Is SSM in New York legal?

I've never seen a Governor sign a new law into existence so fast. It appears that the legislature of New York illegally cut a few corners to redefine marriage and bypass the vote of the people.

I think that people are starting to see the difference between race and sexual behavior when the glbt community compares the definition of true marriage to the historic oppressions suffered by African-American people in the United States.

“...At the very least, the procedure for passage of same-sex marriage in the New York Senate contravenes the principles underlying the constitutional provisions noted above. Those provisions attempt to secure an open, transparent and deliberative process. By contrast, the procedure followed to get the same-sex marriage bill through as quickly as possible was characterized by secrecy, curtailed discussion and top-down control. The important changes to the bill's religious exemption were not only not explored at any length, but the attempt of Senator Ruben Diaz to ask questions about these provisions (which had only become public a few hours before) was completely foreclosed. ...”

The facts that show how the legislators of New York broke some little-known laws to redefine marriage are here.

Where does the redefinition of marriage end?

Click on the yellow bubble.

Redefending ex-lesbian Lisa Miller.

I withdrew my support of this woman, Lisa Miller, because she was defying a court order.

Now there is evidence that this woman's former lesbian lover had forced Ms. Miller's daughter, who was only five years old at the time, to bath naked with her.

Would I defy a court order to prevent my five-year-old son from being taken away from me and forced to bath naked with a gay man, by that gay man? Oh yes I would! Navy Seal Team 6 wouldn't be able to take my son away from me without killing me first.

“... “I asked her what happened. She said, ‘Janet took a bath with me.’ I asked her if she had a bathing suit on. ‘No, Mommy.’ She had no clothes on and it totally scared Isabella. She had never seen this woman except once in 2 ½ years and she takes a bath with her.” ...”

Story here.

Spotlight on Rusty Blustering.

I said I would do this so I'm doing this. Click on comments here.

Sweden's "gender madness."

A little Swedish boy in preschool walks up to his teacher and asks,(in Swedish) "Miss Svensson. Is my father here yet?"

Miss Svensson's face contorts into an angry expression, and she yells at little Olof, telling him to stand in the corner until his "parent" comes to pick him up.

Hurt and confused, little Olof walks away and stands in the corner crying until his "parent" arrives to pick him up from preschool.


What was Olof's crime? Having the sheer nerve to acknowledge the gender of his father! This present-day, absurdist-reality scenario is being played out in at least one pre-school in Sweden, where the mere mention of a person's gender is discouraged!

"The kind of things that boys like to do - run around and turn sticks into swords - will soon be disapproved of," he said. "So gender neutrality at its worst is emasculating maleness."

“...Director Lotta Rajalin notes that Egalia places a special emphasis on fostering an environment tolerant of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people. From a bookcase, she pulls out a story about two male giraffes who are sad to be childless - until they come across an abandoned crocodile egg. ..."

Incredible story here.

A robbery in New York.

So what's new about a robbery in New York you say? The sheer scale of this robbery.

Every registered voter in the state of New York was robbed of their right to vote on the definition of marriage in their state. Not only that, the robbers were so smooth that there are some that approve of this attack on democracy.

"... "The people of New York were robbed of the right to vote directly on this issue, and the legislature forced this on the state," he tells OneNewsNow. "And really, the blame lies with the Republican Party -- for those four Republicans deciding to abandon the principles of the Republican Party and betray their voters. That's what happened, and they're going to be held accountable."

"The poll shows that 57 percent of New York voters believe marriage should be defined only as one man and one woman," says Gallagher, "and that in addition, the vast majority -- I think it was close to 60 percent -- said that they think the people of New York should have the right to decide this issue, not the legislature." ..."

Story here.

How Matthew Shepard REALLY died.

It's been said that a lie can get around the world before the truth can get its shoes on.

Today, I stumbled upon information that the man primarily responsible for Matthew Shepard’s death was a man named Aaron McKinney, a member of the glbt community. Incredible.

"...21-year-old Matthew Shepard was picked up by two other 21-year-old guys at a bar the night of his beating. Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson were doing methamphetamine and were looking to rob Matthew Shepard who was drunk at the bar. While Henderson was driving, the story goes, Shepard made a pass at McKinney by touching his leg. At this point, McKinney, who’d been awake for a week on meth, lost it and hit Shepard with a pistol. Soon after, he told Henderson to pull over, and the beating at the fence proceeded.

Initially, McKinney used the “gay panic defense” to suggest that he lost his mind when Shepard made a pass at him, but we later find that McKinney was a bisexual who actually knew Matthew Shepard. Did he really panic when Shepard made a pass at him or did he react violently out of anger that Shepard was in the process of outing his secret homosexual life in front of Henderson? Henderson, by most accounts, was just the wheelman who tied Shepard to the fence and didn’t do enough to stop McKinney who was out of his mind on meth.

Tom O’Connor, the limo driver who Shepard occasionally hired, had a lot to say. He knew both Matthew Shepard and Aaron McKinney. He said that a few days before his death, Sheppard told him that he’d discovered he was HIV positive, which is something many homosexuals discover. He’d also claimed that McKinney was definitely bisexual because he, himself, had participated in a three-person sex act with McKinney. McKinney’s girlfriend also suggested that McKinney had repeatedly tried to get her to let one of his male friends join them in their escapades. ..."

