Showing posts with label anti-hetero education. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti-hetero education. Show all posts

Friday, March 22, 2013

Hate-filled, homofascist high school play.

Is there a high school principal in the United States that would allow a play that mocked and riduculed the glbt community to take place in his/her school?  How about a play that had explicit, heterosexual erotica?  How about a play that mocked Islam?  Why then, is it okay to attack, defame, insult, and provoke true Christians?                                             




"The school is performing the play, ...by Paul Rudnick. It's billed as a "comedy." But it's described by many as "blasphemous and hateful." The play retells stories from the Bible using homosexual characters in a pornographic and mocking fashion.

The play begins with a retelling of Genesis using a homosexual couple, Adam and Steve, instead of Adam and Eve, along with other homosexual characters who are are very sexually explicit in their speech and actions. As one review puts it, this re-telling of Genesis "gets so specific as to be a gay how-to sexbook."

It includes a depiction of Steve having a sexual relationship with an animal during the Noah's Ark scene. After several other hideous defamations of Bible stories, the first act ends with Adam and Steve being two of the wise men at the Nativity. The second scene appears to be a modern-day depiction of the birth of Jesus in a New York apartment with the "wise man" Steve now being HIV-positive and the pregnant Mary being a lesbian who (among other things) exclaims: "I'm not supposed to be pregnant, I'm a bulldyke!" "

Complete info here.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Meet Caiden Cowger.


Although I don't agree with everything that this young man says, I am amazed at his moral clarity. The glbt community is going to try to destroy this young man.

Monday, April 9, 2012

"Offended" by the natural/true family!?!?


This story illuminates perfectly the influence of glbt organizations in our middle schools and high schools. A mural depicting a married man and woman with their child was deemed "possibly offensive to some" by high school officials, and the natural/true family was actually painted over!

Was the mural too "heteronormative"? Was it too "heterosexist"? What straight person would be offended by this mural? Doesn't this absurd action/point-of-view illustrate the glbt community's perverse mindset? I couldn't believe the homofascist bent/flavor of this story at first, but then my disbelief turned to joy because, once again, the adverse influence of the homosexual lifestyle in our nation's schools can be clearly and easily shown. Anyone offended by a mural depicting a man graduating from college, getting married, and then having a son, is clearly a twisted individual.

This is why I no longer associate with marriage/family redefiners. A person has to be crazy to be offended by true marriage and the normalcy of this mural.

Monday, December 19, 2011

...repeated, unwanted, (homo)sexual advances...


Although I do NOT support Brandon McInerney's killing of Larry King, I do understand his anger at homosexual harassment.


While homosexual schoolchildren are protected by school officials who are desperate to prove that they aren't "homophobic," a heterosexual child has NO protection from homofascism or homosexual harassment. Just today, not an hour ago, I dealt with homosexual harassment...at my age!


Also, I'm shocked that the news story included the information that Larry King was homosexually harassing Brandon McInerney. It would be a completely different story if the 15-year-old homosexual, Larry King was minding his own business, but he wasn't. Larry King kept coming at Brandon McInerney with homosexual advances.


"...McInerney, then 14, had reached an emotional breaking point after King made repeated, unwanted sexual advances toward him and other boys, defense lawyers said. In the weeks leading up to the shooting, school administrators allowed King to wear heels and makeup because federal law provides the right of students to express their sexual orientation. ..."

"...King's father also blamed the school district for not doing more to address the brewing feud between the two teens and their son's flamboyant behavior. "Instead of protecting him from himself and his poor impulse control, they enabled and encouraged him to become more and more provocative," Greg King said. ..."

Complete story here.

Friday, August 19, 2011

History teacher making history?


What would happen to a history teacher, who was also a homosexual, if he supported the redefinition of marriage on his Facebook page in his own home on his own time? What would a school district do if a student filed a complaint on that same history teacher saying that they would be uncomfortable in his classroom because he was gay and supported same-sex "marriage"? What would happen to a Christian student that voiced their discomfort at being taught by a history teacher that was a homosexual?


