Sunday, May 22, 2011
Voters of Minnesota to be heard in 2012.
How does the 6,000+ year-old definition of marriage violate the civil rights of gay people? I don't get it. Every member of the glbt community in the United States of America grew up in a country where marriage is defined as being between one man and one woman, yet now gays are claiming/believing that such a definition is a violation of their civil rights. What? What did you say? You're equating your sexual behavior to race? Waaaa? Are you crazy!
Now, the people of Minnesota get to vote on a Constitutional amendment that defines marriage. How could anybody be upset at that? Story here, here and here.