This story is a bit of a read, but the information in it (including how Matthew Shepard's killer became gay) is shocking.

Ciscohomofascism.

If it's wrong to fire someone for being gay or for their support of same-sex marriage, isn't it also wrong to fire someone for their support of true marriage?
This man was fired for his support of true marriage.

"..."The guy who saw the book never read it -- he just didn't like the fact that I was against same-sex marriage," Turek tells OneNewsNow. "And he told the in-charge director there about it and they fired me within hours, without ever even looking at the book or even ever asking me a question. They just fired me without ever talking to me."

Turek says he challenged Nagel about how he could be fired for embracing a conservative worldview which was never discussed in the workplace, but contends he was only given platitudes about the "inclusive" work environment of Cisco.

"She wouldn't recognize the fact that there is a systemic problem in the culture -- it's not inclusive and diverse," Turek argues. "'Inclusion and diversity' only means if you agree with us, you'll be included. That's not inclusion -- and it's certainly not diversity." ..."

Story about anti-Christ bigotry here.

The gay-friendly skies above San Francisco.

Apparently, in San Francisco’s International Airport, you can board and fly US Airways in your underwear...but ONLY if you have a gay
<----appearance. If you are NOT gay, you will be held to a higher standard.

Apparently, US Airways is more afraid of being called “homophobic” than being called racist. Yet another difference between race and sexual behavior. Sick, sad story here.

Cat impersonating a dog.

Sex "change" regret.

Well. This one's kind of predictable to those with sexual sanity...

This man, Walt Heyer, thought he wanted to be a woman, had his dingus surgically removed, then realized that he made a terrible mistake. He is now in love with and married to a woman, and trying to prevent other, pre-op, male-to-female "transgenders," from making the same mistake that he did.


Walt Heyer writes...

"... Changing genders is zany, exciting and fun at first, but many of us have discovered right away or years after changing genders that our lives turn to disappointment, sorrow and regret. The evidence of this extreme regret can be found in the staggering suicide rate for transgenders, reported to be 30 to 40%.

I am back to living as a male and I am happily married to a woman. But anatomically I'm not a male; I can't be. My birth record was changed and says female. My passport says male. This surgery is absolutely destructive. In fact, it is categorically impossible to change someone's gender.

There are a lot of males without male genitalia who are struggling terribly with this. And at least fifty percent of these surgeries are failures in some way. Your body is mutilated. It's not a good thing. It's a horrible thing.


Homosexuals, lesbians and transgenders were not born that way, no, not at all. Despite an enormous amount of research being done, no scientific evidence can be found to substantiate this view, yet it is reported as fact. My new book, Paper Genders, provides a well-researched look in the homosexual activist movement and how everyone, including the media, runs and hides from this group of bullies and sexual predators.

The question is: Who has the courage and conviction to stand up for our young kids and our families? ..."


In my internet manifesto, I cover how childhood experiences launch a person into the glbt community. Mr. Walt Heyer's experience in the glbt community supports the information in my manifesto. Then there's his news concerning the shocking statistic that a "transgendered" person is 25 times more likely to attempt suicide than a heterosexual.

My supporting data is here, and here.

The difference between race and homosexuality.

A person's sexuality can change; there are ex-gays in this world. Gender and skin color are innate, but, in the wrong circumstances, a person's sexuality can change from it's normal state.

Homofascists are now intentionally trampling the civil rights of parents by telling children in public schools that homosexuality is innate, WITHOUT parental consent. The African-American civil-rights movement didn't go after people's children behind the backs of their parents.

A Gay Girl in Damascus? NOT!!

What's the problem here? Isn't every man essentially a lesbian (happily) trapped in a man's body? I haven't laughed like this in weeks! Click here for more.

The gay Empire Strikes Back.

<---HomoSith Judges Vaughn Walker (seated) and James Ware.

The first sentence that came to my mind when Judge James Ware upheld Judge Vaughn Walker's self-serving prop 8 ruling was...

"So this is how liberty dies. With thunderous applause." -Padme Amidala/Episode III

Once again, the false comparison between race, gender, and sexual sin has eclipsed the fact that Judge Walker stood to gain personally from his decision to throw out the legal votes of over seven million Californians.

"...In his 19-page decision — a response to the first attempt in the nation to disqualify a judge based on sexual orientation — Ware had a bigger message. Gay judges, he said, are just like minority and female jurists: They can be impartial, too, even in cases that might affect them. .."

Homosexuality is a state of mind/emotion, and membership in the glbt community is voluntary, it is not innate like the gender and skin color that comes with birth. Although homosexuality is not an overnight choice, being "gay" is a matter of choice; the end result of a series of choices, like heroin addiction. Although I recognize that a heroin addict has all of the same civil rights that I do, I will not support the lifestyle of a heroin addict as I do not support the glbt community. Nor do I hate the heroin addict since I know how they became an addict.

Seeing homosexuality as innate is where Judge Ware(-is-his-common-sense!) got it wrong. Info here.

Polygamous Federal Judge redefines marriage.

If you replace the word "gay" with "polygamous," how wrong it would be if a Federal judge that was in a sexual, romantic relationship with multiple women, threw out a majority vote that defined marriage as being between one man and one woman, right before his retirement?

