Wednesday, July 31, 2013

How prop 8 was murdered.

The citizens of California voted twice to uphold God’s definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman, yet same-sex “marriage” is still happening in California. How did this happen?

1. A homosexual Federal judge in San Francisco, in a long term sexual relationship with another man (a fact that he wrongfully hid!) who stood to gain personally from his own ruling, AND was about to retire anyway.

2. A Governor who refused to do his sworn duty to uphold the law.

3. A state Attorney General who refused to do his sworn duty to uphold the law.


...the process that killed marriage in California should greatly concern anyone who cares even remotely about democracy and the rule of law.

...The Prop 8 challenge landed in the San Francisco federal courtroom of Vaughn Walker. We’re supposed to accept that this happened randomly, and that the plaintiffs weren’t tipped off by someone in the court system to file the case at a particular time when Judge Walker happened to be the one who’d get it.

...Whether by accident or grand design, it was a fortunate assignment for the plaintiffs. Walker was a judge in a long-term committed relationship with another man—in other words, he was in exactly the type of relationship as the plaintiffs who were bringing suit. Walker never disclosed this critical fact to Prop 8 supporters, or to the public, despite judicial rules requiring such disclosure if even the appearance of impropriety was present.

...Imagine if a judge heard a lawsuit by tomato farmers against an environmental law, but refused to disclose that he was also a tomato farmer. The media and environmentalists would scream to the heavens about the potential for bias. Yet, because the issue in this case was same-sex marriage, Walker got away with the low blow.

...While the lawsuit stood before a hometown judge, state officials did everything in their power to throw the case. Both then-Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and then-Attorney General Jerry Brown refused to defend the law enacted by the people of California, despite their sworn oath of office to do so.

...Of course, the constitution of California does not give to the governor or the attorney general the power to decide for themselves which laws are constitutional and which are not, nor are they free to determine which laws shall be defended and which shall be abandoned. But no matter.

...Having orphaned Prop 8, leaving it and the seven million citizens who enacted it defenseless in court, it fell to the backers of the initiative to defend the law in the federal courts. This not only cost the supporters of Prop 8 over $10 million in legal expenses; it ultimately put a sleeper hold on the initiative.

...Yet because the issue in this case was same-sex marriage, Schwarzenegger, Brown and Harris all got away with it.

...This only strengthened my view that Prop 8 would be upheld on the rationale that if New York had the right to redefine marriage, then surely California had the same right to go in the other direction.

...I feel like we were cheated. Just like I felt as a kid watching the bad guy put a sleeper hold on his opponent, or hitting him below the belt or with the brass knuckles while the referee had his back turned, so have the legal system and politicians cold-cocked the people of California—seven million of whom went to the polls to lawfully enact Prop 8. Only this time, I realize there’s not likely to be a rematch. The cheaters won.

...Supporters of same-sex “marriage” may be happy with the result today, but hold on until the tables are turned and a conservative governor and attorney general refuse to defend a law they don’t personally support, and there’s nobody left with standing to defend it.

...Now those very people in power—the governor and attorney general—have been given a pocket veto over the initiative process itself. They can invalidate any measure they don’t personally support simply by refusing to defend it in federal court. Such power was never contemplated by the framers of the constitution, or by the people of California, but that is the practical result of the Supreme Court’s ruling on Prop 8. Again—it is marriage today, but tomorrow it could be any other issue on the political spectrum.

...their religious differences aside to work together in support of the eternal truth about marriage—that it is a covenant between one man and one woman, modeled after God’s own covenant with us.

...the voters, deserved better than to be left undefended before the legal system, abandoned by those sworn to defend them, ignored by judges determined to impose a particular result, and then orphaned by the Supreme Court as the great referee pretended not to see all the nefarious activity going on with the case right in front of them.

...The decisions worry me. I am actually less worried about the damage done to the institution of marriage than I am about the damage done to the body politic. Marriage is an eternal truth, and a profound good.

...When the votes of millions of people are ignored by the elites in government, when politicians can ignore their oath of office and assume for themselves extra-constitutional authority, when judges can ignore their own internal conflicts and impose their own political views on an issue in direct contravention of the expressed desires of the people, and when the Supreme Court can turn a blind eye to the matter and let the politicians and judges get away with it, public confidence in government is seriously, and perhaps permanently, eroded.

