Tuesday, July 31, 2012

Elton John admits that he's harming his child.

I wanted to post this story about a week and a half ago, but my work schedule and the Chick-fil-A episode have prevented me from doing so.

It is wrong to deprive a child of a parent through one's own sexual actions or "orientation." If you're going to live the single life, or the gay life, or a life that embraces any other sexual sin... leave kids alone!

Homofascists attack Christian cakemaker.

If a bachelor went into a Christian-owned bakery and asked them to bake a cake shaped like a woman's breasts, behind, or crotch, for his bachelor party, the owners of that bakery would refuse to do so. Likewise, if a woman were to ask the same Christian business to create a cake shaped like a man's sexual part for her bachelorette party, her request would be refused also. Also, a polygamist wouldn't be able to have a wedding cake made, by this Christian bakery, with multiple brides standing on both sides of a single man.

Why then would a gay couple go into a Christian bakery and request a cake for their "wedding"? And why would they twist-off when they were refused? Homosexuality isn't like skin color, homosexuality is an activity. Doesn't everybody know that there are certain sexual activities that Christians do not support? Was this an intentional act to harass Christians?

Story here and here.

Friday, July 27, 2012

Vile homofascists celebrating death of Chick-fil-A spokesman.

If just one person calling themselves a Christian were to celebrate the death of a homosexual or a homofascist, the glbt community would go wild with cries of, "hatred!," "homophobia!," and "intolerance!"

Yet some of those who support the redefinition of marriage are celebrating the sudden death of Don Perry, the chief spokesman of Chick-fil-A.

Now that's hatred.

Story here.

Pro Chick-fil-A gay.

I still can't believe how far this Chick-fil-A thing has gone. To try to shut down a business because the owners of that business support God's definition of marriage is beyond absurd and just goes to show the insane mindset of marriage redefiners.

If someone had told me thirty years ago that someday a business would be denied a business licence because they believed that marriage is between one man and one woman, I would've thought that that person was absolutely insane.

Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Homonomic bullying.

The attacks against Chick-fil-A are getting spooky. To deny a business license to a company because the owners of that company support true marriage is the epitome of a homoOrwellian society, and undeniable religious persecution. Again, Chick-fil-A hasn’t denied service or employment to anyone in the glbt community, so what’s the problem with those who hate Chick-fil-A? The homofascism is really over-the-top in the anti-Christ bigotry displayed by those who are attacking Chick-fil-A.

It isn’t “discrimination” to not allow smoking inside of a Chick-fil-A establishment? Aren’t smokers a segment of society? What about denying service to someone without a shirt and shoes on? Doesn’t that discriminate against nudists?

“…Officials in at least three cities have vowed to block efforts to open Chick-fil-A restaurants after the company’s president told reporters that he supported the traditional definition of marriage – and warned that redefining marriage might bring God’s judgment on the nation.

“Because of this man’s ignorance, I will now be denying Chick-fil-A’s permit to open a restaurant in the First Ward,” he announced.

The Los Angeles Times condemned the decision, calling it far more troubling than Chick-fil-A’s support of traditional marriage.

The Boston Globe wondered “which part of the First Amendment does Menino not understand? A business owner’s political or religious beliefs should not be a test for the worthiness of his or her application for a business license.

“When an elected public official wields the club of government against a Christian business in the name of “tolerance,” it’s not harmless kid stuff,” Malkin wrote. “It’s chilling.”

“The militant homosexual advocates have launched an all out assault on Dan Cathy and Chick-fil-A,” he said. “The attempts to hurt or destroy Chick-fil-A are nothing short of economic bullying.” …”

Full story here.

Monday, July 23, 2012

Chick-Fil-A day this wednesday.

Chick-Fil-A hires gays and serves gays, but they support true marriage also. What's wrong with that?!

Apparently, the mayor of Boston, a Mr. Thomas Menino, has embraced homofascism and won't allow Chick-Fil-A to open in his city. What!?! Does he think that he'll live forever? Does he not know that someday he won't be mayor anymore? Mr. Menino thinks that Chick-Fil-A, "discriminates against a population."

One of the most oft-misused words in the English language is the word, "discrimination." Not supporting someone's conduct is not "discrimination." I plan on eating at Chick-Fil-A tomorrow, to avoid the crowd.

“… Dear Marriage Supporter,

Thanks to your recent efforts at DumpStarbucks.com and DumpGeneralMills.com, we've shown the cultural elite, the gay millionaires who fund anti-marriage initiatives, and the biased media that the defenders of marriage are willing to put our money where our mouth is.

Well, this Wednesday, we have a chance to do it again—and this time even more literally—by coming out in support of National Eat at Chick-fil-A Day. …”

Info here, here, and here.

Thursday, July 19, 2012

J.C. Penny stock drop.

True-marriage supporters don't make nearly as much noise as same-sex "marriage" supporters do, but our growing awareness of homofascism is beginning to be felt by corporate America.

Wednesday, July 18, 2012

The Regnerus study.

This is why I blog about homofascism whenever my, roll-of-the-dice work schedule permits.

I didn't know that the man who gathered the data for this info was under attack, but I'm not one bit surprised that homofascists are trying to destroy him.