How long would his decision stand since he clearly benefits from his own judicial decision? Would I be called "polyphobic" for speaking out against his obvious misconduct? Weren't the Mormons stopped from practicing polygamy by the American law the defines marriage as being between one man and one woman? Do the members of the glbt community consider themselves above the law?

Story here and here.

Gay Irish Presidential candidate supports pedophilia.

This man, Mr. David Norris, thinks that a child should be able to consent to having sex with an adult. Although I know that all gay men aren't pederasts or pedophiles, I also know that many homosexual men desire sex with young, if not underage, boys. From what I've seen, there are more homosexuals that support pederasty than those that don't. And it does stand to reason that adults that abandon sexual boundaries are a greater danger to children than those that don't. That's just common sense.

Story here and here.

Challenging homofascism and homosexism.

<-----This is the core goal of the glbt community. It's not even hidden anymore. It's not even deniable anymore. Violating the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual activities of gays, is the prime goal of the glbt community. How can the gay community and their worshippers cry out so loudly about the civil rights of gays and then turn around and so blatantly violate the rights of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim parents?

Parents whose children attend this Canadian school do not have the option of excluding their children from this indoctrination of sexual sin. I have no conversation for those who support this trampling of parental rights. How would the glbt community react if classes that taught Christian principles to their children were mandatory? Are any gay people even embarrassed about this?

Homofascists attack N.Y. State Senator Ruben Diaz.

Homosexual activists want to kill him and "sexually assault" his daughter because New York State Senator Ruben Diaz stands for Jesus Christ's definition of marriage; which is between one man and one woman.

How is this not homofascism? How is this not homointolerance? What kind of a society do I live in where a man's life and daughter are threatened because of his stand for sexual sanity? What percentage of the glbt community supports the murder of Senator Diaz and the sexual assault of his daughter?

“...The entire campaign to enact same-sex marriage is conducted under a banner of acceptance, and equality and respect for others,” Barnes continued. “Yet behind that banner of tolerance is another campaign – of intimidation, threats and ugliness. What at first appears to be simple juvenile behavior by a few is becoming a culture and climate of abusiveness toward those who disagree. ..”

Story here.

The gay Trojan horse.

Who in their right mind would disagree with the phrase, "anti-bullying"? No one right? I mean bullying is something that we all can relate to. Everyone has experienced bullying in some way or another. This very blog came into being as my response to anti-Christ, anti-hetero, homofascist bullying that I encountered on a chat website.

That being said, I also know(most of the time), when someone is trying to sell me Trojan horses**t. "Anti-bullying" is now the phrase that slays the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual antics of the glbt community.

"...While bullying is harmful and always has been, it is an even greater harm that anti-bullying policies have been hijacked by a political agenda for the purpose of promoting homosexual behavior and insulating it from public debate and discussion. Forbidding debate about homosexual behavior in schools attacks our country’s rich tradition of encouraging the open examination of ideas. Sometimes that discourse is uncomfortable and even offensive, testing the very foundation of our identity. But in the end, it is the only way for the truth to prevail. .."

"...We should not confuse acts of intimidation and violence with legitimate debate, on or off the playground. And we should not shroud censorship and political correctness with anti-bullying policies designed to intimidate opposition into silent submission. .."

My supporting evidence is here.

Classic homointolerance.

This is a classic example of the, support-homosexuality-or-else mindset of most of the glbt community. If the situation was reversed, and someone attacked an anti-Christ, pro-gay banner, they would be tackled to the ground by police. I'll bet that the homofascist attacker is never prosecuted for his actions either, like an "anti-gay" person would be if the situation was reversed.

If, twenty-five years ago, someone had taken me to into the future and shown me this event, I would've thought, Why is this group stating the obvious about marriage? And, Is this guy (the attacker) some sort of deranged polygamist or something?

More info here.

Letter by an ex-gay to his dad.

In my Internet manifesto, I write about the "Stockholm" homosexual; the gay man/male who was seduced into homosexuality by an older homosexual. I also cover how misbonding with his father can put a young boy on the path to the glbt community. The following letter, written by a former homosexual illuminates some of the strongest points of my Internet manifesto.

Dear Dad,

I need to read this important letter I have written to you in order to explain some important things about my life, the love and respect I have for you, and (in spite of that love and admiration) the disconnection I have felt from you throughout my life. I am so thankful we have this time to be together on this trip so I can share my authentic feelings with you. I am hopeful that this will be a powerful experience for both of us and lead us to a much deeper and more fulfilling relationship. Please let me finish the letter before we discuss the individual parts of it.

Dad, let me start off by reminding you of the conversation I shared with you and mom two years ago when I revealed my sexual abuse as a child and alluded to struggling with same sex attraction (SSA). As you may, or may not, know there are several precipitating factors (or constellation of variables), which create the environment where a person adapts his romantic emotions toward those of the same sex rather than those of the opposite sex. One of the essential risk factors leading to same sex attraction is sexual abuse, something that occurred to me at age of 4. That event gave me a misguided understanding about love and actually directly contributed to something called "defensive detachment"—something I learned about in my healing work. "Defensive detachment" occurs when a child disidentifies from his father, based on actual or perceived rejection. Let me explain how this concept applies to our relationship.

