clear to me that the promotion of homosexuality as a “normal” lifestyle is a broken ideology, so of course, as I have already made clear, I took it in, for I was spiritually “broken”. I came from a home of divorced parents with an abusive childhood, which left me without a solid foundation for forming healthy relationships. This left me restless and longing for meaningful connection with others. Although I always had a strong work ethic and was considered a high performer, I was in bad spiritual straights at this time in my life as I have already mentioned. Through other circumstances in my life not to do with this issue; family, romantic and professional issues, I had begun to question much about society in general and what my role in the world was, and mostly in a very negative way. Once again, all this has become clear to me in hindsight, and I was completely oblivious to it at the time, but the few solid values that I did have, the ones that had carried me through until that point in my life were trashed.....and they were trashed by me. Values like solid commitment to my work and scrutinizing the character of those I associated with. It will become clearer as to what this means and how it relates to this tale as my story progresses.

I had relocated to the American South West by this time in my life, and I was on a sort of “adventure” ….so to speak, to find myself. I was disenchanted with my profession, but still trying to have faith, but I more or less worked as a way to pay the bills. I found a job running a small hotel kitchen, and this is where the my friendship with the gay individual began, for he had just gotten a job at the same property. I will call him John.

John had just recently located to the area as well, and upon meeting him, I had no idea that he was gay. He was not effeminate and very much an extrovert. In a word, he was very entertaining. Furthermore, I had come from a large city and was now in a rural area with a different culture and I felt somewhat out of place. I knew no one in the area and it was rather lonely. John had also come from a large city where he had worked as a fine dining waiter and dining room manager, and he too felt somewhat out of place. So began our friendship.....

Within a few months, John had landed a job at a small fine dining room in the area, one of a handful, as the dining room manager, and they were badly in need of a qualified chef. I got the job immediately.

In my business, after hours socialization among the staff is very common, and as you can imagine, this usually involves alcohol and sometimes other substances. My situation was no different here. We often went out as a group and had a lot of fun, with some having more “fun” than others, to the point of overdoing it. I was rarely one of those individuals, mostly because my position demanded too many hours, although there were a few hangovers, but on a personal level, I knew I was escaping my accepted norms of personal discipline bit by bit.

It was through these social interactions that I and others at our work place began to suspect that John was maybe gay, but it wasn't really an issue, more of a curiosity. Meanwhile, improprieties began to surface in the dining room where we worked. For example, John would often take bottles of wine for personal consumption and sometimes share them with me and others. It started with the odd bottle, but soon progressed to a couple or more bottles virtually every night. Now, remember that in my position I was half of the management with John for an owner of the business, and although I had a few more late nights than I should have at times, I was always honest to a “T” and ethical about my position. So finally one night I inquired with John as to if the wine was always paid for as it began to seem excessive. He of course assured me it was, and being that the owner of the business was involved in the operation day to day, I couldn't imagine that he was getting away with consistent thievery, so I took him at his word.

But soon other issues about John's character began to appear and they began to bother me. For example, he would often ask me to lend him money until payday......usually no more than $50 dollars. But when payday came, I would have to ask for my money, it wasn't volunteered to be paid, and it was almost always short. This happened several times, until I finally became frustrated and asked as to why he couldn't simply pay what he had borrowed. John was very taken aback, and replied...... “Why didn't you tell me I owed you more?” To this I replied.... “Your debts are your responsibility, not mine, and I am not your parent. Why don't you keep track of your debts in an honest manner?” Judging by the expression on his face, this seemed to be an alien concept to him, but he did pay me.

Finally, after only about 5 months of working together, a huge scandal ensued. A couple of waiters that worked with us came to my place of residence in a panic and told me that the owner was calling the police. They said that he had discovered that he was missing several cases of high dollar wine and suspected he had been being robbed for quite some time. John was the prime suspect of course, but as these waiters rambled on about the situation in a rather frazzled manner, other names were being dropped and fingers were pointing in every direction. Finally, John himself showed up at my place, naming names himself and attempting to admit to maybe some small improprieties, but in large he was trying to absolve himself of all responsibility in the matter. I told them all that I wanted nothing to do with this and they all needed to leave. I felt my initial suspicions about John had been correct.

It turned out that no charges were filed, some wine was returned, John and a waiter resigned and no one in particular was blamed. To this day I don't really know exactly what happened, for it was inconsequential to me. At the same time this “scandal” ensued, I had met a regular diner that very much liked my food and wanted me to do a restaurant for him, so I conveniently resigned myself and went to go work on this project.

