Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Nambla on Facebook?

I don't think, for one minute, that all gay men belong to or support Nambla. Most of the glbt community will vehemently denounce this pedophilistic organization. Yet I still have to point out that men who abandon sexual sanity and chase after each other for romantic and sexual reasons, are a potential danger to young boys since I have yet to hear a homosexual man denounce normalizing homosexuality to a young boy WITHOUT the consent of that young boy's parents, parent, or legal guardian. And I won't associate with someone that would speak to a person under the age of 16 about the glbt lifestyle without the knowledge or consent of that child's parents.

Look at the 'Bishop" Long case. He is alleged to have familiarized himself with fatherless young boys, then had homosex with the boys after they turned 16; a classic homophile tactic. He didn't have sex with them until they were of legal age, but the homonormalization process began years earlier. Is this why, when I ask a gay man to denounce teaching an underage boy that the glbt lifestyle is okay, WITHOUT the consent of that boy's parents, the homosexual never does? I'll denounce teaching a child that heterosexuality is okay without the consent of that child's parents. How come homosexual men can't make the same pledge that I can?

Now, with all that being said.......WHAT THE **** WAS FACEBOOK THINKING!

Story here.

Tuesday, September 28, 2010

"Bishop" Long's accuser.

Isn't this young brother speaking from his heart? Doesn't he describe the classic seduction tactics of a polished homophile? This is incredible. "Bishop" Long is in big trouble with my Boss (and his), Jesus Christ. Big trouble.

Monday, September 27, 2010

A Long way from denial.

Mr. Long did NOT deny having a homosexual relationship with the four young men that are his accusers and says that, "I have never claimed to be a perfect man." This means that he did sex up these young boys but can't publicly admit it, to minimize the amount of money that he's going to loose in the pending lawsuits against him. Story here.

Saturday, September 25, 2010

UCMJ irrelevant if "gay."

Do hetero men that were court-martialed for adultery get their jobs back too? The Universal Code of Military Justice forbids homosexual acts and adultery. (Articles 125 & 134)

I was actually on Major Witt's side when I heard that she didn't tell the military she was gay, but someone else told the military she was gay. After all, it's called don't-ask-don't-tell and she didn't tell, someone else did.

Then I found out that Ms. Witt was dating a married woman! And STILL seeing her! Now all bets are off since she is now in violation of a second, serious article of the UCMJ for which heterosexuals ARE prosecuted! Don't gays want "equality"? She took this same oath that heterosexual servicepeople took. But wait! She's gay. Okay then. Let's all go home now. She's gay and, therefore, cannot be touched by the laws that bind us mere mortals.

Story here, here, and here.

Video on true marriage.

Friday, September 24, 2010

A Long fall from grace.

When it was just two young men accusing this dude of homosexual seduction, I still had hope for his innocence. But now, just a few hours ago, a fourth accuser has come forward. Four young men accuse this guy of the same thing? It's over for this "bishop."

When Christians have as much money as this guy, there's usually something fishy, (no pun intended) about their ministry. It's okay for a servant of Christ to have nice things, but Mr. Long was over the top. It seems that his lavish lifestyle has corrupted him in a horrible way and he's been sexually pursuing young men. That is a really big sin. Story here and here.

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

DADT stands.

I desperately wanted to post this story yesterday but had to get up at 0330hrs today.

Anyway, it looks like DADT will stand for now, which is a good thing. Men in the battlefield have enough to worry about without having to be forced to bunk and shower with homosexuals. The United States should make life as comfortable as possible for those brave men and women who protect our precious freedoms, and it is ridiculous to subject our American warriors to even the possibility of homosexual harassment in their living quarters.

Story here.

Monday, September 20, 2010

Lady Gaga vs. The United States Military.

My money is on the military. Even if DADT is repealed, it won't be because of Lady Gaga.
Would Lady Gaga tolerate showering nude with someone that she didn't want to shower nude with? This is what she expects men in the military to do. Women in the military aren't expected to tolerate sexual harassment from men in the military, but the repeal of DADT will allow homosexuals to harass straight men since ANY complaints from a straight serviceman will be dismissed as "homophobia." Story here.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

DADT still in effect.

Lifting DADT wouldn't be like the racial desegregation of the military because homosexuality is behavior, not race. Those who fight for the repeal of DADT are wrong in their belief that people are born gay, and people that think that homosexuality is a conscious, overnight choice are also wrong.
The glbt lifestyle can be accurately compared to a person becoming a heroin addict; the addiction is not a single choice, but the result of choices and time. Is it okay for a heroin addict to serve in the military?
My supporting link.

Monday, September 13, 2010

SB 543: The LEGAL, glbt pursuit of children.

I'm stunned by this story.

Democratic Senator Mark Leno from San Francisco (where else), wants to make a law that prevents a parent from knowing if their, 12-year-old child is being "counseled" by their school about their desire to enter the glbt community.

"Current parental consent requirements for mental health services create a barrier to treatment that is especially harmful to LGBT youth who may be put at risk of emotional or physical abuse by coming out to their parents prematurely or without support."