When my Uncle invited me to perform oral sex on him, as a 4 year old, I thought it was fun and thus internalized a belief that performing such an act on a man's penis is what love must be about. A few years later, I was with you and you were casually peeing in front of me. Seeing your private part exposed brought my childish mind back to the sexual abuse (which I did not perceive as abuse.) I immediately went to you, hugged you, and said, "I love you, Daddy." Clueless as to why I was doing that while your private part was exposed, and obviously wanting to make sure that you did not pee on me, you pushed me away and said something to the effect of "not now son!" I misperceived that very correct behavior on your part as your rejection of me. In turn, that event was a contributory factor in my defensive detachment of you.

However, my misperception of your statement was not the only factor involved. Dad, while I was growing up, I never really felt truly connected or close to you. Indeed, being emotionally distant from you was not what I really wanted—I wanted to feel and be close to you. Unfortunately, I can't remember if I ever expressed that to you (other than at age 5 or 6 when I was pushed away).

Objectively, you were never a "bad father." You spent a great deal of time supporting the family ... although I perceived your focus on work as a neglect of me. You were gone a lot from the home. Even when you were home, I did not perceive you as being there for me. You would be on the phone or paying attention to something else. Not perceiving your emotional presence, I further detached from you as a defensive reaction to avoid pain and perceived further emotional rejection or wounding. Even when you had time to make it to the occasional camping trips we took, we still never authentically connected. Eventually I stopped seeing you as my Dad, the person to whom I could go to for emotional support, and more simply saw you as just the man with whom I shared a house.

We did share a handful of common interests so we could do something together that both of us would enjoy, but even then, we still had difficulty authentically connecting. And in many cases, your efforts to work with me or teach me masculine skills had the opposite effect. For example, because I lacked a great deal of interest in sports, your efforts to bond with me on a basketball court or on a golf course further separated us rather than bring us closer together. In many cases, your active and excitable personality (which in most cases may be seen as a positive characteristic) was mistaken by me for anger directed toward me. Thus in an effort to protect myself further, I detached even more, drawing further away from you. While I now appreciate how determined you were to teach me how to ride a bike, my timid nature made me afraid to do so and at that time I misperceived your behavior as disapproval directed toward me.

I know you never intended to push me away. You never intended that the lack of a deep relationship between us would contribute to the difficult burden I carry today. This is not your fault because you didn't intend for this to happen. What I want you to know is that I have been searching for something I felt I was lacking in every male friendship I've had. I always said I wanted a best friend. I have always (and in some ways continue) to look for that. Sadly, the truth goes deeper; I wasn't just looking for my friends we left in Pennsylvania or someone I could trust, in truth, I was really looking for what I missed in you.

Sometimes my heart was hardened towards you. Sometimes I was just apathetic. At this time, I want you to know my heart honors you and is open toward you. I want the hills and witnesses to echo this truth: Dad, I forgive you. I forgive you because I love you. I forgive you because I've forgiven myself. I forgive you because I honor you.

To forgive you and to forgive myself is absolutely essential if we are to truly connect as father and son. It permits my inner child to make whole once again what was broken and to make clean what was soiled. Forgiveness is more than reconciliation. It permits me to let go of the resentment of either a real or imagined wrong or indifference. I pray that you in turn can forgive me so we can make a fresh start together as father and son and as best friends.

Please understand that you raised a son who emulated many of his father's qualities. Your example made me into a mighty man. Your work ethic is something I will always admire. Your commitments to God Almighty have given me an inner strength and determination to follow God's will. Without your example, I simply could not have carried on in this life. While you may have unconsciously fed and raised a dragon inside of me, you also provided me with an example of how a proud warrior gains the strength to slay the dragon rather than be consumed by it.

I hope you fully understand the message of this letter. Dad, thank you. I love you. I hope you can see this love that a son has for his father, one that you may not have seen before. You have honored me for being a man of God, for my charity, for my dedication to truth, for selfless service, and for aspiring to be myself. Although you may honor me, it is I who honors you. I love you Dad.

Your son forever,

Max

A unique proposal for true marriage.

Where did "gay rights" go wrong?

Once again, a homofascist explains why he must violate the rights of parents who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community. Once again, any disagreement with the gay lifestyle is falsely labeled as "hate." I don't get it. I can figure out how to teach kids not to bully each other without glorifying any sexual orientation. How come gay "activists" can't?

I think that this mindset is how the glbt community is going to loose credibility in the eyes of those that are undecided concerning the normalcy of homosexuality. Going after children behind the backs of their parents concerning sexual activity is absolutely evil.

"Gender Spectrum" in your rectum.

Under the cloak of anti-bullying (which can be taught without violating the civil rights of Christian parents and glorifying homosexuality), these children were exposed to anti-hetero propaganda, WITHOUT the consent of their parents. This is what the vast majority of the glbt community wants. Teaching children that gender is a "spectrum."

Original info here.

Scott Rose vs. parental rights.

Just about two days ago, I stumbled across this web page and found a fellow heteroactivist under attack. I decided to wade into this fray and test one of my Achilles questions against his most eloquent attacker.

I asked Mr. Scott Rose...

Do you support how some sex education classes for grades K thru 6 welcome schoolchildren INTO the glbt community WITHOUT the consent or knowledge of that child’s parents?

His response was...