Does it not stand to reason/common-sense that a child is better off being raised by their father and mother? Or an acting mother and father? Two, same-sex "parents," cannot provide the ideal environment for raising a child since a man cannot fully imitate the mind of a woman, and a woman cannot fully imitate the mind of a man.

Yet, those who need a "study" to believe what they hear, have flipped out because the Regnerus study confirms common-sense observations about the benefits that a true family provide to a child.

“…Mark Regnerus’ recent study on children who are raised by gay parents. Regnerus’ work has since proven to be very controversial because it does not paint a positive picture of children of gay parents. Even though it’s based on scientific methodology, it suggests conclusions that cut against the prevailing gay rights narrative. As a result, folks on the left have been calling for Regnerus’ head on a platter.

…the witch hunt is officially on. A gay blogger lodged a complaint with the President of the University of Texas, alleging that Regnerus had engaged in “scientific misconduct.”

…This whole thing is outrageous on many levels. There is nothing untoward about this study.

...just released a statement today defending Regnerus’ work as scientifically credible. The push-back is coming simply because some people don’t like where the data led.

…Normally studies like this one are vetted by the scholarly community in subsequent publications. But that is not good enough for the gay activists. The thought-police are out in full force not to counter Regnerus in print, but to destroy his career and reputation.

…the social pressure will transform into governmental pressure, and Christians will suffer. We will look back on moments like this one as one more step down the path of intolerance of Christian views. Mark Regnerus is in the crosshairs now, but it will be all of us before too long. …”

My supporting info is here and here.

Aservant's article. Part 5 of 5.

And meanwhile, what is the reality of this community on which so much time, effort and resources have been spent to ensure it gets a “fair shake”? In spite of all these gains, with even the president of the country taking up the cause, the gay community is still in shambles. The rate of STDs, including AIDS, is much higher than it is in the non-gay community. So is drug addiction, alcoholism, domestic violence, suicide, the list goes on.

And these statistics come from some of the most gay- friendly places in the nation, places that I previously mentioned, where homosexuals are a majority by far in their neighborhoods, businesses, and local governments.

The answers that I listed previously to justify the promotion of the gay agenda all infer that we as a society are combating an injustice that has been committed against homosexuals by the said society at large. We are fighting for tolerance, because we have been intolerant. We are fighting for diversity because we refused to accept anyone but our own in our ignorance. We are fighting for equality because we have denied to those who deserved it. In a word, it could be summed up that we as a culture have been “defective”. And now, by championing the victims of our defective behavior, we have a chance to redeem ourselves.

But what has improved for gays and their lifestyle by doing this? How has our society as a whole been improved through this course of action?

It is my position, backed by the case and facts that I have presented here, that nothing has improved. No, actually conditions for gays and our society in general have gotten worse, much worse, by following this course of action. If it is true as popularly inferred, that the destructive behavior exhibited by gays has been due to them being victimized through bigotry, then their destructive pathologies would have at least diminished in the communities were they have been the majority for quite some time. If it was bigotry and intolerance that drove John to act in a criminal, traitorous manner with me, his manner should have changed at least somewhat after winning my friendship and forgiveness on several occasions. But sadly, this had not been so in either case, not in the least.

But all of this depends on an assumption, an assumption that we have been consistently told time and time again until it has become a “gospel truth” that….. “gay is good”. This truth says there is nothing wrong with being gay, it is the same as being straight, just a different preference, that's all.

Let's change that assumption for a moment and see what happens. The reader may believe that I have failed to make the case that the coerced acceptance of homosexuality of the public at large is a destructive and dangerous agenda. I can accept that. But at the very least, I would like to be given the benefit of the doubt that I have at least made a case raising some doubt regarding the statement “gay is good”. And if I have, then it can be assumed that there is another agenda here, which means that there has been deception. And if there has been deception, only investigation can reveal what is really going on.

When police investigate a crime, a common strategy to solve that crime is to fit different “assumptions” in the form of scenarios into a set of facts that are found at a crime scene. When an assumed scenario fits the facts of the crime scene, the case is then solved. This process is necessary of course because there is always deception by the perpetrator of an unsolved crime as an attempt to conceal his or her guilt. If there wasn't deception, the crime would be solved immediately.

So in conclusion, I will bring it back to where I started. Let's apply this investigative formula to this issue, with society as a whole being the crime scene. Let's assume as fact that my belief is true that homosexuality is a very strong compulsive behavior as well as an addiction. As I stated in the beginning of this essay, it is often common for the severe addict to be unable to change his behavior without a strong intervention by others in a healthy state of mind. Meanwhile, without this intervention, the addict lives a life of destruction to himself and those around him. He practices deception to escape the consequences of his behavior. And, even worse, if he is empowered in his addiction, that is, if he can manipulate those around him to enable him in his addicted lifestyle or surround himself with only other addicts, the destruction in his life and in the lives of others increases massively. There is no longer anything to keep his deviant tendencies in check, and now his addiction will consume him and all that is in his life. When this is case, certain chaos ending with death is inevitable.

I have shown here that the gay lifestyle is filled with much destruction. Deception through propaganda is then used to escape the consequences of the destructive choices that this lifestyle brings. Society, through a strong political gay movement, silences any criticism of homosexuality and encourages the behavior as normal, thus enabling the destruction to continue.