Full, well-written article here.

Monday, July 29, 2013

Scuba soldier surprise homecoming.

A same-sex couple couldn't produce a moment like this because a same-sex couple cannot create children biologically.  This moment was created by true marriage.

...and he searches for the Lord...

Some people are going to undoubtedly twist the Pope's recent words into an endorsement of homosexuality.  But... Pope Francis has not endorsed homosexuality, Pope Francis has welcomed homosexuals into the clergy, if they are searching for the Lord.

Story here.

Saturday, July 27, 2013

Gender-deniers upset over royal baby?!

There are some people that are upset that the royal baby is being called a "boy."   But.. the royal baby was BORN male, so what is the problem?  Gender is not a "social construct," it is a biological reality.  Some people have been educated out of their common sense and believe that a female can be born in a male body and vice-versa.

Sad, ridiculous story here.


Monday, July 15, 2013

Redemption for gay, HIV positive, drag queen.

When a boy doesn't bond with his father or an appropriate father-figure, he can sometimes develop into a homosexual. This video takes an amazing turn at 3:18.

What same-sex "marriage" will do to children.

How great it is to have time to blog again!

On Friday, 12 July 2013, I met one of the rarest of gay couples; an exotic-masculine lesbian with an exotic-feminine lesbian, where both of the women where attractive. I thought that they were both cute, especially the feminine one, and after interacting with them for a few minutes my understanding of the support of same-sex "marriage" was increased.

It is practically impossible for someone who doesn't know the Word of God to see past the counterfiet love that these two adorable women had for each other. God is love, and nothing that comes from God causes same-sex attraction. Those who don't know the Word of God often confuse sexual desire/attraction and the fear of loneliness for "love."

When I was young I dated a few women that didn't know Jesus Christ. I stepped outside of the Word of God thinking that a relationship could still work. I was woefully wrong, and I will never date a non-Christian woman again.

Anyhow, the point of my post today is that a same-sex, romantic/sexual relationship is wrong no matter how right it may seem.

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Street preacher Tony Miano vs. British homofascism.

Street preacher Tony Miano.


If a man were standing on a British street corner verbally advertising a gay nightclub, would he be arrested?  Why then was Tony Miano arrested for preaching what the Word of God says about sexual sins?  He included fornication and adultery, but when he spoke about homosexuality... a woman called the cops and he was arrested.  How come people who have sex outside of marriage and people who cheat on their spouses don't get nearly as upset as do gays when they hear about their sexual sins?

Story here.

Monday, July 8, 2013

Great video for true marriage.


The creator of this video is on almost the exact same page that I'm on. He has a hate-free, logical disagreement with the redefinition of marriage, and a point-by-point explanation addressing the false arguments of the glbt community.  If there is anything that homofascists hate, it's a logical argument.

Sunday, July 7, 2013

Gender "identity" vs. gender reality in California.

And He answered and said, “Have you not read (A)that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female,  -Jesus Christ.

It's simple. If you were born with a penis, you are a boy.  If you are born with a vagina, you are a girl.  If you reject that reality... you are crazy.  Apparently, these simple truths have been denied by the government of California.  In California, it is about to become the law that a boy can use the girl's bathroom in school.  Sad, sick story here.



Saturday, July 6, 2013

Homofascism in Seattle. (Harsh language alert!!)

Finally, I'm home with some time to blog and what do I find?  A perfect example of homofascism.  Homofascists can't stand to be disagreed with.  I can't advertise my own website on my own vehicle lest my employer be boycotted and I be forced to resign.  The glbt community is becoming more and more intolerant every day.  These Christian street preachers are exercising their First Amendment rights, apparently, that's not okay with the glbt community. 

More info here.

Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Monday, July 1, 2013

SCOTUS vs. Prop. 8.

There is a way which seems right to man, but it's end is the way of death.    Proverbs 14:12.  Those who fight for the redefinition of marriage are going up against God.

California's Proposition 8 that defined marriage as being between one man and one woman, was NOT ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States.

These two videos say it best.