"Enlightened human beings of whatever sexual orientation constantly interrelate with one another, as sexual relations are far from being the only thing of importance in life. For example, a heterosexual man with an interest in sailing could very well go out on a lake one day in a sailboat with a lesbian couple and the lesbian couple's children. The way you have phrased your question, Carl Rowan Morris, conspicuously implies that LGBT adults around children in the ages of K through 6th grade would commit child rape on those children. The direct evidence suggests that Catholic priests are far more likely that non-priest LGBT adults to rape children. Anti-gay bigot adults, on the other hand, absolutely should not be permitted to endanger their children's welfare by teaching them irrational anti-gay hate. The children taught that hate by their parents are the ones who become anti-gay bullies in school. That bullying besides damaging the gay victims also hinders the bully from receiving the best possible education. So to answer your question, yes, it is terrible for anti-gay bigot parents to hinder their offsprings' enlightened integration into the contemporary world by teaching them homophobia, the irrational fear of gay human beings, which you have expressed with your stupid question."

Mr Rose's is so fancy and so eloquent as he accuses me of implying child rape, WHILE he admits his support of violating the civil rights of parents that won't support the sexual actions of the glbt community. He calls speaking to a child about ENTERING the gay community, behind the backs of that child's parents, an "enlightened integration into the contemporary world."

Wow. That was some of the smoothest poison I've ever heard.

Isn't Mr. Scott Rose himself guilty of bigotry when he openly advocates the violation of another person's civil rights after he labels that person an "anti-gay bigot"? Isn't it possible to teach kids not to bully each other without glorifying homosexuality? Does Mr. Rose hate those who don't support the concept of a man having sex with another man (anti-gay bigotry according to him) so much that he advocates taking their children away from them? Look at the paragraph marked May 27th at 3:17pm. How will he respond to my question..."How are you better than "anti-gay bigots" when you openly admit your support of violating a parent's right to supervise their child's education?

Again, my evidence is here.

The gay mouse that roared.

I'm stunned by the clarity and quality of this article written by an ex-gay man.

Viral video report.

More gender denial.

Well. Here it is again. People denying the obvious differences between the human male and the human female. American culture is taking yet another step away from sexual sanity and teaching children that they are the gender that they think they are, regardless of what's between their legs.

Where do I buy stock in a company that provides materials and curriculum for homeschooling because, when more people find out about what's being taught to their kids, homeschooling is going to explode.

"Genderealist"

Just like I constructed the word "heteroseparatist" to free those who embrace sexual normalcy from being marginalized, I created the word "genderealist" to counteract the derisive term "heterosexist." (How crazy are human beings going to become in my lifetime?!)

A couple in Canada are refusing to tell anyone the gender of their child. Wow. Okay.

Now, these people have every right to withhold this information from people, and I'm not disputing their parental rights to do so, but why would they do this? Is this the kind of World that gays, feminists, and liberals want? Is ignoring gender the tie that binds the gays and the feminists? What's next? Will I be thrown in jail for saying "Miss" or "Sir" in the future? Am I going to live the life of Harrison Bergeron?

Story here and here.

Voters of Minnesota to be heard in 2012.

How does the 6,000+ year-old definition of marriage violate the civil rights of gay people? I don't get it. Every member of the glbt community in the United States of America grew up in a country where marriage is defined as being between one man and one woman, yet now gays are claiming/believing that such a definition is a violation of their civil rights. What? What did you say? You're equating your sexual behavior to race? Waaaa? Are you crazy!

Now, the people of Minnesota get to vote on a Constitutional amendment that defines marriage. How could anybody be upset at that? Story here, here and here.

"Don't say gay" to gradeschoolers.

Whenever I ask someone who belongs to the glbt community to denounce how some in the gay community want to speak to children about entering their lifestyle, without the consent of that child's parents, they almost always go ballistic.

Then they come at me with an avalanche of propaganda designed to distract me from the fact that they won't disavow the glbt violation of the civil rights of some parents. How odd. How strange. It seems that homopocrisy runs very deep. How did I wake up in a country where a person would openly admit their desire to pull children into homosexuality? If a person is born gay, they will still be gay when they are 18, so why do some gays insist on access to children without parental consent?

Well. It looks like Tennessee is waking up to reality and taking a stand against those who would come at children behind the backs of their parents about sexual matters. How could any sane person have a problem with that? Doesn't a person prove that they are a danger to children when they support doing an end-run around the civil rights of that child's parents? WHO CAN DISPUTE THAT?

Story here.

Hatred FROM the glbt community.

I don't know much about this guy, but he speaks with great clarity. I hear so much propaganda that I'm now at a point where I'm almost shocked by clarity. Though I walk through the valley of homofascism, I shall not fear, for I am with the Lord.

"Transgendered"

99.99% of human beings are born male or female. (Then there are the Caster Semenya types of the World.) Some people reject their own genital and decide that they want to go from male to female or vice versa. This decision is a rejection of sexual sanity and a clear indication of gross parental failure. One of the greatest current examples of this is Chaz Bono, who just doesn't want to be a girl anymore.

Yesterday I found an article that stunned me with its clarity and courage. And, it was written by a psychiatrist (which should silence my recent batch of homofascist hecklers). Dr. Keith Ablow's article is here.

Dear "Voice of Reason."

Dear Voice of Reason, (VoR for short) I've seen your last two comments and I've decided to clear up a matter before I accept any more of your posts. I think that I've figured out something about you.

Because of my experiences with comments about my posts, I've developed a process of figuring out key pieces of information by formulating a key question.