Are the parallels of homosexual behavior and that of the severe addict not identical?

The enabling has become so pervasive that I believe we have arrived at a very critical stage where it is possible that we may not be able to undo the damage that has been done. The term “homofascist” is used frequently on this site and in other realms that are still attempting to make their gay-critical voices heard. This term is a perfect adjective to describe the type of individual that “gay-enabling” has created; a massively egoistic individual that is completely intolerant of opposing viewpoints who has no qualms about using aggression or violence to silence his opponents.

This is what my essay has been about. This is what John had become. This is what those men in Ft. Lauderdale that prowl around at all hours looking for their next sexual conquest, with no regard how their actions affect innocent children at a public park, have become. This is the same mentality outlined in the program by Hunter and Madsen in “After the Ball.” This is the intolerance that was displayed to me by my co-workers when I was asked if I were a “homophobe” when I didn't display complete acceptance of their homosexual lifestyle. If I didn't agree completely with their behavior, there “would be consequences”.......

And this is really what it is all about dear readers. Power, nothing more. Not tolerance, not equality, not diversity......those were all achieved long ago.

Ask yourself this; If gays have been designated a protected class under the law and have made countless gains in the realm of social acceptance and legal benefit as I have outlined here, why does the gay propaganda continue unabated? What more is there to be achieved?

In the supposed fight against discrimination, the answer is……there is nothing more to be achieved. In the quest for complete domination of the society at large, the answer is much, much more.

Judging by the relentless push still for “gay rights” and the accompanying cacophony of critical voices in the media each time another “non-gay-friendly” incident surfaces, one could safely assume that this agenda will not subside until there is absolutely nothing but complete praise and acceptance of each and every homosexual alive. So, has there ever been anyone in the history of civilization that has been able to demand such an elevated status? What common man or woman throughout all known time has been able to live with the expectation that no one would dare even criticize them? What common man or woman has even thought that they could demand such behavior from others?

There has only been one type, ladies and gentlemen, of common man and woman who have behaved as such......totalitarians and tyrants. This is mind set of the “gay movement” of today......make no mistake about it. We are quickly approaching the day where not only opposing viewpoints to “gay is good” will not be tolerated, but complete acceptance and celebration of homosexuality will be demanded.

But, what is even more dangerous, is that these are totalitarians afflicted by a strong, destructive addiction that they see no reason to change, due to societal enablement. Intervention attempted on all unrepentant addicts is always met with aggression. And just what form will that aggression take once all political power has been secured? How much compassion and understanding will be shown by severely addicted fascists in complete power to those who just want a return to normalcy? If history is to be any indication, the answer is…very little.

Before closing, I would like to go back once again to something that I touched on several times throughout my personal account, and that was my own weak spiritual state-of-being and how it made me vulnerable to believe in the destructive idea that “gay is normal.” At one point I wrote that this was central to understanding my story. The reason I believe this was important to include is that I see the state that I was in as being a very typical mindset of most people in today's society. Broken homes, divorce, addiction, materialism, and overt sexuality are rampant trends, just to name a few of the common afflictions that the current population suffers from. A society dominated by such pathologies does not create strong independent characters that can always be aware of when they are being manipulated. Millions of individuals are in a state just like I was; longing for something of meaning in their lives. A fight for eternal brotherhood while overcoming differences in the name of “gay rights” can appear to be rather fulfilling to people in such a bleak spiritual void. Furthermore, as the unhealthy gay community is further normalized, the more the non-gay community will become desensitized to their deviancies and absorb them, only exacerbating the trajectory towards complete social chaos.

If we ever arrive to where the community at large suffers from the same pathologies at the same rates by the percentage of the population that the gay community does as a whole, modern society as we know it will most definitely collapse. The only reason that the gay community hasn't collapsed itself is because it is supported and sheltered by the non-gay, societal exoskeleton that props it up. Once that collapses, its over. If you don't believe this, take a look at societies where pathologies and corruption have been allowed to run unchecked. The favelas of Brazil come to mind. In that society, millions of people live subsistence existences in shanty towns. This is our very near future if we stay the current course.

The book of Romans of the Bible speaks of those in the world who are controlled by earthly ways and refuse to recognize the power of God. Because of this, it says, they are given over to filthy ways; “Men do shameful things with each other....”, it reads. It then continues, “They are filled with all kinds of wickedness, evil, greed and vice; they are full of jealousy, murder, fighting, deceit, and malice. They gossip, and speak evil of one another; they are hateful to God, insolent, proud and boastful; they think of more ways to do evil; they have no conscience; they do not keep their promises, and they show no kindness or pity for others.”

Once I finally read this passage after my involved experiences with the gay community I knew deep in my soul that we are dealing with something much, much deeper here than a mere superficial sexual orientation.

This is the real reason for all the propaganda. It keeps the whole issue “only about a sexual preference”....... “What's the big deal?” And who could argue when it is framed as such?

And this is why the work that Mantronikk does here it is so important.

As long as this mentality continues, as long as the homosexual movement is about power and control as it has been up until now, we must follow the lead of Mantronikk and become heteroseparatists.

