
It's a "rumble" people. A call-out. It's "old-school," where two men met toe-to-toe and slug it out until one is declared the winner. Here are the details...
I think that sex education classes for schoolchildren in grades K thru 6 should NOT include anything other than what an adult man and an adult woman do to make a baby. And that children should not have to attend these classes without the consent of their parents. I believe that all other sexual activities between consenting adults should be left out of sex education classes (which should be called reproductive education) due to the controversial nature of some of these sex acts.
I believe that my greatest critic, Mr. Rob Tish, thinks that it's okay to teach children in grades K thru 6 about oral and anal sex acts between two males/men
even without the consent of their parents! I have asked Rob Tish to clarify his position on this subject three times,
here,
here, and
here. But Mr. Tish will not give me a clear "yes" or "no" to the question of whether or not he supports teaching children in grades K thru 6 about oral and anal sex acts between two consenting, adult males.
Doesn't it stand to reason that, if a person cannot give a clear "no" to such a simple/clear question, they shouldn't be around children? Can you answer with a clear "no" to my question Mr. Tish?