I must preface my question to you with the following statement; I hereby denounce speaking to any child about the Lord Jesus Christ and I denounce recruiting children into the heterosexual lifestyle, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents.

Now. That being said. VoR, can you match me by stating that you won't support gays that wish to tell children that joining the glbt community is okay, WITHOUT the knowledge or consent of that child's parents? Because if you can't, that will tell me how far your support for the glbt community goes.

I know how some people like to throw up a smoke screen when they're dodging a simple question so I'll make it clear that I'm not talking about the mere mention of the existence of homosexuals in the anti-bullying classes taught to schoolkids. I'm specifically talking about those in the gay community that wouldn't hesitate to tell a child that entering the glbt community is okay, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents.

So, Voice of Reason, this is the question I'm presenting to you. Will you denounce how some adults in the glbt community will tell a child/person under the age of 16, that it okay for them to BE gay, WITHOUT the consent of their parents?

You like true marriage? Your fired!

I haven't heard of anyone being fired for supporting the redefinition of marriage, yet I do hear of people being fired and harassed for supporting God's definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman.

Oh but wait! It's Canada where homofascism was legitimized by legalizing same-sex "marriage." The members of the glbt community want me to believe that legalizing homosexual "marriage" in my country won't affect my marriage, and then I read this. If I'm fired for standing for true marriage, won't that adversely effect mine?

Child-endangering-homofascism.

When I first started this blog, I thought that nobody would believe me if I said that the glbt community was after children. My plan was to simply gather evidence to support my point whenever my heteroseparatist philosophy was challenged. But, even when I present the facts of homofascist behavior, there are still those that refuse to accept the horror of the doctrine of the gay community; the pursuit of the minds and hearts of children, WITHOUT the consent of their parents.

I guess I was naive to think that those who supported the glbt community, beyond the understandable point of standing against the bullying of gays, would be shocked back into reality when I showed how some/most gays would go so far as to pursue children with the full knowledge that that child's parents did NOT want their child being taught that homosexuality was okay.

But yesterday, I found the second greatest example of child-endangering-homofascism that I've ever seen. I read it three times to make sure I wasn't hallucinating. Read how this homosexual homofascist plans to proudly and knowingly violate the civil rights of parents by approaching children about homosexuality without parental consent. He even supports raising boys to have sex with men when they grow up! I wonder at what age he considers a boy old enough to have sex with?

"...I for one certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start f****** men. I want lots of young ladies to develop into young women who voraciously ***** ***. I want this just as badly as many parents want their own kids to grow up ********** to trade proteins and forcefully excrete a baby. .."

Story here, here, and here.

The Peter Vidmar case.

How does gay "marriage" affect mine? I could get fired for supporting true marriage. Story here and (as of 17 May 2011) here.

Hero reporter Daniel Miller.

I just had to post this.

Long, but interesting, pro-hetero video.

Homofascists are bullying the Boy Scouts.

Gay is behavior, not race. To swap out the word,"Black" for "gay" is wrong because the color of a person's skin is morally benign and a person's sexual conduct is never morally benign.

The Boy Scouts acknowledge God and his laws. Boy Scouts are; trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent. I memorized these twelve words, in this sequence, over 38 years ago.

A person cannot embrace sexual sin and be reverent. Therefore, all those who wish to embrace sexual sin cannot be a part of the BSA. Leave it to anti-Christ, "gay activists," to want to destroy the Boy Scouts of America for their reverence for God's laws.

Story here.

Viral video report.

DON'T DRINK ANYTHING WHILE WATCHING THIS VIDEO. (Unless you like cleaning off your computer screen.)

What if he was a polygamous judge?

Do I have the same right that "gay activists" do when it comes to word-replacement-arguments?

What if Judge Walker believed in polygamy, was in a long term sexual relationship with multiple women, was about to retire, and worked in Salt Lake City, Utah?

If, under the above mentioned conditions, he then threw out a Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as being between one man and one woman... how would his actions be seen? Wouldn't the personal gain of his decision be an obvious disqualifier?

“It is important to emphasize at the outset that we are not suggesting that a gay or lesbian judge could not sit on this case,” the group’s attorneys said in their motion, which was submitted to the district court. “Rather, our submission is grounded in the fundamental principle, reiterated in the governing statute, that no judge ‘is permitted to try cases where he has an interest in the outcome.’ ”

My supporting evidence is here.

Liberals and same-sex "marriage."

The man's argument could be better, but he still makes some valid points about the redefinition of marriage. Especially about how interracial marriage always existed, and homosexual "marriage" never has.

Upcoming rumble?

Well beloved readers it's happened again. A homosexual is mad at me for using my freedom of speech, (that I have paid for via income tax) to denounce an act of arson against the property of a gay man. I'm not making this up.

This little heckler calls himself, "Absolutely Not Annonymous." He rejects Jesus Christ, has sex with men, and he's mad at me. He's been accusing me of some wanting to "wish gays out of existence," and other homophobic beliefs. He apparently hates my hate-free refusal to support the glbt community and his gay lifestyle. His attacks have become really hard to understand, so I'm going to give him his own post so we can fight one-on-one. As always, I will allow no one but him to comment on this post. I know how heckler-class gays like to group-attack.

I'm making him choose a shorter name so we can talk. I think that that's fair. I'm not going going to cite such a long name every time I address him here and in future posts.