There can be no compromise.......the alternative is not a viable option.

Monday, July 16, 2012

"Black" vs. "gay."

A person's skin color is morally benign; it is neither good or bad, moral or immoral. The man who speaks at 1:05 nails it, but the woman at 2:07 is wrong because she is a female and cannot be a pastor according to the Word of God. The glbt community has tried to hijack the nobility of the black, civil-rights movement, since the Word of God does not elevate one skin color over another, but God created "gender roles," and He has commandments concerning sexual behavior. The glbt community is fighting against the Word of God, not the prejudice of man, like black people did.

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Homofascism, misandry, and liberalism.

I’ve figured out some of the ideological links between homosexuality and feminism; the greatest of which being the denial of gender truths. Every human being that I’ve ever met was either born male or female, and I’ve noticed distinct behavioral and thought-process differences between the two sexes. But I’ve been attacked for speaking about the differences between men and women, and the style and absurdity of those attacks is almost identical from both the feminist camp and the homofascists of the day. And I’ve carried over the lessons that I learned from dealing with ultra-hard-core feminists to my unwanted conflict with the glbt community.

"…The sexual revolution has resulted in the normalization of two malaises: feminism and homosexuality. A lot of liberals shout “Homophobia!” and “You have to be insecure in your sexuality” or “You are secretly gay,” but the truth is that societies which tolerate homosexuality go to accepting it and then finally normalizing it on a grand scale. Children in particular are quite impressionable and if you teach them that there is no difference between heterosexuality and homosexuality then they will ‘experiment.’ If you teach them that there are no differences between men and women then androgyny will be the result (e.g. modern Sweden). Another example: look at how feminism has affected young women into working out hard and achieving boy-like physiques as they masculinize themselves more and more (not to mention the acceptance of perversions like anal intercourse which is tied directly to pederasty and teenage boy love).

…like all demons, liberalism disguises itself as angel of light, when in reality it’s destruction.

…Tolerance, without discernment, is not a virtue.

…Homophilia and feminism are the most important children of the cultural revolution. They share, as such, much of the same ideological baggage that denies biological realities and makes war on the family.

…homosexuals have quickly gone from being pariahs to privileged beings, who flaunt their alleged “superiority” over heterosexuals, who are seen as old-fashioned, outmoded, ridiculous. Heterosexuals are like women who center their lives on the care of children rather than on a career, and are thus something bizarre and implicitly opposed to liberal-style “emancipation.”

…Most lesbians, in his view, are bisexual, rather than purely homosexual, and for whatever reason have turned against men.

…By contrast, male homosexuality was considered abhorrent, because it violated the nature of masculinity, making men no longer “properly” male and thus something mutant.

…The dogma that differences between men and women are simply cultural derives from a feminist behaviorism in which women are seen as potential men, and femininity is treated as a social distortion.

…Feminists therefore affirm the equality and interchangeability of men and women, yet at the same time they reject femininity, …feminism aims to masculinize women and feminize men in the image of its androgynous ideal.

Original articles here and here.

Monday, July 9, 2012

Aservant's article. Part 4 of 5.

This was now 2005 and I had begun to heal my broken spirit in large part through the study of biblical scripture. But it wasn't just this, it was using scripture to understand what my past and current experiences were teaching me. I began for the first time to read extensively on the internet. I read many different conservative blogs and news outlets for the first time in my life, and I began to put many pieces together very quickly.

Meanwhile, it was impossible, completely impossible, to not be affected by the homosexual culture that I was immersed in. Everywhere I went I was longingly started at by gay men and even propositioned on public streets. Several times I went to parks and I was followed, as though being stalked. I figured out pretty quickly that many of the parks were more gay hook-up spots than actual parks. I even had men pull up beside me as I walked and proposition me. It was one of the most uncomfortable environments I had ever been in. In a matter of months it became habit to avoid all eye contact with any males in the area.....seriously.....just a fleeting glimpse would have me on the receiving end of a lustful stare that longed to make physical contact.

Work was not much better. I would frequently be party to conversations between gay men about their sexual exploits the night before. I felt that this was not appropriate in the workplace, no matter if it was gay or straight, but if I even made a slight disapproving facial gesture I would be asked, “What's the matter, are you a homophobe?”, in a sneering, aggressive manner. In the 10 months of my employment there, I saw a gay man that worked in accounting come to work after obviously being badly assaulted at least twice, maybe three times, I don't exactly recall. The first time I saw this I inquired with a female coworker of his as to if he was alright. She replied with a casual laugh..... “Oooooh, that.......his boyfriend likes to get a little rough sometimes”, as though it was the running joke of the office. I was horrified. The lifestyles of all of the homosexuals that I worked with was one of constant partying and sexual encounters.

I of course couldn't help but remember John's friends and their ways while being witness to the scene in Ft. Lauderdale. This was déjà vous. I felt I had stepped into a surreal movie set. Needless to say, I kept to myself and occupied myself with work. I felt that even when I went to the park or beach I was being stalked …..and with good reason.....I was. I couldn't turn around without a gay man ogling me with his eyes. I began to become resentful.