"...Buell told Fox News Radio that he was stunned by the accusations. “It was my own personal comment on my own personal time on my own personal computer in my own personal house, exercising what I believed as a social studies teacher to be my First Amendment rights,” he said.

“And now they showed two guys kissing after their announcement. If they want to call it a union, go ahead. But don’t insult a man and woman’s marriage by throwing it in the same cesspool of whatever. God will not be mocked. When did this sin become acceptable?”

Three minutes later, Buell posted another comment: “By the way, if one doesn’t like the most recently posted opinion based on biblical principles and God’s laws, then go ahead and unfriend me. I’ll miss you like I miss my kidney stone from 1994. And I will never accept it because God will never accept it. Romans chapter one.”

“The school district is being anti-straight, anti-First Amendment and anti-personal liberty,” said Horatio Mihet, an attorney with the Liberty Counsel. “The idea that public servants have to whole-heartedly endorse homosexual marriage is repugnant to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution,”..."


Story here.

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Savaging marriage.


Marriage was founded by God himself in the Garden of Eden. It is to be between one man and one woman, and the married couple are not to have sexual relations with anyone except each other. Sex outside of marriage will lead to great emotional pain at the very least.


This is heart-wrenching to me. Dan Savage is laughing his way into the wrath of God. Mr. Savage won't be laughing when he's standing before Jesus Christ. This is a prime example of how the acceptance of same-sex "marriage" will adveresely affect true marriage; those who accept same-sex "marriage," will accept adultry. And it is still adultry if your spouse consents to you having sex with another person.


God clearly tells us to honor marriage.

Friday, April 22, 2011

Banned from YouTube because...



...it clearly shows the violent bent of homofascists against a peaceful, legal public gathering of Christians who support God's definition of marriage. Looks to me like all of the hate is coming from the homofascists to the Christians.

I had a hard time finding this video to post. More info here.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Race and sexual behavior aren't the same thing.

Homofascists almost always compare sexual behavior to race. Telling kids to not harass each other is a good thing, but forcing kids to accept homosexuality as normal is wrong. Is it not fascism when dissent isn't allowed? The school district in Vallejo CA is refusing to notify the parents of children who don't want the behavior of homosexuality normalized to their children. I will never associate with people who mentally molest children by knowingly ignoring the rights of the parents of those children.

Is this what the glbt community wants? To violate the civil rights of those who disagree with their sexual behavior?

Monday, December 13, 2010

Anti-hetero Middle School?


Whose idea was it to ask 12-year-olds in Hardy Middle School if they were "transgender," AND explain oral and anal sex to 7th-graders, WITHOUT the consent or knowledge of the parents of these children? Where did the concept of asking a child, behind the backs of that child's parents, if that child wanted to change his or her gender? Who would do such a perverse thing? Where would this mindset be found? Click here to find out.

Monday, May 3, 2010

"Daddy's Roomate"


The number one thing that gays don't want people to know is their pursuit of the minds and hearts of children WITHOUT the consent of the parents of those children. This is GLSEN's prime function. It is an old tactic to go after impressionable minds to bring about a larger agenda like legalizing homosexual "marriage." Look at how ads for cigarettes and alcohol are kept from children, and how children are rightfully shielded from profanity and pornography. Yet, the glbt community wants to be exempt from any common-sense boundaries and promote the glbt lifestyle to children without the consent of their parents. Would gays tolerate Christian ideology being taught to their children without their consent? Story here.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Anti-hetero education.

Some in the GLBT community think it's okay to do an end-run around the parental rights of anyone who disagrees with them. Details here.

Friday, November 27, 2009

Glorifying homosexuality to schoolchildren.


I bet that a play glorifying Jesus Christ wouldn't be allowed in this MA high school. Anti-Jewish songs were sung at this play also. This is a level of homofascism that surprises me. Story here and here.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Peversion 101.

At least these kids were in the 11th grade when they were exposed to this perversion.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Anti-heteros say, "Don't tell your parents."

The freshman class of Deerfield High School in Deerfield Ill. had to sign an agreement of "confidentiality" before attending an anti-hetero class.