So... "Absolutely Not Annonymous," until you face me here, your comments won't be posted. So identify yourself, tell me what you've chosen for your shorter name... and BRING IT!

Osama Bin Laden is dead.

He was killed by United States Navy Seals in Pakistan. Justice has been done. Brief account of raid here.

Twitter account of raid here.

Royal Wedding.

The concept of marriage comes from God. And He says that it is to be between one man and one woman. The significance of the Word of God can be seen here also.

Viral video report.

A big surprise at 1:22.

What heteroseparatism ISN'T about.

About four days ago, an anonymous commenter posted a link to this story on this blog, as if to imply that I supported this type of activity against gays.

It seems that no matter what I say, homofascists will not accept the fact that a person can refuse to support the glbt community, and NOT be motivated by hate, fear, or ignorance. I denounced proactive violence against the glbt community from day one in my Internet manifesto AND this blog; my proof is here.

I vehemently denounce this act of arson against the gay man in this news story, yet I still don't believe that a person can be born gay, and I support the concept/definition that a marriage is between one man and one woman.

"Don't Say Gay" in Tennessee schools.

This is Tennessee Senator Stacey Campfield who is proposing a bill to protect schoolchildren in his state from anti-hetero propaganda. Senator Campfield believes that a child's parents should choose how to talk to their children about the glbt lifestyle and, of course, he's receiving hate mail from homofascists.

"...Campfield said his bill aims to stop gay-rights activists from pushing their agenda in the classroom. He cited children's programming that taught homosexuality and said "several" teachers have informed him that they're already teaching the material. .."

"...But Campfield said his bill won't prevent educators from addressing bullying and that families should ultimately decide when their kids should receive sex education. .."

More info on this heroic heteroactivist here.

Judge Vaughn Walker is going down on...

...the issue of the personal gain of his own court ruling.

Lets go over the common-sense viewpoint again; A homosexual judge in a 10-year, sexual relationship with another man, and is about to retire from the bench, throws out the legal, 52% of the vote that defines marriage as being between one man and one woman. In the city of San Francisco. Okay. Wow. The prosecution rests.

Exhibit A is here. Exhibit B is here.

Gays hate it when...

...the difference between race and sexual perversion are explained.

How SB 48 tramples parental rights.

SB 48 is a Trojan horse that will violate the civil rights of parents who don't support the sexual activities of glbt community. How can this be? What would the gay community do if a Christian Senator in California tried to legislate lessons concerning Christian principles to the children of gay "parents" that trampled their right to parental notification/consent? My supporting evidence is here.

Man caught in the wrong McDonalds bathroom.

An 22-year-old man goes into a female bathroom at a McDonald's and pulls out his penis near an 18-year-old and a 14-year-old girl. He disrespects them when they tell him to get out of the women's restroom. This is what happened.

Banned from YouTube because...

...it clearly shows the violent bent of homofascists against a peaceful, legal public gathering of Christians who support God's definition of marriage. Looks to me like all of the hate is coming from the homofascists to the Christians.

I had a hard time finding this video to post. More info here.

Anti-Christ Lady Gaga supports Judas.

Well, well, well. Looks like the glbt community's idol, Lady Gaga, has revealed whom she serves when it comes down to who serves Jesus Christ and who doesn't.

With less than a week until Easter, the creator of the gay national anthem, "Born This Way," has created a song that glorifies Judas. Wow. How will the glbt community react to this? Does this not reveal the spirit behind those who support the gay community? Does she not know where Judas is now? What will "Christian" gays do now? Why doesn't she diss Mohammed to be controversial?

This story is incredible.

Gender Permanence.

Great facts are given in this video. The fact that SB 48 has, "...seriously flawed thinking." How only 8 out of 100,000 people reject their own genitals. And the term,"gender permanence." I love it!

What same-sex "marriage" will bring.

Info concerning the "gay gene" here.

The hidden danger of SB 48.

As usual... race, gender, and sexual conduct are put in the same category by a homosexual. How more people don't see through this homoganda amazes me sometimes. Then, Senator Mark Leno says that glbt people are excluded from history books. Really? How does he know that? Why does he want a persons sexual behavior to be spotlighted? Shouldn't a person keep their sexual activities private?

I DO support anti-bullying for all children, but there has to be a better way than making the glorification of sexual sin mandatory learning in the classrooms of schoolchildren. Few people know that a discrimination-against-"gender-identity" clause/provision is in SB 48, which means that a boy who wants to be considered a girl cannot be prevented from using the girl's bathroom, in a California grade school, if SB 48 is made into a law. That's crazy.

Why prop 8 judge should have recused himself.

It has now come to be public knowledge that Judge Vaughn Walker stood to gain personally when he threw out the votes of 7,001,084 tax paying citizens of the great state of California. Wow.

Doesn't it stand to reason that, if a judge stands to gain from his own ruling, he should recuse himself from the case? Well, it turns out that Judge Walker is/was in a ten year sexual relationship with another man, and was less than a year away from retiring from the bench. (Look at how retirement affected his "judgement.") When he threw out the fair and legal votes of over seven million people (52% of those that voted on prop 8), he stood to gain from his decision!

My evidence is here, here, and (as of 16 April) here.

Discussion with Mr. Rusty Blustering.

Dear Rusty:

I choose not to speak to someone via two different means. I am a monotasker 89% of the time and I'm having a hard time keeping track of our private emails and your comments on my blog posts.