Friday, June 22, 2012

The difference between "black" and "gay."

Consider the words “Polish” and “polish.” The former defines a nationality, while the latter defines the action of shining shoes. Yet, the only difference in the two words is the capitalization of it's first letter. What a world of difference based upon whether or not the first letter is capitalized!

When I use the phrase “black people,” or “gay people,” the words “black” and “gay” are describing two different social groups. But when I say “black person,” or “gay person,” the word “gay” totally changes in its meaning and is now revealing an aspect of the person’s character, whereas the meaning of the word “black” does not change; the word "black" does not reveal an aspect of a person's character.

This subtle difference is always overlooked when the words “black” and “gay” are used a in debate concerning civil rights, yet this difference is well known to black people. It seems that many are ignorant of this subtle, yet significant, difference.

Story here.

School bus monitor bullied.

Beloved readers, I heard of this poor woman's story today and decided to lend a cyber-hand to make her life easier.

Help her out here.

Tuesday, June 19, 2012

"registry of homophobic acts..."

Some people wonder why I fight homofascism with such tenacity. Some people tell me that homofascism will never gain a strong foothold in my country. I call (bovine feces)!! I collect data to counteract homosexual propaganda and to defend myself and the concept of heteroseparatism against those who have a demonic desire to attack, discredit, and mischaracterize me.

Whenever I get involved in an online debate about the danger of redefining marriage, I start sending links to the information that I’ve gathered on this blog, and whoever it is that’s attacking me…suddenly disappears! The truth is an immortal weapon/shield, and whoever lives in the Truth will outlast their opponent.

Now, in Canada, where same-sex “marriage” is legal, a “registry of homophobic acts” has been started. How is this not state-sponsored homofascism?!?

“…a Quebec homosexual activist group has launched a “registry of homophobic acts” with support and funding from the Quebec Government’s Justice Department. Standing alongside Montreal Police Chief Johanne Paquin and Commander Alain Gagnon, the leadership of the group Gai Ecoute launched the anonymous tipster registry at a press conference today.

…“any negative word or act toward a homosexual or homosexuality in general…injurious mockery, inappropriate media coverage…

…anyone who has experienced or witnessed an act of homophobia “must” report it to the registry of homophobic acts.

…the Quebec Justice Ministry’s department of “The Fight Against Homophobia.” The Justice Ministry was tasked with fighting homophobia in 2008 and last year pledged $7 million to ‘anti-homophobia’ activities.

…LifeSiteNews spoke briefly with Roger Noël, the coordinator of The Office of the Fight against Homophobia in the Department of Justice. Noël refused to answer questions about the registry…

…“The compilation and analysis of these data will better identify the problem and will enable us to act at the level of prevention.”

…the registry as a “means to instill a climate of oppression and fear to anyone who disagrees with any of the opinions of the homosexualist movement in Quebec.”

…“Anyone who might believe that a homosexual act is unacceptable at a moral level” is being sent a warning “that they will end up on a list,” he said. “A list to be used for a future purpose which in my opinion is to punish.”

…“It is really about inciting a climate of fear using the media, especially with the presence of the police. Any criticism will be interpreted as homophobia and eventually down the road there will be consequences.” …”

The full story on this latest level of Canadian homofascism is here.

Aservant's article. Part 1 of 5.

The following is the story of my experience that lead me to awake to the truth about gay culture and gay behavior itself. A truth that is the exact opposite of what is being portrayed in popular culture and sold at large to an unknowing public.

I write this because I believe there is an intentional, massive fraud being perpetrated on a population that is largely ignorant about this matter due to a lack of honest discourse and direct experience. I believe that those of us that have been fortunate enough to finally be able to see through this fraud have an obligation to share with others what we have learned. It has become very obvious to me that the politically correct, “en vogue”, “gay is good” meme that currently dominates public discourse regarding this issue is not only untrue, but it is very damaging to our societal structure at large, as well as to the lives of individuals. Personally, I know now that my own ignorance on this matter caused me great spiritual damage and resulted in many years of physical hardship and exposure to very dangerous situations. I feel I was lucky to come through this process intact.

I feel it to be very important that my story be told, for I am sure that many others, unprepared, naïve and indoctrinated, will go through the same experience as myself, and it is very possible that unlike me, they won't come through intact. More importantly, I have come to believe that if the gay issue isn't discussed in an open, sincere and rational manner in the public forum at large there will be devastating consequences for everybody, both gay and straight.