Even still, there were moments when I asked myself....... “Is it that bad? Can it be that bad? Maybe you are being a little paranoid......Maybe John and that whole experience got in your head too much....”

But, as I said before, I was now informing myself about the truth. It was during this time that a story was broken by World Net Daily about the public washrooms in Ft. Lauderdale that were used for sex by the homosexuals in the area. It had become so problematic that timers had to be installed on the doors to make them automatically open after 4 minutes so as to dissuade gay escapades. The article featured comments from parents that used the park on the weekends for baseball tournaments that said this activity even went on when their children were present in the middle of the day. I knew exactly where this park was and had witnessed myself exactly what was going on. It was now confirmed for me that I wasn't paranoid in the least. I knew this wasn't media bias....... and now, in fact, I was now starting to realize that the fact that this story wasn't on the national mainstream news was the true media bias.

On the same website, I discovered a book called “The Marketing of Evil” and I immediately purchased it. The book is from a Christian perspective on the current culture and how many mainstream trends are marketed to the population as “normal”, when in fact they are just evil, according to Christian doctrine of course. There is a chapter in the book on selling gay rights to America. I read about the history of the gay movement for the first time and read about the organized, political movement on gay rights and how deep its roots went. I read about major political manipulations to empower homosexuals to mainstream their activities, a concept completely contrary to what I had previously assumed; that society had just been “evolving” to become more accepting of homosexuality.

But probably, most importantly at this stage, I learned of a book called “ After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the '90s”. About a year later after I had left Ft. Lauderdale (I could only last 10 months there before I saved enough money to re-locate) I read this book myself on loan from the library. It's contents shocked me. It was authored by two very intelligent homosexual activists, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, both Harvard educated. Kirk was a researcher in neuropsychiatry that worked designing aptitude tests for adults with I.Q.s over 200., and Madsen had a doctorate in politics and was also an expert on public persuasion tactics.

Once again for the sake of brevity, I cannot go into the details of all that is in this book, but it reads like a playbook for mass brainwashing of a population for the purposes of carrying out an unpopular political agenda. The book speaks in detail of propaganda techniques to be used in key positions in the media to sell the gay agenda to the American public against their will. It speaks of methods to guilt and shame the population so as to silence any criticism of the homosexual lifestyle. It also speaks of methods for mentally terrorizing and attacking anyone who doesn't support the gay agenda through a method called “jamming”, where critics are basically shouted down in a public forum through an organized attack. The book is a detailed outline of a complex agenda to convert the entire nation to be pro-gay, and upon reading it, I felt convinced that I had seen, and had been living in, the actual execution of this agenda. An exact quote from the book reads:

“We mean conversion of the average American's emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. We mean “subverting” the mechanism of prejudice to our own ends-using the very processes that made America hate us to turn their hatred into warm regard-whether they like it or not.”

It has been said by many who are critical of the current gay agenda that “After the Ball” has become the “public relations Bible” of the gay movement. This of course could never be proven, but for me, it doesn't have to be. The evidence of what I have seen around me throughout my lifetime is proof enough.

It wasn't long before I came across another work by the title, “Homosexuality: A Freedom Too Far” by Charles Socarides”. Dr. Socarides was a psychoanalyst that built a practice on treating homosexuals. He states, and I believe with much sincerity, that he was able to build this practice because of the demand coming from homosexuals themselves; they would come to him in droves expressing a deep desire to change based upon lives that they described as being completely destructive and out of control. He at no time ever set out to “cure” homosexuals of their affliction because of some personal belief or conviction. He actually speaks very sympathetically about homosexuals and believes that they are in dire need of help. But congruently, he also states that by enabling them and telling them that their destructive affliction is “ok”, we are not helping them in anyway, in fact, we are harming them and harming our community at large.

What I read in that book confirmed almost all of what I had come to experience in reality regarding homosexuals and the gay lifestyle. Reading Dr. Socarides’ ideas about homosexuality is what convinced me that homosexuality is an addiction-like affliction, as I stated in the beginning of this essay. Dr. Socarides describes in detail the political manipulations that took place in the early 70s to strike homosexuality from the American Psychiatric Association's list of disorders. Manipulations that happened through homosexual infiltration of that association itself. I found his account to be extremely credible, for he was personally involved with the APA on the national level at that time.

In the book, the lives, thoughts, activities, and motivations, of many homosexual patients are described. I learned that promiscuity amongst average homosexuals is far, far greater than among the heterosexual population, often with many having anonymous sex several times in one night with several different partners, sometimes as many as 10. I had seen the evidence of this for myself in Ft. Lauderdale, so this was only a confirmation for me. I also learned of much higher rates than average of domestic abuse, drug addiction, depression, suicide and alcoholism amongst gays than non gays. This of course was another confirmation of my own personal experience going back to John and his friends and continuing on to what I had been surrounded by in the gay community of Ft. Lauderdale.