I'm going to ask you to list your problems/questions concerning my heteroseparatist lifestyle in the comment section of this blog post so that I can understand you better. Only you and I are going to talk here. I will be deleting any future private emails or comments to other posts from you until I'm satisfied with your answers to my questions here.

And, to be fair, I won't send you any more emails until you are satisfied with my answers to your questions. I believe that I can help you come to a more Biblical understanding of the Lord Jesus Christ.

SB 48.

Even while they cry..."Gay rights! Gay rights! Gay civil rights!" ...the glbt community doesn't even deny their desire to trample the rights of parents who won't support their sexual conduct. Thanks to this type of behavior, more and more people are starting to see through homosexual propaganda.

The talking heads of the "gay rights" movement will preach that gay people just want to be treated with respect, which is a very reasonable point-of-view, but then turn around and support laws that trample the rights of parents to protect their children.

"...The homosexual movement sees SB48 not only as a model for legislation across the country, but as a way to force homosexuality and transgenderism past parents into the minds of children. .."

My facts are here.

Are only 17 out of a 1,000 men full-time homosexuals?

“..."I see this as somewhat of a problem for the gay political movement," Sprigg said. "It undermines the idea that being born homosexual is an immutable characteristic that can't be changed.".."

"...Gates' best estimate, derived from five studies that have asked subjects about their sexual orientation, is that the nation has about 4 million adults who identify as being gay or lesbian, representing 1.7 percent of the 18-and-over population. ..” My supporting evidence is here.

Homofascism at Apple.

Dude! Where's your sock?

I can't believe how funny this "conversation" is. The hand-waving kills me!

Homosexual "marriage" and Noah's ark.

I've found a brilliant piece of writing at The Christian Post by a man calling himself "Max Veritas."

"...The "Babylonian Talmud" – the book of rabbis' interpretation of the scriptures 1,000 years before Christ, there was only one time in history that reflects where we are right now. There was only one time in history, according to these writings, where men were given in marriage to men, and women given in marriage to women.

Want to venture a guess as to when? No, it wasn't in Sodom and Gomorrah, although that was my guess. Homosexuality was rampant there, of course, but according to the Talmud, not homosexual "marriage." What about ancient Greece? Rome? No. Babylon? No again. The one time in history when homosexual "marriage" was practiced was … during the days of Noah.

And according to Jeffrey Satinover, that's what the "Babylonian Talmud" attributes as the final straw that led to the Flood. Rabbi Aryeh Spero verified this to be true. Rabbi Spero spoke of God's compassion before the Flood, in hopes people would repent and turn back to His ways. He showed patience for hundreds of years.

But, he said, the Talmud's writings reveal that "before the Flood people started to write marriage contracts between men, in other words, homosexual 'marriage,' which is more than homosexual activity – it's giving an official state stamp of approval, a sanctification … of homosexual partnership." In fact, he said, "the writings indicated that it wasn't even so much the 'straw that broke the camel's back,' but that the sin in and of itself is so contrary to why God created the world, so contrary to the order of God's nature, that God said then and there 'I have to start all over … to annihilate the world and start from the beginning. …'"

Rabbi Spero went on to say, "Even in ancient Greece they did not write marriage contracts between men. There was homosexuality, and it was wrong, but there was not an official 'blessed' policy. … Marriage is 'sanctification' (not simply a partnership)." He said to confer the title of sanctification and holiness upon this behavior is "probably one of the greatest sins of all that one does against God's plan for this world." As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. – Mathew 24:37..."

Challenge for "hu6xxui6"

Well folks, it's happened again. Once again I'm asking a heckler from another website if he has the guts to fight me one-on-one.

It's been my experience that big-mouthed people are never going to fight me mono-e-mono. A heckler is like a jackal; useless when alone due to their pack-attack mentality and inability to think critically.

So, "hu6xxui6" do you have the guts to face me here? It'll be just you and me toe to toe. Only your comments and mine will be allowed on this post. How can you call yourself a man when you can't meet me here to debate your anti-Christ, pro same-sex marriage, point of view? Guys like you want to ignore how the people in 31 out of 31 states have voted in Constitutional amendments defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Come on. I triple-dog-dare ya!

If Christian, Muslum, or Jew, NO foster kids for you!

It's official. (This is not an April fool's joke.) British society has become a homoOrwellian reality, where gays are "more equal" than Christians. Now, in England, if you won't support the glbt lifestyle, you cannot adopt children!

<---These married Christians, Owen and Eunice Johns, have been denied the right to adopt children by London's High Court. What makes them unfit to adopt children? They are Christians, and will not support the concept that homosexuality is normal. It doesn't matter that they've fostered children before without any problems. It only matters that they won't support the glbt lifestyle.

"...Think about what this means. Britain has a huge Muslim population. Muslims, like Christians, believe that homosexual conduct is immoral. So do orthodox Jews. What the court is saying is that Christians, Muslims, and Jews are unfit to care for children simply because of their religious beliefs. ..."

"...Americans may think our First Amendment will protect us from this kind of thing happening here. Think again. In the appeal of Proposition 8, in which California citizens voted to keep marriage between one man and one woman, Judge Vaughn Walker ruled that Christian beliefs “harm gays and lesbians.”..."

My indisputable proof of British homofascism is here.