Tuesday, May 22, 2012

See YouTube-banned video about Harvey Milk on "Harvey Milk Day."

I know that all homosexuals aren’t child-molesters, and I understand that most gays, would never harm a child. Yet, on the other hand, I also understand that the majority of gay men were seduced into the glbt community while being told that their sexual contact was an act of love.

To gauge their level of respect for the civil rights of others, I sometimes ask gays if encouraging a child INTO the glbt community, without the consent of that child’s parent, is okay. The answer, or lack thereof, tells me whether or not I’m dealing with a homofascist, since a person who doesn’t respect the parental rights of another is a clear danger to children.

“...“Homosexual activists didn’t like the truth that was in the video; they complained to YouTube and YouTube’s committee yanked it,” Thomasson said. “They did the bidding of the homosexual activists and apparently don’t do their research and all of these are true facts.”

“People around the world – they’re getting a one-sided and biased, incorrect picture of Harvey Milk. Harvey Milk is being called a hero and a role model. Actually, he was a sexual predator,” Thomasson said.

“It doesn’t show all of the young boyfriends Harvey Milk had. It made him look like he had only one steady, older boyfriend. It doesn’t talk about all of the boyfriends who went and killed themselves because they got AIDS and so forth,” Thomasson said.

“They don’t want the truth told about the lifestyle, about the unhealthiness of it. They continue to introduce bills that promote the lifestyle, especially Senate Bill 48 that forces schools to promote homosexual and transgendered figures and prohibits anyone talking about them in a way that affects them adversely,” England said.

“So we’re calling on parents to visit SaveCalifornia.com and get informed and keep your child home from the government and get a taste of academic freedom and opt out of all eight of California’s homosexual indoctrination laws.” Thomasson said. ...”

Original, extended info here.


  1. I wonder...do you ask blacks and women if teaching children about Martin Luther King Jr or Gloria Steinem without a parent's consent is ok? Is this something you worry about? Or is it a religion problem and not a civil rights problem? Do you ask protestants if it's ok to teach about Martin Luther without permission...or Jewish parents if in history class they can be taught about Jesus vis a vis the Catholic church? Where do you draw the line? At something that offends you? A lot of things offend a lot of people. If you want anyone to learn anything you will have to let things that are offensive to you're personal sensibilities be taught. If you find them so terrible, then talk to your kids about how terrible it is at home, but if there is no scientific or historical basis against teaching something (a real scientific/historical reason not an imaginary one) then you need to chill out, because that becomes a very slippery slope.

  2. Don't you know the difference between skin color, gender, and sexual behavior? Sexual behavior is a choice. Would you object if your children were being taught how to smoke cigarettes in school without your knowledge? The CDC has scientific proof that MSM are at least 44 times more likely to contract an STD.


    You are the one that needs to chill out since you comment shows your disregard for the parental rights of others. Homosexuality is a behavior, it is not like race or gender. Race and gender are morally benign; homosexual conduct isn't.


Debate and discussion are welcome here, but attitude and ad hominem attacks will get you banned.