What I have spoken of here are just a few examples of degeneracy within the gay life style that I now, had not only seen repeatedly for myself, but they were also being re-confirmed for me in well-known published works. This made a very deep impression
upon me. It was the beginning of my formal education about the “true” homosexual lifestyle. I now began to piece together much of the information I read with my own personal experience. Each time a gay issue surfaced in the news, I began to be very aware as to the motivation behind how it was portrayed. I began to learn of
things like the yearly Folsom Street Fair in San Francisco and the overt, open lasciviousness of this event and many other events like it across the country. I became educated to the fact that there is an obvious pattern that is too coordinated to be coincidence. Like the constant portrayal of heterosexual men on TV as foolish and buffoons, while the gay men are sleek, smart and very cool. At the same time, I became convinced through my own experience, and by the facts listed by qualified authors that I read time and time again, that this mainstream portrayal of homosexuals of being “oh-so-together” and “just like the rest of us....but better” just didn't hold water. Not in the least. I now was getting a picture of reality where in fact the organized gay community was quite aware for some time as a whole that their ranks were comprised of a large percentage of what could only be called deviants by general public standards, and elements within that community were actively and consciously trying to conceal that fact. This of course would lead anyone trying to understand this phenomenon to then ask: why? If it is good to be gay, if it is “normal”, if it is the same as us, as is being trumpeted time and time again in the media......why hide what it is really about?

Well, for me, the answer is obvious when you understand that this group of people have been well organized and politically active for decades.. And what is politics about? Power, control and influencing how people live. So we have a minority group with a very distinct culture that is seeking influence and power within the majority. To achieve this power and influence, the acceptance of the majority must be won. But in this case, it now appears to me, from what I have experienced first hand when compared to the media’s portrayal of homosexual culture, the gay leadership knows this acceptance will never be won if the gay lifestyle is allowed to be shown as it truly is. So a campaign of deception has been implemented to “sell gayness” to the non-gay majority. The next question for me was.......why? Why is this so important?

We have been given many answers, you have all heard them before: tolerance, diversity, equality, and many more, much more complex. But what about these answers?

There have been large, openly homosexual communities in many cities now for decades......New York, San Francisco, Miami, Vancouver, Los Angeles.....just to name a few. We have seen the acceptance of openly gay politicians, even on the federal level. Portland, Oregon currently boasts an openly gay mayor. There are now even homosexuals featured in children's cartoons. The movie “Brokeback Mountain” which was explicitly about anti-gay bigotry, almost won the Oscar for best picture of the year a few years ago. Homosexuals are even legally protected as a persecuted minority through affirmative action and hate crime legislation. Either gay marriage, gay civil unions or gay adoptions have been accepted in the majority of the states in the nation. The list goes on.....and yet, the propaganda never ceases. It seems that we non-gays are never “gay friendly enough”, no matter how many gains are made.

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Spotlight homosexual assualting true marriage supporters.

It is, legally, an assault to "glitter" someone. And this gay man has the exact same right to marry that I do. Anti-Christ gay activists never glitter anyone who looks like they can defend themselves. Notice how the spotlight homosexual backs off from the men that are prepared to stand up to him at :03 and :33.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Aservant's article. Part 3 of 5.

I did not speak to John after this incident for several months, and honestly, I did not intend to speak with him again. I felt I had been betrayed and lied to. But as time passed, (and this is where my personal spiritual state relates to the story), loneliness set in and I was very much still in my “questioning” phase of life, so I finally went to see how he was doing.

I have come to realize that one can easily fall prey to negative situations if they aren't deeply committed to a standard, or a truth, or a morality, if you will. And this is so important to understand with this issue, for this is the vast majority of people today in society. Most are like me; raised from broken homes without a solid moral foundation, lonely, and desperately searching for a connection. And I am not speaking of sex here, but rather a sense of “community”. What society offers us may feel good for a time and the pain goes away.........but it never lasts, and then we are left alone again, searching, longing....... False idols are offered to fill the void.

John was very remorseful and apologized profusely about the whole prior situation. I didn't ask exactly what had happened and he didn't volunteer the information. He seemed genuinely embarrassed and as though he had learned a lesson. He had gone back to the hotel where we had met and was working a menial position. I felt bad for him and believed he had just made a big mistake in judgment, getting caught up in having too much of a “good time”.

So we began to converse again and I worked on a restaurant plan for this new private interest. John seemed to be genuinely different. He seemed to have taken on a much more humble persona and we conversed about matters of substance. This finally lead to me asking about his sexual orientation. He told me he was bi-sexual, but had always been in the closet. He said that only his family knew and he was terribly judged and criticized for this and it had caused him great pain. He revealed that part of the reason for him relocating to the area was to escape that situation. And he did seem to be a man in great pain....this did not look like an easy thing for him to confess as I sat there in front of him. Once again, I felt bad for him......and frankly, I admired his candor and honesty. It seemed he was turning over a new leaf.

So life continued...I worked on the opening of the new restaurant for almost a year, and upon opening, I decided to bring John into the fold again as a dining room manager at the new restaurant. The owners knew him from the previous restaurant and liked him, although they were oblivious to the scandal that had culminated in his resignation. He seemed to be a repented individual, and while I planned the restaurant, we talked much and really got to know each other. I grew to genuinely like John a lot and began to consider him a good friend, eventually the best friend I had at the time.

