Sunday, July 17, 2011

Where anti-hetero SB 48 went wrong.

Some few days ago, while I was in comment-combat, a man (who was probably a homofascist judging by the gist of his comments) challenged those who don't support the glbt community to read the actual language of SB 48, which I, of course, did, and found the following paragraph...

"...Native Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans,
Pacific Islanders, European Americans, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender Americans, and members of other ethnic and cultural
groups, to the economic, political, and social development of
California and the United States of America, with particular emphasis
on portraying the role of these groups in contemporary society. ..."

Once again, the advantages of being a forensic heteroseparatist have paid off. The paragraph above shows how sexuality and sexual behavior are deceptively elevated to, and categorized with, the innate aspect of a person's skin color. It's the same old story once again. The sad, absurd comparison of race to sexual behavior. This mischaracterization has led to the legal trampling of the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual misconduct of the glbt community.


  1. "...ethnic and cultural groups"

    I belive the above summarizes where you are wrong. ETHNIC and CULTURAL. YOU are equating this with RACE. It looks like the authors of the bill are not. Try again.....

  2. @Lenny

    Do you not see the ten words that precede "lesbian"? Do you not understand the psychological significance of grouping sexual sin and race together in the same paragraph? Have you not heard of how children are taught to replace the word "gay" with "Black" in gradeschools to brainwash them into accepting homosexuality as innate? Come on now. Snap out it.

  3. Innate....wrong again! No believes that BS anymore. That played out with Big Foot.... Keep trying.......

  4. @Lenny

    I'm beginning to be concerned for your welfare. Your comments have the flavor of someone who is unable to think coherently. You make a mocking remark, and run off thinking that you have confounded me. And that's all you do. Are you saying that nobody believes that homosexuality is innate anymore?

  5. "Are you saying that nobody believes that homosexuality is innate anymore?" - No. What I was refering to is "brainwashing into accepting that it is innate". By "brainwashing", wondering if that is the same method used by the God Squad on their gradeschool children?

  6. @ Lenny

    The "God Squad" will tell their children about Jesus Christ and why He died for our sins. True Christians don't seek to legislate lessons about Jesus Christ that bypass parental consent to schoolchildren like the glbt community did with SB 48.

    Jesus Christ died to make a way for you to be reconciled with God Lenny, but if you are going to reject that fact, you are going to have a very unpleasant meeting with Jesus after you die.


Debate and discussion are welcome here, but attitude and ad hominem attacks will get you banned.