But before I get to my actual experience, I want to share a few words of my acquired beliefs on this very important issue.

I want it to be known from the beginning of this story that I do not believe homosexuals and homosexuality are beyond redemption nor are they or their behavior inherently evil. This is important to state because in today's culture, as soon as one speaks critically of gay culture, they are labeled a “bigot, hater, and intolerant.” Well, as you read this true personal account, you will see that I have not been any of those, and nothing in this essay is written with any malice whatsoever. What I write here is what I have learned through years of study, direct experience, and personal observation. The issue of hate or intolerance is not anywhere in the picture. Rather, this is a discussion about the health and stability of our society, nothing more.

The most common label thrown at one who speaks critically of homosexual behavior is “homophobe”, as though this person is personally terrified of homosexuals and therefore must attack them to keep them at a distance. I have come to understand that this response, along with the others previously mentioned, is used by homofascists and their sympathizers as a way of projecting their own terror on to others about their own proclivities that they feel powerless to control. This is a defense mechanism on the part of the homosexual who feels attacked by honest discourse about homosexuality. Let me explain how this works.

This can only be understood if one understands the true nature of homosexuality and is not deceived by what is being trumpeted about gay culture in popular culture today. In today's “mainstream discourse”, being gay is portrayed as a mere “tendency”, no different than being right or left handed. But as I just stated, this is a portrayal, nothing more. It has little if anything to do with what the reality is of being homosexual, which is of course what this essay is about. I used to believe in this “portrayal” of “gayness”. Not anymore. I am now convinced without a doubt, that homosexuality is a strong behavioral compulsion akin to an addiction, and actually is a form of addiction, and an extremely strong one at that. Once I finally understood this, then the aggressive and often hateful reaction that homosexuals display when confronted about the facts of the lifestyle they embrace began to make perfect sense. It began to become clear that just like severe alcoholism or drug addiction, the subject often feels completely powerless to their desires. In the same way that certain drug addicts and alcoholics are blinded by their addiction and can't or are not willing to see how it is destroying them or those around them, so is the unrepentant homosexual. We all know of cases of intervention by others into the life of a drug addict or alcoholic that result with addict becoming extremely aggressive, even to the point of violence. My experience has brought me to believe that attacks by homosexuals on those who speak frankly about this matter is no different at all than the severe drug addict who becomes aggressive when told the truth about his destructive behavior. This aggression comes from a deep, primal fear, which is very understandable if one is to truly comprehend the psychology of severe addiction. The severe addict becomes completely overpowered by his addiction to the point that it is the central driving force in his life. It is his identity, and he literally must continue to consume a substance in order to function, or so he feels. He feels that if he were to stop consuming the substance he would surely do himself great harm, perhaps even die, and in some cases of severe chemical dependency, this is in fact the case. But those cases are rare. In most cases the addict will need treatment, perhaps experience withdrawal symptoms, but they will continue to live without their dependency if they can overcome it. And although it isn't obvious to the practicing addict, if they can conquer their addiction, they will actually live much better. This is why there exists the “intervention”. It is clear to those on the outside that the addict is powerless to their addiction and someone must act to reveal the truth about their behavior to them. They have become blind to how they live and what they do.

I believe that this is the exact same behavioral dynamic at play within homosexual compulsion. When one speaks honestly about homosexual behavior and the practicing homosexual is witness to this, it is very threatening to them and invokes a fearful and aggressive response as a matter of self defense. This is due to the fact that deep down the truth always exists, in spite of the powerful corrupting influences of the human ego with its self-deception and vanity. . When it is proclaimed to an individual about their destructive behavior they can no longer hide in the comfort of their denial. They are faced with the reality of the destruction that they are living, but as already stated above, this destruction has now “become them”, so it is as if the core of their being is under attack. If they are not ready to change or in fact have deluded themselves so deeply for so long that they see no need to change, it is only natural that they will aggressively attempt to defend themselves with a counter attack. And today, with a massive, mainstream public movement telling the homosexual that “gay is good”, he is that much more empowered in his addiction. But when one speaks openly about this destructive way of living, whether as a homosexual or a drug addict, the coping mechanism of denial that the person has employed is rendered useless in a moment. Truthful words, especially in front of witnesses, have much power. The addict had succeeded in fooling himself that his behavior is “normal”. Now, once the power of truth is interjected, the charade is over, reality is revealed, and the person is brought into account. This is a very painful, frightening experience for one who has been living in destruction.