From what I've heard, a child can call the police or child-protective-services on their own parents in the case of emotional or physical abuse. Also, if people are truly "born gay," as many homofascists and homoappeasers would have people believe, then why are some anti-hetero types so desperate to approach children without the knowledge or consent of that child's parents? I mean, if they are "born gay," won't the "gay" still be there when they're 18?

What would happen if Christians wanted to approach the 12-year-old children of gays without the knowledge or consent of their parents? How would the glbt community react to that?

Get a container to vomit in before clicking here and here.


Today was the last day for the Governator or the attorney general of California to file court papers to defend Prop 8, yet neither one will defend this particular part of California law.

What would these two politicians do if the situation was reversed, and there were county or city clerks that refused to perform homosexual "marriages"? If Prop 8 had been defeated, and there were government officials that refused to cooperate with the processing and performance of homosexual "marriage," what would Arnold or Jerry Brown do about it? Would they be silent and passive? No they wouldn't. Anyone in California's government that refused to cooperate with homosexual "marriage" would be promptly fired. Story here.

Gay porn gets man fired.

I hate to see a man loose his job, but if the man were heterosexual, the same thing would've happened. Story here.

Friday, September 10, 2010

50 Cent vs. Perez Hilton.

I guess Perez Hilton didn't learn his lesson about provoking people.

Although I do NOT support 50 Cent's violence-slanted tweet, this is still a classic case of a homovocateur provoking someone to anger and then playing the victim. Classic.

This is how I got pulled into the culture war against homofascism when I was, originally, minding my own business. Core info here.

Thursday, September 9, 2010

A female Vaughn Walker?

Where were these types of judges in years past? All of a sudden, marriage between one man and one woman is "unconstitutional." Now, DADT is "unconstitutional." When will speaking out in support of heterosexuality be "unconstitutional?"

The United States military has to curtail certain sexual behaviors within it's ranks. A married officer would be disciplined for cheating on his wife. A higher ranking male officer couldn't have a sexual relationship with a lower ranking female. Why do gays seek exemption from any boundaries on their sexual behavior then cry out for a marriage certificate which is a declaration to, among other things, have sex with just one person as long as both of you are alive? Gays seem to hate sexual boundaries of any kind, then have the nerve to cry "homophobe!" when people like me try to tiptoe away from all things gay.

Click here and here for the whole story.

Gays vs. God.

I keep trying to tell homofascists that they're not fighting against the misperceptions of humanity like African-American/Black people once had to, but that they are, in fact, fighting against God himself. I don't fear gays, I fear for gays.

"It is the resentment of that divine moral authority that ultimately fuels much of the homosexual legal agenda, just as reverence and respect for that authority-not bigotry-drives many of those who ultimately oppose that agenda."

For my supporting evidence, click here.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Xbox wouldn't play with Fort Gay.

This story is comical to me. This video-game dude lives in a town called "Fort Gay," and when he entered the name of the town in an attempt to play Xbox LIVE, his account was suspended. Xbox seems to have a heteroseparatist policy that rejects both pro and anti gay monikers. Damn that's cool. They apparently don't put up with homofascism or homophobia. Now where have I heard that concept before? Story here.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

"Conservatives" who support homosexuality.

I just don't get it. A common-sense, first-gut-reaction to the word "conservative," means someone that conserves/protects something. Presumably, something worth protecting.

So, with this in mind, my core processor runs an uninterruptable autoeject program when I hear that someone who calls their self a conservative, supports the destruction of the family by supporting homosexual "marriage."

"The Greeks assaulted the family in the name of beauty and Eros. The Marxists assaulted the family in the name of progress. And today, gay liberation assaults it in the name of compassion and equality."

My supporting evidence is here.

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Airline says "later" to Slater.

How did this not happen within 48 hours? There's no way this flamboyosexual* could have kept his job, with his parting speech to the plane's passengers and highly illegal deployment of the plane's emergency chute. Story here.

* Copyright 2010. Carl Rowan Morris. All Rights Reserved. (Sun. 05 Sept.)

Saturday, September 4, 2010

The "gay" Kookaburra.

The Gay Kookaburra; sounds like a gay, Australian nightclub to me.

A principal in an Australian primary school used some common-sense and made a change to the lyrics of a 75-year-old song.

"...I knew if we sing 'Gay your life must be' the kids will roll around the floor in fits of laughter."

This principal's decision has, of course, offended (OMG!!) a local gay group. Story here.

Thursday, September 2, 2010

British NAMBLA?

I truly believe, with all of my heart, that those who abandon sexual sanity are, either directly or indirectly, a danger to children.
Looks like a British homosexual named Peter Tatchell wants to "lower the (legal) age of consent" of a child to 14! This sounds like the thoughts of a pedophile to me. I don't think that all homosexuals are pedophiles, but I have yet to hear a homosexual denounce teaching a child that homosexuality is normal, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents. My case is supported here.