Gay "love" not enough for kids.

Once, in an online discussion, in an effort to pull him back into the realm of sexual sanity, I asked a homosexual what he would do if he found out that his male friend was having sex with a seven year old girl. To my horror, the homosexual responded that he would, “talk” to his friend to, “see what his reasoning was.”

I know what I would do if my best friend told me that he was having sex with a seven year old girl. I would tackle him and hold onto him until the local police took him into custody.

It really boggles my mind when I stop to think that there are people that actually believe that a same-sex household does NOT harm a child, or that the redefinition of marriage won’t harm children. What kind of a depraved mind can’t understand the concept of just how important a safe environment for children is?

Today I found a great article concerning sexual sanity and the safety of children...

“...Men and women bring diversity to parenting...Mothers and fathers simply are not interchangeable. Two women can both be good mothers, but neither can be a good father. ...”

“...children progress through predictable and necessary developmental stages. Some stages require more from a mother, while others require more from a father.”

“...if a young boy is to become a competent man, he must detach from his mother and instead identify with his father. A fatherless boy doesn’t have a man with whom to identify and is more likely to have trouble forming a healthy masculine identity.”

“...Overall, fathers play a restraining role in the lives of their children. They restrain sons from acting out antisocially, and daughters from acting out sexually. When there’s no father to perform this function, dire consequences often result both for the fatherless children and for the society in which these children act out their losses.”

“...Certainly homosexual couples can be just as loving as heterosexual couples, but children require more than love. They need the distinctive qualities and the complementary natures of a male and female parent. The accumulated wisdom of over 5,000 years has concluded that the ideal marital and parental configuration is composed of one man and one woman. Arrogantly disregarding such time-tested wisdom, and using children as guinea pigs in a radical experiment, is risky at best, and cataclysmic at worst.”

Complete, homofascist-crushing-article here.

Gay couples vs. love.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Through biblical scripture, I can prove that gay couples do not love each other.
 

We have to start with the true definition of love that comes from the eternally glorious Word of God. Verse 5 points out that,"love does not seek it's own." This means that sacrifice is a part of love.

I learned from my parents that sacrifice is a part of love. When I was a child, I saw my parents put themselves between me and possible danger.

One time, when a man had given me candy, in front of my parents, my dad had some of it first and waited to see if it would have any ill effect on him before he allowed me to eat any of it. And there were other similar, protective actions on his part throughout my childhood. I learned some things about love by observing his actions, especially when I knew that he didn't know that I was watching him. It's no surprise to me that very few gay men have their fathers in their life since I learned 85% of manlaw by simply observing the day-to-day behavior of my father.

There are times, like this morning and almost every morning, when I wake up before my wife and turn on her coffee machine and warm up our home so that she doesn't have to get out of a warm bed into a cold environment. I go first into a cold, hostile environment and change it to a more comfortable one, putting her comfort before my own, because her comfort is more important to me than my own.

That being said, I can prove, through Biblical scripture and secular example that gay couples are not functioning under God's definition of love.

Since same-sex "marriage" will restrict or eliminate religious freedom wherever it is wrongfully legalized, those who support SSM do not act out of love because love does not harm a neighbor.

When a gay couple puts their pursuit of happiness before the welfare of children in their home, they are not acting out of love because they're depriving their child of a much-needed, opposite sex parent.

I found two stories of today that show the difference between those that function out of love, and those that don't. Story A is about a man and a woman that found out that they were brother and sister after they conceived a child and, despite their feelings for each other, ended their romantic, sexual relationship. They didn't insist that society accept their sexual relationship when they found out that they were siblings.

Story B is about a lesbian couple that is trying to normalize their sexual relationship at the expense of the children in their home.

Which couple is acting out of love?