I write this as a Christian, so for me really, this is a spiritual matter and best understood as such. The behavior I described above that likens the homosexual to the drug addict is a good example of what Christian belief calls sin. One could write an entire essay on exactly what sin is and how it is defined, but the topic of sin itself is not the subject here, so I will offer a concise definition for the sake brevity and clarity. Sin is evil behavior. And what is evil behavior, you ask? Who is to define this? According to whom? Well, I will offer this. Evil is “live” spelled backwards, and this seems to offer us a perfectly clear interpretation as to what it means. It is any force directly opposed to life. This can be actions, beliefs, philosophy or just simple words. In the context of behavior, evil is comprised of actions that lead to destruction, not creation. I have learned through direct experience, and it is this experience that lead me to believe in Christian doctrine, that there are those who act evilly because it is their nature; they are children of the dark and enjoy this behavior. And then there are the rest of us, who all act evilly from time to time, some more than others, for a variety of reasons. These reasons could be because we suffer from vanity, pride, anger, lust, weakness....the list is large. But we are not evil at heart, and we do not enjoy acting this way as a way of living, but we are weak and make mistakes.

But sometimes, one can make mistakes repeatedly and fall into sin, just like each drug addict starts with just one episode that leads to addiction. Sin in all its forms, which comes through temptation and seduction of the soul, is highly addictive and can often be very intoxicating. And again, just like hard core drug addiction, sin can be so highly addictive that it can completely consume a person to the point that they are unable to return to normalcy and perish. But sin can also be fought and overcome. I have learned this first hand.

So for me it has become very evident that the homosexual is a suffering, lost sinner, just like the rest of us, nothing more, and this has always been the case throughout time. But today there is another dimension to this issue, and that is the mainstreaming of homosexual behavior in what has been a western culture deeply rooted in Christian values for many centuries. These values of course have always held that homosexuality is not to be embraced as “normal”, but rather, homosexual behavior is a reflection of a disturbed soul and a sin not unlike countless others. Now, in what could only be described as a near instantaneous reversal of popular opinion, it is the Christian who doesn't embrace homosexuality as normal who is seen in mainstream society as “disturbed”. Progressive society today champions the homosexual simply as a “misunderstood minority.” This is completely opposite to the traditional Christian viewpoint that has dominated our culture for centuries, which maintains that we are sinners and must fight our darker side. Today's society has succeeded by and large in removing the moral question about homosexual behavior.

I will make a case in this essay that this is a dangerous development for the security and prosperity of our society. I will even go as far to say here that normalizing homosexual behavior at large in our culture may very well be the linchpin issue for its destruction. If one is to understand homosexuality in the spiritual Christian paradigm, and not only that, but in a psychological, scientific manner, what is to stop us from openly embracing all forms of sin? Why discriminate against other sin? Why don't we openly celebrate lying? Or adultery? Or theft? No, you say, that would be destructive by destroying all trust between individuals, and there is no comparison........being gay is just preferring the same sex as an intimate partner, that's all.

Is that all? My direct experience over many years has told me that isn't all in the least, not by far. I have already used the term "gay culture", and gays use it themselves, and this is correct, because there is a whole culture and lifestyle associated with being gay, especially homosexual rather than lesbian, that is very different from non-gay culture. My story will tell you about this in detail, and it is this experience that makes me conclude, without a doubt, that embracing and celebrating homosexuality is just as destructive as embracing the sins of theft, lying and adultery......just to name a few.

These may seem to be very bold statements to someone that hasn't experienced what I have, and even more so if one takes at face value what is publicly being represented as the state of current gay culture. So what would make me state such bold opinions you may ask? Especially in the social climate of today, where I will be attacked, ridiculed and hated? Well, the honest answer is a very strong conviction on the matter, one that I sincerely believe has come from God himself.

Let me tell you what I have seen......

Introducing "Aservant."

This is the avatar of Aservant.

As of today, Tuesday, 19 June 2012, recognizes Aservant as the World's second heteroseparatist.

Sunday, June 17, 2012

The risks of having lesbian "mothers."

Supporting info here.

Intense talks...

Beloved readers,

I am in intense talks with the author of's first guest article/series. And I'm planning on an announcement within the next 72 hours. (Work has been beating the crap out of me and delaying production!)

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Don't use the word "Dad" ?!?!?

Talk about bigotry and intolerance! A gay couple objects to the word "dad" in a guide for raising children, and ALL references to fathers and fatherhood are removed from that guide!?!