As our friendship grew, John confided in me more and more, and part of this was him being more open about his homosexuality. He eventually told me that he had never been directly asked about his sexual orientation like I had asked him, and at the time, he didn't have the courage to tell me the whole truth. He now told me that he wasn't bi-sexual, he was strictly gay. I didn't really feel I had been lied to at the time and didn't read too much into it. It did seem to be very hard for him when he had first told me, and this is a sensitive subject. I gave John the complete benefit of my doubt.

Once again, I will mention here that all becomes much clearer with hindsight. Now that I look back, this was the time of the “ramping up” of the gay agenda. This is around the time of the Matthew Shepard case, the raging popularity of shows like “Will and Grace” and the constant media attention about the “don't ask, don't tell” policy, just to name a few of the gay issues in the spot light at that time. I know without a doubt that this ubiquitous gay propaganda had a strong impact on my dealings with and perception of John, but I was completely unaware of it at the time. I say this because now as I look back, I was lied to repeatedly and grossly manipulated, and as you will read, these lies and manipulation became vicious and destructive. Under normal circumstances, I would have already ended this friendship after the initial “wine” episode, but I remember feeling so badly for this rejected, suffering individual, just like I did when I heard about the Matthew Shepard case and other propaganda like it. I now know that I was played, like we are all being played.

Another aspect that now came into play is that I was to meet several of John's gay acquaintances. If they were more than that, that is, if they were also lovers, I don't know. John never spoke to me about his sexual exploits and I never inquired. They were only introduced as friends. Sometimes in the evenings John and I would talk at his apartment or mine, and now and then one of this friends would drop by for a bit and we would talk. Well, it was more them talking about their “drama” and John and I listening. I began to hear some very outrageous things and I began to see a pattern. The pattern was one of people with lives out of control. One friend in particular would brag about his ability to steal.....and not just steal anything, but walk into a major department store and walk out the front door with furniture on a regular basis! He had an apartment completely decorated with all of the stolen merchandise and he enjoyed gloating over this fact. Other friends would give consistent accounts about their escapades with “straight guys” that either had girlfriends or were married and talk about how they were going to “turn them”. All of them seemed to be committed to gossip, drank in excess and/or used other substances, and were especially vindictive if someone crossed them. For example, the same friend that was the master thief was dismissed from a job once for suspicion of stealing while I knew him, but before he left he bragged to us as to how he had severely sabotaged company property. And they were all very materialistic.

So of course, the reader is probably asking themselves at this point..... “If this was the company this man kept, and after our prior experience, why did I continue the friendship?” Well, I did not see John to be a party to any kind of this behavior, and we spent a lot of time together and actually lived in the same apartment complex now. These were acquaintances dropping by, and, to my knowledge, not all that frequently, and I accepted the narrative of the time.

The narrative was, and still is, that these were poor suffering souls that only acted this way because the world made them act this way. If we were only to show them some understanding, they would be OK. And look at what had just happened between myself and John.....this is exactly what I had done with him, and as a result he confided in me, and now I felt I was watching him become a new person. And remember my own spiritual condition as well as I have mentioned, which really blinded me to what was really important in my life. Superficially I appeared “fine”, but in reality I was drifting and alone, having abandoned much of my commitment to the discipline of my youth in the name of “fitting in”.

So I began to see a pattern already amongst this gay crowd that I was acquainted with, but as I just said, I didn't link their homosexuality to their other destructive behavior. What I linked the destructive behavior to was the effects of discrimination, and my perceived transformation of John gave testament to this....or so I thought. The propaganda was deep within me.

I mentioned in the beginning of this article that a major change for me between then and now is that I have become a Christian. Christianity has much to say about the company one keeps and how that reflects on and affects one's character. Although I thought John was different now, it wasn't to be.....I finally realized that he was just using me for the opportunity to run his next racket. But I didn't come to this conclusion just yet, for I was becoming somewhat self destructive myself and couldn't see the forest for the trees.

I will cut out many details for the sake of brevity, but we were to work on two more projects over the next two years. I had set, as a condition of our relationship, a zero tolerance policy for improprieties on John’s behalf, and I had clearly vocalized this to him. I had a solemn promise from him that those days were over. Even still, in the first project, there came to light management indiscretions on John's behalf once again, and although it wasn't outright theft, I was furious, based upon the agreement we had, but I let it blow over. Shortly after I left that project for personal reasons, but my friendship with John continued. As such, I began to notice a lot of contradictions in things he told me, especially about his past. Things that had nothing to do with the gay issue, but eluded more to an almost criminal inclination that he was, maybe, trying to hide.....or maybe trying to overcome or out run....I didn't know for sure. But the short lived confidence I had placed in John's “new found character” began to erode.

A short time later, another project came up that would involve John again. Yes, I know the reader is asking, “What in the name of God was I thinking?”, but I did believe this one to be different. I knew the owner of the business personally and he was the one that had brought John into the fold, not I. This owner had great respect for me and my ability, so it was really for him that I took on this endeavor, it just so happened that I would be working with John again. I shared my reservations about John with the owner, but he assured me that all would be fine. He was dead wrong.

