Screw your rights as a parent beacuse your just homophobic/transphobic!!

This highly disturbing story is why I fight to expose the truth about homofascism and transtyranny. All the glbt community has to do is call you homophobic or transphobic or intolerant or bigoted to then turn around and justify, in their own minds, taking a giant crap on your rights as a parent. But let a true servant of Jesus Christ disagree with homofascist propaganda and the glbt community will go insane.

A Muslim man can kill 49 members of the glbt community and the HRC will say nothing against Islam, but let a true Christian refuse to bake a “wedding” cake for a so-called same-sex “marriage,” and the glbt community will threaten the lives of their children.

Even after going out of my way to denounce hatred and proactive violence, I’ve been threatened for merely creating the word “heteroseparatist.”

Amazing.


How is it that a clear, extreme violation of a parent’s civil rights can happen like this?!?

“… “Why wasn't I even notified? I feel that my constitutional rights have been stripped from me," Calgaro said at a press conference.

…In the lawsuit, Calgaro argues her parental involvement has been "repeatedly circumvented" as it concerns her child.

…however no legal action has been taken to terminate his mother’s parental rights.

…Two medical service providers, Park Nicollet Minneapolis Gender Services and Fairview, provided the 17-year-old medical treatment for a sex change from male to female and for prescribed narcotics, respectively. The medical services and were paid for through St. Louis County Public Health and Human Services.

Full story here.

What same-sex "marriage" will do to children.

How great it is to have time to blog again!

On Friday, 12 July 2013, I met one of the rarest of gay couples; an exotic-masculine lesbian with an exotic-feminine lesbian, where both of the women where attractive. I thought that they were both cute, especially the feminine one, and after interacting with them for a few minutes my understanding of the support of same-sex "marriage" was increased.

It is practically impossible for someone who doesn't know the Word of God to see past the counterfiet love that these two adorable women had for each other. God is love, and nothing that comes from God causes same-sex attraction. Those who don't know the Word of God often confuse sexual desire/attraction and the fear of loneliness for "love."

When I was young I dated a few women that didn't know Jesus Christ. I stepped outside of the Word of God thinking that a relationship could still work. I was woefully wrong, and I will never date a non-Christian woman again.

Anyhow, the point of my post today is that a same-sex, romantic/sexual relationship is wrong no matter how right it may seem.

Broken promises from the glbt community.

The GLBT's community's desire to violate parental civil rights.

I can fully understand and support a gay child's desire to live a harassment free life. But what I can not understand is the glbt community's desire to normalize homosexuality to children in grade school, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parent or parent's.  Some people think that homosexuality is wrong and their parental civil rights should be respected. 

Anti-bullying classes can be taught to children without glorifying sexually deviant actions. And NOTHING concerning sexual activities should be taught to children without the full knowledge and consent of that child's parents. Without a doubt, the glbt community wants to bypass parental consent to teach children that homosexuality is a normal thing. This is wrong. Sexual behavior is not morally benign like skin color. Sex education should be renamed "reproductive" education, in order to prevent the parental-civil-rights-violating recruitment efforts of the glbt community. 

Anyone who wishes to bypass parental consent when it comes to teaching children about sexual matters is cut from the same cloth as a child-molester.

The consequences of redefining marriage.

Matt Birk supports true marriage.

One of the consequences of having a same-sex romance is that you cannot marry each other since a marriage is between one man and one woman.  Many in the glbt community want to rebel against the heteronormative design of their own bodies and change the definition of marriage to normalize the perversion of their choices.  Some gays want to rebel against what a heterosexual couple does, (which is recognize and conform to the design of their genitalia,) and then demand what heterosexual couples have; the legal option of marriage.  This doesn't make sense.  If you want what heterosexuals have, you have to do what heterosexuals do.


"...The union of a man and a woman is privileged and recognized by society as "marriage" for a reason,

...government recognizes marriages and gives them certain legal benefits so they can provide a stable, nurturing environment for the next generation of citizens: our kids.

...Children have a right to a mom and a dad, and I realize that this doesn't always happen.

... Same-sex unions may not affect my marriage specifically, but it will affect my children -- the next generation.

...Marriage redefinition will affect the broader well-being of children and the welfare of society. As a Christian and a citizen, I am compelled to care about both. ..."

Original info here.

NOT "bigotry" to support God's definition of marriage.

Those who hate the truth sometimes call the truth "hate." Anti-Christ bigotry is the driving force behind most homofascist marriage redefiners.

A child's right to a mother and a father.

It is evil for a person to put their own desires before the needs of their child.

True marriage is worth defending.

Ignoring the fact that marriage is the appropriate joining of a man and a woman is unspeakably absurd.

Canada...again.

Religious freedom, free speech, and parental rights have to be done away with in order to redefine marriage.

SS"M" vs religious freedom.

I will never stop defending my religious freedom.

More from Minnesota.

"Animus" towards gays?!?

Judge Vaughn Walker, who accuses those who support God's definition of marriage of having "animus towards gays," was also working in San Francisco, very near retirement, and stood to gain personally from his own ruling.

The DANGER of redefining marriage.

Last week, I discovered a story concerning a sexual relationship between three men where ALL of the definitions of a true marriage were broken; the one-man-with-one-woman definition, the TWO-become-one definition, and, the definition of adult-with-adult was also brushed against.

The story was too disturbing for me to cover at first. A Facebook friend posted it on her wall, and I discovered it during a standard, morning sweep of the internet. The story gave me the creeps and I was going to leave it alone until I saw the video above. It was this paragraph sent me into a high orbit when I first encountered this story.

"... “My relationship with Mark is lover and husband. And my relationship with Vinny is lover and son—even though there’s a sexual aspect to it,” DiLuzio says. “I think the type of nurturing we both give to Vinny is more of a parental kind of guideline, as well as a boyfriend guideline.” ..."

Lover and SON!?!?! WHAT WAS THAT!! What the f*** did you say?!

Is this not proof, from the words of an active homosexual, of the link between marriage redefiners, homosexuality, child molestation, and polygamy? It's obvious to me that all those who deviate from God's definition of marriage either directly or indirectly support sexual practices that endanger children.

Those who support same-sex "marriage," don't care about depriving a child of an opposite-sex parent. Those who support homosexuality think that it's okay to tell a child that homosexuality is okay without the consent of that child's parents. Those who support sexualizing, or having sex with children, obviously do so without the consent of that child's parents. And those who support polygamy refuse to see that it is mathematically impossible for a man with too many children to spend an appropriate amount of time with each of his children.

Those who cast aside true marriage must cast aside the Truth first.

Children need their mother and father.

Plain talk about true marriage.

True marriage supporters in Minnesota.