WOW!!! This is yet another example of the denial that is the cornerstone of the gay community. To deny that it takes a male and a female to create a child is insane. Yet this type of behavior is supported by those who fear being labeled "homophobic."

Is this not insanity? How is this NOT crazy? After God created Adam and Eve, it takes a male and a female to create a human life on this planet, yet some in the glbt community want this fact silenced. And I'm called a "bigot" for walking away from this? I'm "intolerant," or "homophobic," for my heteroseparatism?

I don't associate with people who deny the truth about gender differences.

Story here.

Well, here we go again.

A person that is very most probably an anti-Christ bigot said that one of my videos was banned from YouTube. That struck me as curious, since I’ve never even made a video, much less for YouTube. When I investigated the accusation, I immediately discovered that it was yet another false accusation from someone who very probably thinks that anyone who doesn’t support male-on-male sexual activity is a “bigot.”

Yet the more I clarify heteroseparatism, the more false accusations I get. That’s no surprise to me. That’s why I wrote my manifesto, to cover all of the little lies that are told about those who don’t support the glbt community.

So now I’m laying down a challenge for each person who can only attack me with a like-minded group to support them. I’m challenging anyone from to find a post on this blog where I have condoned proactive violence, hatred, or oppression against the glbt community. Until someone from can face me here, where I guarantee a one-on-one debate, the commenters on the linked-to thread above are nothing but anti-hetero bigots.

Will anyone one of those cyberjackals take me on one-on-one? No they won’t. Jackals cannot fight mono-e-mono.

Worth a thousand words...

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Meet Caiden Cowger.

Although I don't agree with everything that this young man says, I am amazed at his moral clarity. The glbt community is going to try to destroy this young man.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

R.I.P. Ray Bradbury

One of the greatest writers of Science Fiction/Fantasy has died. His work was brilliant.

Monday, June 4, 2012

Sexual behavior vs. religious freedom.

I wonder, could a Christian photographer be sued for refusing to take pictures of sex toys, or heterosexuals dressed up in S &M gear? Or children in sexually suggestive poses?

Same-sex marriage was not even legal in the state of New Mexico, but Elane Photography, a Christian company, was still fined for refusing to photograph a ceremony of sexual sin. Apparently, a person’s sexual activities makes them a member of a legally protected class. Is this why some people become gay? To belong to a protected group? This is why I fight homofascism and marriage redefiners. I’m fighting to protect my freedom to walk away from the glbt community. Homosexuality is not innate like gender or skin color; people can leave the glbt community anytime they want to.

“... “Should the government force a videographer who is an animal rights activist to create a video promoting hunting and taxidermy? Of course not, and neither should the government force this photographer to promote a message that violates her conscience. Because the Constitution prohibits the state from forcing unwilling artists to promote a message they disagree with, we will certainly appeal this decision to the New Mexico Supreme Court.”

...Benjamin Bull, chief counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, noted at that time, “Homosexuals got exactly what they wanted. In the marketplace of ideas, one side has now been censored. This [situation] is exactly what homosexual activists have in mind.”

...Interestingly, a subsequent poll revealed that almost half of Americans believe that Christians in the United States are being persecuted by homosexual “marriage” advocates who take legal action against them over their religious beliefs, and almost one in three Democrats believes such persecution is “necessary,” according to the alarming results of a new poll

...But 31 percent of Democrats, as well as 12 percent of Republicans and 24 percent of independents, said, “Such tactics are necessary.” ...”

Full story here.

Gay Green Lantern.

Apparently, the powers that be at DC Comics are afraid of being called homophobic, and are now allowing homofascists access to the impressionable minds of children. When will DC Comics approve of a superhero that smokes cigarettes? After all, male-on-male sexual activity is more harmful than smoking.

If I had young children in my home, Green Lantern comics wouldn’t be allowed under my roof.

“...The character is different than the more modern Green Lantern, ladies' man Hal Jordan, who stars in his own comics and is a member of an extraterrestrial police force called the Green Lantern Corps. Jordan's also part of DC's Justice League with Wonder Woman, Batman, Superman, the Flash and Aquaman.

...In the current "New 52" continuity, the Alan Scott Green Lantern and the Justice Society operate in a different universe than the Justice League. Robinson said in the "Earth 2" universe, Scott is the sole Green Lantern, and "the strongest, most important super-powered character" in the world. ...”

My supporting info here.