It was only a matter of months before I caught John completely red handed embezzling the business. This was the final straw. I confronted him and presented the owner with the evidence. I then came under the impression that the owner had been manipulated as well, for although he could not deny the preponderance of evidence, he was trying to find a way to salvage the working relationship. This was amazing to me, because there was no doubt now as to how deceitful John had been with this proprietor. At the same time, I also confronted John about many of the contradictions he had told me about over the time of our friendship. I went as far as telling him that I was now pretty well convinced that he was a complete fraud and probably even a career criminal, and I needed some hard, straight answers not to come to this conclusion. He could say nothing of value whatsoever in his defense. The only thing he tried to offer up was how terrible it was to be a hated homosexual and that it basically drove him to do these things! In that moment, it all came crashing in. This had all been a fraud from the start. It was a masterful playing of the “victim card” to get people off guard so they could be taken advantage of.

Well, the proprietor of the business arranged a meeting between all parties and gave John the chance to explain himself. There were two reasons that I tolerated this. First, I had put myself in the very poor situation of not having a lot of other immediate, quality employment options at the time, and I had put a lot of work into this project that I hoped I could salvage. Second, I thought John's ass was going to be nailed to the wall, and frankly, I was going to enjoy it.

What I heard from John astounded me. He dropped the “Homosexual Card” again....and then went on to say that he was deathly afraid of me, so much so that he had filed a police report saying that I had threatened his life! I refused to compromise under any circumstance. This time, I informed the business owner, John's boss and mine, in detail of all of the past indiscretions on the part of John and that we had been through this song-and-dance several times already. I also told him that if John was not removed from the business immediately, I would resign and call the police myself. That's all it took. John was gone and our relationship was over.

Now, I'm sure that there are readers who will say..... “So you write an article about the dangers of the homosexual lifestyle based upon one corrupt individual? That is ignorant and not reflective of the homosexual community as a whole, no more than criminal activity by non-gays reflects on their behavior as a whole”, and that is true. But this was just the beginning........

Now that John was expelled from the business and our friendship permanently over, I began to hear many disturbing things. This was a small community and there were many that knew both John and me. Several came forward to tell me that they had been told by him that we were a couple! They had even been told that I had married in order to disguise my closet homosexuality, for during the years that I knew John, I had indeed married. They were also informed that I had had several gay rendezvous with friends of John's. It also seemed to be widely thought that I was of the same character as John and we were sort of a “team” that ran rackets on business owners. I thought to myself, “So this is what tolerance and forgiveness gets you.” I came to realize that without knowing it, my association with John was quickly ruining my personal and professional reputation, and, in fact, had already largely ruined it in that community. I now became convinced, and still am, that John may have had tendencies actually quite sinister and a long list of victims. In hindsight, I believe this actually could have developed into a dangerous situation, and in fact already was, by the time it was resolved.

During my final months of working with John, I had learned much more about his past as I have stated already. I had learned that he had done time in jail. I had also learned of other very shady associates of his during that time, and from the time before I had met him. I began to question if everything I had ever been told had been a lie. This is what prompted me to begin the investigation that resulted in the discovery of the embezzlement of the business. I ended up wondering, and still do to this day, if this man was a sort of a sociopath that was able to lie without remorse. I couldn't help but think of how he had told me about being persecuted by his own family for being gay. Now I was thinking that this probably wasn't the case at all. His strained family relationship probably had much more to do with his manipulation, lying and outright criminality.

Once again, I am omitting many, many details here for the sake of brevity, but this experience shook me to the core. But even still, I didn't associate almost all of John’s poor character traits to his sexual orientation in any way. That wouldn't come until a few years later.

Central to this story is my own spiritual turmoil at this time of my life. The chapter with John had definitely taught me some hard lessons, but I still was too blind to see my underlying character issues that attracted me to that situation in the first place. This resulted in a couple more years of “wandering”, so to speak, that landed me eventually in Ft. Lauderdale, only because I had a friend there that could offer me a place to stay and a job. Now, I will say I wasn't so oblivious that I got myself into another situation as poor as the one that I had developed with John, but everything didn't go from bad to great overnight, converting me into the man that writes this today. This was a step by step process over time.

But although I was still “getting it together” during this time, I had very profound spiritual experience that lead me to study the bible. This experience had nothing to do with John or the gay issue, it is another story. But I mention here because it was the key to finally and truly opening my eyes about our society in general for good. And of course, part of the truth about our society includes the homosexual issue.

All I had known of Ft. Lauderdale until this point in my life, was that it was the spring break capital of the US, so imagine my surprise upon arrival of being immersed in a gay community 70,000 strong. I knew absolutely nothing of this before my arrival. Being that I did not have a lot of money and the area is very expensive, I found an affordable place close to my place of work that had been arranged for me by the friend I previously mentioned. My residence was in the black community that borders the gay community of Wilton Manors. Every day I had to commute through the gay area to arrive at work and I rode a mountain bike. My workplace, a beach front hotel, had a large percentage of homosexuals as employees, including the general manager and human resources manager, among others.

Monday, July 2, 2012

The importance of words.

The misuse of words is what got me started here at heteroseparatist.com.

Often, when the correct definition of "marriage" is legislated, it is very often mischaracterized as a, "ban on same-sex 'marriage.' " That mischaracterization happins in this very video at 2:19.

Minneapolis News and Weather KMSP FOX 9

More info here.